第五章 結論與建議
第二節 研究限制與建議
國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a
tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
大眾捷運系統對辦公大樓租金之影響
50
第二節 研究限制與建議
經由實證過程之經驗與研究設計之限制，提出後續研究建議如下：
一、研究限制
侷限於辦公大樓租金資料取得不易，本研究在實證資料的完整性上仍有不少改 進空間，未來也期望可以擴大樣本範圍，納入台北市其他地區樣本作為後續實證範 圍，供後續相關交通建設與辦公大樓之關係提供參考。
此外，台北捷運自 1988 年首條路線正式動工起，各路線即陸續分期分段施工、
完工通車，未有間歇，至今仍有多條路線興建中，其效果不易衡量區別，又受限於 某些捷運線僅通車至今第二、三年，發展尚未完全成熟，可及性效益對於租金效果 之影響有限，未來可持續觀察辦公大樓租金之變化及其影響因素，以使捷運對台北 地區辦公大樓租金之資訊更臻完整與深入。
二、研究建議
本次研究以整體捷運全線的分析方式將可再加以改進，因各區位間市場的不同，
會對捷運影響有所差異。將捷運影響分不同區位角度切入，能更準確評估捷運對辦 公大樓租金之影響。此外，台北市交通運輸系統中包含複雜且便利的公車路線，公 車路線與捷運系統相輔相成，有助於交通可及性的提升，亦即其他交通可及性設施 亦有可能對辦公大樓租金產生影響，當納入其他交通可及性設施時，能更準確掌握 捷運對不動產之影響。
再者，針對本研究所探討的區域特定固定效果與時間特定固定效果，本研究僅 能以文獻回顧推估影響該固定效果的因素，因此建議可針對此進行更嚴謹的實證研 究加以分析其他影響租金之因素對辦公大樓租金之影響。
‧
台北捷運公司，2014，台北大眾捷運股份有限公司網站，2014年12月04日，取自 http://www.trtc. com.tw/c/
李朝賢，1993，『區域發展規劃』，台北：華泰書局。
洪德洋、林祖嘉，1999，「台北市捷運系統與道路寬度對房屋價格影響之研究」，
『住宅學報』，第八期，第47-67頁。
徐永明、林昌平，2009，「選舉縱橫資料中地區效果的測量:以民進黨得票率的變化 為例1986-2004」，『人文及社會科學集刊』，第九期，第431-465頁。
馮正民、曾帄毅、王冠斐，1994，「捷運系統對車站地區房價之影響」，『都市與計劃』， 第21卷，第1期，第25-45頁。
黃名義，1999，「台北市辦公室市場租金之研究」，『中華民國住宅學會第八屆年會論
Alonso, W.,1964,
Location and land use: Toward a general theory of land rent
, Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.Armstrong, R. J. and Rodriguez, D. A., 2006, “An Evaluation of the Accessibility Benefits of Commuter Rail in Eastern Massachusetts Using Spatial Hedonic Price
‧
Functions.”
Transportation,
33(1), pp.21-43.Bajic, V., 1983,“The Effect of a New Subway Line on Housing Prices in Metropolitan Toronto”,
Urban Studies
, 20: 147-158.Bollinger, C. Ihlanfeldt, K. and Bowes, D., 1998,“Spatial Variation in Office Rents within the Atlanta Region”,
Urban Studies
, Vol. 35, No. 7, 1097-1118Bowes, D. R. and Ihlanfeldt, K. R., 2001, “Identifying the Impacts of Rail Transit Stations on Residential Property Values”,
Journal of Urban Economics
, 50: 1-25.Clapp,J.M.,1993,”Dynamics Of Office Markets”,
AREUEA Monograph Series
,No.1, Coffman, C. and Gregson, M. E., 1998,“Railroad Development and Land Value.”,Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics
,16(2), pp.191-204.Craig, L. A., Palmquist, R. B. and Weiss, T., 1998,“Transportation Improvements and Land Values in the Antebellum United States: A Hedonic Approach.”
Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics
,16(2), pp.173-89.Cervero, R. 1994,“Rail Transit and Joint Development: Land Market Impacts in Washington, D.C.and Atlanta”, Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 60, No. 1, pp. 83-94.
Cervero, R. and Duncan, M. 2002, “Benefits of Proximity to Rail on Housing Market:
Experience in Santa Clara County”,
Journal of Public Transportation
, 5(1): 1-18.Cervero, R. and Landis, J. 1993,“Assessing the Impacts of Urban Rail Transit on Local Real Estate Markets Using Quasi-Experimental Comparisons.”,
Transportation Research A
, Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 13-22.Cervero, R. and Landis, J., 1997,“Twenty Years of the Bay Area Rapid Transit System:
Land Use andDevelopment Impacts.”, Transportation Research A, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 309-333.
Damm, D., Lerman, S. R., Lerner-Lam, E., and Young, J., 1980,“Response of Urban Real Estate Values in Anticipation of the Washington Metro.”,
Journal of Transport
Economics and Policy
, 14, pp.315-336.‧
Debrezion,G., Pels, E., and Rietveld, P., 2007,“The Impact of Railway Stations on Residential and Commercial Property Value: A Meta-analysis.”,
Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,
35, pp.161-180.Dewess, D. N., 1976,“The Effect of a Subway Improvement on Residential Property Values in Toronto.”,
Journal of Urban Economics
, 3, pp.357-369.Dunphy, R., 1995,“Transit-Oriented Development: Making a Difference?”,
Urban Land
, July, pp. 32-36,Falcke, C. O., 1978,
Study of BART’s Effects on Property Prices and Rents.
Washington, D.C.: Urban Mass Transportation Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.Gatzlaff, D. H. and Smith, M. T., 1993,“The Impact of the Miami Metrorail on Value of Residences Near Station Locations.”,
Land Economics
. 69, pp.54-66.Gat,D.,1998, “Urban Focal Points And Design Quality Influence Rents:TheCase Of The Tel Aviv Office Market”
The Journal Of Real EstateResearch
,Vol.16,No.2,pp.229-47.Glascock,J.L., Shirin Jahanian and Sirmans,C.F.,1990, “An Analysis Of Office Market Rents:Some EmpiricalEvidence”,
AREUEA Journal
, Vol.18,No.1,pp.105-19.Hansen W G, 1959, “How accessibility shapes land-use”,
Journal of the American Institute of Planners,
25 73-76Hough,D.E.and Kratz,C.G.,1983,“Can ‘Good’ Architecture Meet The Market Test?”
Journal OfUrban Economics
,Aug-ust,pp.40-50,Landis, J., Guhathakurta, S., and Zhang, M., 1994,
Capitalization of transit investments into single-family home prices: A comparative analysis of five California rail transit systems
, University of California Transportation Center.Landis, J. and Loutzenheiser, D., 1995,
BART at 20: BART Access and Office Building
Performance
, Berkeley: Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California.‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a
tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
大眾捷運系統對辦公大樓租金之影響
54
Mills,E.S.,1992, “Office Rent Determinants In The Chicago Area”
AREUEAJournal
,Vol.20,No.1,pp. 273-87.McMillen, D.P. and McDonald, J., 2004,“Reaction of Prices to a New Rapid Transit Line：
Chicago’s Midway Line, 1983-1999.”,
Real Estate Economics
. 32(3), pp.463-486.McNeal, A. and Doggett, R., 1999,“Metro Makes Its Mark.”,
Urban Land
, September, pp.78-81, 118.
Nelson, A., 1999,“Transit Stations and Commercial Property Values: A Case Study with Policy and Land-Use Implications.”,
Journal of Public Transportation
, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1999, pp. 77-93.Thomas P.Brennan, Roger E.Cannaday and Peter F.Colwell, “Office Rent In The Chicago CBD”,
AREUEA Journal
,Vol.12,No.3,1984。Voith, R., 1991,“Transportation, Sorting and House Values.”
Real Estate Economics
, 19(2), pp.117-137.Wheaton, W.C. and Torto,R.G., 1988, “Vacancy Rates And The Future Of OfficeRents”
AREUEAJournal
,Vol.16,No.4,pp. 430-36.Weinberger, R., 2000,“Commercial Property Values and Proximity to Light Rail:
Calculating Benefits with a Hedonic Price Model.”,Paper presented at the 79th, Annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board., Washington, D.C.
Weinberger, R. 2001.,“Light Rail Proximity: Benefit or Detriment? The Case of Santa Clara County, California.”Paper presented at the 80th, Annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board., Washington, D.C.
Weinstein, B. and Clower, T., 1999,
The Initial Economic Impacts of the DART LRT System
,report prepared for the Dallas Area Rapid Transit District.Denton, Texas:University of North Texas, Center for Economic Development and Research.