研究限制與未來研究建議

本研究目的在於比較製造業組織間不同技術合作類型進行合作方式與學習 表現，然實證上受限於訪談樣本難以取得，僅以十六個案例相較，在研究工具方 面受到限制。且訪談案例中兼含如交通運輸工具之傳統製造業，及光學器材、半 導體產業之高科技製造業，但傳統製造業與高科技製造業的產線移轉方式、內容 是否有別，本研究並未加以分析。

且受訪人員所舉合作案例，乃受個人參與計畫而定，有的案例述及整個工廠 的產線移轉，有的案例僅述及單項產品的產線移轉。技術合作類型亦然，有的案 例述及單一產品的合作開發，有的案例述及同一客戶多項產品合作開發經驗。將 所有訪談案例並呈，個別計畫所需投注人力與面臨的挑戰，比較基準已高低有別。

未來研究建議

本研究僅針對單一合作關係雙方組織之間的交流活動進行分析，但組織並非 僅與單一組織發生合作關係，產業供應鏈中舉凡上游設備商、供應商、競爭同業、

下游客戶皆與組織有合作關係的連結，且供應商自身也有其供應商支援體系；本 研究雖提及受訪案例衍生的合作關係，但並未深入分析其產生影響與意義，後續 研究可針對組織於產業體系中衍生的合作網絡再進行探討。

本研究僅以製造業為研究範圍，但組織間的技術合作關係絕非製造業獨有，

後續研究可拓及其他產業，例如較多新創技術發展的高科技產業，其中晶片設 計、軟體開發、設備技術發展皆是本研究未及探索的範圍。

66

英文參考文獻

Argyris, C., 1999. Why individual and organizations have difficulty in double-loop Learning. On Organizational Learning. 2nd ed. 67-91

Bower, G. H. & Hilgard . E. R., 1981, Theories of Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall

Carlson, S. A., 2003. Knowledge managing and knowledge management systems in inter-organizational networks. Knowledge and process management, 10, 3, 194-206

Cohen, W. M. & Levinthal D. A., 1987. Participation in cooperati ve research ventures and the cost of learning. Technical Report, Dept. of Social and

Decision Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University 35-39

Colarelli, S. M. & Montei, M. S., 1996. some contextual influences on training utilization. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science. 32, 3,

306-322Demchak, C. C., 1992. Complexity,rogue outcomes and weapon systems. Public Administration Review. 52, 4 347-355

Cook, S. D. N. & Yanow, D., 1993. Culture and organizational learning. Journal of Management Inquiry, 2, 373-390

Crossan, M. A., lane, H.W. & White, R.E., 1999, An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. The Academy of Management Review, 24, 3, 522-537

Daft, R. L. & Weick, K. E., 1984. Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9, 284-295 Davenport TH, Prusak, L., 1998. Working knowledge. Harvard Business

School Press: Boston, MA

Duncan, R. L. & Weiss, A., 1979, Organizational learning: Implications for organizational design. In B. Staw(Ed.), Research in Organizational Behavior,

1, Greenwich, Conn. JAI Press, 75-123

Ellis, H.C., 1965. The transfer of learning. New York: MacMillan

Estes, W. K., 1994, Classfication and Congition, New York, Oxford University Press

Ellis, S. & Shpielberg, N., 1998, Organizational learning mechanisms and managers’ perceived uncertainty, paper presented at the conference on Managerial and Organizational Cognition, Stern School of Management, New York University, New York, 7-8 May

Hamel, G., 1991. Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal. Summer Special Issue, 12, 83-103

Harlow H. F., 1949. The formation of learning sets. Psychol. Rev. 56:51-65.

Hedberg, B., 1981. How organization learn and unlearn, in C. P. Wystrom and W. T. Starbuck (eds) Handbood of Organizational Design, 1.

Huber, G. P., 1991. Organizational learning: The contributing processes and literatures. Organization Science, 2(1), 88-115

Kanter, R. M. 1988. When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. In B.M. Staw & L.L.

Cummings(Eds), Research in organizational behavior, 169-211, Purchasing and Materials Management, 34, 3; 2-9

Kulwant, S., 1995. The impact of technological complexity and interfirm cooperation on business survival. Academy of Management Journal. 67-71 Lindsay, P. H. & Norman, D. A., Human information processing. Orlando, FL:

Academic Press

Lippman, S. & Rumelt, R. P., 1982. Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. Bell Journal of

68

Eocnomics, 13, 418-438

Moore, D. T., 2004. Curriculum at work：An educational perspective on the workplace as a learning environment. Journal of Workplace Learning. 16, 5/6, 325-340

Nahapeit, J. & Ghoshal, S., 1997. Social capital, intellectual capital and the creation of value in firms. Academy of Management Best Paper

Proceedings.

Polanyi, M., 1958. Personal Knowledge：Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago,IL.

Porter, M. E., 1985. Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York, Free Press

Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W. & Smith-Doerr, Laurel., 1996. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation：Networds of learning in

biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 1, 116-145

Reed, S. & DeFillippi, R., 1990. Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management. The Academy of Management Review, 15, 1, 88-102

Scolnick, E.M., 2000. Leading R&D in the pharmaceutical industry. Research Technology Management, 43, 3, 35-38

Simonin, B. L., 1999. Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal. 20,7, 595-623 Simon, H. A., 1991. Bounded rationality and organizational learning.

Organization Science, 2, 125-34

Sitkin, S. B., 1992, Learning through ：The strategy of small losses. Research in Organizational Behavior, 14, 231-66

Spender, J.C., 1989. Industry recipes: An inquiry into the nature and sources of

managerial judgment. Blackwell. Oxford. UK

Stata, R., 1989. Organizational learning-The key to management innovatgion.

Sloan Management Review, 30, 3, 63-74

Stewart, A.M., Mullarkey, G.W. & Craig, J.L., 2003, Innovation or multiple copies of the same lottery ticket: The effect of widely shared knowledge on organizational adaptability. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 11, 3, 25-44

Tan, K. C., Kannan, V. R., & Handfield, R. B., 1998. Supply chain management:

Supplier performance and fir7m performance. International Journal of Tsai, W. P. & Ghoshal S., 1998. Social capital and value creation: The role of

intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 4, 464-476 Von Hipple, E., 1994. Sticky information”and the locus of problem solving：

Implications for innovation. Managemen Science, 40,4,429-439 Weick, K., 1979. The social psychology of organizing, Reading, Mass.

70