• 沒有找到結果。

第三章 各國公告後修正之相關規定

第三節 韓國立法例

立 政 治 大 學

N a tio na

l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y

58

利範圍。

(19)申請專利範圍雖未更正,而發明說明或圖式之更正結果,即使未 超出申請時原說明書或圖式所揭露之範圍,但導致於申請專利範圍 之解釋與原來所核准公告申請專利範圍之涵義不同者。

(20)有關化學組成物發明之請求項,原係以封閉式連接詞記載時,更 正為開放式連接詞記載者。

(21)誤記事項之訂正導致實質擴大或變更申請專利範圍者。

例如:原公告之申請專利範圍記載:“A 是帶分枝的烯烴基”,專 利權人雖主張其為“A 亦可是帶分枝的烯烴基”的誤記事項,但就 原說明書或圖式內容而言並無明顯錯誤或反常不合理之情形,且經 更正後其涵義較原來為廣,故實質擴大了原申請專利範圍,因此不 允許更正;惟若專利權人主張原說明書所記載的「公枝」係「分枝」

之誤記事項,而經檢視原說明書或圖式內容,察覺其原意應是指「分 枝」,且「分枝」是唯一的解釋,則「公枝」確屬明顯錯誤且無意 義,其更正不致實質擴大或變更申請專利範圍,因此允許更正。

又例如:原公告之申請專利範圍記載某種光纖材料具有「-0.3﹪之 折射率」,而發明說明中記載為「-0.3﹪以上之折射率」,專利權人 雖主張原公告申請專利範圍之數據係屬誤記事項,惟就原說明書或 圖式內容而言,不能察覺申請專利範圍所記載之「-0.3﹪之折射率」

有任何明顯錯誤或反常不合理之情形,且經更正後其涵義較原來為 廣,故實質擴大了原申請專利範圍,因此不允許更正。

第三節 韓國立法例

韓國之立法,與日本相近,訂正審判,係規定於第 136 條84:「

84 제 136 조(정정심판) ① 특허권자는 다음 각 호의어느 하나에 해당하는 경우에는 특허발명의 명세서또는 도면에 대하여 정정심판을 청구할 수 있다.

다만, 특허의 무효심판이 특허심판원에 계속( 係 屬 )되고 있는 경우에는 그러하지 아니하다.

Whenever any patent is, through error without any deceptive intention, deemed wholly orpartly inoperative or invalid, by reason of a defective specification or drawing, or by reason of the patentee claiming more or less than he had a right to claim in the patent, the Director shall, on the surrender of such patent and the payment of the fee required by law, reissue the patent for the invention disclosed in the original patent, and in accordance with a new and amended application, for the unexpired part of the term of the original patent. No new matter shall be introduced into the application for reissue.

The Director may issue several reissued patents for distinct and separate parts of the thing patented, upon demand of the applicant, and upon payment of the required fee for a reissue for each of such reissued patents.

The provisions of this title relating to applications for patent shall be applicable to applications for reissue of a patent, except that application for reissue may be made and sworn to by the assignee of the entire interest if the application does not seek to enlarge the scope of the claims of the original patent.

No reissued patent shall be granted enlarging the scope of the claims of the original patent unless applied for within two years from the grant of the original patent.