• 沒有找到結果。

組織中的主管情緒協助:一個調節式中介模式的發展與檢驗 - 政大學術集成

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "組織中的主管情緒協助:一個調節式中介模式的發展與檢驗 - 政大學術集成"

Copied!
90
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)1. 立. 政 治 大. Emotion Helping by Managers: Development and. ‧ 國. 學. Testing a Moderated Mediation Model. ‧. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. 3. i n U. v.

(2) n a. r n. r d. r r. i. 立. (,). r -.. 學. i. i. ‧. g. Nat. a. io. n. al. ƒ. y. g. χ. ))-. sit. g. X. 政 治X χ大 g (,). er. ))-. ‧ 國. χ. s. Ch. engchi. i. i n U. v. i.

(3) Abstract The working environments nowadays are multi-work, multi-role and multistimulation. The emotion issue of employees is held in high regard today for organizations since people get in touch with each other more frequently. Among them, supervisors’ emotion helping plays an important role in this situation. Moreover, how supervisors’ behaviors affect subordinates, followed by the impact on organization is crucial when it comes to leadership. Based on pervious cognitive knowledge of emotion helping related studies and conservation of resources theory, the main focus of this. 政 治 大 with personal resources and the distinctive mediating mechanisms that may explain 立 research is to examine whether supervisors’ emotion helping behaviors are associated. subordinates’ subjective well being and work fatigue, as well as the classification of. ‧ 國. 學. emotion helping behaviors. Furthermore, understanding the moderating role of power. ‧. distance orientation according to broad social impact theory. This study is conducted by questionnaire survey and received 152 replies from subordinates. The results. y. Nat. sit. indicated that personal resources mediated the relationship between emotion helping –. n. al. er. io. subjective well-being and emotion helping – work fatigue while subordinate power. i n U. v. distance orientation play a moderated role between emotion helping and personal. Ch. engchi. resources. This study contributing to the implications for organizational researches and managerial practices. Furthermore, limitation and future direction were being discussed at the end of this paper.. Key words: Emotion helping; Conservation of resources theory; Personal resources; Subjective well being; Work fatigue; Social impact theory; Power distance orientation. ii.

(4) žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž1. X. žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž1. žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž5 žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž6. X. ržžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž6 r. 立. žžžžžžžžžžž10. 治 政 žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž16 大. X. žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž18 žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž20. ‧. 學. žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž22. y. Nat. io. sit. žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž37. er. ‧ 國. žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž18. žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž40. n. al. X n. žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž44 n. v i n Ch žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž40 engchi U. žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž48. žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž53. X. žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž54. žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž58. žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž60. a. ƒ. žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž62. iii.

(5) žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž63 žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž74 žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž79. 立. y. sit. al. n. io. Nat. er. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 政 治 大. Ch. engchi. iv. i n U. v.

(6) žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž19 žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž21. X. r. žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž23. r. žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž23. r. žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž24. r. žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž25. oW. s. 立. o. žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž26 政 治 大 žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž27. ‧ 國. 學. žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž28 žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž28. ‧. žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž31. Nat. žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž33. n. al. er. io. sit. y. žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž32. Ch. i n U. v. žžžžžžžžžžžžžž35. e n g c žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž36 hi. žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž43 žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž45 žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž46 žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž47 r r. n n. žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž50 žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž52. žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž53. v.

(7) b b. žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž18. b. žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž29. b. r. žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž45. b. Hayes’s Process. .. žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž48. b. Hayes’s Process. .. žžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžžž48. 立. ‧ 國. y. sit er. al. n. io. ‧. Nat. 學. 政 治 大. Ch. engchi. vi. i n U. v.

(8) n. n i. i. p. g. n. Y si. b. si. i. o e. & Humphrey, 1995 Jordan, 2008. Ashforth. s. Ashkanasy &. 政 治 o大. 立. n Kaplan n. Cortina, Ruark, LaPort, & Nicolaides, 2014. i. affective events theory, AET n. io. al. n. n. y h. n. n. s. sit. n. s. n. i. er. a. r. Nat. i. n. Cropanzano 1996. ‧. ‧ 國. Weiss. 學. Lawler & Thye, 1999. i n C h Grandey, 2008 engchi U r. v. n. i a. d. n. s e. emotion helping v. s. g. n. e. s. d i. d Van & LePine, 1998 r Ashkanasy. r. Daus, 2002. 1. s.

(9) r. Goleman, 1998. r. si h. s n. e. d. o. e i e. s. d. a s r. Gouldner, 1960. ƒ. Y. n. a. a. n. a. Barsade, 2002. Y. s. ‧. Y. d. e. n. er. io. al. leadership. n U engchi r. r. e. task-oriented. Ch. d. Y. r. iv. r. n. n. Brown, 2003. r. 1997. r. idealized influence — attributed behavior. individualized consideration. stimulation. inspirational motivation contingent reward. d. relations-oriented. Bass, 1990a. s. sit. Toegel, Anand, & Kilduff, 2013. a. d. y. Nat. Y. r. r. 學. n. ‧ 國. 立 s. r. d 政 治 大. Rousseau, 1989. r. Bass. Avolio. r idealized influence — intellectual r. management by exception —. 2.

(10) active. e. management by exception — passive. r. n. e. rl. r. npY. h. d. rn. r. d. r. d Y. r. n. n. d. a. Y. ps. n. 政 治 大Y. 立. p. r. i. Barsade & Gibson, 2007. ‧ 國 d. s. 學. d Humphrey, 2002. io. al. n. ƒ. Hobfoll. COR. y. Lawler & Thye, 1999. i. n. e. o. Ch. g. iv. n s U engchi d. 1989. s Y. conservation of resources theory,. r. r. emotion helping behavior. i. personal resources work fatigue. subjective well being psychological health. r. i. sit. ƒ. r. er. Nat. Morales, & Steiger-Mueller, 2010. ‧. Eisenberger, Karagonlar, Stinglhamber, Neves, Becker, Gonzalez-. n. 3. n.

(11) r. r. r. i. n i. Latane 1981 p. e. social impact theory. i. power distance r. orientation n r. s. X. n. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. 4. i n U. v.

(12) X. X. r. r. i. r. i. r. 立. y. al. n. io. sit. Nat. ‧. er. ‧ 國. 學. 政 治 大. Ch. engchi. 5. i n U. v.

(13) X. r r. r. ƒ. s. r r. n n. r. 政 治 大. 立. ‧ 國. 學. r. d. Nat. y. Toegel, Anand, & Kilduff, 2013 g. io. n. al. g. n. Ch. n. e n g c hgi. n. Y. sit. d. er. r. X. ‧. n. i n U. v. r p. h. o. pd. g. g. g. p. Diefendorff &. Richard, 2003 s n. r a pb r. r. Y r. 6. extra-role.

(14) r. behavior. r in-role i. behavior r. r. a. Wayne, Shore, & Liden, 1997. as. i. i e. n i. Cialdini, Vincent, Lewis, Catalan, Wheeler, & Darby 1975 o. i. n. Gouldner, 1960 a. Yi. Toegel, n. Anand & Kilduff, 2013 r. ƒ. d. r. n b. r. n. al. er. io Zellars. Perrewé 2001. Ch. enn g c h i. i n U. r n. 2013. reframing. v. r. Toegel. r. oW. ao. sit. Nat r. Y. ‧. ƒ. r. y. pb. Zellars & Perrewé, 2001. 學. r. ‧ 國. 立 r. r. 政 治 大. r. r. Anand. r. Kilduff. listening. validating--empathy and ego-strengthening. transforming. X. advising. Y oW X. o. l. r. 7. o. s.

(15) r. r n. 2002. Rhoades & Eisenberger,. n. d. r. Ashford, Rothbard, Piderit, & Dutton, 1998. Milliken,. Morrison, & Hewlin, 2003 oW. Bass & Riggio, 2006. s. Miller, Berg & Archer, 1983. p. s. X. s. o. o. Beukeboom, 2009. & Riggio, 2006. 政 治 大. Blader & Tyler, 2003. 立. r. s. ps. n. o. oW n. Nat. r. s. n. l. r. er. io r. Y. Ch. iv. n U e n g crh i h. r. i. s Toegel Anand r. Kilduff 2013. ƒ. r. n oW. r. i. e. s r. Brief & Weiss, 2002. X. r. Toegel, Anand, & Kilduff, 2013. o. sit. Ames Maissen, & Brockner, 2012. al. o. y. n Y. o. ‧. ‧ 國. si. e. Collins & Miller, 1994. 學. o. Bass. 8. nb.

(16) rn. d. s. g r. o. X. Miller, Berg, & Archer, 1983. y i. y. o. i. Detert & Burris, 2007 r. y. pb. i. r s n. 立. rs. e. X. rY. ‧. ‧ 國. p. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. Lloyd, Boer,. 學. s. X. 政 治 大. pb. Ch. X e. r. Keller, & Voelpel, 2015. o. engchi. 9. i n U. v.

(17) X r. rY. g Hobfoll Johnson Ennis r. o. s. job resources. Jackson 2003. s. oW. Y s 政 治 大 Xanthopoulou Bakker Demerouti, & Schaufeli, 2009 立. pb. r. n. X. io. al. n. Bandura, 1989. s. d. Ch n. r. o. Chen, Gully, a. i n U. v. organizational based self esteem. e n g cys hi. y r. Pierce & Gardner, 2004. optimism. s. Scheier, s. Carver, & Bridges, 2001. Aspinwall & s. Taylor, 1997 & Youssef, 2007. Hobfoll 2002. e. e. n. r. X. r. n. r. oW. er. i. & Eden, 2001. o. rX. sit. Nat. r. s generalized self efficacy. n. Schaufeli 2009. ‧. Xanthopoulou Bakker Demerouti. y. ‧ 國. g. 學. si. 10. X. Luthans.

(18) Hobfoll 1989. conservation of resources theory. yi i y. o. r. entities. χ. Hobfoll, 2002. r. objects resources. conditions resources s. personal characteristics resources. energy resources. b Y. 政s 治 大 s. 立. s. pb. s. n. al. Jacobshagen, & Tschan, 2011 s Y. y. b. s. Ch o. p. sit. io. si. i. ƒ. Gross, Semmer, Meier, Kälin,. er. ‧ 國. p. s. ‧. s. r. Nat. Y. i. Hobfoll 1989. 學. l. r. s. i n U. r. engchi oW. s. o. v. r ei i. ap n. d. s. s. n. s. Xanthopoulou, Bakker, Demerouti, & Schaufeli, 2009 r o. d. p s. o e o. r. 11. s Y n. s.

(19) r s oW. o e. Erez, & Locke, 2005. s y. Luthans. 政 治 大 χ. n 立. 1998. X bi. YX. n. n. engchi. i n U r. y pb. pb yi. ypi. o. a s. & Smith, 1999 Sen, & Fitoussi, 2009. Xχ. v. X X. χn. er. io. Ch. sit. y. Nat. r. r. Lu 2006. r. ‧. χn. al. χ. 學. ‧ 國. r. χn. n. d. d. Judge, Bono,. p. X. o. s. gbi. & Youssef, 2007. n. o. 12. y. Y. Ed, Suh, Lucas, Stiglitz,.

(20) r. X. d. Zijlstra & Sonnentag, 2006. Sadeghniiat-Haghighi. r. Yazdi 2015. X. n b. s. d. Geurts &. h. Sonnentag, 2006. s. si. Meijman & Mulder, 1998. n r. r. d. 政 治 Frone 大 & Tidwell, 2015. ‧. ‧ 國. d. 學. n. a. s. 立. r. a. Nat. Y. p. y. e. e. n. al. y. o. s Y. 1989. Ch. engchi. i. i coping. er. io. n. 1989 ; Scheier & Carver, 1992. sit. Chen, Gully, & Eden, 2001 ; Pierce, Gardner, Cummings, & Dunham,. i d n U. v. X. i Hobfoll,. o. pi. h. s. r. well-being Hobfoll, 2002. pb. i s. Judge, Locke, & Durham, 1997 ys. y. 13. p ƒ. y.

(21) s. Xanthopoulou, Bakker, Demerouti, & Schaufeli, 2007 o. si p. n. s. si. o. o. s. n. r. d. r. s. g i. 政 治 大. 立. ‧ 國. 學. n. ‧. n. al. n. Kilduff 2013. r n. Ch. e n gsc h i. s. g. v. r. g. b. sp s. r. Hobfoll, 1989. b. p. ƒ. oW. Judge, Van Vianen, & De Pater, 2004 r. oWpi. oW. s. n. i n U. r pb. i r. r. er. io. Toegel Anand s. s. sit. y. Nat. Gibson, 2007 Lawler & Thye, 1999 r. Barsade &. 14. i o. o. o p. s r.

(22) r d i. d. Y. n. r a. n. s Latané & Arrowood, 1963 n. Janssen, Lam, & Huang, 2010 i. Weiss & Cropanzano,. n e. 1996. p. s. Weiss & Beal, 2005. pb. n i. p. n. Gross, Semmer, Meier, Kälin, Jacobshagen, & Tschan, 2011 r. n. 立. r. oW. s. o. ‧ 國. g. r. r. n. i. n. s. Ch. engchi. 2. 2. 15. sit. io. al. r. er. i. y. o. Nat i. r. ‧. i. r. a. s. 學. n. 政 治 大. i n U. v. pb.

(23) r 1962. Mulder i. X. r h. 1997. r n. n. X Dorfman. r. ns. 政1988 治 大. Howell. 立. X. n. Farh, Hackett, & Liang, 2007. Y. i. r. l. y. o. g. sit. r. Nat. Atwater, Wang, Smither, & Fleenor, 2009. io. n. al. er. i. Gudykunst,. ‧. ƒ. n Y. pb. ‧ 國. h. X. Y. 學. l. X. Y. Mulder. n. 2003. Emerson,. 1977. n. Hofstede. i. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. r r. s i. Latane 1981 r. i. n. y. ƒ. r. Wyi. i. o pi r. i. e. r. e. s r. i. i. strength 16. immediacy.

(24) s. number h. h. g. h. h. h r. b h. r. i. h. i. h i. h e. 立. Y. y. p. n. engchi. er. io. p. sit. si. Ch. si. Y. i n U 2. h. 17. d. ‧. ‧ 國. o r. al. r. 學. r. Nat. r. s. h. p. Yi. r. 政 h治 大. r r. i. v. e.

(25) r. n. n. p. e. i r. n. g (. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. (. Ch. engchi. (. 18. i n U. v.

(26) (. a b a b. 立. y. sit. al. n. io. er. Nat. ‧ 國. ‧. 學. 政 治 大. Ch. engchi. 19. i n U. v.

(27) n. g X. ))-. )(0. ƒ. ))-. X. χ. r. g. g. ƒ. .. χ. χ. g. χ. g. g. (,). (,). r -.. ) n. X. ƒ. χ. χ. r .%0) 3 % 4 % , 政 ƒ治 大 χ X χ. =G PML. 0,. 立. χr ;G GLG. r (%(. ;G GLG. n. al. r. 0,. Ch. engchi. 3 %). 4 % ,. y. r (%)(. sit. 3 %). 4 % ,. ;G GLG. ;G GLG. r%/-. er. io. 4% ,. r% (. 3 %( 4 % ,. ;G GLG. r (%). 3% /4% ,. ;G GLG. r )%-/. 3 %) 4 % ,. ;G GLG. r%.0. 3 %)/ 4 % ,. Nat. r (%-0. X. ‧. 3 %0( 4 % ,. p. 學. ;G GLG. ‧ 國. r. i n U. v. o r. ƒ. 3% -. ƒ. common method variance, CMV. =odsakoff, MacKenzie, Lee, & Podsakoff, 2003 ƒ. ƒ. i. n. r. r priming effect r. 2006 X. χ. χ. n. 20. χ.

(28) ). 5= %. ). (. %. %. ). 3. 74. %. 1 5. %. -. () ( %. %. %(. %. ( (% ). ). ) )% 70. %. ) % 9. ). )9. %) -. 1 %. ). 2. ( ). 8. 6. (. % %)9. ( %). ). ). (. % -. %%. -. %. -. %. %. 9. 970. ). %). a%(- l)- C %) % h. %. %. %(. %. %. )% 9. n. -. io. 8. %. % )974. %. Nat. (. ). ‧. 5. - )-. 學. -970. ( 3. 政 治 大. 立. -9. ‧ 國. ). %%% %%. -). ( ) 9. %. .. (. % %974. %. % % %. y. %. sit. 74. er. %. % % 2. engchi U %. v ni. % - )% % ((. -. -. %. - 1. %%. %. %. (. %%. ( 2. ). ). %. (. - )-. %. %. %%. %(. ( %). 21.

(29) o (. ) r. n. X a. X. 立. n b. io. r. ƒ. n. Kilduff 2013. n. Hinkin 1995. n. al. y. r. ao. sit. d. Y. er. ƒ. r. Nat. ƒ. ‧ 國. pb. ‧. r. r. Zellars & Perrewé, 2001. 學. r. 政 治 大. C hr engchi U. v ni. Toegel. r. Anand. r. oW ). y. n (. n. r. n. Y e. n. )( r)%.. r. g. ,0. ,%-. / r. n 22. g. - % ). %. r),%-( h. ).

(30) .(%). g. (,. ),%. X. %-,. ( r--% (. Cronbach's α. r.95. e( oW. e,. r. N=59. C 0 h. 立. a A. 政 治 大4. .. 0. F. ‧. '. al. E. o. y. sit. er. '. n. c. =. io. *. '. *. Nat. '. 235. *. a. s. 1 '. 學. ‧ 國. b. n. Ch. r. engchi. i n U. v. *. a .7652134 8 9 C. ' n. .7652134 8 9. C. n. 9. 23.

(31) r 4. N=59. 60. . .. ((. .. *. .. **. .(. ((. (. ). (. .). *. *. *). *. ) *. .*. ) ). )*. ). ( ). *. )*. .. ((. )(*. )*. (. (. ). ). .. *. *(). *. ). * ). (*. ). .. (. (. ). ) (. (. ). (. * * *. E27 0 H 9. *. 1. E2. 3 5. 8. 立. n. n. (. %/. r ),%),. h. /(. g - %/. r )% ) /. -,%. r. r g. (. )3,.% , 1 FT3 , 1 3 % ( 1. ‧. )%. ‧ 國. (%-. ().. 學. ). 政 治 大 %-. io ; 4 %/. al. y. Bollen, 1989. i n U. v. Maskarinec, Novotny, & Tasaki, 2000. Ch. engchi. Black, Babin, Anderson, & Tatham, 1998 s. r. n. Pang 2014. )& FT 2 )%. n. 68. Cheung Wong Yiu. er. ,. sit. Nat. )& FT 3(%- 1 98 3 %0) 1 68 3 %0/ 1 8 3 %0/ 1 ; 3 %0. 1 >< 753 % .. (. (. a. >< 75 2 % /. 98 Hair,. e. r. ,. r. .563 /. N=127. 2. .563 2041. 24.

(32) n. a r. (. Likert. a. W. W. n. W. i. i. W. Y W. WX. X. W. (. -. h. X. r,-%. r h. r. 7. 0. 76n. C76. 7o. 76. Nat. 76. s7. 76. 7 7. 76. r. ' 76. 78 a. a76. a6l. a7. n. 76. 9. io. 76. 7. y. 7. sit. 76. Ch 76. e n g ch h i. c8. 321. 0 4 5. er. 76. b. .. ‧. 76. r.92. 政 治 大. 學. 76. i n U. v. Cronbach's α. =76. 76. C76. %. 立. r. ‧ 國. 76. -. 25.

(33) n r. Hobfoll Johnson Ennis Jackson 2003 o. s. s. oW. Xanthopoulou n. Bakker. ƒ. X. r. oW. Schaufeli. s. a (. Likert. -. a. X. Schwarzer. self efficacy. X 政 治 大 oW s. 立. s. 學 ‧ s. n. al. s. Cronbach's α. er. io. %. Ch. engchi. i n U 3. 7. 6. 7. r.86. y. oW. sit. rX. h. oW. W. X. Nat. r -%(. s Generalized. (. .. h. oW. Jerusalem 1995. ‧ 國. W. . X. 2009. o. )r. Y. Demerouti. v. .0. 1. 4. a. 6 76c 7. 7. 6. a. r 7 6. 7. 6. '. 7C. 7 6. 7. 9. 6 6 8o. 7. 7 n. '. 78. 7. 8=. 6. b =. ' b. 9 7. 7. 7h. ''. 6 6. s 321. 0 4 5. '. 26.

(34) o. Pierce Gardner Cummings Dunham 1989 o. Organizational based self esteem n W. ( /. h. X. r -%0. r. o. r.89. Cronbach's α. X. %. 立. o o7. 6. o7. 6 7. 7. o 7. =. 6= h. al 6b. n. o7. n. 7. Ch. er. io. C. sit. 6= 6. '. y. a. Nat. ' 7. 24. 6. c68. 9. .0. ‧. o7 7. 3. 學. ‧ 國. /. 政 治 大. n U engchi. iv. '. 321. 0 4 5. Scheier Carver. Bridges 1994. Optimism W. i. -. 0. h. X. r, %)) h. r. Cronbach's α. % 27. r.85.

(35) 0 2. .. 0. 7 ' 7. h. nc. 97 7. 97. 6. 7. 6 6b. 7 8= r7. 7. o. 6 s. 7. '. 321. 0 4 5 'aC. a. C. h b. X. oW. 立. 治 s o 政 大. r. )3 ,0% - 1 FT3 ) 1 2 % ( 1. ). Hu 68. .. 2. Ch. engchi. n. ><>2 % /. y. n. sit. al. n. /. 1999. 28. er. io. (. ; 4 %0,. >< 75 2 % -. Nat. Bentler. ‧. ‧ 國. (. 學. )& FT 3 )% ., 1 68 3 %0. 1 8 3 %0. 1 ; 3 %0, 1 >< 753 % 0 1 ><> 3 %. i n U. v.

(36) ). e10 e9. .85 .90. e8. .88 .86. e7. 政 治 大. 立 .84 .88. sit. al. n. e3. e2. .89. er. io. 1 2. 1 2. y. ‧ 國. 1 2. ‧. e4. .95. Nat. e5. e11. 學. e6. 1 2. Ch. e ne12 gchi. i n U .77. v. .83 .80 .79. e1. 29.

(37) r. Lu 2006. y. Lu 2006 oW. b. a. a r. a. W. W. wW. 立. X. 學. (. Cronbach's α. X. p. r.93. sit. y. ‧. n. io. al. n. W. 政 治 大. Nat. ‧ 國. h. r. W. (. ((. r,.%0. W. er. W. i. Ch. engchi. 30. i n U. v. g. h. %.

(38) (( 2. .. 0 3. 8 8. ). 8. 8. 8. 8. 7. 8 8. )). 8 8 8. 8. a. 8. a. ). 8. a. 政 治 大. 8 a 8. a. 8. 立. ha a. ‧ 國. b. 8. b C. 8. =. b. 8b 87 b 87. io. 8. '. Nat. 8. 7. 8o 87. y. b. ‧. 8. sit. 8. 學. 8 ). n. al. er. 8. 8. =. 8. =. 8. =. 79h. 8. 7 7 9. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. C. ' 7s 7 9h. 7. 7. C. 7 8. C. 7. 7. 8. 7. 8. 7. 8. 7. 87rc. 7. ). n 8. 87rc. n 8. 87rc. n 8. 87rc. n 8. ). 432 .01 5 6. 31.

(39) Sadeghniiat-Haghighi. r. Yazdi 2015. X. n Frone. Tidwell 2015 a n. %0. W. %0(. %00. W. %0. W r (. 立. ‧ 國. -. Likert. n. n. al. Cronbach's α. y. g. sit. -. X. X. p. er. io. r. a. ‧. r , %0.. i. W. Nat. h. W. 學. (). %0). a 政- 治 大. Y. W W. W. %0. s. W. n C hr.86 U engchi. iv. h. %. () 3 6. .0. 24. =. 6 6. =. '. 6 '. 6 68. C 9. 5. bac 210. . 34. '. 32.

(40) Dorfman. r. Howell 1988. ns. X Dorfman. g. l a. Howell 1988 l. (. Likert. Y. rX rX. W. -. W. Y W. 立. g. ‧ 國. r)-% (. (,% (. r. Nat. r. sit. y. X. er. io. al. n. (. s. r.56. Cronbach's α. %. r. ‧. r. r. W. 學. Y. ( % ). d. 政 治 大. (. h. a. r. r. -. X. a. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 3 5. 102. 3 46. 9=. 8. n a. 87. 9=. 8. n. r a. 3 3 46. ''. 8. '. 9=. 8. 8. n. 9=. 8. n. 9=. 8. n. 8. n. '. a. 8. o 8. C. 7s 9= 8. '. ' '. 7h. b. c c -432 .01 5 6. '. 33.

(41) si n. Scarpello. Campbell 1983. X. l. r Scarpello. Campbell. a. 1983 a. X. 政 治 大. (. Likert. W Y. Collins. r. Gibbs 2003. Y. Likert. ). al. n. Hobfoll o. Ch. Johnson s. a. y. W. n. a. 2003. sit. io. (. Gibbs. i n U. engchi Ennis. h ,. er. Nat. X. h. Collins. ‧. a. a. 學. ‧ 國. 立. W. Jackson. v. r. 2003. s. oW ƒ. n. a. Toegel Anand. n. r o a. r n. r. g 34. Kilduff 2013 r.

(42) r. r. (. Y. a. -. Likert. a. l. W. o. r. g re. n. -. (. h. X. r )% 0. r. r.72. 立. ‧ 國. C. o8. o. 6. s. C. o8. 6. n. 7. C. o. c. h. 6. C o. c. 6. o. r c. h. c. ahl. 6. 9. Ch 8. engchi. 9. =6. C. '. n. 7. c. o6. io. ' 7. 3. y. 6. h. 0. sit. o. C. .. er. 8. 7. ‧. c. 2. Nat. o. % 政 治 大. 學. (. Cronbach's α. o. i'v n U. o6. h. o6. 321. 0 4 5 C. b. C. b. a. Watson Clark. Tellegen 1988. 35. r.

(43) Watson Clark Tellegen 1988 a. (. Likert. a. X. W. Y. X. W. (. (,. h. X. r -%,(. r. 立 6 9. 7. 6 9 C. 7. 6 9. '. y. 6 9. io. 6 9. 6 98 =. 7. 6 9. '. al. '. n. 7. Ch. engchi U. si. 013. ‧. 6 9 6 9. Nat. 7 7. '. 36. sit. 7. .. ‧ 國. 6 9. 政 治. 大. 學. 7. 321. 0 4 5. r.89. Cronbach's α. %. (,. ' 7. o. er. h. 7. -. v ni. ' '.

(44) o n. self-report. g n. i ,. n r r. s. χ. r. X. p i. 立. X 治 χ 政 大r. r. X. n. ‧ 國. 學 r. ‧. X. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. aln Ch. engchi. n. i n U. v. X. n. s. r i SPSS 22.0. Hayes’s Process statistics reliability. Amos21.0. descriptive. correlation analysis. internal consistent. factor analysis. hierarchical regression. analysis. 37.

(45) X a. X. i. a. Pearson r. n. 立. 政 治 大. X. n. al. y. %-. Cronbach's α. X. r. h. er. r. r. Cronbach's α. sit. X. io. %.. Nat. X. X. X. ‧. a. s. 學. ‧ 國. X. r. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. r. ƒ. n e. a. i. confirmatory factor analysis i. explorative factor analysis s. 38.

(46) a. r r. 立. y. al. n. io. sit. Nat. er. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 政 治 大. Ch. engchi. 39. i n U. v.

(47) r v n. n. r g. 4. 政 治 大. 立. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. X. (0. 3% ). sit. r. n. al. Ch. 2% (. er. io. (-. y. Nat. X. n U engchi 3 %. 3 % )) 2 % (. iv 0. r. 2% (. 3 % (, 2 % , r. h. i i. n (-. 3 % /) 2 % (. r. 3%, 3 %(. 2 % ,. 40. 2% (. 3%). 2% (. 3 % 0 2% (.

(48) i p. h. i. (-. r. 3 % ,). 2% (. 3% 0. 2% (. 2% (. 3 % ).. 3 % ) 2% ( i. 3%. r. 2% ( 3 % )0. 2% (. 3% - 2% (. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi U. 3%) 3 % ) 2% (. 3 % (/ 2 % , i. d. v ni. 2% ,. h. X. 3 % -. ‧. i. (-. h. 政i 治 大. 學. ‧ 國. 立. p. n. 41. r. i. 2% (.

(49) (-. r. 3% ) r. 2% ( i. X. n (-. 3 % -/ 2 % ( i a 3 % ( 2% (. 立. y. sit er. al. n. io. Nat. ‧ 國. Ch. engchi. b. ‧. i. 學. 政 治 大. 42. i n U. v.

(50) p. 43. ',. '. '*. '). '(. 90. -. ,. *. p. a. c. ( .*. '. h. n1' =. C1'. 1(. 1(. n1(. ,'. ). ( ). .. ) .-. ,. ' ((. * (,. ' .. *'. ( -). ) '. -(. ((. 2 874356 <. 90 '. , (). (- ((. *,. *-. ' ,.. ( (-. .'. (.. .. ( -(. ' ''. -). *). *'. ,. 104. * ((. 7. 1). )(. (. (. .(. )(. -. ). (*. ''. .. '.. ,. (. (. s p. '. (. ,. ,. *. *. (. ). *. (. .. -(. n1). )*. '(. '-. ((. ''. '). ',. -. '-. '(. () (. ). ,. '). '(. ).. '*. ),. *. engchi. ( 71' ( ) 1'. '. 3. o. 1 3. 8 3. c. 3. c. b. 3. 52 3. ''. '. .. -. ,. *. ). b. (. '. 6. n. Ch. v. s p. . '. ') ' * .. * *( ), (. n1*. y. .. '. sit. ). '*. (,. ''. '*. '). (. '.. er. i n U s p. *. *. ''. '. -. *. (. n1. ,. '(. ). (. *. ,. ‧ 國. ‧. io. al. 學. Nat. ', r. , '.. (-. (*. ). (*. (.. 立 (. '*. ). *. ''. -*. 政 治 大. ,. ''. *. '). '*. ('. )). )(. (. (.. )'. ,.. ). '. *'. (). ., ,.

(51) ƒ Y. n n. r r r (. n. X. 立. i n β= .02. Y. a. n. al. Ch. i. enn g c h i. i n U. n West. X. v. Reno. 1991 ). r h. β= .10, p<.01 r. pb. β= -.09, r. i. r i. e. β= -.96, p<.001 Aiken. p<.05. i. sit. io (.. X. y. Nat. n. (.. er. b. n. ‧. a. i. 學. ‧ 國. b. n. 政 治a 大. 44.

(52) (.. 6 87. -*. FfB. -) (. -(. ,.. (. F. (. R ,. ,. , ,. .. d 9. ). Nat. 45 45. ,-. *. *. ,),. ) (-*. ). io. 4.4 4.35. ,.. , (. ).. -(. ).). (.. n. al. .. ). y. ,-. *. ( (-. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 4.3 4.25 4.2 4.15 4.1 4.05 4 3.95 Low. High. r. 45. , ) (,. sit. 2 A 1. -. er. 2 A. ). ‧. 30. ‧ 國. (. -. 學. B X R0. ,. ,. 立 ). .. 政 治 大.

(53) r. X. Y. n. r n (/. (0. a (/. b n. β= -.76, p<.001 n. β= -.30, p<.05. a. b n. 立. l. 政 治 大. n. d 8. Ch. -. e n g) c h i U. er. io. al. (. (.. sit. *. ,v i n * (. 7. *. R 7. -. (. *. (. * 6. ). 54. , 0. (. *),. 90. (. * -. , ,12 12. y. ‧ 國. 8 f. F. ‧. 3. Nat. 54. X. 學. (/. (0. ( .. ). 46. (..

(54) (0. 54 8. f. 3. F. ). .. ,. ,. , d. 8. . (. (. 7. (. *. R. ,. -. 立. 7 6. ) -,. er. al. (.. sit. ). y. ) ). Ch. engchi. .. (*. n. ,. io. ((. (. Nat. 12 12. ‧ 國. 90. (. ‧. 0. 政 )治 大 ,. 學. 54. -. 47. i n U. v.

(55) ƒ. Hayes’s Process. n. r. .. Hayes, Preacher, & n. Myers, 2011 Hayes, 2013 Preacher, & Hayes, 2004 r. < rn. Cr. 立. A. Ar. 政 治 大. n. al. Ch. i n U. engchi. , Hayes’s Process. sit. .. er. io. y. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. Nat. Hayes’s Process. . 48. v.

(56) n. ƒ. macro Process. ). )(. i a. e. n. i. X. r. n r 政 治 大 r. ) β= .43, p<.001. 立. 學. ‧ 國. β= -.14, p<.001. r. β= .78, p<.001. ‧. r. n. Nat. Y. X. n. al. Ch. r. engchi. β= -.14, p<.001. n. er. io. n. sit. y. r. ). β= .07, p>.05. i n U. v. r n. LLCI= -.1900, ULCI= -.0553 LLCI= .0225, ULCI= .1521 pb. LLCI= -.1250, ULCI= -.0168. r. r. i. 49. 0, i.

(57) Ux. t. t. eR. t FE 9 L. .. 61. B. (. p i. -). ). .8. (. FE. (. U L. f. cr. ). ). (. -. (. -. d. (. d n. (). iL. (. (. *). -. *. -. o. *. (. 政 治 大 ). U 5 S. -. *. ‧ 國. ( **-. t Ux. ( ( (. al. (. n. iL. C h(. o. *. (. cr. io. d n. -. y. f. d. (. sit. U L. B ). Nat. FE. 61. *. engchi. -. er. L. 9. ‧. FE. ). 學. 2. ((. 立. IX. -. i n )* U. v. ). (( * U. IX. (-. 5 S. )) ). 2. ( * t. tX p i. R A 9B 9B. *. ). - *). *. ) *. B 61. B. 4403. 7403. ). ) (. *. -. (. 50. ) ) *. *. ) B. * B. B. 4403. 7403. -. )). 61. C FE. B.

(58) r. n. )(. r r. β= .43, p<.001 β= -.14, p<.001. β=. r. -.49, p<.05. r. β= -.07, p>.05. n r. Y. n )(. LLCI= -.1241, ULCI= -.0048 pb. Nat. n. al. i. sit. y. r. er. io. 0,. Ch. engchi. 51. n. ‧. ‧ 國. LLCI= .0076, ULCI= .1564. LLCI= .0041, ULCI= .1002. i. r. β= -.14, p<.001. 學. n. 立. 政 X治 大 r. i n U. v. r.

(59) d. t. or. r. eR. r FE x. 9. L. .. 61 (. n i. -). ). .8 FE. B. ( x. ). ). (. -. (. U L. f. cp. (. -. d. (. d. () iL. (. (. *). -. *. -. *. (. 政 治 大 ). U 5 S. ). -. *. ‧ 國. ( **-. 學. 2. ((. 立. IX. -. r d. x. U L. f. (. -. al. iL. -. ). n. d. *. (. cp. io. d. ) -. Nat. FE. (-. ). Ch. -. n() U e n g c h i )* ) ). ). iv. IX. (). (. * ** ). (. ( U. (. y. L. B. sit. x. 61. ‧. FE. 9. er. x. *) -. *. -. (. B. B. B. 4403. 7403. 5 S 2. ( )) or. rX tR n i *. A 9B 9B. 61. (*. - *) ) *. C. FE. x. ). 52. (. (. ). ((. -. ( 61. ( B. B. B. 4403. 7403. ). *. )*(.

(60) n. d. b. a. ƒ. )). )). 立. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. b. ‧. a. ‧ 國. b. 學. a. 政 治 大. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 53.

(61) r. X. r. n e. n. X. n Hobfoll, 1989. 政 治 大. X. 立. Y. n. n. al. n. s. self-directedness. Ch. s. e nrg c h i. s Demerouti. i n U. y. n. Schaufeli. 2007. n i. v. n r. Xanthopoulou. i. sY. sit. io oW. i. er. n. Schooler 1982. y. s. Nat. Kohn. X. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. rn. n. n. Bakker o. i i. r. Y. Y. p Y Chen, Gully, & Eden, 2001; Pierce, Gardner, Cummings, & Dunham, 1989; Scheier & Carver, 1992. 54.

(62) n. Latane. i. 1981. ƒ. e. r. y i. i. i. s. h. 政 治 大. h. i. 立. i. r. 學. ‧ 國. r. i. ‧. i. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. n. n. Ch. i. 1981. n. engchi. i n U. v. macro Process. r. r. Latane. i. i n. n. ƒ. Y. s r r. i. Y. s. Y. Y pi. 55.

(63) n. Ng & Van Dyne, 2001. Y. r. s. r. o. i. h. i r g. ƒ. 政 治 大. Lazarus. ‧ 國 io. i. n i ii. 1984. al. n. r. ƒ. Folkman. o o. i. y. Ch. s. engchi. s. i n U. r. d. s. ‧. X. h. Nat. r. o. 學. i. Kirkman, Chen, Farh,. Ng & Van Dyne, 2001. 立 s. r. Y. y. Chen, & Lowe, 2009. p. sit. h. r. er. g. o. v. n r. d r. Stone-Romero, Stone, & Salas, 2003. d. a r. Lazarus, & Folkman, 1984 Y Y. r Lazarus. Folkman. ri Y. 1984. r. Lin, Wang, & Chen, 2013. r. 56.

(64) r. r. y. i y. Farh, Hackett, & Liang, 2007 p. Y. g. Tyler, Lind, & Huo, 2000. Yi. rr. r. e. ni a. r. Y. YX. Hackett, & Liang, 2007. 立. 政 治 大. o n. ‧ 國. r. 學. rr nYi. ‧. n. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. Farh,. Tyler, Lind, & Huo, 2000. i. r. r. e. y. g. r. Ch. engchi. 57. i n U. v. e r. r r.

(65) X g r. n. r. X. r. X. r. n. r. Y Toegel, Anand & Kilduff, 2013. r. Liden, 1997. g. r. X 政 r治 大. a. 立. Hobfoll, 1989. Y. r. sit. n. er. io. al. r. Latane 1981. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. r. Y. i r. r. ƒ. y. i. r. n. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. d. Nat. n. Wayne, Shore, &. i. i. n n. n 7 PGLEG G. ) (. ISG (000. 58. ; RG.

(66) χ a. i i. n i. g. 政 治 大r sY v. r. Yi. r. a. n. sit. n. engchi. a. 59. r. s. s. er. io. Ch. h. i n U r. n. y. Nat. al. e. ‧. a. i. r. 學. a. v. ‧ 國. re. 立. v. n r. ƒ.

(67) ƒ. X n ƒ. X. Y χn n. X. χ. r. 立. X. 政 治 大. ƒ. s. a. n. g. χ. ‧ sit. y. Ch. engchi r. X. er. n. al. ƒ. i n U. vg. s YX. g X. h g. e s. ƒ Y. 60. n. s. 學. io s. s. ƒ. Nat. g. χn. n. ƒ. ‧ 國. p. χ. s. s.

(68) s. Y s. i. n Y. α. Cronbach's a. r d. s r. i. X. Toegel, Anand, & Kilduff, 2007 George, 2000. oW. y. sit. n. er. io. al. Ch. engchi. Fredrickson, 2003 g p. Toegel, Anand, &. p. Nat d. Levine, Prosser,. ‧. Evans, & Reicher, 2005 Kilduff, 2007. 學. s. ‧ 國. 立. 政 治 大. 61. i n U. v. Schein, 1990.

(69) s. a. ƒ. X r v n. r a. 政 治 p大. ‧ 國. ‧. al. n. er. a. Ch. v. Martini, & Busseri, 2010. n. n. io. s. Y. y. n. Nat. s. 學. n. ƒ. a. 立. n. χ. sit. n. engchi. i n U. g. oW. oW. 62.

(70) (00/. n. i i. /(. ((, ( .. ) -. n ) (. ƒ. .. 0/. 政 治 大 Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and 立 interpreting interactions. Sage.. ‧ 國. 學. Ames, D., Maissen, L. B., & Brockner, J. (2012). The role of listening in. 349.. ‧. interpersonal influence. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(3), 345-. y. Nat. sit. Ashford, S. J., Rothbard, N. P., Piderit, S. K., & Dutton, J. E. (1998). Out on a limb:. n. al. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(1), 23–57.. Ch. engchi. er. io. The role of context and impression management in selling gender-equity issues.. i n U. v. Ashforth, B. E., & Humphrey, R. H. (1995). Emotion in the workplace: A reappraisal. Human Relations, 48, 97–125. Ashkanasy, N. M., & Daus, C. S. (2002). Emotion in the Workplace: The New Challenge for Managers. The Academy of Management Executive, 16,1, 76. Ashkanasy, N. M., & Jordan, P. J. (2008). A multi-level view of leadership and emotion. In R. H. Humphrey, C. A. Schriesheim, & L. L. Neider (Eds.), Affect and emotion: New directions in management theory and research (pp. 17–39). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. Aspinwall, L. G., & Taylor, S. G. (1997). A stitch in time: Self-regulation and proactive coping. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 417–436.. 63.

(71) Atwater, L., Wang, M., Smither, J. W., & Fleenor, J. W. (2009). Are cultural characteristics associated with the relationship between self and others’ ratings of leadership? Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(4), 876. Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175–1184. Barsade, S. (2002). The ripple effect: Emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47: 644-675. Barsade, S. G., & Gibson, D. (2007). Why does affect matter in organizations? Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, 36–59.. 政 治 大. Bass, B. (1990a). Bass & Stogdill's Handbook of Leadership (3rd ed.). New York: The. 立. Free Press.. ‧ 國. 學. Bass, B. & Avolio, B. (1997). Full range leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.. y. Nat. NJ: Erlbaum.. ‧. Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership (2nd ed.). Mahwah,. io. sit. Beukeboom, C. J. (2009). When words feel right: How affective expressions of. n. al. er. listeners change a speaker’s language use. European Journal of Social. Ch. Psychology, 39(5), 747–756.. engchi. i n U. v. Blader, S. L., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). A four-component model of procedural justice: Defining the meaning of a ‘‘fair’’ process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(6), 747–758. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables. Wiley, NY. Brief, A. P., & Weiss, H. M. (2002). Organizational behavior: Affect in the workplace. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 279–307. Brown, B. B. (2003). Employees' organizational commitment and their perceptions of supervisors' relations-oriented and task-oriented leadership behaviors. Blacksburg, Va.: University Libraries, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State. 64.

(72) University. Chen, G., Gully, S. M., & Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale. Organizational Research Methods, 4, 62–83. Cheung, S. O., Wong, W. K., Yiu, T. W., & Pang, H. Y. (2014). Developing a trust inventory for construction contracting. In Construction Dispute Research (pp. 147-168). Springer International Publishing. Cialdini, R. B., Vincent, J. E., Lewis, S. K., Catalan, J., Wheeler, D., & Darby, B. L. (1975). Reciprocal concessions procedure for inducing compliance: The door-in-the-face technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 2, 206-215.. 立. 政 治 大. Collins, P. A., & Gibbs, A. C. C. (2003). Stress in police officers: a study of the origins,. ‧ 國. 學. prevalence and severity of stress-related symptoms within a county police force. Occupational Medicine, 53(4), 256-264.. ‧. Collins, N. L., & Miller, L. C. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic. y. Nat. review. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 457.. io. sit. Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the. n. al. er. door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50, 869–884.. Ch. i n U. v. Diefendorff, J. M., & Richard, E. M. (2003). Antecedents and consequences of. engchi. emotional display rule perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 284– 294. Dorfman, P. W., & Howell, J. P. (1988). Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership in patterns. Advances in International Comparative Management, 3: 127-150. Ed, D., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276-302. Eisenberger, R., Karagonlar, G., Stinglhamber, F., Neves, P., Becker, T. E., Gonzalez-Morales, M. G., & Steiger-Mueller, M. (2010). Leader-member. 65.

(73) exchange and affective organizational commitment: the contribution of s u p e r v i s o r ' s o rg a n i z a t i o n a l e m b o d i m e n t . T h e J o u r n a l o f A p p l i e d Psychology, 95, 6, 1085-103. Emerson, R. M. (1962). Power-dependence relations. American sociological review, 31-41. Farh, J. L., Hackett, R. D., & Liang, J. (2007). Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizational support–employee outcome relationships in China: Comparing the effects of power distance and traditionality. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 715-729.. 政 治 大. Fredrickson, B. L. (2003). Positive emotions and upward spirals in organizations.. 立. Positive organizational scholarship, 163-175.. ‧ 國. 學. Frone, M. R., & Tidwell, M. C. O. (2015). The meaning and measurement of work fatigue: Development and evaluation of the Three-Dimensional Work Fatigue. ‧. Inventory (3D-WFI). Journal of occupational health psychology, 20(3), 273.. y. Nat. George, J. M. (2000). Emotions and leadership: The role of emotional intelligence.. io. sit. Human relations, 53(8), 1027-1055.. n. al. er. Geurts, S. A. E., & Sonnentag, S. (2006). Recovery as an explanatory mechanism in. Ch. i n U. v. the relation between acute stress reactions and chronic health impairment.. engchi. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health, 32, 482–492. Goleman, D. (1998). Working with emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam Books. Gouldner, A. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25: 161-179. Grandey, A. (2008). Emotions at work: A review and research agenda. In C. Cooper & J. Barling (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational behavior: 234-261. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Gross, S., Semmer, N. K., Meier, L. L., Kälin, W., Jacobshagen, N., & Tschan, F. (2011). The effect of positive events at work on after-work fatigue: they matter. 66.

(74) most in face of adversity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(3), 654. Gudykunst, W. B. (2003). Cross-cultural and intercultural communication. Sage. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 207-219). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice hall. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford Press. Hayes, A. F., Preacher, K. J., & Myers, T. A. (2011). Mediation and the estimation of indirect effects in political communication research. Sourcebook for political. 政 治 大. communication research: Methods, measures, and analytical techniques, 23, 434-. 立. 465.. ‧ 國. organizations. Journal of management, 21(5), 967-988.. 學. Hinkin, T. R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of. ‧. Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing. y. Nat. stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513–524.. io. sit. Hobfoll, S. E. (2002). Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Review of. n. al. er. General Psychology, 6, 307–324.. Ch. i n U. v. Hobfoll, S. E., Johnson, R. J., Ennis, N., & Jackson, A. P. (2003). Resource loss,. engchi. resource gain, and emotional outcomes among inner city women. Journal of personality and social psychology, 84(3), 632. Hofstede, G. (1997). Cultures and Organisations: Software of the Mind. McGraw Hill, London. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55. Humphrey, R. H. (2002). The many faces of emotional leadership.The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 5, 493-504.. 67.

(75) Janssen, O., Lam, C. K., & Huang, X. (2010). Emotional exhaustion and job performance: The moderating roles of distributive justice and positive affect. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(6), 787–809. Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Erez, A., & Locke, E. A. (2005). Core self-evaluations and job and life satisfaction: The role of self-concordance and goal attainment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 257–268. Judge, T. A., Locke, E. A., & Durham, C. C. (1997). The dispositional causes of job satisfaction: A core evaluations approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 19, 151–188.. 政 治 大. Judge, T. A., Van Vianen, A. E. M., & De Pater, I. (2004). Emotional stability, core. 立. self-evaluations, and job outcomes: A review of the evidence and an agenda for. ‧ 國. 學. future research. Human Performance, 17, 325–346.. Kaplan, S., Cortina, J., Ruark, G., LaPort, K., & Nicolaides, V. (2014). The role of. ‧. organizational leaders in employee emotion management: A theoretical model.. y. Nat. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), 563-580.. io. sit. Kirkman, B. L., Chen, G., Farh, J. L., Chen, Z. X., & Lowe, K. B. (2009). Individual. n. al. er. power distance orientation and follower reactions to transformational leaders: A. Ch. i n U. v. cross-level, cross-cultural examination. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 744-764.. engchi. Kohn, M. L., & Schooler, C. (1982). Job conditions and personality: A longitudinal assessment of their reciprocal effects. American journal of Sociology, 87(6), 1257-1286. Latane, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American psychologist, 36(4), 343-356. Latané, B., & Arrowood, A. (1963). Emotional arousal and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 47: 324-327. Lawler, E. J., & Thye, S. R. (1999). Bringing Emotions into Social Exchange. 68.

(76) Theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 217. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer. Levine, M., Prosser, A., Evans, D., & Reicher, S. (2005). Identity and emergency intervention: How social group membership and inclusiveness of group boundaries shape helping behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(4), 443-453. Lin, W., Wang, L., & Chen, S. (2013). Abusive supervision and employee well-being: The moderating effect of power distance orientation. Applied Psychology, 62(2), 308-329.. 立. 政 治 大. Lloyd, K. J., Boer, D., Keller, J. W., & Voelpel, S. (2015). Is my boss really listening. ‧ 國. 學. to me? The impact of perceived supervisor listening on emotional exhaustion, turnover intention, and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Business. ‧. Ethics, 130(3), 509-524.. y. Nat. Lu, L. (2006). Cultural fit: Individual and societal discrepancies in values, beliefs and. io. sit. SWB. Journal of Social Psychology, 146, 203-221.. n. al. er. Luthans, F., & Youssef, C. M. (2007). Emerging positive organizational behavior.. Ch. Journal of Management, 33, 321–349.. engchi. i n U. v. Martini, T. S., & Busseri, M. A. (2010). Emotion regulation strategies and goals as predictors of older mothers’ and adult daughters’ helping-related subjective wellbeing. Psychology and aging, 25(1), 48. Maskarinec, G., Novotny, R., & Tasaki, K. (2000). Dietary patterns are associated with body mass index in multiethnic women. The Journal of nutrition, 130(12), 3068-3072. Meijman, T. F., & Mulder, G. (1998). Psychological aspects of workload. In P. J. D. Drenth, H. Thierry, & C. J. D. Wolff (Eds.), Handbook of Work and Organizational Psychology: Vol. 2: Work psychology (pp. 5–34). East Sussex,. 69.

(77) England: Psychology Press. Miller, L. C., Berg, J. H., & Archer, R. L. (1983). Openers: Individuals who elicit intimate self-disclosure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1234–1244. Milliken, F. J., Morrison, E. W., & Hewlin, P. F. (2003). An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don’t communicate upward and why. Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1453–1476. Mulder, M. (1977). The daily power game. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Social Sciences Division.. 政 治 大. Ng, K. Y., & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Individualism-collectivism as a boundary. 立. condition for effectiveness of minority influence in decision making.. ‧ 國. 學. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 84(2), 198-225. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating. y. Nat. 717-731.. ‧. indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior research methods, 36(4),. io. sit. Pierce, J. L., & Gardner, D. G. (2004). Self-esteem within the work and. n. al. er. organizational context: A review of the organizational-based self-esteem. Ch. i n U. literature. Journal of Management, 30, 591–622.. engchi. v. Pierce, J. L., Gardner, D. G., Cummings, L. L., & Dunham, R. B. (1989). Organizational-based self-esteem: Construct definition, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 622–648. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879. Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698. Rousseau, D. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee. 70.

(78) Rights and Responsibilities Joumal, 2: 121-139. Sadeghniiat-Haghighi, K., & Yazdi, Z. (2015). Fatigue management in the workplace. Industrial psychiatry journal, 24(1), 12. Scarpello, V., & Campbell, J. P. (1983). Job satisfaction: Are all the parts there? Personnel Psychology, 36, 577-600. Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S. (1992). Effects of optimism on psychological and physical well-being: Theoretical overview and empirical update. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 16, 201–228. Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994). Distinguishing optimism from. 政 治 大. neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A re-evaluation of. 立. the Life Orientation Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1063–. ‧ 國. 學. 1078.. Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (2001). Optimism, pessimism, and. ‧. psychological well-being. In E. C. Chang (Ed.), Optimism and pessimism:. y. Nat. Implications for theory, research, and practice (pp. 189–216). Washington DC:. io. sit. American Psychological Association.. n. al. er. Schein, E. H. (1990). Organizational culture (Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 109). American. Ch. Psychological Association.. engchi. i n U. v. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35–37). Windsor, United Kingdom: NFER-NELSON. Stiglitz, J.E., Sen, A., Fitoussi, J.P., (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. Retrieved on 4 November 2009 from <http://www .stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf> Stone-Romero, E. F., Stone, D. L., & Salas, E. (2003). The influence of culture on. 71.

(79) role conceptions and role behavior in organisations. Applied Psychology, 52(3), 328-362. Toegel, G., Anand, N., & Kilduff, M. (2007). Emotion helpers: The role of high positive affectivity and high self-monitoring managers. Personnel Psychology, 60(2), 337-365. Toegel, G., Anand, N., & Kilduff, M. (2013). Emotion helping by managers: An emergent understanding of discrepant role expectations and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 2, 334-357. Tyler, T. R., Lind, E. A., & Huo, Y. J. (2000). Cultural values and authority relations:. 政 治 大. The psychology of conflict resolution across cultures. Psychology, Public Policy,. 立. and Low, 6, 1138-1164.. ‧ 國. 學. Van, D. L., & LePine, J. A. (1998). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 1,. ‧. 108-119.. y. Nat. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief. io. sit. measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of personality. n. al. er. and social psychology, 54(6), 1063.. Ch. i n U. v. Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived Organizational Support. engchi. and Leader-Member Exchange: A Social Exchange Perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1, 82-111. Weiss, H. M., & Beal, D. J. (2005). Reflections on affective events theory. In N. Ashkanasy, C. E. J. Ha¨rtel, & W. Zerbe (Eds.), Research on Emotion in Organizations: Vol. 1: The effect of affect in organizational settings (pp. 1–21). Oxford, England: Elsevier. Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational. 72.

(80) Behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews (Vol. 18, pp. 1–74). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). The role of personal resources in the job demands-resources model. International Journal of Stress Management, 14, 121–141. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. Journal of Vocational behavior, 74(3), 235-244. Zellars, K. L., & Perrewé, P. L. (2001). Affective personality and the content of. 政 治 大. emotional social support: Coping in organizations. Journal of Applied. 立. Psychology, 86, 3, 459-467.. ‧ 國. 學. Zijlstra, F., & Sonnentag, S. (2006). After work is done: Psychological perspectives on recovery from work. European Journal of Work and Organizational. y. sit. n. al. er. io. Nat. ‧. Psychology, 15, 129 –138. doi:10.1080/13594320500513855. Ch. engchi. 73. i n U. v.

(81) . w. n d. n r. 立. 政 o治 大 Y. Y. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. h. g 0978-112-556 krimmiepeng@gmail.com. 74.

(82) 3 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 3. 4. 5. 6. .. ). 政 治 大. 立. ‧ 國. 3. 1 .5. 0. 1. sit. n. al. er. io 2. Ch. 8. engchi. 0 43. 2. y. Nat 6. ‧. 2. 學. 1.. 1. 8. 743 1 ) .. i n U. v. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 8 9 9. 75.

(83) 6 4. .. 7 . 5. 立. 政 治7 大. ‧ 國 .. 6. Ch. engchi U. 1 8. . 8 91 5 7. 5. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 2. 4. 5. 6. 3. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. v1 i n 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. er. al. 5. 3. 1. y. 2. 6. sit. 8. 5. 1. n. 9. 4. ‧. io. 3. 3. 學. 3. 5 .. 2. 1. Nat. 0. 1. 76.

(84) )(. 5. 2. . 5 0. 0. 4. 8 5 6. 8. .0 1. 政 治 大. 立. 0. 95. 1. 4. 0. 50. 50 7. 6. Ch. engchi. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1 1 1 1. 2 2 2 2. 3 3 3 3. 4 4 4 4. 5 5 5 5. 6 6 6 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. y. al. .. n. 6. er. io. 1.. 5. sit. 5. 9. 4. 1. 5 4. 3. 1. Nat. 3. 2. ‧. ‧ 國. 5. 1. 學. 2. 77. i n U. v1.

(85) a 043 0 0 0. 7. 2. 0. 9. 5. 8. 3. 1. 7. 3 3. 2. 3. 0. 4. 0. 4 0 14 i. 3. 6 0. 立.  . ‧ 國. m 6. e l. ‧. 0. 政 治 大. m. 學. 5. a. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch l. e. i. engchi. i n U m. v. 0 .. 0. 78.

(86) . w. n d. n r. 立. 政 o治 大 Y. Y. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. h. g 0978-112-556 krimmiepeng@gmail.com. 79.

(87) 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 學. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 2. 4. 5. 6. 2 6. 6 2. 4. 7 3 6. 2. 立9. ‧ 國. 6. 政 治 大 3. 9. 9. 1. 8. 1. Nat. ). 6. io. 1. al. n. 9. 7. 8. 2 ). y. 2. 3. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. v1 i n 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. er. 2. sit. ). 0. ‧. 1. Ch. 7. engchi U. 9 4 6. 6. 5. 1 3 .. 80.

(88) 72. 9. 1. .. 2. 2. 2. 2 2. 2 2. 2. 3 5. 3 52 3 5 3. 0. . 52 5. 立. 2. 5. 2. ‧ 國. 學. 5 2. 政 治 大. 2 8. 2. 8. 2. 7. 2. 7. n. al. er. io. . 0. sit. y. Nat. .. 3 2 2. ‧. 8. 5 5. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 7 5 ) 1. 8 2. 1. 8. 1. 86. 5 5 5 7. .9. 4 9. 4. 9. 4. 9. 4. .9 9 9 9. 81.

(89) . 2. 1. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 5. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 6. 3. 0. 0. 6. . 6 5. 81. 3. 6. 1. 8. 治 政 大 4. .1. 立. 0 2. . 3. 2. .. io. .. 1. 5 7. al. 1. n. 2. y. 1. 9. sit. 1. 0. Nat. 4. 1. er. 0. 8. 0. 9. Ch. engchi. 2 2 5. . 3. 5. 3. 8 3. .. . 2 1. ‧. ‧ 國. 0. 學. 3. 82. Un. iv 1.

(90) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. . 5. .. 1 1 1. 2 2 2. 3 3 3. 4 4 4. 5 5 5. 6 6 6. .. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 3. 18 7. 0. .1 6. 9. 31 0. 8 7. 政 治 大 6. 2. ‧. ‧ 國. 4. 學. 4. 立. 3. 0. 2. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 83.

(91)

參考文獻

相關文件

簡報裡展現一枚以拉斐爾的名畫一角做成的郵 票。 請搜尋這幅畫的全貌,並模仿美術館導覽

文學賞析能力:形式、節奏的感 悟、從詩歌與政治的關係了解詩 歌的怨刺作用,探討深層的主題

™ “五、四”反帝愛國運動中北京女學生成立的一個愛國組

運用想像力、形式/技巧表現一個 的夢境 回憶 的一刻,以形式/技巧,表達 的情 景/情緒。. 從評賞

• 在「心房」進行課堂或體驗 式學習活動後,學生能以表 情符號表達自己的情緒,令 學生能以多元化的途徑表達 情緒,以便老師深入了解學

Key words: theory of the nature of the mind, the Buddha nature, one who possesses a gotra, non-resultant activity which is neither positive nor negative and is able

本學年,我們在Google Classroom 建立各級「德育及成長」課室,發放 有關內容的素材,關顧學生在疫情期

在日常生活中照顧自己,並養成自 律精神,以應付日常生活中,個人 衞生、個人安全及情緒的問題