生態城市發展下台灣都市計畫土地使用管制新策略模式之研究
116
0
0
全文
(2) 1 2 3. 4. II.
(3) The Study of New Strategic Model for Land Use Control in Taiwan City Planning under Ecological Urban Development Advisor(s): Dr.(Professor) Tseng ,Tse-Fong Institute of Urban Development and Architecture National University of Kaohsiung. Student: Hong,Yu-Cheng Institute of Urban Development and Architecture National University of Kaohsiung. ABSTRACT. In the time of global climate change and global warming, which is harming human survival and progression, ecological urban development has become the hot topic in reversing the environment deterioration and promoting improvement for quality of life. Taiwan is also in this global trend and strived to advance her own localized achievement. Revealed from the related discussions of eco-city, urban land use control plays an important role in promoting the construction of ecological urban expanse. The zoning, intensity, character and quality are the core purports of land use control. However, the content of land use control in Taiwan city planning are often focused too much in zoning and intensity, in contrary the character and quality of land use are not measuring up the expectation. Hence, the core topic addressed in this Study is how to closely connect the character and quality of land use with the land use control policy in Taiwan city planning. Connecting the character and quality of land use to the framework of Taiwan city planning land use control involves research and modification of urban planning, zoning control , urban design and land sub-division. Therefore, this Study proposes four core views in Taiwan city planning land use control strategic model based on studies from American and Germany ecological urban planning in land use control infrastructure as well as related publications in international ecological urban development: 1) City design should lead the city planning for ecologic urban development since establishing the master and detailed plans of city planning is the III.
(4) process of city design. 2) Master plan becomes the indicator of ecologic value and development infrastructure with basic frameworks of “Controlling ecologic conditions”, “Responding to development agenda” and “Proposing development standards”. 3) Detailed plan becomes the carrier of environment quality control and basic frameworks of “Revealing development vision” and “Formulating overall development plan”. “Land Use Zoning Control Policy” should be established based on practical planning details and land subdivision should be developed based on published environment quality in the detailed plan. 4) Use landscape planning as support to guide city planning ecology agenda. Taiwan current “County City Landscape Master Plan” and “Township Landscape Master Plan” should serve to assist land use control in city planning as supporting role of exquisitely managing ecological issues. Four specific points above are the key conclusions of this Study. Keywords: eco-city, city planning land use control, character, quality, strategic model. IV.
(5) 2011. V. 4.
(6) .............................................................................................................. 1 .................................................................................. 2 .................................................................................. 3 .................................................................................. 3 ................................................. 5 .............................. 6 ............................... 6 ............................... 9. 1参参櫫 196櫫. ...................................... 12 ...................................................................... 12 .................................. 15 .......................................... 21 ...................................................................................... 21 ...................................................................................... 26 ....................................................................................................... 28 ........................ 29 .................................................... 30 ...................................... 31 .... 31 .................... 33. -. ........................ 35 ...................................................................... 35 .......................................... 45 .............................................. 46 ....................................................................................................... 50. VI.
(7) ............................ 51 .......... 52 .......................................................................... 52 .......................................... 53. Kronsberg. ..... 62 .......................................................................... 62 ....................................... 64. Kronsberg. ....................................................................................................... 70 ........................ 73 ........................................................ 74 ...................................... 76 .............................. 76 .......................................... 77 ...................................................... 78 ...................... 80 ....................................................................................................... 83 ................................. 84. -. -. ............ 86 ................................... 89 ecological conditions ........................................ 89 issue ........................................................................ 90 criteria .................................................................. 91 ................................................. 94 vision ...................................................................... 94 master plans .................................................. 94 .......................................................................... 96. ....................................................................................................... 98 .............................................................................................. 99 ..................................................................................................... 100 .................................................................................. 102 ................................................................................................................. 103. VII.
(8) 1-1. ........................................................................................................ 4. 饋-1 ........................................................................................ 6 饋-饋 ................................................................................................ 7 饋-纇 ................................................................................................ 7 饋-4 196櫫 .................................................................. 8 饋-5 196櫫 ................................................................ 10 饋-6 Ecocity Book 1 ................................................................ 14 饋-参 Bad Ischl .......................................................................................... 15 饋-8 Bad Ischl masterplan ............................................................................ 15 饋-9 Bad Ischl .................................................................. 15 饋-1櫫 Bad Ischl ........................................................................ 16 饋-11 Umbertide ........................................................................................ 16 饋-1饋 Umbertide ................................................................................ 16 饋-1纇 Umbertide ................................................................................ 17 饋-14 Umbertide masterplan .......................................................................... 17 饋-15 Umbertide ............................................................................ 17 饋-16 Umbertide ............................................................................ 17 饋-1参 kronsberg ........................................................................................ 18 饋-18 kronsberg ................................................................................ 18 饋-19 kronsberg ........................................................................ 18 饋-饋櫫 kronsberg ............................................................ 19 饋-饋1 kronsberg .................................................................... 19 饋-饋饋 .................................................................................... 21 饋-饋纇 What makes an eco-town ...................................... 22 饋-饋4 Eco-Town Report Learning from Europe on eco-towns ........... 22 饋-饋5 Beyond Eco-towns Applying the Lessons from Europe ........... 23 饋-饋6 ............................................................................................ 23 饋-饋参 .................................................................................... 24 饋-饋8 ........................................................................ 24 饋-饋9 small-area plan ............................................................................ 25 饋-纇櫫 small-area plan 纇D ...................................................................... 25 饋-纇1 ........................................................ 26 饋-纇饋 .................... 28 纇-1 .......................................................... 30 纇-饋 .................................................................. 31 纇-纇 .................................................................. 31 VIII.
(9) 纇-4. .................................. 32. 纇-5 .............................................................. 32 纇-6 .............................................................. 32 纇-参 .............................. 32 纇-8 ..................................... 33 纇-9 ................................................................. 33 纇-1櫫 ................................................................................ 34 纇-11 ........................................................................ 34 纇-1饋 ............................................................ 37 纇-1纇 .................................... 38 纇-14 .................................................... 39 纇-15 .................................................... 40 纇-16 ............................................ 41 纇-1参 ............................................................ 43 纇-18 .................... 44 纇-19 ............................................................................ 45 纇-饋櫫 .................................................................... 45 纇-饋1 ............................................................................................ 46 纇-饋饋 ............................................................................................ 47 纇-饋纇 ............................................................ 50 4-1 ...................................................................... 53 4-饋 Ohio .................................................................................................... 53 4-纇 Cleveland .......................................................................................... 53 4-4 饋櫫饋櫫 ................. 54 4-5 ...................................................................... 54 4-6 饋櫫饋櫫 ............................................ 55 4-参 饋櫫饋櫫 .................................................... 58 4-8 Detroit Shoreway ............................................................................ 58 4-9 Detroit Shoreway .................................................................... 59 4-1櫫 Masterplan .................................................................................. 60 4-11 纇D .......................................................................................... 60 4-1饋 ........................................................................ 60 4-1纇 Battery Park masterplan ................ 61 4-14 Madison Avenue masterplan ................................................................ 61 4-15 Madison Avenue .............................................................. 61 4-16 Madison Avenue ...................................................................... 61 4-1参 Hanover ............................................................................................ 62 4-18 Kronsberg ....................................................................................... 62 IX.
(10) 4-19. .................................................................... 63. 4-饋櫫 4-饋1 4-饋饋 4-饋纇 4-饋4 4-饋5 4-饋6 4-饋参 4-饋8 4-饋9 4-纇櫫 5-1 5-饋 5-纇 5-4 5-5 6-1 6-饋 6-纇 6-4 6-5 6-6 6-参 6-8 6-9 6-1櫫 6-11 6-1饋 6-1纇. ................................................ 65 ................................................ 66 ........................................................................................ 66 F-Plan ......................................................................................... 66 Kronsberg F-Plan .................................................................................. 66 Kronsberg ................................................................................ 67 Kronsberg masterplan ......................................................................... 67 Kronsberg ................................................................ 68 Kronsberg B-Plan .................................................................................. 69 .................................................... 70 Kronsberg ................................................ 71 .................................................................. 77 .............................................................................................. 81 .......................................... 82 .......................................................................... 82 .............................................................. 83 .......................................................................................... 85 .............................................................................. 85 .................................................................. 86 .................................................................. 87 ...................................... 87 ...................................................................... 88 .......................................... 89 ...................................................................... 91 .............................. 92 ................................................ 93 ............................ 96 .................................................................... 97 ........................................ 98. 饋-1 纇-1 纇-饋 4-1. .................................................. 12 .......................................................... 36 .............................................. 36 ...................................................................................... 62. X.
(11) 1.
(12) 1. 1. 1999 饋櫫櫫9 2.
(13) 1 饋 纇. . EcoVillage. Kronsberg. 3.
(14) 1-1. 4.
(15) 1参参 1参参櫫 196櫫. 5.
(16) 1参参 1参参櫫 18. 188櫫 New York 1885. . 189纇. City Beautiful Movement 19 18参櫫. Frederick Law. Olmsted 189纇 19. City Beautiful. Movement. 饋-1. 2. 饋. Planning and urban design standards，2006，Hoboken, NJ :John Wiley & Sons 6.
(17) 1898. . Garden City. 1898 Howard. Ebenezer. 饋-饋. 1916. . 纇. Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance 1885 191纇 1916. 19饋9. . Neighborhood unit. 1898 Clarence Arthur Perry. 19饋9. 8櫫櫫 饋-纇 3 4. 饋櫫櫫饋 Planning and urban design standards，2006，Hoboken, NJ :John Wiley & Sons 7. 4.
(18) . 19纇纇. Chart of Athens Congres Internationaux Architectural Moderne 18 19纇纇. CIAM 纇纇. 1945. . . . 1885. 189纇 19饋9. 1916. 1898 19纇纇. 5. 饋-4 196櫫. 5. 8.
(19) 196櫫 196饋 Spring). Rachel Carson. (Slient. 196櫫. Lan L. McHarg. 1965. . 1969. Design with Nature McHarg. sensitive area 1965 critical areas. 1965. 19参纇 19参5 sensitive lands sensitive area. . 196櫫. carrying capacity. 196櫫 196櫫 . 196櫫. growth management. 196櫫 196櫫 19参櫫 9.
(20) . 196櫫. LandLand-use Suitability Analysis 196櫫. George A.Hills McHarg. Philips H. Lewis. Lan L.. 196櫫. 196櫫. . 6. 饋-5 196櫫. 6. 10.
(21) 196櫫 196櫫. 11.
(22) 19参1. UNUSCO. 16. 饋-1. 1984. Yanitsky, O.参. 198参. Register, R.8 ecologically healthy city. 199参. Liao, C. M.. 199参. 9. 1998. 7 8 9. 饋櫫櫫8. p2-9 12.
(23) 饋櫫櫫纇. 饋櫫櫫纇 1櫫. 饋櫫櫫参. Eco-Town. 11. 饋櫫櫫8 饋櫫櫫5. 饋櫫櫫纇. 饋櫫櫫櫫 Ecocity Book 1. 10 11. 饋櫫櫫纇 Eco-Town Report 13.
(24) 饋櫫櫫櫫. 饋-6 Ecocity Book 1. 196櫫. 12. 14. 1饋.
(25) Bad Ischl Bad Ischl. 13. 饋-参 Bad Ischl . 饋-8 Bad Ischl masterplan . 15. 饋-9 Bad Ischl 13 14. Ecocity book 1 Ecocity book 1 15. 14.
(26) . 16. 饋-1櫫 Bad Ischl Umbertide Umbertide. 饋-11 Umbertide. 15 16 17 18. Ecocity Ecocity Ecocity Ecocity. book book book book. 17. 饋-1饋 Umbertide. 1 1 1 1 16. 18.
(27) . 饋-1纇 Umbertide. 19. . 饋-14 Umbertide masterplan 19 20 21. 21. Ecocity book 1 Ecocity book 1 Ecocity book 1 17. 饋-15 Umbertide. 20. 饋-16 Umbertide. 22.
(28) kronsberg kronsberg Hannover kronsberg kronsberg. 饋-1参 kronsberg. 23. Kronsberg Kronsberg. 饋-18 kronsberg 22 23 24 25. 24. 饋-19 kronsberg. Ecocity book 1 http://www.hannover.de/data/download/lhh ：Hannover Kronsberg Handbook ：Hannover Kronsberg Handbook 18. 25.
(29) kronsberg kronsberg. kronsberg. 饋-饋櫫 kronsberg. 26. 27. 28. 饋-饋1 kronsberg. 26 27 28 29. 29. ：Water Concept Kronsberg ：http://www.topenergy.org/news_4921.html ：http://www.topenergy.org/news_4921.html Water Concept Kronsberg 19.
(30) Bad Ischl. Umbertide kronsberg. 20.
(31) Ecocity Book 1 饋櫫櫫櫫. Ecocity Book 1 planning framework. 饋-饋饋. 纇櫫. What makes an eco-town31. 1.. criteria criteria ecological limits framework. framework criteria criteria. 饋.. 30. Philine Gaffron,Gé Huismans,Franz Skala 饋櫫櫫5 Ecocity Book BioRegional Development Group and the Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE)，2008 21 31.
(32) 纇.. master plans master plans criteria. master. plans. 4.. sustainability action plan project. 饋-饋纇 What makes an eco-town. 纇饋. master plans criteria landscape. working. Eco-Town Report- Learning from Europe on eco-towns33. Agreeing development frameworks master plans. 饋-饋4 Eco-Town Report Learning from Europe on eco-towns 32 33. Homes and Communities Academy，2008. 34. 22. 纇4.
(33) Beyond Eco-towns Applying the Lessons from Europe35. 饋-饋5 Beyond Eco-towns Applying the Lessons from Europe Planning And Urban Design Standards纇参 Ecological Planning Model. 饋-饋6. 35. 纇8. PRP Architects Ltd，2008. 36 37 38. Hoboken, NJ :John Wiley & Sons，2006 Hoboken, NJ :John Wiley & Sons，2006，Planning and urban design standards 23. 纇6.
(34) comprehensive plan neighborhood plan. 饋-饋参. 纇9. Urban Land Use Planning40. 饋-饋8 39 40 41. 41. Hoboken, NJ :John Wiley & Sons，2006，Planning and urban design standards Philip R. Berke，2006 Philip R. Berke，2006，urban land use planning 24.
(35) areawide land policy plan communitywide land use design plan small-area plan. 饋-饋9 small-area plan. 4饋. 饋-纇櫫 small-area plan 纇D. planning； ；sustainable cities： ：policy directions44. master plans. 42 43 44. Philip R. Berke，2006，urban land use planning Philip R. Berke，2006，urban land use planning united nations human settlements programme，2009 25. layout plans. 4纇.
(36) 45. 饋-纇1 1. ecological conditions. 饋. issue. 纇. criteria. 4. vision. 45. 26.
(37) 5. master plans master plans. . 纇D landscape What makes an eco-town master plans Planning And Urban Design Standards. 46. 47. 46 47. 198参 饋櫫櫫饋/1 27.
(38) 18. 饋櫫. 196櫫. 19参櫫. 48. 饋-纇饋. 48. 28.
(39) -. 29.
(40) 49. 纇-1. 49. 30.
(41) -. 50. 纇-饋. 50. Google earth. 51. 31. 纇-纇. 51.
(42) 52. 纇-4. 53. 纇-5. 54. 纇-6. 55. 纇-参 52 53. Google earth Google earth. 54. 饋櫫櫫参 32.
(43) -. . 纇-8 56. . 57. 纇-9. 55 56 57. Google earth Google earth Google earth. 饋櫫櫫参. 33.
(44) . 58. 纇-1櫫. 纇-11. 饋櫫櫫饋. 58 59. Google earth Google earth 34. 59.
(45) 1. 1895. 6櫫. 1899. 1899 19櫫櫫. 60. 1999 35. p纇-饋纇.
(46) 饋.. 19纇饋. 纇-1. • •. • • •. •. 19纇参 61. 纇-饋. . 61. 36.
(47) . 6饋. 纇-1饋. 1945. 1949. 199纇. 19纇9. 纇饋 1945 63. 62 63. 饋86 37. 1946.
(48) 194櫫 195纇. 1954. 64. 纇-1纇 195纇. 1961. 64. 38.
(49) 65. 纇-14 196饋. 19参1. 1965. 1966 UHDC UHDC 19参纇. 65. 39. 19参1.
(50) 66. 纇-15 19参纇. 1964 19参纇 1999. 66. 40. 19参5.
(51) 6参. 纇-16. . 饋櫫櫫9. 1964. 饋櫫櫫4. 67. 41.
(52) 饋櫫櫫9. 68. 1964. 1985 饋櫫櫫9. 饋櫫櫫饋. 195櫫. 196櫫. 68. 42.
(53) 69. 1964. 纇参. 19参纇. 参櫫. 纇-1参 饋櫫櫫櫫. 69. 198櫫. p4櫫. 70. 43.
(54) 1996 71. 饋櫫櫫纇. 72. 纇-18. 71 72. 44.
(55) 19参参 19参9. 纇-19. 纇-饋櫫. 参纇. 纇-19. 73 74. 饋櫫櫫饋. 纇-饋櫫. 饋櫫櫫8 饋櫫櫫8. 45. 参4.
(56) land subdivision. 纇-饋1. 参5. 纇-饋饋. 75. Planning and urban design standards，2006，Hoboken, NJ :John Wiley & Sons 46.
(57) 参6. 纇-饋饋. 饋櫫櫫饋. 77. 1). 饋). 纇). 参6. 饋櫫櫫6. 78. http://www.quantumcity.com/PagesFromChapter櫫6.pdf. 参参 参8. 55 47. 111-146.
(58) 1945 1958 19参饋. 19参櫫 19参6. 19参6. 1984. 19参参. 1989. 48. 饋櫫櫫饋.
(59) 饋櫫櫫饋 79. 79. 49.
(60) 8櫫. 纇-饋纇. 80. 50.
(61) Kronsberg Kronsberg. 51.
(62) Cleveland. EcoVillage. Hannover. Kronsberg. standard planning enabling act comprehensive plan comprehensive plan neighborhood plan comprehensive plan comprehensive plan. community plan. zoning ordinance. land subdivision regulation land subdivision regulation zoning ordinance building code. 52.
(63) 饋櫫櫫饋 comprehensive plan community plan 4-1. 饋櫫饋櫫. Connecting Cleveland 饋櫫饋櫫 Citywide Plan. 饋櫫饋櫫. 4-饋 Ohio 81 82. 81. 4-纇 Cleveland. 8饋. http://my.opera.com/debplatt/about/ http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/gangsters_outlaws/mob_bosses/birns_greene/7.html 53.
(64) 饋櫫饋櫫 饋櫫饋櫫. 4-4 饋櫫饋櫫. 4-4. 8纇. 饋櫫饋櫫. 84. 4-5. 83 84. http://planning.city.cleveland.oh.us/ 54.
(65) 1. 饋櫫饋櫫. 4-6 饋.. 饋櫫饋櫫. 饋櫫饋櫫 . . live-work. . 55.
(66) . NASA . 纇.. 饋櫫饋櫫 . 4.. 饋櫫饋櫫. . 56.
(67) . . . . . . . . . . . . 57.
(68) 4-参. 4-参. 饋櫫饋櫫. 饋櫫饋櫫 Detroit Shoreway ecovillage. 4-8 Detroit Shoreway. 85. http://planning.city.cleveland.oh.us/ 58. 85.
(69) 199櫫 ecovillage. 1.Detroit 1.Detroit Shoreway. 饋.. Masterplan Detroit Shoreway. 4-9 Detroit Shoreway. 86. 59. 86.
(70) Masterplan. 4-1櫫. 87. Masterplan. 纇.. 纇D. 4-11. 纇D. 88. Masterplan Masterplan Masterplan Masterplan Battery Park Madison Avenue. Detroit Shoreway. 89. 4-1饋. 87 88. http://planning.city.cleveland.oh.us/ http://planning.city.cleveland.oh.us/ 60.
(71) . Battery Park. 4-1纇 Battery Park . masterplan. Madison Avenue. 4-14 Madison Avenue masterplan. 4-15 Madison Avenue. 4-16 Madison Avenue 89. http://planning.city.cleveland.oh.us/ 61.
(72) Kronsberg 饋櫫櫫櫫 Kronsberg. Hanover Kronsberg. Kronsberg 1櫫櫫. 1995. Kronsberg. 9櫫. 4-1参 Hanover. 91. 4-18 Kronsberg. 9饋. 4-1. -. -. LEP. LRPr AR. RP / . GEP AVP. LRP. BLP FNP F-Plan BP B-Plan. LSP GOP. 90. http://www.moving2germany.net/major-cities-in-germany/hannover.html. 91. http://www.rudi.net/pages/8800. 92. 1994 62.
(73) F-Plan. B-Plan bauleitplan B-Plan. F-Plan Flächennutzungsplan Bebauungsplan Bauplan F-Plan B-Plan F-Plan. B-Plan. LSP. GOP. F-Plan. B-Plan. 饋櫫櫫6. F-Plan. B-Plan. 9纇. 4-19. 93. 63.
(74) Kronsberg Kronsberg. 饋櫫櫫櫫 Kronsberg Kronsberg Kronsberg. Kronsberg Kronsberg Kronsberg . Ecological Optimisation Improve environmental efficiency City as Social Habitat Kronsberg Landscape Increase use of clean technology Increase public awareness. Kronsberg. Environmental Impact Analysis. EIA. 94. 94. 64.
(75) Kronsberg. 95. 4-饋櫫. 95. Kronsberg handbook 65.
(76) 96. 4-饋1. 4-饋饋. F-Plan. 4-饋纇. 4-饋饋. 96 97 98 99. 9参. 4-饋纇. F-Plan. 98. Kronsberg handbook Kronsberg handbook ：http://www.hannover-gis.de/GIS/index.jsp http://www.hannover-gis.de/GIS/index.jsp 66. 4-饋4 Kronsberg F-Plan. 99.
(77) Kronsberg Kronsberg. 198参. Kronsberg 100. 4-饋5 Kronsberg. B-Plan B-Plan Kronsberg. B-Plan MASTER PLAN. PLAN. MASTER. B-Plan. MASTER PLAN Kronsberg. 4-饋6 Kronsberg masterplan. 100 101. Kronsberg handbook Kronsberg handbook 67. 1櫫1.
(78) B-Plan masterplan. Kronsberg. 68. B-Plan.
(79) 102. 4-饋参 Kronsberg. Kronsberg. B-Plan B-Plan. 4-饋8 Kronsberg B-Plan. 102 103. Kronsberg handbook Kronsberg handbook 69. 103.
(80) Kronsberg. 4-饋9. masterplan. 1櫫4. 4-饋9. 104. 70.
(81) Kronsberg Kronsberg. 4-纇櫫. Kronsberg. masterplan. 1櫫5. 4-纇櫫 Kronsberg Kronsberg . 105. 71.
(82) . Kronsberg. -. 饋櫫饋櫫. . Detroit Shoreway. . masterplan Detroit Shoreway. Kronsberg masterplan. Kronsberg. masterplan. masterplan Kronsberg. . Detroit Shoreway. Battery Park. 72. Madison Avenue.
(83) 73.
(84) 1964. criteria. ecological conditions vision. kronsberg. 74. issue master plans.
(85) 1985 饋櫫櫫9. 1996 106. 饋櫫櫫纇. 106. 75.
(86) 饋櫫櫫饋. Kronsberg. 76.
(87) 1櫫参. 5-1. 饋櫫櫫9. Kronsberg. 107. 77.
(88) 1954. Ecocity boob 1 Beyond Eco-towns Applying the Lessons from Europe Cambridgeshire Quality Charter for Growth Eco-Town Report What makes an eco-town Planning and urban design standards. 饋櫫櫫9. 108. masterplan. 108. 78.
(89) masterplan Kronsberg Masterplan 纇D 1954 Masterplan. masterplan masterplan. masterplan masterplan masterplan. masterplan Kronsberg. Masterplan. masterplan. masterplan. 79.
(90) masterplan. 109 110. What makes an eco-town. Planning And Urban Design Standards. 109 110. 198参 饋櫫櫫饋/1 80.
(91) 111. 5-饋. Kronsberg. 饋櫫櫫参 11饋. 111 112. Planning and urban design standards，2006，Hoboken, NJ :John Wiley & Sons 饋19 饋4櫫 81.
(92) 11纇. 5-纇. 114. 5-4. 113. 饋櫫櫫参 饋19. 饋4櫫 82.
(93) masterplan. 115. 5-5. 114 115. 83.
(94) ecological conditions issue criteria. vision master plans. 84.
(95) 9櫫. 116. 6-1. 饋櫫櫫 115 6-饋. 117. 6-饋. 116. 饋櫫櫫参 饋櫫櫫参. 117. 85.
(96) -. Regional Park. 6-纇. 118. 6-纇. 118. 86.
(97) 119. 6-4. 6-5. 1饋櫫. 6-5 119. 87.
(98) 6-6. 1饋1. 6-6. 120 121. 88.
(99) -. ecological conditions. 6-参. 1饋饋. 122. 89.
(100) issue. . 1.. . 饋.. . 纇.. . 4.. . 5.. 90.
(101) criteria. 1饋纇. 6-8. 123. 91.
(102) 1饋4. 6-9. 124. 92.
(103) 125. 6-1櫫. 1饋5. 饋櫫櫫参 93.
(104) -. vision. master plans. 94.
(105) 95.
(106) masterplan. 1饋6. 6-11. 126. 96.
(107) 127. 6-1饋. 1饋参. 饋櫫櫫参 97.
(108) 128. 6-1纇. 128. 98.
(109) 99.
(110) ecological conditions criteria vision. issue master. plans. Kronsberg. . . 100.
(111) . masterplan Masterplan masterplan. 纇D. . 101.
(112) . Kronsberg. . . 纇櫫. 102.
(113) 1.. 19参8. 饋.. 1985. 纇.. 1985. 4.. 1985. 5.. 199纇. 6.. 199纇. 参.. 1994. 8.. 1999. 9.. 饋櫫櫫櫫. 1櫫.. 饋櫫櫫饋. 11.. 饋櫫櫫纇. 1饋.. 饋櫫櫫4. 1纇.. 饋櫫櫫5. 14.. 饋櫫櫫6. 1895-1988 ;. 15. Dr. Anja Eckert，Roland Kastner，Inge Schottkowski-Bahre（2003）Hannover Kronsberg Handbook-planning and realisation。 16. Philine Gaffron,Gé Huismans,Franz Skala（2005）Ecocity Book Ⅰ。 17. Hoboken, NJ :John Wiley & Sons（2006）Planning and urban design standards。 American planning association。 18. Philip R. Berke（2006）urban land use planning。Urbana :University of Illinois Press。 19. BioRegional Development Group and the Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE)（2008）What makes an eco-town。 20. PRP Architects Ltd, URBED(Urban and Economic Development) and Design for 103.
(114) Homes（2008）Beyond Eco-towns Applying the Lessons from Europe Report and Conclusions。 21. PRP Architects Ltd, URBED(Urban and Economic Development) and Design for Homes（2008）Eco-towns: Learning from International Experience。 22. the Homes and Communities Academy（2009）Eco-Town Report -Learning from Europe on eco-towns。. 1.. 1954 19参饋. 饋. 纇.. 198櫫. 4.. 1989. 5.. 199纇. 6.. 1999. 参.. 1999. 8. 9. 1櫫.. 饋櫫櫫纇 饋櫫櫫5 饋櫫櫫5. 11.. 饋櫫櫫5. 1饋.. 饋櫫櫫5. 1纇.. 饋櫫櫫参. 14.. 饋櫫櫫参. 15.. 饋櫫櫫8. 16.. 饋櫫櫫8. 1参.. 饋櫫櫫8. 18.. 饋1. 饋櫫櫫8. 饋櫫櫫8 104.
(115) 19.. 饋櫫櫫9. 饋櫫.. 饋櫫櫫9. 饋1.. 饋櫫1櫫. 22. Cleveland City Planning Commission （ 2007 ） Connecting Cleveland 2020 Citywide Plan。 23. Cleveland City Planning Commission（2007）Detroit Shoreway Neighborhood Master Plan。 24. cambridge city council（2008）Cambridge shire Quality Charter for Growth。 25. united nations human settlements programme（2009）planning；sustainable cities：policy directions。First published by Earthscan in the UK and USA。. 1.. 198参. 饋.. 饋櫫櫫饋. 纇.. 饋櫫櫫6 55. 111-146. 纇4. 饋櫫櫫参 饋19-饋4櫫. 4. 纇. 1.. 饋櫫櫫纇. 饋.. 饋櫫櫫纇. 纇.. 饋櫫櫫参. 4.. 饋櫫櫫8. 5.. 饋櫫櫫9. 6.. 饋櫫櫫9. -. -. -. 105.
(116) 。. 1.. http://www.tcd.gov.tw/index.php?stp=history&sidflags=92ad1274e40c4e51692 811c2dc79a097 2.. The role of urban design。 http://www.quantumcity.com/PagesFromChapter06.pdf. 3. 4.. HANNOVER. http://www.hannover.de/. Kronsberg, a new sustainable development as part of EXPO 2000。 http://www.eaue.de/winuwd/190.htm. 5.. EcoCity Cleveland。http://www.ecocitycleveland.org/. 6.. Cleveland City Planning Commission。http://planning.city.cleveland.oh.us/cwp/. 7.. Cleveland Land Use Zoning Code。 http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/clevelandcodes/. 8.. GreenCityBlueLake。www.gcbl.org/planning/lakefront/coast-guard-station. 9.. The Detroit Shoreway Community Development Organization。 http://detroitshoreway.org/ecovillage.aspx. 106.
(117)
相關文件
(1996)“Urban knowledge parks and economic and social development strategies”, Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 122(2):33-45. (1997)“Strategic behavior and
Therefore, in order to effectively utilize and manage the coastal lands in Tao-Zhu-Miao region, this study will intensively explore the current situation of land use and
Therefore, this study uses Hsinchu County coast as an example, bases on ecological planning method, complies with landscape ecology, selects appropriate landscape elements
From The study of indicators for sustainable detailed planning in residential areas, we attain twenty two ecological factors and three frameworks of ecological
of individuals (Species richness): Number of individuals detected in each group (the value in parentheses is species richness)... Spatial distribution of irrigation ponds and land
市場行銷計畫 (Marketing Planning) 是以顧客為導向，為了達到企業
In this study, we model the models of different permeable spur dikes which included, and use the ANSYS CFX to simulate flow field near spur dikes in river.. This software can
In this study, we make use of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use as primary factors, followed by perceived level of
