• 沒有找到結果。

教師支持、高中生學習投入與數學成就之關係 何宗益、黃德祥

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "教師支持、高中生學習投入與數學成就之關係 何宗益、黃德祥"

Copied!
4
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

教師支持、高中生學習投入與數學成就之關係 何宗益、黃德祥

E-mail: [email protected]

摘 要

本研究主要目的在於探討高中職學生教師支持、學習投入與數學成就之關係。首先探討不同背景變項間之高中職學生在教 師支持、學習投入及數學成就之差異分析;其次檢視高中職學生的教師支持、學習投入與數學成就之相關分析;最後以高 中職學生的教師支持、學習投入對數學成就做徑路分析。 本研究以中部地區高中職一、二年級學生為母群體,以便利取樣 的方式,共抽取510位高中職學生為樣本,並施以「個人基本資料表?、「教師支持量表?、「學習投入量表?。「數學成就?

則以101學年度第二學期第二次月考數學分數轉換成班級T分數。所得資料以獨立樣本t檢定、皮爾森積差相關及徑路分析 進行處理。 本研究之發現如下:(一)不同性別的高中職學生在教師支持有顯著差異。(二)不同社經地位的高中職學生在教師 支持上之「勝任感支持」有顯著差異。(三) 不同性別的高中職學生在學習投入有顯著差異。(四)不同社經地位的高中職學生 在學習投入無顯著差異。(五)高中職學生教師支持與學習投入有顯著正相關;教師支持與數學成就有顯著正相關;學習投 入與數學成就有顯著正相關。(六)教師支持會直接影響高中職學生學習投入;教師支持會間接影響高中職學生數學成就;

而學習投入會直接影響數學成就。根據以上發現,本研究對數學教師及未來的研究方向提出一些建議。

關鍵詞 : 教師支持、學習投入、數學成就

目錄

內容目錄 中文摘要....................... iii 英文摘要................

....... iv 誌謝辭....................... vi 內容目錄.............

.......... vii 表目錄........................ ix 圖目錄..........

.............. x 第一章 緒論.................... 1 第一節  研究動機與目的

............. 1   第二節 研究目的................ 4   第三節  研究問題..

.............. 5 第四節 研究假設................ 6 第五節 名詞釋義......

.......... 7 第六節 研究範圍與限制............. 9 第二章  文獻探討.........

......... 10   第一節  教師支持之意涵與相關研究......... 10   第二節  學習投入之意涵 與相關研究......... 17   第三節  學習成就之理論與相關研究........ 24 第四節 教師支持、學習投 入與學習成就之相關研究.. 28 第三章 研究設計.................. 31 第一節 研究架構....

............ 31 第二節 研究對象................ 34 第三節 研究工具.......

......... 36 第四節 資料處理與統計方法........... 47 第五節 實施程序..........

........ 48 第四章 結果與討論................. 50 第一節  不同背景變項之高中職學生 在教師支持各層面及整體的差異情形..50    第二節 不同背景變項之高中職學生在學習投入各層面及整體的差異情形

. 53 第三節 不同背景變項之高中職學生在數學成就的差異情形..... 56 第四節 教師支持、學習投入與數學成就之 關係.. 59 第五節 教師支持、學習投入對數學成就之徑路分析 62 第五章 結論與建議...............

.. 64   第一節 結論.................. 64   第二節  建議..............

.... 66 參考文獻....................... 68 附錄A 施測說明............

...... 83 附錄B 預試問卷.................. 85 附錄C 正式問卷............

...... 90 參考文獻

一、中文部分 王永裕(2006)。雲林縣國中、小學生成就目標導向、認知投入、考試焦慮與學業成就之關係研究─以數學領域為例。國立 彰化師範大學,彰化市。 王枝燦 (2001)。同儕影響與青少年偏差行為之研究。東吳大學社會學研究所,台北市。 石文宜(2006)。國中生 人格特質、師生互動關係與偏差行為之關係。國立政治大學,台北市。 石培欣(2000)。國民中學家庭環境、同儕關係與學業成就之相關 研究。國立高雄師範大學,高雄。 余民寧(2006)。影響學習成就因素的探討。教育資料與研究,73,14。 吳明隆(2007)。SPSS統計應 用學習實務:問卷分析與統計。台北:知城。 巫有鎰(2007)。學校因素對台東縣原漢國小學生學業成就的影響:結合教育機會均等與學校效 能研究的分析模式。國立屏東教育大學,屏東市。 李介至、黃惠貞(2001)。青少年社會支持之問題分析-從社會計量之觀點探討。中等 教育,52(5),150-160。 李秋娟(2011)。國小學童數學課室目標結構、家庭教養方式與學習投入及學業成就之關係研究。私立東海大學,

(2)

台中市。 李素菁(2002)。青少年家庭支持與幸福感之相關研究─以臺北市立國中生為例。私立靜宜大學,台中市。 杜容瑩(2007)。台北 市國中學生學業無動機, 社會支持與學業成就關係之研究。台北市立教育大學,台北市。 周新富(1999)。國民小學教師專業承諾、教師 效能信念與學生學業成就關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。 林文瑛、王震武、黃富源(1999)。青少年犯罪形成歷程的學校因素 探討。論文發表於「台灣社會問題研究學術研討會」,台北:中央研究院社會問題研究推動委員會暨中央研究院社會學研究所

。(NSC88-2418-H-030-001-Q14) 林生傳(2000)。教育社會學。台北:巨流。 林妙貞(2007)。國小學童創意自我效能、目標導向、依附關係 與創意活動投入及創意表現之關係-以科展團隊為例。國立台北教育大學,台北市。 林啟超(2008)。父母親成就教養取向、課室目標結構 對高職學生之成就目標與學習行為之關係。測驗統計年刊,16,59-84。 林淑惠、黃韞臻、林佳筠(2009)。中部地區五專學生社會支持、

情緒智力及生活適應之相關研究。學校衛生,55,41-66。 施淑慎(2009)。自主學習,快樂而投入。科學發展,436,74-75。 胡綺 祐(2011)。國中學生主觀控制知覺、自主性與學習投入之關係研究。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。 唐建雄(2005)。高職學生家庭環境、學 習動機與生涯期望及學業成就之研究。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。 師瑋瑋、田琨(2006)。淺談自我決定論與青少年內部動機發展。遼 寧教育行政學院學報,23(5),57-58。 翁福元(2006)。影響學習成就之社會因素比較分析。教育資料集刊,32,23-39。 張怡真(2007)。父 母教養方式、教師支持與國三學生偏差行為之關聯性研究。國立成功大學,台南市。 張春興(1996)。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐

。臺北市:東華。 張春興、林清山(1989)。教育心理學。臺北市:東華。 梁翠珊(2006)。不同學區、年級國中學生自然科學習動機差異之研 究。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。 陳彥甫(2001)。國中學生主觀控制感與教學情境及學習行為之相關研究。國立屏東教育大學,屏東市

。 陳婉玉(2010)。國小英語分組與能力高低對學生的學習動機與學習投入之調節效果。國立台北教育大學,台北市。 陳惠珍(2010)。國 中生對任課老師自主支持知覺、自主動機與學習投入之關係研究─以數學科為例。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。 陳嘉惠(2007)。國中學 生知覺教師期望、自我效能與學業成就關係之研究---以新竹縣市為例。彰化師範大學,彰化市。 陳麗麗(2010)。高中生數學自我概念、

數學自我效能與數學學業成就之相關研究-以巴生區四間獨中為例。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。 單延愷(1995)。青少年自殺行為危險 因子與危險警訊之探討。私立中原大學,桃園市。 曾妙音、王雅玲、李瓊雯、張恬瑜(2011)。父母社經地位與國中生學習動機、學業成 就之相關性研究。家庭教育雙月刊,32,6-27。 程炳林(2002a)。大學生學習工作、動機問題與自我調整學習策略之關係。教育心理學報

,33,79-101。 黃怡瑛(2009)。家長背景與居住地對國小學生數學學習成效影響之研究。私立亞洲大學,台中市。 黃俊傑、王淑女 (2001)。家庭, 自我概念與青少年偏差行為。應用心理研究,11,45–68。 黃俐婷(2003)。探討青少年接受到的社會支持。社區發展季刊

,103,144-156。 黃雅玲(2009)。國中學生所知覺的導師班級經營效能、學生自我概念與學生學習動機之關聯性研究-以桃園縣為例。

私立中原大學,桃園市。 黃德祥(2010)。青少年發展與輔導。台北市:五南。 葉在庭(2001)。青少年情緒調適、焦慮、社會支持及生活事 件與自殺意念的關係。中華輔導學報,10,151-178。 劉盈芳(2010)。學校依附感與教師支持。國立台北大學,台北市。 劉漢政(2010)。

國中學生社會支持、憂鬱傾向與網路成癮之分析研究。國立嘉義大學,嘉義市。 蔡東敏(2002)。職校學生之重要他人影響、學習態度、

學習動機與學業成就之相關研究。國立台灣科技大學,台北。 蔡金鈴(2006)。彰化縣國中學生學校氣氛知覺、人際關係、學校投入與學 業成就之關係研究。彰化師範大學,彰化市。 鄭照順(1996)。高壓力青少年所知覺的家庭、社會支持及其因應效能之研究。國立高雄師 範大學,高雄市。 盧俊安(2011)。影響高中職學生數學學習成效因素之研究。國立雲林科技大學,雲林。 賴英娟(2010)。教師支持、數 學自我效能及數學興趣對職業意向之影響。中華輔導與諮商學報,28,1-27。 賴鑫城(1992)。國中學生自我概念、學業成就、師生關係 對學校態度之研究。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。 薛人華(2009)。學業謙虛、學習投入與學業成就的關係。國立台北教育大學,台北市

。 鍾文悌(2004)。外籍配偶子女學業表現與生活適應之相關研究。國立屏東教育大學,屏東市。 鍾明芬(2009)。影響學生學習成效關鍵 成功因素之彙總分析。國立彰化師範大學,彰化市。 簡新哲(2012)。國中學生自然科學習動機、教師支持、學習投入與學業成就之研究

。私立大葉大學,彰化。 魏麗敏、黃德祥(2001)。國中與高中學生家庭環境、學習投入狀況與自我調節學習及成就之研究。中華輔導學 報,10,63-118。 蘇美如(2009)。國小體育教師支持和學生體育課參與動機歷程之關係研究—自我決定理論之檢驗。國立台北教育大學

,台北市。 龔心怡、林素卿與張馨文(2009)。家長社經地位與數學學習動機對數學學業成就之研究—以國中基本學力測驗數學領域為例

。彰化師大教育學報,15,121-142。 二、 英文部分 Ahmed, M., Minnaert, A., Werf, G., & Kurper, H. (2010). Perceived social support and early adolescents’ achievement: The mediational roles of motivation beliefs and emotions. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(1), 36-46.

Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R. and Dauber, S. L. (1993). First-grade classroom behavior: its short- and long-term consequences for school performance. Child Development, 64, 801–814. Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Horsey, C. S. (1997). From first grade forward: Early foundations of high school dropout. Sociology of Education, 70, 87-107. Ali, S. R., & McWhirter, E. H. (2006). Rural appalachian youth’s vocational/educational postsecondary aspirations: Applying social cognitive career theory. Journal of Career Development, 33(2), 87-111. Andrews, M., Duncombe, W., & Yinger, J. (2002). Revisiting economies of size in American education: Are we any closer to consensus? Economics of Education Review, 21(3), 245-262. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Bandura, A., & Locke, E. A. (2003). Negative self-efficacy and goal effects revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(1), 87-99. Beggs, J. J., Haines, V. A., &

Hurlbert, J. S. (1996). Situational contingencies surrounding the receipt of informal support. Social Forces, 201–222. Brown, A. L., Campione, J.

C., & Day, J. D. (1981). Learning to Learn: On Training Students to Learn from Texts. Educational Researcher, 10(2), 14-21. Burk, W. J., &

Laursen, B. (2005). Adolescent perceptions of friendship and their associations with individual adjustment. International journal of behavioral development, 29(2), 156. Caplan, G. (1974). Support system and community mental health. New York:Behavioral. Chang, D. C. (2008). A case study to determine what perceived factors, including student engagement, contribute to academic achievement in a high performing urban high school. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California. Chapman, E. (2003). Assessing Student Engagement Rates. ERIC Digest. ERIC. The Educational Resources Information Center US; Maryland, 4. Chirkov, V. I., & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Parent and teacher autonomy-support in

(3)

Russian and US adolescents. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(5), 618–635. Cobb, S. (1976). Social Support as a moderator of life stress.

Psychosomatic Medicine, 38, 300-314. Coleman, J. S., Cambell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, f. D., & York, R. L.

(1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991).

Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. The Minnesota Symposia on Child Development, 23, 43-78. Connell, J. P., Halpem-Felsher, B. L., Clifford, E., Crichlow, W., & Usinger, P. (1995). Hanging in there: Behavioral, psychological, and contextual factors affecting whether African American adolescents stay in school. Journal of Adolescent Research, 10, 41-63. Connell, J. P., Spencer, M. B., & Aber, J. L. (1994). Educational risk and resilience in African-American youth: Context, self, action, and outcomes in school.

Child development, 65(2), 493–506. Dornbusch, S. M., Ritter, P. L., Leiderman, P. H., Roberts, D. F., & Fraleigh, M. J. (1987). The Relation of Parenting Style to Adolescent School Performance. Child Development, 58(2), 1244-1257. Duff, B. (2006). Senior project as a remedy for

“senioritis”: What are the active ingredients? Gainesville, FL: University of Florida. Fan, W., & Williams, C. M. (2010). The effects of parental involvement on students’ academic self-efficacy, engagement and intrinsic motivation. Educational Psychology, 30(1), 53. Farmer, H. S. (1985).

Model of career and achievement motivation for women and men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 32(3), 363. Finn, J. D., & Cox, D. (1992).

Participation and withdraw among fourth-grade pupils. American Educational Research Journal, 29, 141-162. Finn, J. D., & Rock, D. A. (1997).

Academic success among students at risk for school failure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 221. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. Glanville, J. L., &

Wildhagen, T. (2007). The measurement of school engagement. Educational and psychology Measurement, 67(6), 1019-1041. Greene, B. A., Miller, R. B., Crowson, H. M., Duke, B. L., & Akey, K. L. (2004). Predicting high school students’ cognitive engagement and achievement:

Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 462-482. Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M.

(1989). Parent styles associated with children's self-regulation and competence in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(2), 143-154.

Hallinan, M. T. (2008). Teacher influences on students’ attachment to school. Sociology of Education, 81(3), 271-283. House, J. S. (1981). Work stress and social support. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. House, J. S. (1987). Social support and social structure. Sociological Forum,2, 135-146. House, J. S., Umberson, D., & Landis, K. R. (1988). Structures and processes of social support. Annual review of sociology, 293-318. Inga-Dora, S., George, F., & Eric, S. (2004). The role of depressed mood and anger in the relationship between family conflict and delinquent behavior. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33(6), 509-522. Jimerson, S. R., Campos, E., & Greif, J. L. (2003). Toward an

understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. The California School Psychologist, 8, 7–27. Kathryn, R. W., Ann. B., Shannon, L. R., & Lisa, B. L. (2010). Social supports from teachers and peers as predictors of academic and social motivation.

Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 193-202. Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1998). Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Educational Technology, 38(5), 20-23 Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up:

Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Kindermann, T. A., McCollam, T., & Gibson, E. (1996). Peer networks and students’ classroom engagement during childhood and adolescence. In J. Juvonen & K. Wentzel (Eds.), Social motivation:

Understanding children’s school adjustment (pp. 279-312). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004).

Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262-273. Kuh, G. D.

(2003). What we are learning about student engagement from NESS: Benchmarks for effective educational practices. Change, 35(2), 24-32. Kuh, G. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683-706.

Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., & Whitt, E. J. (2005a). Assessing conditions to enhance educational effectiveness: The inventory for student engagement and success. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Ladd, G. R., & Dinella, G. M. (2009). Continuity and change in early school

engagement: Predictive of children’s achievement trajectories from first to eighth grade? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 190-206. Lau, S., & Roeser, R. W. (2002). Cognitive abilities and motivational processes in high school students’ situational engagement and achievement in science. Educational Assessment, 82(2), 139-162. Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1997). High school size: What works best and for whom? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(3), 205-227. Legault, L., Green-Demers, I., & Pelletier, L. G. (2006). Why do high school students lack motivation in the classroom? Toward an understanding of academic motivation and social support. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 567-582. Lempers, J. D., & Clark-Lempers, D. S. (1992). Young, middle, and late adolescents' comparisons of the functional importance of five significant relationships. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 21(1), 53-96. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., Brenner, B., Chopra, S. B., Davis, T., Talleyrand, R., & Suthakaran, V. (2001). The role of contextual supports and barriers in the choice of math/science educational options: A test of social cognitive hypotheses. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48(4), 474. Li, Y., Lerner, J. V., & Lerner, R. M. (2010). Personal and ecological assets and academic competence in early adolescence: The mediating role of school engagement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(7), 801-815. Ma, X. (2005). Growth in mathematics achievement: Analysis with classification and regression trees. Journal of Educational Research, 99(2), 78-86. Manlove, J. (1998). The influence of high school dropout and school disengagement on the risk of school-aged pregnancy. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 82, 187-220. Marks, G. (2006). Family size, family type and student achievement: Cross-national differences and the role of socioeconomic and school factors. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 37(1), 1-24. Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37(1), 153-184. Melor, M. Y., Wan, S.

W. O., & Noriah, M. I. (2011). Teacher-student relationship factor affecting motivation and academic achievement in ESL classroom. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2637-2641. Metheny, J., McWhirter, E. H., & O’Neil, M. E. (2008). Measuring perceived teacher support

(4)

and its influence on adolescent career development. Journal of Career Assessment, 16(2), 218-237. Minging, Z., Wei, J. M., & Edward L. D. (2009).

The importance of autonomy of rural Chinese children’s motivation for learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 492-498. Muller, C.

(2001). The role of caring in the teacher-student relationship for at-risk students. Sociological inquiry, 71(2), 241-255. Murray, C. (2002).

Supportive teacher-student relationships: Promoting the social and emotional heath of early adolescents with high incidence disabilities. Childhood Education, 78, 285-290. National Research Council & Institute of Medicine. (2004). Engaging schools: Fostering high school students’ motivation to learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Newman, R. S. (2000). Social influences on the development of children’s adaptive help seeking: The role of parents, teachers, and peers. Developmental Review, 20, 350-404. Newmann, F. M. (1992). Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools. New York: Teachers College Press. Newmann, F., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp.

11-39). New York: Teachers College Press. Noddings, N. (1992). The challenge to care in schools: An alternative approach to education. New York: Teachers College Press. Noddings, N. (2003). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press. O'Farrell, S. L., & Morrison, G. M. (2003). A factor analysis exploring school bonding and related constructs among upper elementary students. The California School Psychologist, 8, 53-72. Papanastasiou, C. (2002). Effects of background and school factors on the mathematics achievement. Educational Research & Evaluation, 8(1), 55-70. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P.T. (2005). How college affects students:

Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivated and self-regulated learning components of academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40. Reeve, J., & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students' autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 209. Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students’engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147-169. Roeser, R. W., Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. C. (1996). Perceptions of the school psychological environment and early adolescents’

psychological and behavioral functioning in school: The mediating role of goals and belonging. Journal of Education Psychology, 88(3), 408. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68. Ryan, R. M., Stiller, J. D., & Lynch, J. H. (1994). Representations of relationships to teachers, parents, and friends as predictors of academic motivation and self-esteem. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 14, 226-249. Sarason, I. G., Sarason, B. R., Shearin, E. N.,

& Pierce, G. R. (1987). A brief measure of social support: Practical and theoretical implications. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 4(4), 497-510. Schiller, K. S., Khemlkov, V. T., & Wang, X. Q. (2002). Economic development and the effects of family characteristics on mathematics achievement. Journal of Marriage & Family, 66(3), 730. Shahar, G., Henrich, C. C., Blatt, S. J., Ryan, R., & Little, T. D. (2003). Interpersonal relatedness, self-definition, and their motivational orientation during adolescence: A theoretical and empirical integration. Developmental Psychology, 39, 470-483. Sinclair, M. F., Christenson, S. L., Lehr, C. A., & Anderson, A. R. (2003). Facilitating student engagement: Lessons learned from Check & Connect longitudinal studies. The California School Psychologist, 8(1), 29-42. Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993).

Motivation in the classroom: reciprocal effect of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational

Psychology, 85, 571-581. Skinner, E. A., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 765-781. Skinner, E. A., Wellborn, J. G., & Connell, J. P. (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I’ve got it: The role of perceived control in children's engagement and school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 22-32. Skinner, E. A., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., & Connell, J. P. (1998). Individual difference and the the development of perceived control. Monographs of Society for Research in Child Development, 63(2), 1-220. Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2003).

A model of contextual motivation in physical education: Using constructs from self-determination and achievement goal theories to predict physical activity intention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 97-110. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (2004). Improving mathematics teaching. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 12-17. Stipek, D.J. (1988). Motivation to learn. NJ: Prentice Hall. Technology-based teaching and learning. Retrieved from http://home.sprynet.com/~gkearsley/engage.htm Torsheim, T., Wold, B., & Samdal, O. (2000). The teacher and classroom support scale: Factor structure, test-retest reliability and validity in samples of 13 and 15-Year-old adolescents. School Psychology, 21, 195-212. Voelkl, K. E. (1997).

Identification with school. American Journal of Education, 105, 204-319. Wentzel, R. K. (1997). Student motivation in middle school: The role of perceived pedagogical caring. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 411-419. Wubbels, T. (1997). Paying attention to relationships. Educational Leadership, 54(7), 82–86. Yeung, A. S., & Mclnerney, D. M. (1999). Student’s perceived support from teacher: Impacts on academic

achievement, interest in schoolwork, attendance, and self-esteem. Paper Presented at the International Conference on Teacher Education, Hong Kong, China.

參考文獻

相關文件

The study applies Discriminate Analysis to discuss the aspects of Junior high school students living Adjustment Scale and then develops a scale to be the standard of Junior

In order to serve the fore-mentioned purpose, this research is based on a related questionnaire that extracts 525 high school students as the object for the study, and carries out

In studying habits, 72.2 percent of the subjects attended cram schools before senior high school, and they went to cram schools two to four times a week.. After entering senior

In addition, the way that students deal with homework is different: senior high school students used to handwriting, while college student are asked to typing. Moreover, thought

This research tries to understand the current situation of supplementary education of junior high school in Taichung City and investigate the learning factors and

The effect of gender on motivation and student achievement in digital game-based learning: A case study of a contented-based classroom. Using game-based learning to

Keywords: Junior high students, Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL), English teaching and learning methods, perceived usefulness, perceived ease to use, willingness

The purpose of the study aims at discussing the important factors of affecting junior high school students in aboriginal areas in terms of learning mathematics.. The research