American Heart Association (2012). Go to 2012 CPR Study Guide. Retrieved April 10, 2012, from
http://ebookbrowse.com/gdoc.php?id=280419799&url=9641e5e59bd83 fcac1e20ca0ad1e6dd6
Anantharaman, V. (2011). Chest compression-only CPR or good quality 30:2 CPR. Singapore medical journal, 52(8), 576-581.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral
Beauchamp, G. (2004). Teacher use of the interactive whiteboard in primary schools: Towards an effective transition framework. Technology, peda-gogy and Education, 13(3), 327-348.
Beauchamp, G., & Kennewell, S. (2010). Interactivity in the classroom and its impact on learning. Computers & Education, 54(3), 759-766.
Betcher, C., & Lee, M. (2009). The interactive whiteboard revolution:
Teaching with IWBs. Victoria, Australia: ACER Press.
British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (2003). What the research says about interactive whiteboards. UK: British Educa-tional Communications and Technology Agency (BECTA).
British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (2007). Eval-uation of the Primary Schools Whiteboard Expansion Project. Retrieved May 16, 2012, from http://www.becta.org.uk/research.
Broodfield, S. (1985). Involving adults in the educational process: Discus-sion as an effective educational method. In S. H. Rosenblum (Ed.), New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education (pp. 55-67), San Fran-cisco: Jossey-Bass.
Bray, J. E., Deasy, C., Walsh, J., Bacon, A., Currell, A., & Smith, K. (2011).
Changing EMS dispatcher CPR instructions to 400 compressions before mouth-to-mouth improved bystander CPR rates. Resuscitation, 82(11), 1393-1398.
Burden, P. R., & Byrd, D. M. (1994). Methods for effective teaching. Boston:
Allyn & Bacon.
Churches, A. (2008). Bloom's Taxonomy Blooms Digitally. Retrieved May, 10, 2011, from
http://www.techlearning.com/showArticle.php?articleID=196605124 Cuthell, J.C. (2005). The impact of interactive whiteboards on teaching,
learning and attainment. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of
Conference 2005 (pp. 1353-1355). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Cutrim Schmid, E. (2008a). Potential pedagogical benefits and drawbacks of multimedia use in the English language classroom equipped with inter-active whiteboard technology. Computers & Education, 51(4),
1553-1568.
Cutrim Schmid, E. (2008b). Using a voting system in conjunction with in-teractive whiteboard technology to enhance learning in the English language classroom. Computers & Education, 50(1), 338-356.
Dhindsa, H. S., & Emran, S. H. (2006). Use of the interactive whiteboard in constructivist teaching for higher student achievement. Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference for Middle East Teachers of Science, Mathematics and Computing. METSMaC: Abu Dhabi.
Ettl, F., Testori, C., Weiser, C., Fleischhackl, S., Mayer-Stickler, M., Herkner, H. et al. (2011). Updated teaching techniques improve CPR perfor-mance measures: a cluster randomized, controlled trial. Resuscitation, 82(6), 730-735.
Gall, M. D., & Gillett, M. (1981). The discussion method in classroom teaching. Theory into Practice, 19(2), 98-103.
Gilbert, C. (2008). Writing improvement through whiteboard. Retrieved Oc-tober 23, 2011, from
http://downloads01.smarttech.com/media/sitecore/en/pdf/research_libra ry/note_taking/writing_improvements_through_the_whiteboard.pdf Gillen, J., Littleton, K., Twiner, A., Staarman, J. K., & Mercer, N. (2007).
Using the interactive whiteboard to resource continuity and support multimodal teaching in a primary science classroom. Journal of Com-puter Assisted Learning, 24(4), 348-358.
Glover, D. & Miller, D. (2001). Running with technology: The pedagogic impact of the large-scale introduction of interactive whiteboards in one
tion, 10(3), 257-276.
Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D., & Door, V. (2005). The interactive white-board: A literature survey. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 14(2), 155-170.
Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D., & Door, V. (2007). The evolution of an ef-fective pedagogy for teachers using the interactive whiteboard in ma-thematics and modern languages: An empirical analysis from the sec-ondary sector. Learning, Media & Technology, 32(1), 5–20.
Goodison, T. (2003). Learning with ICT at primary level: pupils’ perceptions.
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 18(3), 282-295.
Hall, I. & Higgins, S. (2005) Primary school students' perceptions of interac-tive whiteboards, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(2),
102-117.
Hillman, D.C., Willis. D. J., & Gunawardena, C. N. (1994) Learner-interface interaction in distance education: An extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. American Journal of Distance Educa-tion, 8(2), 30-42.
Holmberg, B. (1983). Guided didactic conversation in distance education. In D. Sewart, D. Keegan, & B. Holmberg (Eds.), Distance Education: In-ternational Perspectives (pp. 114-122). New York: St. Martin's Press.
Holmberg, B. (1995). The evolution of the character and practice of distance education. Open Learning, 10(2), 47-53.
Jang, S. J. (2010). Integrating the interactive whiteboard and peer coaching to develop the TPACK of secondary science teachers. Computers &
Education, 55(4), 1744-1751.
Johnson, L., Adams, S., & Cummins, M. (2012). The NMC Horizon Report:
2012 Higher Education Edition. Austin, Texas: The New Media Con-sortium.
The impact of CPR and AED training on healthcare professionals' self-perceived attitudes to performing resuscitation. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 20(1), 26-31.
Kanstad, B. K., Nilsen, S. A., & Fredriksen, K. (2011). CPR knowledge and attitude to performing bystander CPR among secondary school students in Norway. Resuscitation, 82(8), 1053-1059.
Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 383-434). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Asso-ciates.
Kennewell, S., & Beauchamp, G. (2007). The features of interactive white-boards and their influence on learning. Learning, Media & Technology, 32(3), 227-241.
Kennewell, S., & Morgan, A. (2003). Student Teachers’ Experiences and At-titudes Towards Using Interactive Whiteboards in the Teaching and Learning of Young Children. Paper presented at the IFIP Working Groups 3.5 Conference: Young Children and Learning Technologies, UWS Parramatta, UK.
Levy, P. (2002). Interactive whiteboards in learning and teaching in two Sheffield schools: a developmental study. Retrieved October 12, 2011, from http://dis.shef.ac.uk/eirg/projects/wboards.htm
Merrett, S. & Edwards, J. (2005). Enhancing mathematical thinking with an interactive whiteboard. Micromath, 21(3), 9–12.
Messenger, C. (2010). Interactive Displays / ICT Products Market Quarterly Insight State of the Market Report
－
Quarter 1 2010. Bedfordshire, UK:Futuresource Consulting.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A
sour-Miller, D. (2006). The Magic Box. Enhancing Interactivity. MicroMath, 197(7), 28-31.
Miller, D., Glover, D., & Averis, D. (2005, September). Developing Peda-gogic Skills for the Use of the Interactive Whiteboard in Mathematics.
Paper presented at British Educational Research Association (BERA), Keele University, UK.
Miller, D., Glover, D., Averis, D., & Door, V. (2004). Research Reports to the Nuffield Foundation, BECTA and TTA. Keele University, UK.
Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3(2), 1-6.
Ong, E. H. (2011). Improving the quality of CPR in the community. Singa-pore medical journal, 52(8), 586-591.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Rieber, L.P. (2005). Multimedia learning in games, simulations, and microworlds. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The cambridge handbook of
multimedia learning (pp. 549-567). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Small, R. V., & Gluck, M. (1994). The relationship of motivational condi-tions to effective instructionalattributes: A magnitude scaling approach.
Educational Technology, 36(8), 33-40.
Slay, H., Siebörger, I., & Hodgkinson-Williams, C. (2008). Interactive whiteboards: Real beauty or just “lipstick” ? Computers & Education, 51(3), 1321-1341.
Smith, H. J., Higgins, S., Wall, K., & Miller, J. (2005). Interactive white-boards: Boon or bandwagon? A critical review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 91-101.
Stipek, D., Feiler, R., Daniels, D., & Milbum, S. (1995). Effects of different instructional approaches on young children's achievement and
motiva-Solvie, P. (2004). The digital whiteboard: A tool in early literacy instruction.
Reading Teacher, 57(5), 484-487.
Swan, K., Schenker, J., & Kratcoski, A. (2008). The Effects of the Use of In-teractive Whiteboards on Student Achievement. In Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Tele-communications 2008 (pp. 3290-3297). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
Tataroğlu, B., & Erduran, A. (2010). Examining students’ attitudes and views towards usage an interactive whiteboard in mathematics lessons. Pro-cedia Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2533-2538.
Taylor, J., & Sharples, M. (2006). The Pedagogical Perspectives of Mobile Learning. UK: University of Leicester.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology (2010).
Transforming american education: Learning powered by technology.
Alexandria, VA: ED Pubs.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.
Wall, K., Higgins, S., & Smith, H. (2005).｀The visual helps me understand the complicated things’: Pupil views of teaching and learning with in-teractive whiteboards. British Journal of Education Technology, 36(5), 851–867.
Warwick, P., Mercer, N., Kershner, R., & Staarman, J. K. (2010). In the mind and in the technology: The vicarious presence of the teacher in pupil’s learning of science in collaborative group activity at the interactive whiteboard. Computers & Education, 55(1), 350-362.