未來研究建議

本研究的結果與過去研究相比，發現不只是不同學科領域的學術傳播模式不 同，同一學科領域中的高產量學者，與學科領域中一般學者的研究也有不同的發 表論文模式，針對不同對象的研究，有助於我們瞭解各領域中不同學者的需求及 學術傳播模式，更能提供學者適合的服務。因此本研究之結果無法推論至其他學 科領域也無法推論至生醫領域內的產量較低的學者。故而未來建議可以針對產量 較低的學者或是不同領域的學者進行類似的研究，並且也可以進一步的針對同一 學科領域不同產量的學者進行比較研究，或是針對領域中的高產量學者與領域中 開放近用期刊的高產量學者進行比較研究，此將有助於瞭解各種不同學者發表論 文之情形；掌握各類型學者學術研究之情形將使圖書館更加可以提供更為切合讀 者需要的服務，促進學術研究之精進。

89

參考文獻

毛慶禎（2007）。開放近用運動的真諦。臺灣圖書館管理季刊，3（2），1-14。

吳紹群、陳雪華（2008）。學術出版價值鏈變遷之圖書館角色之概念性初探。國 家圖書館館刊，92（2），23-59。

林巧敏、范蔚敏（2010）。臺灣地區檔案學文獻計量分析。圖書與資訊學刊，2

（1），16-38。

邱炯友、蔣欣樺（2005）。學術出版傳播之 Opean Access 模式。中華民國圖書館 學會會報，74，165-183。

徐華玉、林奇秀（2011）。生物醫學領域研究人員投稿開放近用期刊經驗之研究。

教育資料與圖書館學，49（2），241-264。

國家圖書館輔導組（2006）。中華民國九十七年圖書館年鑑。臺北市：圖家圖書 館。

國家圖書館輔導組（2011）。中華民國一百年圖書館年鑑。臺北市：圖家圖書館。

黃明居、黃瑞娟、賴姿伶（2012）。大學圖書館期刊館藏之開放性資源比例與引 用優勢之研究。大學圖書館，16（1），36-52。

蔡明月（2003）。資訊計量學與文獻特性。臺北市：國立編譯館。

蔡明月、陳憶玲（2006）。生醫科學期刊引用數據之分析比較研究。國家圖書館 館刊，95（1），1-33。

劉聰德、張朝欽、梁晋嘉、謝青宏、任孝祥、林聖勇、林康藝、蔡艾玲（2012）。

開放近用的機會與展望。臺北市：國研院科技政策中心。

90

Association of Research Libraries. (2004). Framing the issue: open access. Retrieved from http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/framing_issue_may04.pdf

Berlin Declaration. (2003). Berlin declaration on open access to knowledge in the sciences and humanities. Retrieved from

http://oa.mpg.de/files/2010/04/berlin_declaration.pdf

Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing.(2003, June 20). Definition of open access publication. Retrieved from

http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm

Bhat, M. H. (2009). Open access repositories in computer science and information technology: an Ｅvaluation. IFLA Journal, 35(3), 243-2457.

BioMed Central. (2012). Do BioMed Central journals have impact factors and are they citation tracked? Retrieved from

http://www.biomedcentral.com/about/faq/impactfactor

Björk, B.-C., Welling, P., Laakso, M., Majlender, P., Hedlund, T., & Guðnason, G.

(2010). Open access to the scientific journal literature: Situation 2009. Plos One, 5(6), e11273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011273

Bosch, S., Henderson, K., &Klusendorf, H. (2011). Under pressure, times are changing: Periodicals price survey 2011. Library Journal, 136(8), 30.

Budapest Open Access Initiative. (2009). Frequently Asked Questions. Retrieved from http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/boaifaq.htm

Davis, P. M. (2008). Author-Choice Open-Access Publishing in the Biological and Medical Literature: A Citation Analysis. Journal of the American Society for

91

Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 3-8. doi: 10.1002/asi.20965

Directory Open Access Directory. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.doaj.org/

Eysenbach, G. (2006). Citation advantage of open access articles. Plos Biology, 4(5), 692-698. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040157

Fortney, L. M. (2009). Price history for core clinical journals in medicine and nursing 2005-2009. Retrieved from

http://www2.ebsco.com/en-us/Documents/prodServices/Biomedical_Price_Histo ry_Report_2005-2009.pdf

Frandsen, T. F. (2009). The integration of open access journals in the scholarly communication system: Three science fields. Information Processing &

Management, 45(1), 131-141. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2008.06.001

Goodman, D. (2004). The criteria for open access. Serials Review, 30, 258-270.

Hajjem, C., Harnad, S. and Gingras, Y. (2005) Ten-year cross-disciplinary comparison of the growth of open access and how it increases research citation Impact. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin, 28(4), 39-47.

Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569-16572. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507655102

Kyrillidou, M., & Young, M. (2008). ARL statistics 2005-2006. Retrieved from http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/arlstats06.pdf

Laakso, M., & Björk, B.-C. (2013). Delayed open access: An overlooked high-impact category of openly available scientific literature. Journal of the American Society

92

for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1323-1329. doi:

10.1002/asi.22856

Laakso, M., Welling, P., Bukvova, H., Nyman, L., Björk, B.-C., & Hedlund, T. (2011).

The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009. Plos One, 6(6). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020961

McVeigh, M. (2004). Open access journals: in the ISI citation databases: Analysis of impact factors and citation patterns. Retrieved from

http://science.thomsonreuters.com/m/pdfs/openaccesscitations2.pdf

National Institutes of Health. (2008). NIH Public Access Policy Details. Retrieved from http://publicaccess.nih.gov/policy.htm

Nariani, R., & Fernandez, L. (2012). Open access publishing: What authors want.

College & Research Libraries, 73(2), 182-195.

Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., & Rowlands, I. (2004). Open access journal publishing:

The views of some of the world’s senior authors. Journal of Documentation, 61(4), 497-519.

Norris, M., Oppenheim, C., & Rowland, F. (2008). The citation advantage of open-access articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(12), 1963-1972. doi: 10.1002/asi.20898

Open Access Directory. (2012). Retrieved from

http://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/Research_questions

Panitch, J. & Michalak, S. (2005). The serials crisis. Retrived from

http://www.unc.edu/scholcomdig/whitepapers/panitch-michalak.html

93

Park, J.-H. & Qin, J. (2007). Exploring the willingness of scholars to accept open access: A grounded theory approach. Journal of Scholarly Publising , 38(2), 55-84.

Park, T.K. (1999). The maze of electronic journals in digital libraries. In Chen, C.C.

(Ed.), IT and global digital library development (pp.313-322). West Newton:

Micro use Information.

PLOS. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.plos.org

Poynder, R. (2009). Open access in 2009: the good, The bad and the ugly. Retrieved from

http://poynder.blogspot.tw/2009/12/open-access-in-2009-good-bad-and-ugly.htm l

Schroter, S., Tite, L., & Smith, R. (2005). Perceptions of open access publishing:

interviews with journal authors. BMJ, 330(756). doi:

10.1136/bmj.38359.695220.82

Schroter, S., & Tite, L. (2006). Open access publishing and author-pays business models: A survey of authors' knowledge and perceptions. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99, 141-148.

Suber, P. (2004). SPARC Open Access Newsletter, 77. Retrieved from http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/newsletter/09-02-04.htm

Swan, A. & Brown, S. (2004). Authors and open access publishing. Learned Publishing, 17, 219-224.

Testa, J. (2012). Journal selection process. Retrieved from

94

http://thomsonreuters.com/content/science/pdf/ssr/journal_selection_essay-englis h.pdf

Warlick, S. E., & Vaughan, K. T. (2007). Factors influencing publication choice: Why faculty choose open access. Biomedical Digital Libraries, 4, 1-12. doi:

10.1186/1742-5581-4-1

95

附錄

附錄 1 30 位學者發表論文之期刊數量與論文篇數分布圖

96