第五章 結論
第三節 研究架構修正
本研究從台灣子公司之自發性行動、台灣子公司之主導性及母子公司的關係 三個變數的分析為主軸，透過研究分析的結果與研究變數的修正，發現台灣子公 司採取自發性行動之類型與其原本被設定之價值活動有極大關係，亦即透過由原 來設定下之價值活動為基礎，來採取自發性行動。而在子公司主導性部分則進一 步從在大陸市場經營的主導性，延伸到在全 MNC 中在其他國家市場經營的主導 性，故以分析結論及文獻對於研究變數的修正，本研究將研究架構再修正，提出 以下修正之研究架構。
母公司與台灣子公司 關係
˙母公司層級變數
˙子公司層級變數
˙母公司與子公司間 的溝通管道及方式
台灣子公司原來被設 定的經營範圍
˙價值活動
˙專業功能
˙市場經營範疇
˙產品線
台灣子公司的主導 性
˙在全球 MNC 中的 決策範圍的改變
˙價值活動
˙專業功能
˙市場經營範疇
˙產品線 台灣子公司自發性行
動
˙原設定的自發性行 動
˙原設定外之延伸性 的自發性行動
圖 6 - 1：修正之研究架構（本研究整理）
參考文獻
一、 中文部份:
曾志弘，２０００，多國籍企業子公司自主權與主導行為影響因素之研究-以多 國籍企業在台子公司為企業在台子公司為例，中山大學企業管理研究所未出版博 士論文
二、英文部份
Agarwal, S. and S.N. Ramaswami. 1992. Choice of foreign market entry mode:
Impact of ownership, location and internalization factors.
Journal of International Business Studies
: 1-27.Anand, J. and A. Delios. 1997. Location specificity and the
transferability of downstream assets to foreign subsidiaries.
Journal of International Business Studies:
579-603.Anderaon, J.C., H. Hakansson and J. Johanson. 1994. Dyadic business relationships within a business network context.
Journal of Marketing
, Vol.58：1-15.Andersson, U. and C. Pahlberg. 1997. Subsidiary influence on strategic behavior in MNCs：An empirical study.
International Business Review
, Vol.6：319-334.Andersson, U. and M. Forsgren. 1996. Subsidiary embeddedness and control in the multinational corporation.
International Business Review
, Vol.5：487-508.Baliga, B.R. and A.M. Jaeger. 1984. Multinational corporations：Control systems and delegation issues.
Journal of International Business Studies
: 25-40.Barkema, H. G., and F. Vermeulen. 1998. International expansion through start-up or acquisition: A learning perspective.
Academy of Management Journal
, Vol.41: 7-26.Barney, J. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage.
Journal of Management
, 17：99-120.Bartlett, C.A. and S.Ghoshal. 1991. Global strategic management: Impact on the new frointers of strategy research.
Strategic Management
Journal
, Vol.12: 5-16.Birkinshaw, J, and N. Fry. 1998. Subsidiary initiatives to develop new markets.
Sloan Management Review
, Spring: 51-61.Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N. and S. Jonsson. 1998. Building firm-specific advantages in multinational corporations: The role of subsidiary initiative.
Strategic Management Journal
, Vol.19: 221-241.Birkinshaw, J, and N. Fry. 1998. Subsidiary initiatives to develop advantages in multinational corporations: The role of subsidiary initiative.
Strategic Management Journal
, Vol.19: 221-241.Birkinshaw, J. 1995. Entreprenrurship in multinational corporations: The initative processes in Canadian subsidiaries.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation , Western Business School, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario
.Birkinshaw, J. 1996.How multinational subsidiary mandates are gained and lost.
Journal of International Business Studies
: 467-495.Birkinshaw, J. 1997. Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: The characteristics of subsidiary initiatives.
Strategic Management Journal
, Vol.18: 207-229.Birkinshaw, J. 1998. Corporate entrepreneurship in network
organizations: How subsidiary initiative drives internal market efficiency.
European Management Journal
, vol.16: 355-365.Birkinshaw, J. and N. Hood . 1997. An empirical study of development process in foreign-owned subsidiaries in Canada and Scotland.
Management International Review
, vol.37: 339-364.Birkinshaw, J. and N. Hood . 1998. Multinational subsidiary evolution:
Capability and charter change in foreign-owned subsidiary companies.
Academy of Management Review
, Vol.23: 773-795.Birkinshaw, J. and N. Hood . 1998b. Multinational corporate evolution and subsidiary development.
London. MacMillan Press Inc
.Birkinshaw, J. and A. J. Morrision. 1995. Configurations of strategy and structure in subsidiaries of multinational corporations.
Journal of International Business Studies
: 729-753.Birkinshaw, J. and J. Ridderstrale. 1999. Fighting the corporate immune system：A prosess study of subsidiary initiatives in multinational corporations.
International Business Review
, Vol.8 : 149-180.Christmann, P., D. Day and G.S. Yip, 1999. The relative influence of country conditions, industry structure and business strategy on multinational corporation subsidiary performance.
Journal of international management
, Vol.5：241-265.Cray, D. 1984. Control and coordination in multinational corporations.
Journal of International Business Studies
, First Quarter: 85-98.D’Cruz, J. 1986. Strategic management of subsidiaries. In Etmad and Dulude(eds.) Managing the multinational subsidiary.
London: Groom Helm.
Damanpour, F. 1991. Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators.
Academy of Management Review
, Vol.34:555-590.
Decarolis, D. M. and D.L. Deeds. 1999. The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: An empirical
investigation of the biotechnology industry.
Strategic Management Journal
, Vol.20: 953-968.Delany, E. 2000. Strategic development of the multinational subsidiary through subsidiary initiative-taking.
Long Range Planning
, Vol.33：220-244.
Doz, Y.L. and C.K. Prahalad . 1984. Patterns of strategic control within multinational corporations.
Journal of International Business Studies
, Fall：55-72.Doz, Y. and C.K. Prahalad. 1993. Managing DMNCs：A search for a new paradigm. in S. Ghoshal and D.E. Westney (eds.), Organization theory and the multinational cooperation, 24-50.
New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Doz, Y.L. and C.K. Prahalad . 1994. Managing DMNCs: A search for a new paradigm. Fundamental issues in strategy: 495-526. Rumelt, Schendel and Teece(eds).
Harvard Business School Press. Boston, Massachusetts
. Egelhoff, W.G. 1982. Strategy and structure in multinational corporations：An information-processing approach.
Administrative Science
Quarterly
, 27：433-458.81
Johanson, J and J. E. Vahlne. 1977. The internationalization process of the firm—A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitment. Journal of International Business Studies,
Egelhoff, W.G. 1991. Information-processing theory and the multinational enterprise.
Journal of International Business Studies
, Vol.22：341-368.Eisenhardt, K.M. and Schoonhoven, C..B. 1996. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms,
Organization Science
, 7:136-150.Feinberg, S.E. 2000. Do world product mandates really matter? Journal of
International Business Studies
, Vol.31：155-167.Garnier, G. H. 1982. Context and decision making autonomy in foreign affiliates of U.S. multinational corporations.
Academy of Management Journal
, Vol.25（4）：893-908.Ghoshal, S. 1987. Global strategy: An organizing framework.
Strategic Management Journal
, Vol.8: 425-440.Ghoshal, S. and C. Bartlett. 1988. Creation, adoption and diffusion of innovations by subsidiaries of multinational corporations.
Journal of International Business Studies
, third quarter: 365-387.Ghoshal, S. and C. Bartlett. 1990. The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network.
Academy of Management Review
,Vol.15:603-625.
Ghoshal , S. and N. Nohria. 1994. Internal differentiation within multinational corporations.
Strategic Management Journal
, Vol.10:323-337.
Ghoshal, S. and D.E. Westney. 1993. Introduction and overview. in S.
Ghoshal and Westney (eds.),
Organization theory and the multinational cooperation, New York: St. Martin’s Press
.Glynn, M. A. 1996. Innovative genius：A framework for relating individual and organizational intelligences to innovation.
Academy of Management Review
, Vol.21:1081-1111.Gupta, A.K. and V. Govindarajan. 1991. Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations.
Academy of Management Review
, Vol.16:768-792.Gupta, A.K. and V. Govindarajan. 1994. Organizing for knowledge flows within MNCs.
International Business Revies
, 3（4）：443-457.Gupta, A.K. and V. Govindarajan. 2000. Knowledge flows within
multinational corporations.
Strategic Management Journal
, Vol.21:473-496.
Hedlund, G. 1980. The role of foreign subsidiaries in strategy decisionmaking in Swedish multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, Vol.1: 23-36.
Jarillo, J.C. and J.I. Martinez. 1990. Different roles for subsidiaries:
The case of multinational corporations in Spain. Strategic Management Journal, Vol.11: 501-512.
Kim, W.C. and R. Mauborgne. 1993. Procedural justice, attitudes and subsidiary top management compliance with multinational’s corporate strategic decisions,
Academy of Management Journal
, Vol.36: 502-526.Kogut, B. and U. Zander. 1993. Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation.
Journal of International Business Studies
: 625-645.Roth, K.and A.J.Morrison. 1990. An empirical analysis of the
integration-responsiveness framework in global industries.
Journal of International Business Studies, first quarter
: 541-564.Roth, K. and A. J. Morrison. 1992. Implementing global strategy:
Characteristics of global subsidiary mandate.
Journal of International Business Studies, fourth quarter
: 715-735.Taggart, J.M. 1997a. An evaluation of integration-responsiveness framework: MNC manufacturing subsidiaries in the U.K.
Management International Review,
Vol.37: 295-318.Vernon, R. 1966.International investment and international trade in the product life cycle.