第五章 結論與建議
第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議
國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
87
第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議 壹、創新定義題目再改進
本研究在對創新的定義題項中，採用的是單選題形式而非多選題，此種考慮 是因為從文獻中可知創新定義十分多元，創新定義題項中的四個選項其實就是不 同面向上的創新，若採用多選形式，很可能導致受訪者選擇全部的選項，認為全 都是創新，反而呈現不出差異。人在對各種事物下判斷時，一定會有一個標準，
當要去認定事物時，便會使用心中最認同的標準、定義去進行判別，本研究欲探 究的除了創新定義外，更希望得知的就是人們會如何從此定義出發去看待事物，
故本研究最終選擇以單選形式呈現題目。後續研究者若有意，或許可改採用是非 題形式，針對每一個定義詢問受訪者是否認為是創新，以避免所有選項都在同一 題最後全部被選而無差別的情況。
貳、對公部門創新政策了解程度的重設計
前述結論即有提及，本研究中對公部門創新政策了解程度的影響力不彰，認 為可能是因為無法測量到受訪者聽聞該創新政策時的態度，無法確定受訪者究竟 有無吸收到該訊息或僅是將其當作例外，或是因為受訪者即便有聽聞過亦不認為 該政策為創新政策，無法反映出真正的了解程度。針對此種情況，未來在進行此 種了解程度調查時，可考慮將案例總數縮減，在詢問受訪者有無聽聞過案例的同 時，加問受訪者聽聞此案例時是否認為是創新，以及詢問受訪者在聽聞此案例後 是否對公部門約略改觀，盡可能降低無法反映受訪者真實接收態度、想法的問題。
此外本研究對此題預設「只要聽聞過」即算了解的最低標準，透過是非題的詢問 其時無法更進一步瞭解到受訪者究竟是有多清楚該項創新政策，畢竟僅僅只是聽 過，與詳細了解該政策目的、用意、實施方式，還是有極大差別。
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
參、影響對公、私部門看法的因素再釐清
本研究發現公務人員與一般大眾對公、私部門創新程度的看法複雜，心理 距離或為主因，但對創新定義、個人創新意願、對公部門創新政策了解程度在 其中的定位尚未明朗，本研究雖在結論提出可能的關聯架構，但其是否能真正 表明這五個變項之間的關係仍有待討論與證實，並且公務人員與一般大眾對彼 此部門的這段心理距離中，是否僅有影響到本研究目前提出的三個變項亦不一 定，說不定尚有其他本研究未考慮到的因素也會影響到對公、私部門創新程度 的看法，在這方面未來或許可以有更多的架構來嘗試說明其間的關聯。
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
89
參考文獻
中文文獻
李仲彬（2013）。政府創新的類型與分佈：我國政府 1999-2010 年間的觀察。公 共行政學報，44，73-112。
李仲彬（2013）。影響地方政府創新產出量的因素。東吳政治學報，
31（1）
，105-160。李仲彬（2016）。從哪來的創新想法？地方政府創新來源與創新政策特質的分析。
公共行政學報，50，1-42。
李仲彬（2018）。與生俱來與後天培養：影響公務人員創新態度與行為的因素分 析。公共行政學報，54，1-40。
李美枝（2002）。社會心理學：理論研究與應用。台北：文笙。
余伯泉、李茂興譯（2003）。社會心理學。台北：弘智。
陳啓光、曾淑芬（2002）。論政府機關人員創新能量之提升。研考雙月刊，26(5)，
20-29。
陳皎眉、王叢桂、孫蒨如(2014)。社會心理學。台北：雙葉書廊。
陳敦源、蘇孔志、簡鈺珒、陳序廷（2011）。論資排輩還是工作表現？年資因素 對於我國公務人員績效考評影響之研究。文官制度季刊，3（1），53-91。
陳嘉彌（1996）。中等學校教師接受創新程度之分析。教育研究資訊，4(3)，86-103。
張潤書（2013）。行政學。台北：三民。
董祥開、林嚴凡（2019）。公私部門轉換經驗對工作滿意度之影響：以公私部門 工作差異認知為中介變項。行政暨政策學報，68，1-48。
劉坤億、胡龍騰、曾冠球（2012）。政府服務創新類型與策略引導。研考雙月刊，
36（5），91-104。
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
英文文獻
Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1988). Innovation in large and small firms: An empirical analysis. American Economic Review, 78(4), 678-690.
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research
in organizational behavior, 10(1), 123-167.
Anderson, N. R., & Gasteiger, R. M. (2008). Innovation and creativity in organizations:
Individual and work team research findings and implications for government policy.
In B. Nooteboom & E. Stam (Eds.), Micro-Foundations for Innovation Policy (pp.
249-272). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
Beckerman, W. (1956) . Distance and the pattern of Intra-European trade. Review of
Economics and Statistics,38(1),31-40.
Bellante, D., & Link, A. N. (1981). Are public sector workers more risk averse than private sector workers?. ILR Review, 34(3), 408-412.
Boardman, C., Bozeman, B., & Ponomariov, B. (2010). Private sector imprinting: An examination of the impacts of private sector job experience on public manager's work attitudes. Public Administration Review, 70(1), 50-59.
Bordalo, P., Coffman, K., Gennaioli, N., & Shleifer, A. (2016). Stereotypes. The
Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1753-1794.
Borins, S. (2001). Encouraging innovation in the public sector. Journal of Intellectual
Capital, 2(3), 310-319.
Boyne, G. A. (2002). Public and private management: What’s the difference? Journal
of Management Studies, 39(1), 97-122.
Bullough, E. (1912). Psychical distance as a factor in art and an aesthetic principle.
British Journal of Psychology, 5(2), 87-118.
Carlson, S. (1974). International transmission of information and the business firm. The
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
91
Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 412 , 55-63.
Carr, P. B., & Steele, C. M. (2010). Stereotype threat affects financial decision making. Psychological Science, 21(10), 1411-1416.
Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi‐dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of
Management Studies 47(6), 1154-1190.
Damanpour, F. (1992). Organizational size and innovation. Organization Studies, 13 (3), 375-402.
Damanpour, F., Walker, R. M., & Avellaneda, C. N. (2009). Combinative effects of innovation types and organizational performance: A longitudinal study of service organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 46(4), 650-675.
Dong, H. K. D. (2017). Individual risk preference and sector choice: Are risk-averse individuals more likely to choose careers in the public sector?.Administration &
Society, 49(8), 1121-1142.
Drucker, P. F. (1998). The discipline of innovation. Harvard business review, 76(6), 149-157.
Edison, H., Bin Ali, N., & Torkar, R. (2013). Towards innovation measurement in the software industry. The Journal of Systems and Softwar, 86, 1390–1407.
Evans, J., & Mavondo, F. T. (2002). Psychic distance and organizational performance:
An empirical examination of international retailing operations. Journal of
International Business Studies, 33(3), 515-532.
Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in experimental social
psychology, 23, 1-74.
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
Fruhling, A. L., & Siau, K. (2007). Assessing organizational innovation capability and its effect on e-commerce initiatives. Journal of Computer Information Systems,
47(4), 91-103.
Geiger, S. W., & Cashen, L. H. (2002). A multidimensional examination of slack and its impact on innovation. Journal of Managerial Issues, 14 (1), 68-84.
Goodsell, C. T.(1994). The Case for Bureaucracy: A Public Administration Polemic, (3rd ed), Chatham, NJ, Chatham House Publisher, Inc.
Gunday, G., Ulusoy, G., Kilic, K., & Alpkan, L. (2011). Effects of innovation types on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 133(2), 662-676.
Hage, J. T. (1999). Organizational innovation and organizational change. Annual
Review of Sociology, 25 (1), 597-622.
Hewstone, M., Johnston, L., & Aird, P. (1992). Cognitive models of stereotype change:(2) Perceptions of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. European
Journal of Social Psychology, 22(3), 235-249.
Hilton, J. L., & Von Hippel, W. (1996). Stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology,
47(1), 237-271.
Horton, S., Baker, J., & Deakin, J. M. (2007). Stereotypes of aging: Their effects on the health of seniors in North American society. Educational Gerontology, 33(12), 1021-1035.
Hughes, D. J., Lee, A., Tian, A. W., Newman, A., & Legood, A. (2018). Leadership, creativity, and innovation: A critical review and practical recommendations. The
Leadership Quarterly, 29(5), 549-569.
Inzlicht, M., & Kang, S. K. (2010). Stereotype threat spillover: how coping with threats
to social identity affects aggression, eating, decision making, and attention. Journal
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
93
of personality and social psychology, 99(3), 467.
Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign commitments. Journal of
International Business Studies, 8 (1), 23-32.
Johanson, J. & Wiedersheim-Paul, F. (1975). The internationalization of the firm–four Swedish cases. Journal of Management Studies, 12, 305-322.
Jensen, P. H., & Webster, E. (2009). Another look at the relationship between innovation proxies. Australian Economic Papers, 48 (3), 252-269.
Johnston, L. C., & Macrae, C. N. (1994). Changing social stereotypes: The case of the information seeker. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24(5), 581-592.
Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (1993). Definition and assessment of accuracy in social stereotypes. Psychological Review, 100(1), 109.
Jussim, L., Crawford, J. T., Anglin, S. M., Chambers, J. R., Stevens, S. T., & Cohen, F.
(2016). Stereotype accuracy: One of the largest and most replicable effects in all of social psychology. Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping, and Discrimination, 2, 31-63.
Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Stephan, E. (2007). Psychological distance. In Kruglanski, A. W. & Higgins, E. T., (Eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles (pp. 353–381). New York, NY : Guilford Press
Macrae, C. N., Milne, A. B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (1994). Stereotypes as energy-saving devices: A peek inside the cognitive toolbox. Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology, 66(1), 37.
O'grady S. & Lane H. W. (1996). The psychic distance paradox. Journal of
International Business Studies, 27(2), 309-333.
Oke, A. (2007). Innovation types and innovation management practices in service
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
companies. International Journal of Operations & Production Management,
27(6), 564-587.
Palmberg, C. (2004). The sources of innovations—looking beyond technological opportunities. Economics of Innovation & New Technology, 13 (2), 183-197.
Perry, J. L., & Rainey, H. G. (1988). The public-private distinction in organization theory: A critique and research strategy. Academy of Ｍanagement Review, 13(2), 182-201.
Rainey, H. G. (2009). Understanding and Managing Public Organizations. (2nd ed.).
San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). New York . Free Press.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1961). The Theory of Economic Development ; An Inquiry into
Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and The Business Cycle. New York. Oxford
University Press.Sousa, C. M., & Bradley, F. (2006). Cultural distance and psychic distance: Two peas in a pod? Journal of International Marketing, 14(1), 49-70.
Standing, C., D. Jackson, A. C. Larsen, Y. Suseno, R. Fulford, & D. Gengatharen (2016).
Enhancing individual innovation in organisations: A review of the literature.
International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 19(1), 44-62.
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance.
Psychological Review, 117(2), 440.
Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Wakslak, C. (2007). Construal levels and psychological distance: Effects on representation, prediction, evaluation, and behavior. Journal
of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 83-95.
Von Hippel, W., Jonides, J., Hilton, J. L., & Narayan, S. (1993). Inhibitory effect of schematic processing on perceptual encoding. Journal of Personality and Social
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
95
Psychology, 64(6), 921.
Weber, R., & Crocker, J. (1983). Cognitive processes in the revision of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(5), 961-977.
Windrum, P., & Koch, P. M. (Eds.). (2008). Innovation in Public Sector Services:
Entrepreneurship, Creativity and Management. Cheltenham, U.K. Edward Elgar
Publishing.Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do And Why They