國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
行動電話──甚至沒有各種電子媒介──的過去。循此，在本文看來，或許「混 雜實在」的逾越與變異如今只能是永恆可能的嘗試，嘗試讓自己在「人－機」
混雜（混種）的關係中，持續探問每一個當下自身是否在「誘惑」與「化約」
中迷失了。
三、 終結與之後
總之，從「如何生活」到「如何存在」，本文在這最後的章節裡試圖說明的 便是，在透過「人─技術─世界」相互關連的理論與分析架構「理解」了行動 電話之普及所帶來的變遷與影響後，我們的反思與探問終究要回到「得」與「捨」
的選擇上。現代技術的發展帶來了進步、舒適與便利的生活，但它並非沒有代 價的恩賜。這一點，晚近諸多風險社會學的討論也都已清楚地指出了。不存在 沒有交換代價的技術「進步」，這意味著不論我們再怎麼小心翼翼地發展、使用 新的技術（物），它在作為一種「服務」（service）的同時，也總是在某些地方作 為「束縛」（servitude）框限著我們自身。這或許也反映了人與技術（物）之間 在存有論層次上即存在的原初矛盾性。如同 Stiegler（1988: 189‐195）透過 Prometheus 與 Epimetheus 的神話所指出的，人的原初缺陷也正是其原初的技術 性，但也正因為此一藉由 Prometheus 的盜火而來的「得」，使人類面臨了技術（火）
失控的風險，同時也讓人們必須面對、承受自身的死亡。
循此，即便在現代技術發展的過程中，人們總是貪婪地想要「兼得」，意即，
如我們在「後人類」的超人類主義版本中看到的，一方面要求新技術所帶來的 能力，另一方面卻仍想要保留作為「人類」的同一。（Thacker, 2003: 94）或者如 Iihde（1990: 75）所指出的，要求技術物所帶來的擴增力量，卻又要求技術物的
「完全體現」。但透過對於人與技術（物）之關係的反思，我們可以發現，這或 許終究是（已接近其尾聲的）處於黑箱中的人文主義主體的幻覺、美夢。在今
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
日這個流動的生活中，我們或許尚未名符其實地成為裝著電子義肢的「賽伯格」， 但我們也已如 Ihde（1990）所說遠離了「純淨」的伊甸園，甚至是已然進入了 一種前所未有的混雜（混種）境況。本文對於行動電話普及之影響的探問僅僅 是一個開端，這個混雜、流動越來越劇烈的生活世界需要的是更多的「理解」。
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
參考書目
王居尉（2009）。《行動通訊導論》，台北：學貫行銷。
王雪玲（1998 年 8 月 22 日）。〈台灣大哥大：受話率 57%，品質可考驗〉，《大成 報》，14 版。
吉見俊哉（2009）。《媒介文化論
──
給媒介學習者的 15 講》，蘇碩斌譯，台北：群學。
林文剛（2007）。〈緒論：媒介環境學的思想沿革初探〉，《媒介環境學：思想沿 革與多維視野》，頁 1‐42，北京：北京大學出版社。
楊汝椿（1990 年 6 月 1 日）。〈大哥大炙手可熱，今起接受認證〉，《聯合晚報》， 第 9 版。
曹家榮、黃厚銘（2011）。〈流動的手機：液態現代性脈絡下的速度、時空與公 私領域〉，「E 世代重要議題
──
人文社會面向研討會」論文（9 月 15 日），新竹：清華大學。
黃厚銘（2001）。《虛擬社區中的身分認同與信任》。台灣大學社會學研究所博士 論文。
黃厚銘（2009）。〈邁向速度存有論
──
即時性電子媒介時代的風險〉，《新聞學 研究》，101：139‐175。黃貴華、李健果（1993 年 9 月 29 日）。〈門號荒，大哥大限制申請〉，《聯合報》， 第 3 版。
鍾蔚文、陳百齡、陳順孝（2006）。〈數位時代的技藝：提出一個分析架構〉，《中 華傳播學刊》，10：233‐264。
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
聯合報（1987 年 9 月 13 日）。〈行動電話新噱頭，車上路上隨身聽〉，《聯合報》， 第 3 版。
Akrich, M. (1992). The de‐scription of technical objects. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/Building society: Studeies in sociotechnical change (pp.
205‐224). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Arminen, I., & Weilenmann, A. (2009). Mobile presence and intimacy－－Reshaping social actions in mobile contextual configuration. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 1905‐1923.
Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bauman, Z. (2005). Liquid Life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bauman, Z.（2007）。《液態之愛
──
論人際紐帶的脆弱》，何定照、高瑟濡譯，台北：商周出版。（原書 Bauman, Z. [2003]. Liquid love: On the frailty of human bonds. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.）
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity (M. Ritter, Trans.). London:
SAGE.
Bijker, W. E. (1987). The social construction of bakelite: Toward a theory of invention.
In W. E. Bijker, T. Hughes & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 159‐187). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bijker, W. E. (1992). The social construction of fluorescent lighting, or how an artifact was invented in its diffusion stage. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/Building society: Studeies in sociotechnical change (pp. 75‐102).
Cambridge: MIT Press.
Boase, J., & Wellman, B. (2006). Personal relationships: On and off the internet. In A.
L. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The cambridge handbook of personal
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
relationships (pp. 709‐723). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buchanan, I. (2000). Michel de Certeau: Cultural theorist. London: SAGE.
Button, G., & Sharrock, W. (1998). The organizational accountability of technological work. Social Studies of Science, 28(1), 73‐102.
Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge (pp. 196‐233). London: Routledge.
Callon, M. (1987). Society in the making: The study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis. In W. E. Bijker, T. Hughes & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 83‐103). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Callon, M., & Law, J. (1989). On the construction of sociotechnical networks: Content and context revisited. In L. Hargens, R. A. Jones & A. Pickering (Eds.), Knowledge and society: Studies in the sociology of science past and present (pp. 57‐83). London: JAI Press.
Campell, S. (2008). Mobile technology and the body: Apparatgeist, fashion, and function. In J. E. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of communication studies. Cambridge:
The MIT Press.
Castells, M., Fernandez‐Ardevol, M., Qiu, J. L., & Sey, A. (2007). Mobile communication and society: A global perspective. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Chayko, M. (2008). Portable communities: The social dynamics of online and mobile connectedness. New York: SUNY Press.
Dant, T. (2005). Materiality and society. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life (S. Rendall, Trans.). Berkeley:
University of California Press.
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
de Gournay, C. (2002). Pretense of intimacy in France. In J. E. Katz & M. A. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 193‐205). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
de Souza e Silva, A. (2006). Interfaces of hybrid spaces. In A. Kavoori & N. Arceneaux (Eds.), The cell phone reader: Essays in social transformation (pp. 19‐43). New York: Peter Lang.
Dodge, M., & Kitchin, R. (2001). Mapping cyberspace. London: Routledge.
Donner, J. (2008). The rules of beeping: Exchanging messages via intentional "missed calls" on mobile phones. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 13, 1‐22.
Dreyfus, H. (2001). On the internet. New York: Routledge.
Ekine, S. (2010). Introduction. In S. Ekine (Ed.), SMS uprising: Mobile phone activism in Africa (pp. ix‐xxii). Cape Town: Pambazuka Press.
Elliott, A., & Urry, J. (2010). Mobile lives. New York: Routledge.
Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society (J. Wilkinson, Trans.). New York: Vintage.
Ellul, J. (2008). Ideas of technology: The technological order. In F. R. (Ed.), Technology studies (Vol. 1, pp. 135‐161). London: Sage.
Fortunati, L. (2002). The mobile phone: Towards new categories and social relations.
Information, Communication & Society, 5(4), 513‐528.
Fortunati, L. (2005). The mobile phone: Local and global dimension. In K. Nyíri (Ed.), A sense of place: The global and local in mobile communication. Vienna:
Passagen Verlag.
Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. New York: Routledge.
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York:
Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1984). What is enlightenment? In P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader.
New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1997). What is critique? In S. Lotringer & L. Hochroth (Eds.), The politics of truth: Michel Foucault (pp. 23‐82). New York: Semiotext(e).
Gardiner, M. (2000). Critiques of everyday life. New York: Routledge.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Garfinkel, H. (1990). The curious seriousness of professional sociology. In B. Conein, M. d. Fornel & L. Quéré (Eds.), Les formes de la conversation (Vol. 1, pp.
69‐78). Paris: CNET.
Garfinkel, H. (2002). The central claims of Ethnomethodology: Working out Durkheim's aphorism. In A. W. Rawls (Ed.), Ethnomethodology's program:
Working out Durkheim's aphorism. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giridharadas, A. (2010). Africa's gift to silicon valley: How to track a crisis. The New York Times.
Goggin, G. (2006). Cell phone culture : mobile technology in everyday life. London:
Routledge.
Goldstein, J., & Rotich, J. (2008). Digitally networked technology in Kenya's 2007‐2008 post‐election crisis: The Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University.
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
Green, N. (2002). On the move: Technology, mobility, and the mediation of social time and space. The Information Society, 18(4), 281‐292.
Hahn, H. P., & Kibora, L. (2011). The domestication of the mobile phone: Oral society and new ICT in Burkina Faso. Journal of Modern African Studies, 46(1), 87‐109.
Haraway, D.（2010）。《猿猴、賽伯格和女人：重新發明自然》，張君玫譯，台北：
群 學 。（ 原 書 Haraway, D. [1991]. Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.）
Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Hayles, N. K. (2002). Flesh and metal: Reconfiguring the mindbody in virtual environments. Configurations, 10(2), 297‐320.
Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology. In D. F. Krell (Ed.), Basic writings: From being and time to the task of thinking (pp. 306‐341). New York:
HarperCollins.
Heim, M. (1993). The metaphysics of virtual reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Highmore, B. (2002). Everyday life and cultural theory: An introduction. New York:
Routledge.
Honore, C.（2005）。《慢活》，顏湘如譯，台北：大塊文化。（原書 Honore, C. [2004].
In praise of slow: How a worldwide movement is challenging the cult of speed.
London: Orion Books）
Hutchby, I. (2001). Conversation and technology: From the telephone to the internet.
Cambridge: Polity Press.
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
Ihde, D. (1979). Technics and praxis. Boston: D. Reidel Pub. Co.
Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Ihde, D. (2002). Bodies in technology. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.
Ihde, D. (2009). Postphenomenology and technoscience: The Peking University lectures. Albany: SUNY.
Ito, M. (2005). Introduction: Personal, portable, pedestrian. In M. Ito, D. Okabe & M.
Matsuda (Eds.), Personal, portable, pedestrian: Mobile phones in Japanese life (pp. 1‐16). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Katz, J. E. (2005). Mobile communication and the transformation of daily life: The next phase of research on mobiles. In P. Glotz, S. Bertschi & L. C. (Eds.), Thumb culture: The meaning of mobile phones for society (pp. 171‐182).
Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
Katz, J. E., & Aakhus, M. A. (2002). Conclusion: Making meaning of mobiles
─
a theory of Apparatgeist. In J. E. Katz & M. A. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact:Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 301‐318).
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lash, S. (2002). Critique of information. London: Sage.
Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern. New York: Harvard University Press.
Leiter, K. (1980). A primer on ethnomethodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levinson, P.（2000）。《數位麥克魯漢》，宋偉航譯，台北：貓頭鷹。（原書 Levinson, p. [1999]. Digital McLuhan: A guide to the information millennium. London:
Routledge.）
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
Levinson, P. (2004). Cellphone: The story of the world's most mobile medium and how it has transformed everything. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Licoppe, C. (2003). Two modes of maintaining interpersonal relations through telephone: From the domestic to the mobile phone. In J. E. Katz (Ed.), Machines that become us: The social context of personal communication technology. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Ling, R. (2004). The mobile connection: The cell phone' s impact on society. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
Ling, R. (2008a). The mediation of ritual interaction via the mobile telephone. In J. E.
Katz (Ed.), Handbook of communication studies (pp. 165‐176). Cambridge:
The MIT Press.
Ling, R. (2008b). New tech, new ties: How mobile communication is reshaping social cohesion. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Ling, R., & Donner, J. (2009). Mobile communication. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Ling, R., & Yttri, B. (2002). Hyper‐coordination via mobiles phones in Norway. In J. E.
Katz & M. A. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 139‐169). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lynch, M. (1999). Silence in context: Ethnomethodology and social theory. Human Studies, 22, 211‐233.
Matsuda, M. (2005). Discourses of Keitai in Japan. In M. Ito, D. Okabe & M. Matsuda (Eds.), Personal, portable, pedestrian: Mobile phones in Japanese life (pp.
19‐40). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extension of man. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Meyrowitz, J. (2003). Global nomads in the digital veldt. In K. Nyíri (Ed.), Mobile democracy: Essays on society, self and politics. Vienna: Passagen Verlag.
Meyrowitz, J. (2005). The rise of glocality: New senses of place and identity in the global village. In K. Nyíri (Ed.), A sense of place: The global and local in mobile communication (pp. 21‐30). Vienna: Passagen Verlag.
Mumford, L. (1967). The myth of the machine: Technics and human development.
New York: Harcourt.
Napolitano, C. M. (2010). "MXing it up": How African adolescents may affect social change through mobile phone use. New Media and Technology, 128, 105‐113.
Nunes, M. (1997). What space is cyberspace? The internet and virtuality. In D.
Holmes (Ed.), Virtual politics: Identity and community in cyberspace (pp.
163‐178). London: SAGE.
Oksman, V., & Turtiainen, J. (2004). Mobile communication as a social stage:
Meanings of mobile communication in everyday life among teenagers in Finland. New Media & Society, 6(3), 319‐339.
Ong, W. J. (1988). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London:
Routeledge.
Pinch, T., & Bijker, W. E. (1987). The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. In W. E. Bijker, T. Hughes & T. Pinch (Eds.), The social Construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 17‐50). Cambridge: MIT Press.
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
Postman, N. (1993). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York:
Vintage Books.
Rawls, A. W. (2002). Editor's introduction. In A. W. Rawls (Ed.), Ethnomethodology's program: Working out Durkheim's aphorism (pp. 1‐64). Lanham: Rowman &
Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Rheingold, H. (2000). The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier.
Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Rheingold, H.（2004）。《聰明行動族－－下一場社會革命》，張逸安譯，台北：聯 經。（原書 Rheingold, H. [2003]. Smart mobs: The next social revolution.
Cambridge: Perseus Pub..）
Rheingold, H. (2008). Mobile media and political collective action. In J. E. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of communication studies (pp. 225‐239). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Richardson, I. (2008). Pocket technospaces: The bodily incorporation of mobile media. In G. Goggin (Ed.), Mobile phone cultures (pp. 66‐76). New York:
Routledge.
Schuler, I. (2008). SMS as a tool in election observation. Innovations: technology, governance, globalization, 3(2), 143‐157.
Schutz, A.（1992）。《舒茲論文集（第一冊）》，盧嵐蘭譯，台北：桂冠。（原書 Schutz, A. [1990]. Collected papers. Vol. 1, The problem of social reality. Dordrecht:
Kluwer Academic.）
Sennett, R. (1992). The fall of public man. New York: Norton.
Slouka, M.（1998）。《虛擬入侵
──
網際空間與科技對現實之衝擊》，張義東譯，台北：遠流。（原書 Slouka, M. [1995]. War of the worlds: Cyberspace and the high‐tech assault on reality. New York: BasicBooks.）
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and time, 1: The fault of Epimetheus (R. Beardsworth & G.
Collins, Trans.). California: Standford University Press.
Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human‐machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Suchman, L. A. (2000). Embodied practices of engineering work. MIND, CULTURE, AND ACTIVITY, 7(1&2), 4‐18.
Thacker, E. (2003). Data made flesh: Biotechnology and the discourse of the posthuman. Cultural Critique, 53, 72‐97.
Tomlinson, J. (2007). The culture of speed: The coming of immediacy. London: SAGE.
Turkle, S.（1998）。《虛擬化身
──
網路世代的身分認同》，譚天、吳佳真譯，台 北：遠流。（原書 Turkle, S. [1996]. Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster）Turkle, S. (2008). Always‐on/ Always‐on‐you: The tethered self. In J. E. Katz (Ed.), Handbook of communication studies. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Verclas, K. (2008). A mobile voice: The use of mobile phones in citizen media:
MobileActive.org.
Virilio, P. (1997). Open sky (J. Rose, Trans.). New York: Verso.
Virilio, P. (2000). Polar inertia. London: SAGE.
Virilio, P. (2007). The original accident (J. Rose, Trans.). London: Polity Press.
Wasserman, H. (2010). Mobile phones, popular media and everyday African democracy: Transmissions and transgressions. Paper presented at the Mobile Phones: The New Talking Drums of Everyday Africa?, Afrika Studiecentrum, Leiden, Netherlands.
Wellman, B. (1999). The network community: An introduction. In B. Wellman (Ed.),
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
Networks in the global village: Life in contemporary communities (pp. 1‐47).
Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.
Wellman, B. (2001). Physical place and cyberspace: The rise of personalized networking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 25(2), 227‐252.
Wessels, B. (2010). Understanding the internet: A socio‐cultural perspective. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Williams, R. (2003[1974]). Television: Technology and culture form. London:
Routeledge.
Winner, L. (1986). The Whale and the reactor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Winner, L. (2005). Resistance is futile: The posthuman condition and its advocates In H. W. Baillie & T. K. Casey (Eds.), Is human nature obsolete? Genetics, bioengineering, and the future of the human condition (pp. 385‐411).
Cambridge: The MIT Press.
國科會補助計畫
計畫主持人: 曹家榮計畫編號: 100-2420-H-004-038-DR 學門領域: 文化研究
無研發成果推廣資料
量化
得獎項、重要國際合 作、研究成果國際影響 力及其他協助產業技 術發展之具體效益事 項等，請以文字敘述填 列。)
成果項目 量化 名稱或內容性質簡述
測驗工具(含質性與量性) 0
課程/模組 0
電腦及網路系統或工具 0
教材 0
舉辦之活動/競賽 0
研討會/工作坊 0
電子報、網站 0
科 教 處 計 畫 加 填 項
目 計畫成果推廣之參與（閱聽）人數 0