• 沒有找到結果。

第五章    結論與建議

第二節    省思

二、 英文文獻

Baturo, A., & Nason, R. (1996). Student teachers' subject matter knowledge within the domain of area measurement.

Educational Studies in

Mathematics, 31

, 235-268.

Blumer, H. (1969).

Symbolic interactionism

. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ:

Prentice-Hall.

Booth, L. R. (1988). Children's difficulties in beginning algebra. In A. F.

Coxford & A. P. Shulte (Eds.),

The Ideas of Algebra K-12

(pp.20-32).

Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Booth, L.R.(1984). Child-method in secondary mathematics. Educational studies in Mathematics,12,29-41.

Bright, G.W. (1976). Estimation as Part of Learning to Measure.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Yearbook

.

Krummheuer, G. (1995).

The ethnology of argumentation

. In P. Cobb & H.

Bauersfeld (Eds.). The emergence of mathematical meaning : Interaction in classroom cultures (pp. 229–269). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1996). Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research.

Educational Psychologist, 31

, 175-190.

Cobb, P., Wood, T., &Yackel, E. (1993). Discourse, mathematical thinking, and classroom practice. In E. Forman, N. Minick, & C. Stone (Eds.),

Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children's development

(pp.

91-119). New York: Oxford University Press.

De Bock, D.,Verschaffel, L., & Janssens, D.(1998). The predominance of the linear model in secondary school students’solutions of word problems involving length and area of similar plane figures.

Educational Studies in

Mathematics, 35

, 65-83.

Dembo, Y., Levin, I., & Siegler, R. S. (1997). A Comparison of the Geometric Reasoning of Students Attending Israeli Ultraothodox and Mainstream Schools.

Developmental Psychology, 33

(1), pp.92-103.

Denzin(1978).

The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods

. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Dickson, L., Brown, M., & Gibson, O. (1984).

Children Learning Maths: A Teacher's Guide to Recent Research

. London: School Council.

Douek, N., & Scali, E. (2000). About argumentation and conceptualization. In T.

Nakahara & M. Koyama (Eds.), The proceedings of the 24th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education Vol. 2 (pp.249-256). Japan: Hiroshima University.

Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000).

Establishing the norms of

scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84

(3), 87-312.

Fitzgerald, W. M. & Shroyer, J.(1979).

A Study of the Teaching and Learning of Growth Relationships in the 6th Grade

. Final Report. ERIC Documents ED 197964.

Hopkins H. H. (1996). Picket Fences.

Teaching Children Mathematics, 2

(2), 86-90.

Hartweg K. (2003). Picasso Masterpiece & Responses to the Have a Heart Problem.

Teaching Children Mathematics, 9

(6), 342-346.

James J. Hirstein(1981). The Second National Assessment in Mathematics : Area and Volume,

Mathematics teachers, May

,704-708.

LaSaracina, B. A., & White, S. K. (1999). The Restless Rectangle and the Transforming Trapezoid.

Teaching Children Mathematics, 5

(6), 336-37.

Maurer, S. B. (1987). New Knowledge about Errors and new Biews about Learners: What They Mean to Educations and More Educators Would Like to Know.In. H.

Schoenfeld (Ed.),

Cognitive Science and mathematics Education

(pp. 165-187).

N. J.: LEA.

Moyer, P. S. (2001). Using representations to explore perimeter and area.

Teaching Children Mathematics, 8(1), 52-59.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(2000).

Principles and Standards for School Mathematics

. Reston, VA: NCTM.

Patton, M. Q. (2002) . Utilization-focused evaluation (U-FE) checklist. Western Michigan University, Retrieved October 9, 2008

Rommetveit, R. (1985):

Language acquisition as increasing linguistic

structuring of experience and symbolic behavior control

. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition (pp. 183–205).

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schoenfeld.(1985).

Mathematical problem solving

. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Suggate, J., Davis, A., & Goulding, M.(2010).

Mathematical Knowledge for Primary Teachers

. London:David Fulton.

Thompson, C. S. & Rathmell, E. C. (1988). NCTM’S Standards for School Mathematics, K-12.

Arithmetic Teacher(May)

, 10-16.

Tierney, C., Boyd, C. & Davis, G. (1990). Prospective Primary Teacher’s Conception of Area.

Proceedings of 14th Annual Conference of the International Group for Psychology of Mathematics Education, Mexico.

(vol 2)

, 307-315.

Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Toulmin, S. E. (2003).

The uses of argument

(Updated Ed.). Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Whitenack, J. W., & Knipping, N. (2002). Argumentation, instructional design

theory and students' mathematical learning: a case for coordinating interpretive lenses.

The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21

(4), 441-457.

Woodward, E. & Byrd, F. (1983). Area Included Topic, Neglected Concept.

School Science and Mathematics. 83

(4), 343-347.

Woodward, E. & Hamel, T. (1993). The Use of Dot Paper in Geometry Lessons.

Mathematics Teacher. 86

(7), 558-561.

Yackel, E. (2004). Theoretical Perspectives for Analyzing Explanation,

Justification and Argumentation in Mathematics Classrooms.

Journal of the Korea Society of Mathematical Education, series D: Research in mathematical education, 8(1)

, 1-18.

Yackel, E.; Rasmussen, C. & King, K. (2001): Social and sociomathematical norms in an advanced undergraduate mathematics course.

Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 19

, 1-13.

Yackel, E. (2004). Theoretical Perspectives for Analyzing Explanation,

Justification and Argumentation in Mathematics Classrooms.

Journal of

the Korea Society of Mathematical Education Series D : Research in

Mathematical Education, 8

(1), 1-18

附錄

附錄一

前測試題

年 班 號 姓名:

各位同學大家好:

這份試卷的目的,是想了解你對面積與周長概念的理解情形,作答 結果不影響你的數學成績,請看清楚題意後,認真作答,並盡可能的寫 出你的想法。謝謝!

1.

甲 乙 丙 丁

(1) 上列 4 個平面圖形,哪些具有「周長」?

答:

(2) 什麼是周長?請將想法寫下來。

答:

2. (1) 承上題,上列 4 個平面圖形,哪些具有「面積」?

答:

(2) 什麼是面積?請將想法寫下來。

答:

3. (1)下列黑色框線圖形的周長指的是哪裡?請用彩虹筆畫出來。

1cm 1cm

(2)請你測量這個圖形的周長,並回答。

周長: (請寫出單位)

4. (1)下列圖形的面積指的是哪裡?請用彩虹筆畫出來。

1cm 1cm

(2)請你測量這個圖形的面積,並回答。

面積: (請寫出單位)

5. 娜美說:「面積都是 16 cm2的平面圖形,周長一定相等。」你覺得 她的說法對嗎?請寫出你的想法。

6. 羅賓說用一條 50cm 的繩子分別圍出正方形、長方形、三角形、平 行四邊形和梯形,而且繩子都剛好用完,請問五個圖形中哪些值 會相同。(甲)角度(乙)邊長(丙)周長(丁)面積

答:

7. 正方形的「周長」變成原來的2倍(如下圖),「面積」的數值變 為原來的幾倍?請寫出你的想法。

8. 將梯形的「面積」變為原來的 4 倍(如下圖),「周長」的數值會變 為原來的幾倍?請寫出你的想法。

9. 下面圖形的周長和面積各是多少?

10. 下面圖形的周長和面積各是多少?

11. 下面圖形的周長和面積各是多少。(單位:公分)

12. 下面圖形的周長和面積各是多少?(單位:cm) 

13. 下面圖形的周長和面積各是多少?(單位:cm) 

3

4  5  5 

附錄二

後測試題

年 班 號 姓名:

各位同學大家好:

這份試卷的目的,是想了解你對面積與周長概念的理解情形,作答 結果不影響你的數學成績,請看清楚題意後,認真作答,並盡可能的寫 出你的想法。謝謝!

1.

甲 乙 丙 丁

(1) 上列 4 個平面圖形,哪些具有「周長」?

答:

(2) 什麼是周長?請將想法寫下來。

答:

2. (1) 承上題,上列 4 個平面圖形,哪些具有「面積」?

答:

(2) 什麼是面積?請將想法寫下來。

答:

3. (1)下列圖形的「周長」指的是哪裡?請用彩虹筆畫出來。

1cm

1cm

(2)請你測量這個圖形的周長,並回答。

周長: (請寫出單位)

4. (1)下列圖形的面積指的是哪裡?請用彩虹筆畫出來。

1cm

1cm

(2)請你測量這個圖形的面積,並回答。

面積: (請寫出單位)

5. 艾連說:「面積都是 20 cm2的平面圖形,周長一定相等。」你覺得 他的說法對嗎?請寫出你的想法。

6. 茶渡說用一條 60 cm 的繩子分別圍出正方形、長方形、三角形、

平行四邊形和梯形,而且繩子都剛好用完,請問五個圖形中哪些 值會相同。(甲)角度(乙)邊長(丙)周長(丁)面積

答:

7. 平行四邊形的「周長」變成原來的2倍(如下圖),「面積」的數 值變為原來的幾倍?請寫出你的想法。

8. 將正方形的「面積」變為原來的 4 倍(如下圖),「周長」的數值會 變為原來的幾倍?請寫出你的想法。

9. 下面圖形的「周長」和「面積」各是多少?

10. 下面圖形的「周長」和「面積」各是多少?(單位:公分)

11. 下面圖形的「周長」和「面積」各是多少?(單位:公分)

12. 下面平行四邊形的「周長」和「面積」各是多少?(單位:公分)

13. 下面圖形的「周長」和「面積」各是多少?(單位:公分)

13

9

45  25  25

15 

13cm 13cm

20