Albert, V. C., & Lawrance, R. B. (2000). Cohesion: Conceptual and measurement issues. Small Group Research, 31(1), 89-106.
Albert, V. C., Lawrance, R. B., Mark, A. E., Steven, B., Kim, D., Paul, E., et al. (2003).
Do individual perceptions of group cohesion reflect shared beliefs: An empirical analysis. Small Group Research, 31(1), 468-496.
Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait names: A psycho-lexical study.
Psychological Monographs, 47, 211-232.
Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart &
Winston.
Ancona, D. C., & Caldwell, D. F. (1992). Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3, 321-341.
Baron, R., & Byrne, D. (2000). Social psychology (9rd ed.). Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.
Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, M. K. (1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 377-391.
Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., & Piotrowski, M. (2002). Personality and job performance: Test of the mediating effects of motivation among sales representatives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 43-52.
Barry, B., & Stewart, G. L. (1997). Composition, process, and performance
inself-managed groups: The role of personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 62-78.
Callaway, M. R., & Esser, J. K. (1984). Groupthink: Effects of cohesiveness and problem-solving procedures on group decision making. Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 157-164.
Caplan, R. D., Cobb, J. R., French, R. V., & Pinneau, S. I. (1975). Job demands and
102
worker health. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
Carron, A. V. (1982). Cohesiveness in sport group: Interpretations and considerations.
Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 123-138.
Cartwright, D., & Zander, A. W. (1968). Group dynamics research and theory (3rd ed.). New York: Harper and Row.
Cattell, R. B. (1943). The description of personality: Basic trait resolved into clusters.
Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38, 476-506.
Cattell, R. B. (1946). Description and measurement of personality. New York: World Book.
Cohen, S., & Weinstem, N. (1981). Nonauditory effects of noise on behavior and health. Journal of Social Issues, 37(1), 36-70.
Costa, P. T., Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory manual, FL:
Psychological Assessment Resources.
Costa, P. T., Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1989). The NEO-PI/NEO-EFI Manual Supplement, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Costa, P. T., Jr. & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 653-665.
Costa, P. T., Jr. McCrae, R. R., & Dye, D. A. (1991). Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: A revision of the NEO personality inventory. Personality And Individual Differences, 12, 887-898.
Daniel, M. C., & Timothy, A. J. (1996). Person-organization fit, job choice decisions, and organizational entry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 67(3), 294-311.
David, V. D., & Stanley, B. S. (1989). Personality and job performance: Evidence of incremental validity. Personnel Psychology, 42, 25-36.
Davis, J. H. (1973). Group decision and social interaction: A theory of social decision schemes. Psychological Review, 80, 97-125.
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model.
103
Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
Dougherty, D. J. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3, 179-202.
Driskell, J. E., Hogan, R., & Salas, E. (1987). Personality and group performance.
Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 91-112.
Eaton, J. (2001). Management Communication: The threat of Groupthink. Corporate Communications, 6(4), 183-192.
Eby, L. T., & Dobbins, G. H. (1997). Collectivistic orientation in teams: An individual and group level analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 275-295.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
Esser, J. K., & Lindoerfer, J. S. (1989). Groupthink and the space shuttle Challenger accident: Toward a quantitative case analysis. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2, 167-177.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison process. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
Finkelstein, S., & Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Strategic Leadership: Top executives and their effects on organization. MN: West.
Fisher, S. G., Hunter, T.A., & Macrosson, W. D. (2001). A validation study of Belbin's team roles. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 10(2), 121-144.
Fiske, D. W. (1949). Consistency of the factorial structure of personality ratings from different sources. Journal of Personality and Abnormal Psychology, 44, 329-344.
Flowers, M. L. (1977). A laboratory test of some implications of Janis’s groupthink hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 888-896.
Fodor, E. M., & Smith, T. (1982). The power motive as an influence on group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 178-185.
Forsyth, D. R. (1983). An Introduction to Group Dynamics. CA: Brooks/Cole.
Forsyth, D. R. (1999). Group Dynamics(3rd ed.). CA: Brooks/Cole.
104
Gardin, J ., Kaplan, K., Firestone, I., & Cowan, G. (1973). Proxemic effects on cooperation, attitude, and approach-avoidance in a prisoner's dilemma game.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 13-18.
George, J. M. (1990). Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 107-116.
Guffey, M. E. (2003). Business communication: process and product. Mason, Ohio:
Thomson.
Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for
universals in personality lexicons,” In Wheeler, L. (Ed.), Review of Personality and Social Psychology, CA: Beverly Hill.
Goldberg, L. R. (1982). From ace to zombie: Some explorations in the language of personality. In C. D. SpielBerger & J. N. Butcher (Eds.), Advance in Personality Assessment. NJ: Lawrance Erlbaum.
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative description of personality: The big five factor.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
Goolsby, J. R. (1992). A theory of role stress in boundary spanning position of marketing organizations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20(2), 155-164.
Gouran, D. S., & Hirokawa, R. Y. (1983). The role of communication in group decision making: A functional perspective. In M. S. Mander (Ed.), Communication in Transition (pp.51-84). New York: Praeger.
Gouran, D. S., & Hirokawa, R. Y. (2003). Effective decision making and problem solving in groups: A functional perspective. In R. Y. Hirokawa, R.s. Cathcart, L.
A. Samovar, & L. D. Henman (Eds.), Small group communication (pp. 27-38).
Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
Greitemeyer, T., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2003). Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: Beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 322-339.
Guilford, D. W. (1959). Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings
105
from different source. Journal of Abnormal and Social psychology, 44, 329-344.
Gwen, M. W., Andrea, B. H., Paul, B. P., et. (2004). The Functional Perspective as a Lens for Understanding Groups. Small Group Research, 35, 17-43.
Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work team. In J. W. Lorsh (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315-342). NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hackman, J. R. (1990). Groups that work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. Advances in experimental social psychology, 8, 45-99.
Hall, J., & Watson, W. H. (1970). The effects of a normative intervention on group decision making performance. Human Relations, 23, 299-317.
Halpern, D. (1995). Mental health and the built environment: More than bricks and mortar. London: Taylor & Francis.
Harper, N. I., & Askling, L. R. (1980). Group communication and quality of task solution in a media production organization. Communication Monographs, 47, 77-100.
Hensley, T. R., & Griffen, G. W. (1986). Victims of groupthink: The Kent State University board of trustees and 1977 gymnasium controversy. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 30, 497-531.
Herek, G., Janis, I. L., & Huth, P. (1987). Decision making during international crises:
Is quality of process related to outcome? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 31, 203-226.
Hirokawa, R. Y. (1982). Group communication and problem-solving effectiveness I: A critical review of inconsistent findings. Communication Quarterly, 30, 134-141.
Hirokawa, R. Y. (1983). Group communication and problem-solving effectiveness II:
An exploratory investigation of procedural functions. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 47, 59-74.
Hirokawa, R. Y. (1985). Discussion procedures and decision-making performance: A test of a functional perspective. Human Communication Research, 12, 203-224.
106
Hirokawa, R. Y. (1988). Group communication and decision-making performance: A continued test of the functional perspective. Human Communication Research, 14, 487-515.
Hirokawa, R. Y. (1992). Communication and group decision-making efficacy. In R. S.
Cathcart & L. A. Samovar (Eds.), Small Group Communication: A reader (6rd ed.). Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
Hirokawa, R. Y., & Pace, R. (1983). A descriptive investigation of the possible communication-based reasons for effective and ineffective group decision making. Communication Monographs, 50, 363-379.
Hirokawa, R. Y., & Rost, K. M. (1992). Effective group decision making in organizations: Field test of the vigilant interaction theory. Management Communication Quarterly, 5, 267-288.
Hirokawa, R. Y., & Scheerhorn, D. R. (1986). Communication in faulty group decision-making. In P. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Pooles (Eds.), Communication and group decision-making (pp. 63-80). Beverly Hill, CA: Sage.
Hirokawa, R. Y., Gouran, D. S., & Martz, A. E. (1988). Understanding the sources of faulty group decision making: A lesson from the Challenger disaster. Small Group Behavior, 19, 411-433.
Hogan, R., Curphy, G. J., & Hogan, J. (1994). What we know about leadership:
Effectiveness and personality. American Psychologist, 49, 485-504.
Jackson, S. E., & Ruderman, M. N. (1995). Diversity in work teams: Research
paradigms for a changing workplace. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Jackson, S. E. (1991). Team composition in organizational settings: Issues in managing an increasingly diverse work force. London: Sage.
Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of Groupthink. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions (2rd ed.).
Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Janis, I. L. (1985). Source of error in strategic decision making. In J. M. Pennings (Ed.), Organizational strategy and change (pp. 157-197). San Francisco:
107
Jossey-Bass.
Janis, I. L. (1989). Crucial decisions: Leadership in policy-making and management.
New York: Free Press.
Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: Free Press.
Kichuk, S. L., & Wiesner, W. H. (1997). The big five personality factors and team performance: Implications for selecting successful product design teams. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 14, 195-221.
Kimberley, L. G., Albert, V. C., & Paul, A. E. (2001). Team Cohesion and Individual Productivity: The Influence of the Norm for Productivity and the Identifiability of Individual Effort. Small Group Research, 32(1), 3-18.
Langfred, C. W. (1998). Is group cohesiveness a double-edged sword? An investigation of the effects of cohesiveness on performance. Small Group Research, 29(1), 124-143.
Latane, B., & L'Herrou, T. (1996). Spatial clustering in the conformity game:
Dynamic social impact in electronic groups. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 70, 1218-1230.
Lawler, E. E., Mohrman, S. A., & Ledford, G. E., Jr. (1995). Creating high
performance organizations: Practices and results of employee involvement and total quality management in Fortune 1000 Companies. San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass.
Leana, C. (1985). A partial test of Janis's groupthink model: The effects of group cohesiveness and leader behavior on defective decision making. Journal of Management, 11, 5–17.
Littlepage, G. E., Schmidt, G. W., Whisler, E. W., & Frost, A. G. (1995). An
input-process-output analysis of influence and performance in problem-solving groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 877- 889.
Lorge, I., Fox, D., Davitz, J., & Brenner, M. (1958). A survey of studies contrasting the quality of group performance and individual performance, 1920-1957.
Psychological Bulletin, 55, 337-372.
108
Lott, A. J., & Lott, B. E. (1965). Group cohesiveness and interpersonal attraction: A review of relationships with antecedent and consequent variable. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 259-302.
Mark, S., & Scott, C. (2002). The process-outcome connection in foreign policy decision making: A quantitative study building on groupthink. International Studies Quarterly, 46, 45-68.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1992). An Introduction of the Five-Factor Model and it’s applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175~215.
McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. NJ: Prentice-Hall.
McGrath, J. E. (1991). Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): A theory of groups.
Small Group Research, 22, 147-174.
McGrath, J. E., Arrow, H., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). The study of groups: Past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 95-105.
McGrath, J. E., Kelly, J. R., & Rhode, J. E. (1993). A feminist perspective on research methodology: Some metatheoretical issues, contrasts, and choices. In S. Oskamp
& M. Costanzo (Eds.), Gender issues in social psychology: The Claremont symposium on applied social psychology (Vol. 6, pp.19-37). Newbury Park, CA:
Sage.
Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads:
Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups.
Academy of Management Review, 21, 402-433.
Mullen, B., Anthony, T., Salas, E., & Driskell, J. E. (1993). Group cohesiveness and quality of decision making: An integration of tests of the groupthink hypothesis.
Small Group Research, 25(2), 189-204.
Neuman, G. A., & Wright, J. (1999). Team effectiveness: Beyond skills and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 376-389.
Neuman, G. A., Wagner, S. H., & Christiansen, N. D. (1999). The relationship
between work-team personality composition and the job performance of teams.
Group & Organization Management, 24, 28-45.
Norbert, L. K., & Tindale, R. S. (2004). Group performance and decision making.
109
Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 623-655.
Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward and adequate taxonomy of personality attributes:
Replicated factor structure. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574-583.
Offermann, L. R., & Gowing, M. K. (1990). Organization of the future: Changes and challenges. American Psychologist, 45, 95-108.
Orlitzky, M., & Hirokawa, R. Y. (2001). To err is human, to correct for it divine: A meta-analysis of research testing the functional theory of group decision-making effectiveness. Small Group Research, 32, 313-341.
Parks, C. D., Sanna, L. J., & Posey, D. C. (2003). Retrospection in social dilemmas:
How thinking about the past affects future cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 988-996.
Peabody, D. (1987). Selecting representative trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 59-77.
Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1-28.
Peter, G. D., Richard, R. R., & Jack, W. M. (1997). The effects of peer feedback on team member behavior. Group and Organization Management, 22(4), 508-520.
Poole, M. S., & Hollingshead, A. B. (2004). Theories of small groups: An interdisciplinary perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Cihangir, S. (2001). Quality of decision making and group norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 918-930.
Riess, M. (1982). Seating preferences as impression management: A literature review and theoretical integration. Communication, 11, 85-113.
Sally, A. C., & Caroline, D. P. (2000). The Measurement of cohesion in work teams.
Small Group Research, 31, 71-88.
Schafer, M., & Crichlow, S. (2002). The process-outcome connection in foreign policy decision making: A quantitative study building on groupthink.
110
International Studies Quarterly, 46, 45-68.
Schneider, F. W., & Delaney, J. G. (1972). Effect of individual achievement
motivation on group problem solving efficiency. Journal of Social Psychology, 86, 291-298.
Shaw, M. E. (1976). Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group behavior. NY:
McGraw-Hill.
Shaw, M. (1932). A comparison of individuals and small groups in the rational solution of complex problems. American Journal of Psychology, 44, 491-504.
Smith, M. A., & Canger, J. M. (2004). Effects of supervisor big five personality on subordinate attitudes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18(4), 465-481.
Stasser, G. (1999). The uncertain role of unshared information in collective choice. In L. L. Thompson, J. M. Levine & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of Knowledge (pp. 49-69). Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum.
Stasser, G., & Stewart, D. (1992). Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of personality and Psychology, 63, 426-434.
Stasser, G., Taylor, L. A., & Hanna, C. (1989). Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 67-78.
Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467-1478.
Stevens, M. J., & Campion, M. A. (1999). Staffing work teams: Development and validation of a selection test for teamwork settings. Journal of Management, 25(2), 207-228.
Stogdill, R. M. (1972). Group productivity, drive, and cohesiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 8, 26-43.
Susan, M., & Linda, C. A. (2003). Personality heterogeneity in teams: Which
differences makes a difference for team performance. Small Group Research, 34,
111
651-677.
Tellegen, A., & Waller, N. G. (1987). Reexamining basic dimensions of natural language trait descriptors. Paper presented at the meeting of the American.
Psychological Association, Chicago.
Terborg, J., Castore, C., & DeNinno, J. (1976). Group Composition, Group
Performance, and Cohesion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 782--790.
Poole, M. S., & Hollingshead, A. B. (2004). Theories of small groups:
Interdisciplinary perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Thomas, J. B., & Kenneth, P. D. (1996). Diagnosing whether an organization is truly ready to empower work teams: A case study. Human Resource Planning, 19, 38-47.
Thompson, L., Kray, L., & Lind, A. (1998). Cohesion and respect: An examination of group decision making in social and escalation dilemmas. Journal of
Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 289-311.
Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1961). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Journal of Personality, 60, 225-251.
Turner, M. E., Pratkansis, A. R., Probasco, P., & Leve, C. (1999). Threat, cohesion, and group effectiveness: Testing a social identity maintenance perspective on groupthink. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(5), 781-796.
Wayne, J. H., Musisca, N., & Fleeson, W. (2004). Considering the role of personality in the work-family experience: Relationships of the big five to work-family conflict and facilitation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 64(1), 108-130.
Williams, K. Y., & O’Reilly, C. A. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations:
A review of 40 years of research. In B. M. Staw & R. M. Sutton (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (pp.77-140). CT: JAI Press.
Winquist, J. R., & Larson, J. R., Jr. (1998). Information pooling: When it impacts group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 371-377.
Wittenbaum, G. M., & Park, E. S. (2001). The collective preference for shared
112
information. Current direction in Psychological Science, 10, 70-73.
Wittenbaum, G. M., & Stasser, G. (1996). Management of information in small groups.
In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.), What’s social about social cognition? Social cognition research in small groups (pp. 3-28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Wittenbaum, G. M., Hubbell, A. P., & Zuckerman, C. (1999). Mutual enhancement:
Toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 967-968.
Won-Woo, P. (2000). A comprehensive empirical investigation of the relationships among variables of the groupthink model. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(8), 873-887.
113