國中資賦優異學生過度激動特質與生活壓力及生活適應之關係研究

全文

(1). 2 The Study of Relationship among Overexcitabilities, Life Stress and Life Adaptation on Junior High School Gifted Students. ..

(2) 8 w8. :. 8. o. .. 8. 8. 8. r. 8 -. 8. ). .. 8. ). 8 4 (. 8. 8. -. n. (. 1 : (. 9. E 8. 6. :. E (. ( 2018/02/06 i.

(3) . . E. -. .. . SPSS22.0. 2. t. Pearson 2. 2. ) .. ( (. ;. (. .. ( (. (. .. (. ( 1.. . .. 2.. 8 .. 8 .. 8. 3.. .. E. 4.. .. E. ii. E. E.

(4) 5. . 6.. 7.. E. 8.. .. 8. E. .. .. 2. iii. 2.

(5) The Study of Relationship among Overexcitabilities, Life Stress and Life Adaptation on Junior High School Gifted Students Chia-en Chen. Abstract The purpose of this study were to investigate the relationship among overexcitability (OE) traits , life stress and life adaptation of junior high school gifted students. The 236 gifted students in Greater Taipei area were analyzed with “The Me Scale II”, “Life Stress Inventory for Junior High school Student” scale, and the “Life Adaptation Scale for Junior High School Students” as tools. The results of this study are as followed: 1. Intellectual Overexcitability(TOE) of gifted students is evident from other OE traits. The boys are more outstanding than the girls on Psychomotor Overexcitability(POE). There are no significant differences between grade levels. 2. School-related stress is the most significant domain. The girls are higher than the boys on School-related stress and physical and mental development stress. There are no significant difference between grade levels. 3. Gifted students are excellent in society adaptation. There are no significant differences between genders and grade levels. . iv.

(6) 4. The correlationship among OE, life stress, and life adaptation. (1) POE is only correlated with peer interpersonal stress. Except for family adaptation, POE is correlated with other life adaptation subscale. (2) Sensual Overexcitability (SOE) correlated with stress-related subscales except for the family-related stress subscale. Except for the family adaptation and society adaptation subscales SOE is correlted with other life adaptation subscales. (3) Intellectual Overexcitability (TOE) is correlated with peer interpersonal stress and also correlated with all of the subscales in "Life Adaptation Scale for Junior High School Students". (4) Imaginational Overexcitability(MOE) is only correlated with peer interpersonal stress as well as correlated with all of the subscales in "Life Adaptation Scale for Junior High School Students". (5) Emotional Overexcitability (EOE) is correlated with all of the subscales in " Life Stress Inventory for Junior High school Student" and as well as self-awareness and society adaptations. (6) Both family-related and school-related stresses are correlated with all of the subscales in "Life Adaptation Scale for Junior High School Students" (7) Peer interpersonal stress is correlated with self-direction, family, relationship, and work adaptations. v.

(7) (8) Physical and mental development stress is correlated with all life adaptation subscales except the society adaptation subscales. 5.Life adaptation performance of students could be predicted using TOE, physical and mental development stress, and MOE as variables.. Key words: gifted and talented student, overexcitabilities, life stress, life adaptation. vi.

(8) ;. ;. ;. ;. . ;. 2. . .. .. 2. .. 2. .. ; vii.

(9) 8 ; 8. .. . .. viii.

(10) ix.

(11) .. 2 E. .. (2 II II. 5 .. .. (2. . 5. .. .. .. (2. . 5. . 2 . .. 2 2. x.

(12) .. 2 ;. ;. . 8. .. o E. ( 8. 8 .. 8. (. : (. . 8. E. o. (. .. E 7 E. 6 1. (.

(13) E. 6 …. (. 8Dabrowski(1964) ( 6. . Ackerman(1997). 8. 8 6. . …. (. 8. ( . .. bb. …. ( : :. o. E. 8 (6 1. 12. Silverman(1993) (6 . …. 6 2. ….

(14) ; 8 i. (. ) 6. 9. k. … 6 6. :. 98. 8 1979. ). E E. (. 2001 ( 8. Magery. Freehill(1972)6. E. 2. E o. 2. 1999) 8 E. 2 3.

(15) 8 ; (. 8. (. 6. 9 8. 8. 6. 6. …. ( 8 w. 4.

(16) ; (. ). . (. .. (. .. (. .. 8. .. 5.

(17) (. 2. ). 2. ;. 2. .. (. )(. 2. .. (. )(. 2. ;. .. (. 2. .. (. 2. .. (. 2. ;. (. .. .. (. 2. .. (. 2. .. (. .. .. 6. )(.

(18) 2 ). . 2 2. .. 5. 2. ) 2 o. ;o. 5. ( ;. -. ) 2 ;o 5. ( -. ;. 2 ( 2. 7.

(19) Overexcitability Dabrowski(1964). E. overexcitability,OE intellectual,TOE. sensual,SOE. psychomotor,POE. emotional,EOE. imaginational,MOE ). ;. ( o. o oE. .. ( (. 2. ). 2 o. -. 2. 8. a. (.

(20) Life Stress .. :. :. o. o o 2. . 2. o :. : : E. Life Adaptation o o. 8. 2 -. 2. oE. -. . . E o. .. oE. 9.

(21) 10.

(22) ; . ( ;. Terman. Oden(1959). w8. E. E. Davis. .. Rimm(1998). n. 8 8 Terman. Oden(1959). 6. 8. E. 6. E. Lovecky(1993) 6 2006. 8 Clark. o 2007 .. )6. w 11. 8.

(23) (Powell & Haden,1984). 2000 6. ) o E (. Lovecky(1992) .. i. 6. (. VanTassel-Baska. Stambaugh(2006). (. 6. E. (. 6 Lovecky(1992). E. oE 6 (. ( E. Powell. -. Haden(1984) Davis Rimm 2012 . 6. 4 ( 12. Single.

(24) VanTassel-Baska. (. Stambaugh(2006). -. (. ( Davis. Rimm(2004). (. ). .. -. .. 6. (Manaster & Powell, 1983) ( Davis. Rimm(2004) E. (. E. 6. 6 E. (. 6. ( Lovecky. Davis. 1992). Rimm(2004). ( -. E (. 6 2007. 8 ( 2001 13.

(25) ( (. E. 6. (. ). ). 14. 2.

(26) ;. 1938. Dabrowski. E. 2. 8. (Psychic Overexcitability). 8 oE. (. 8. E. Dabrowski. 8. TPD. TPD. theory of positive disintegration 8. E. (Dabrowski & Piechowski, 1977; Piechowski, 2002; Silverman, 1993). ;. Dabrowski. E2. (. 8. 6. E. Piechowski,1997 E. E. 6 (Dabrowski &. 6. Piechowski, 1977) (. (Silverman,1983) 15. Dabrowski. 170.

(27) w. 85%. .. 120-150. 6 (Dabrowski,1964). Piechowski(1999). (. Dabrowski. o. o. oE. 2 (Dabrowski & Piechowski, 1977) ) ). -. s Ackerman,1997 ; Dabrowski & Piechowski,1977 ; Harrisom &. Haneghan,. Silverman,1993 (Psychomotor OE) o ). ) 16.

(28) (Sensual OE). ;. ( (. (. k. (Imaginational OE). (. 6. .. w (Intellectual OE). (. (. ( (Emotional OE) (. E .. :. E E. ( 17.

(29) E. ( ( 2003. 2001 Teiso, 2007 Treat, 2006. ;. (. w. -. w (. ( (Falk , Manzanero & Miller,1997). (. (. E (Bouchert & Falk , 2001;. E. Piechowski , Sliverman &Falk , 1985 ; Wirth &Rost , 2011) 2003. 2006 ;. 2008. .. .. (. (Ackerman,1997) (. . 2005. 18. E. 2012.

(30) Terman. .. … …. … E 1996 ( (chen,1993). .. (. .. E. . 2003. 2005. Bouchet & Falk,2001 ; Miller, Silverman & Falk, 1994 (Falk , Manzanero & Miller,1997) (Peichowski &. ( Cunningham, 1985). ;. 2011 (. ). 2003 2001. 6. . 2011. n. 19. n. (. ).

(31) 2011. (. ). 62. 10 o. . a. a a. a a .257~.689. .939. 2. .029~.688. . 8. 8. 2. -. (. 2. 1. 6. .. 2 2. (. (. 6 8 ( w. 8 2. 20.

(32) 1932. Cannon. o. ). (. (Lazarus & Folkman,1984) (stimulus-based model). ) based model). (response-. (interactional model). -. o. 6 (Cox, 1990 ; Holmes & Rahe, 1967 ; Sutherland & Cooper,1990). (Sutherlan & Cooper,1990 ,p146). 21.

(33) ; Cox(1990) 8o. 8 o. 8 i. (. Cox,1987: fig1.8. Hobfoll(1989). 8 8. 2. o (Lazarus. Folkman,1984). 22. (.

(34) Slavin , Rainer , McCreary & Gowda , 1991, p157). ;. (. .. o 8. 8. 8. Lazarus. :. Cohen(1977). :. (cataclysmic event) :. 5;. E. 23. n. o.

(35) ;. (personal stressor). oE :. oE. 2:. o :(daily hassles) :. :. o o o. 2009. 1967. Holnes. :. Rahe (The social Readjustment. n. Rating Scale. SRRS. 8o (8. o (Stone,. :. Kessler & Haythornthwaite,1991) ( (Coddington,1972). : .. ). . 24. E.

(36) .. 2. oE. oE. 1986. .. .. 63. : 1991. :. . 50. :. :. :. 1994. .. 50. :. :. 1998. .. 25.

(37) 60 :. ;. 2000. . :. 42. 2001. .. .. 32 E oE Ⅱ. 2003. : E. :. :. . 29. 26.

(38) 2004. .. .. 42. : 2004. :. .. E. .. : 47. :. (. :. E. oE 1999 2004. 2. 2 .. 0 -. o. 27. ..

(39) .. 8. ) ). 1991. .. :. 2000. . ( (. (6. 2. ; 1991 :. ; -. .. ;. .. 1993. :. 6. . -. ;. 2000 (. 5 5. 28. 6.

(40) … Lamborn, Mounts, Steinberg, & Dornbusch, 1991. 2005. … …. …. …. ). 1993. … oE. …. …. D. 2001. .. ( 2002. :. 6. (. (. 2. 2. 2. .. 29. 2. 2. 2 8. (.

(41) ;. .. Erikson -. .. 8. ( E. oE Moneta,2001 1993 : (. . 2000. -k Gross(1998). E. o. 6 E. E 8 E. E 6. 8. (Clark,1996) 2001. . Adams. (1994). 9. 30.

(42) k. ( 8. 8. 8. . 9. (. 31.

(43) 1859. Darwin. 8. w o 1986 ( o 8 ;. 8 . 1986. 8 (. o. 8. (. (. o. . o. o 1987. E 2000 6. o. .. (adjustment. 8. (. o. o. .. ;. 1977. o. o. o 32.

(44) .. 1995 6. E oE oE. oE. -. E. Arkoff(1968). .. oE. E 1997. 2003. oE. 2003. o. ;. 1995. o ). 2. .. .. (. o. (. o. (. … E. o. E. (. ( 2 2009 :. . . E .. 33.

(45) 8. ) ) 1992. .. . (. 2001. ( (. Leroux(1988). 6. oE. .6. ( 2001. ( 8. E 9. 8. ;. 1995 2002 (o ;. ( 2011. .. (. 5. .. 5. ( 8. 34. (.

(46) 1978. o E. … 1984. o … E Lai(1987). 6 6. Shaffer(2002). ). ) 8. ). 6. 6. 6. … 6. ( ( (. 6 ). 35. E.

(47) (. 8 o. . .. :. 8. w 9. 36. (.

(48) . 2. -. ) -. 2. oE. .oE E E. 37.

(49) 2. 2. E. E. 38.

(50) ;. 2. ). 2001. . 8. .. 8 .. 2. .; (. ). . 2. . ). E. M. C. L. I. .. .. .. .. 8. 14. 12. 9. 16. 7. 8. 14. 6. 9. 6. 8. 8. 24. 6. 9. 15. 7. 8. 13. 6. 9. 39. 49. 34. 52. 35.

(51) D. W. .. .. 8. 15. 10. 9. 12. 6. 8. 9. 2. 9. 8. 4. 156. 80. 40. 43. 23. 236.

(52) o. (. ; .. ). .. oE. ). ;. 5. The Me Scale (II). (2011). (II) 2 o. 6. 4. 5. 6. 7. 6. 9. 7. 7. (5. 62. ). .. a a. a a a. (. 41.

(53) ;. (II)2. ( 7. 2 ;. 1 2. 9 ; .700~.855 .70. (. (α=.855). .. (α=.825). (α =.814). (α=.772). (α=.778). (α=.760). (α=.703). (α=.700). (α=.777). (α=.759) .939. 2. 2. o (.765) (.735). (.721) (.674). (.754) (.713). (.587). . 6. .804(p<.01). 6. 42. .587~.765. 2. (.748). (.701). (.678). 8 2.

(54) Life Stress Inventory for Junior High. .. School Student 2004. .. n2. .. ;. .. o : : :. 47 (. o. ). ):. … 1. :. 13. 13. (;) 14. : (. ). 27. 36. 10. ) : 11. 43. 13. E :. (. 26. 37. 47.

(55) ;. 2 :. : ) o 1. 0 2 0. : : 94. 3. 2. 1. .45. 9. ; 80 .82. 2 E. .80. .79. p<.001. 44. .84 .89. ;.

(56) Life Adaptation Scale for Junior High. .. School Students 2009. 2 .. .. .. o. ). oE. ;. E. oE. .…. oE. .. oE. E. oE oE. E:. oE oE. ;. .. Likert. o 4. 2. 3 1 o -. 8. 45.

(57) . ) 1. 5.55. o 69.34%. o. 2. 2006 .. oE. .. 2 . E. .. ; 788. . 1033. 397. .. 2218 E. α= .97. .79. .80 .67 (2013)6 α .94. .92 2. .93. .01. .05. .86 2. .01 60. .5. .87 .89 .69 .70 .76 .66 .76 r=.78. 46. .. .81. α.

(58) o. 2 -. 2. ;. -. .. .. 2. 2. -. 2. .. -. 2 -. 47.

(59) ;. . .. i . 35. a E. -. 2 (. . SPSS22.0. . 2. o. -. 48. ).

(60) 2 (Statistical Package for the Social. Sciences SPSS for WINDOWS 22.0). .. (. . ( t. ;. ( t (. .. .. (. .. .. ( t. ;. . (. t. . (. .. .. (. .. .. ( ;. t. . (. t. . ( 49.

(61) .. pearson .. .. .. .. 50.

(62) 2 2 (2. -. (. . .. .. .. )2. ;. 2. .. .. 2 (. ). .. .. .. (2. .. (. .. .. 2. 2. ). 2. -. ). .. 4-1 .. 2. . 1.. 2 M=4.81. 2.. M=4.48. 4.. M=4.29. 5.. 1. SD=0.96. 3.. SD=0.82. M=4.47 M=4.11. SD=1.04. 51. 3.. 4.. 2. SD=0.81.

(63) 5.. SD=0.76. .. 2 (. .. 2 Piechowski & Colangelo(1984) (. .. 2003. ;. .. ( 2. 2 .. .. 2 .. 2001. 2 (. .. .. ) 4-1. .. 2. .. (2 E 236. 4.29. 1.04. 4. 236. 4.47. .81. 3. 236. 4.81. .82. 1. 236. 4.48. .96. 2. 236. 4.11. .79. 5. 52.

(64) (. 2. ).. 4-2 t=3.04, p<.01. Lysy & Piechowski(1983) 2. .. 2001. 8. .. 2. (. o. 6. 4-2. (. ). (n=156). **. (. n=80. t. 4.44. 1.06. 4.01. .95. 3.04**. 4.44. .85. 4.53. .73. -.79. 4.80. .82. 4.83. .82. -.29. 4.54. .94. 4.37. 1.01. 1.33. 4.08. .80. 4.18. .77. -.90. p <.01. 2. .. 4-3. (. ). o 2001. .. . 53. 2. .. .. ..

(65) . .. 2. o. 4-3. (. 5 (n=131). (. ) n=105. 5. t. 4.40. 1.02. 4.15. 1.05. 1.85. 4.46. .77. 4.49. .87. -.25. 4.88. .78. 4.73. .87. 1.40. 4.48. .91. 4.50. 1.03. -.14. 4.07. .68. 4.16. .91. -.87. (. .. ). .. 2. ( (. E. .. (. ( .. . .. 5. 54. 5. -.

(66) ;. .. .. .. 2. -. ). .. .. 4-4 .. 2. . :1.. 2 M=1.16. 3.. M=0.93. 1. 3.. SD=0.67. E. SD=0.87. 4.. M=1.31 4.. E. 2.. SD=0.71. SD=0.60. .. .. ( 2006 1996 2. .6. (. . 6 (. .. 8. ). .. 55. M=0.86. 3. 2..

(67) 4-4. .. .. (2. E. E. 236. .93. .60. 3. 236. 1.31. .71. 1. 236. .86. .67. 4. 236. 1.16. .87. 2. 2. .. 4-5. .. . t =-2.87 , p<.01. 6. -. t =-5.42 , p<.01. ( 2007. 2. . -. (. .. 2. 2 2007. : .. ( E. ( 4-5 2. .. ( 2. .. ( (. 2. 56. (. -.

(68) 4-5. . (n=156). t. .90. .57. .99. .64. -1.08. 1.22. .68. 1.49. .72. -2.87**. .84. .69. .86. .64. -.43. .95. .79. 1.56. .88. -5.42**. E. **. n=80. p <.01. 2. .. 2. .. .. .. .. 5. E -. (. .. 2007. .. 2. . (. ;6. ;. ; .. (. 6. 4-6. 5. . (n=131). E. 5. t. .97. .63. .89. .55. 1.01. 1.32. .72. 1.30. .69. .24. .90. .66. .81. .69. 1.04. 1.19. .85. 1.12. .90. .60. 57. n=105.

(69) (. .. .. .. .. ( .. (. .. ( . .. ( (. .. (. 6. ( ( .. 5. 58. 5. -.

(70) .. .. .. 2. 2. -. ). .. .. 4-7 .. 2. . :1.. 2. . M=25.38. 2.. M=24.98. 3.. M =24.61. 4.. M =24.56. 5.E. M =24.32. 6.. M =24.22. 7.. M =23.75. 8.. M =23.27. 1.. SD=4.58. 2.. SD=4.54. 3.. SD=4.16. 4.. SD=3.91. 5.. SD=3.86. 6.. SD=3.78. 7.E. SD=3.61. 8.. SD=3.59 (. . 2. .. .. (. (. 6. 2. 23. 6. 25. 2. 2001 .. .(. -. oE. o. 6 . 8 (. :. .. 59.

(71) 4-7. .. .. (2. E. E. 236. 23.27. 4.58. 8. 236. 24.61. 4.54. 3. 236. 25.38. 3.78. 1. 236. 24.32. 3.61. 5. 236. 24.22. 3.86. 6. 236. 24.98. 3.59. 2. 236. 23.75. 4.16. 7. 236. 24.56. 3.91. 4. 2. 4-8 o. .. 2. .. .. .. .. . E . 1997. (. oE. 2. 60. 2.

(72) 4-8. . (n=156). E. t. 23.44. 4.54. 22.94. 4.68. .80. 24.44. 4.49. 24.95. 4.66. -.81. 25.28. 3.50. 25.56. 3.14. -.60. 24.53. 3.75. 23.90. 3.30. 1.27. 24.33. 3.85. 23.99. 3.89. .65. 24.96. 3.60. 25.03. 3.59. -.13. 23.62. 4.09. 24.00. 4.30. -.67. 24.68. 3.96. 24.34. 3.83. .64. 2. 4-9. n=80. .. 2. o. .. .. .. .. 5. .. E . 2011. ( 2. (. 5. 5 2. 6. 5. (. 6. .. 61. (. ..

(73) 4-9. 5. . (n=131). E. (. 5. n=105. t. 22.90. 4.82. 23.72. 4.23. -1.36. 24.92. 4.62. 24.24. 4.45. 1.14. 25.43. 3.23. 25.31. 3.56. .25. 24.50. 3.61. 24.09. 3.61. .88. 24.28. 3.78. 23.13. 3.98. .29. 25.03. 3.52. 24.92. 3.69. .22. 23.59. 4.13. 23.94. 4.21. -.65. 24.63. 3.91. 24.48. 3.93. .30. .. .. .. .. ( .. (. .. (. (. (. .. 2. (. -. -. .. .. 2 .. 62. (. 5 5. -.

(74) (. .. ). .. . 4-10. ). 2. .. .. 2. (. ) .01 .33≤ r ≤.54 p<.01 2. 6 .. .01. E. r=.17 p<.01 E. ( . .05. E .14≤ r ≤.16. p<.05 .25≤ r ≤.33 p<.01 E (. .. o. E. ( (;) .01 .42≤ r ≤.61 p<.01 2. 6 63.

(75) .. .05. E. r=.15 p<.05. r=.18. p<.01. E (6 . .01. .19≤ r ≤.31 p<.01. (. . oE. (. .. ) .01. .46≤ r ≤.64 p<.01 2. 6 .. E. .05. r=.15 p<.05. E. (6 . .01. E .18≤ r ≤.55 p<.01 E (. . oE. E:. 64. (6.

(76) .01 2 .45≤ r ≤.64 p<.01 2. 6 .. .01. E. r=.19 p<.01. E. (6 .05. . r=.16 p<.05. E .01. .20≤ r ≤.45. p<.01 E. ( . oE. (. (. ) .01 2. .33≤ r ≤.50 p<.01 2. 6 .05. . r=.13 p<.05. E. .01. (. .25≤ r ≤.35 p<.01 E. (6 .05. . r=.14 p<.05. (. .01. p<.01. ( . oE. .. E. ( 65. r=.21.

(77) ;. (. .. ) .01. .36≤ r ≤.49. p<.01. 2. 6 .05. . r=-.15 p<.05. E .01. (. -.38≤ r ≤-.17. p<.01. 6. …. .. (. (;) .01. .47≤ r ≤.59. p<.01. 2 .05. . r=-.16 p<.05. E .01. (. -.29≤ r. ≤-.19 p<.01 .. 6. 6. E. E. 6. (. ). E .01. E p<.01. E E. 2. 6 .05. .. r=-.15. p<.05. E. -.25≤ r ≤-.20 p<.01 66. .36≤ r ≤.52. (. .01.

(78) E. 6. E. .. E. E. 6. .01. .49≤ r ≤.59. p<.01. 2 .. 6 E. .01. -.35≤. r ≤-.21 p<.01. E 6. . oE. .. (. ) E .01. .49≤ r. ≤.70 p<.01 E. 6 (;) E .01. ≤.59. p<.01. E. 6. 67. .47≤ r.

(79) (. ) E .01. ≤.72. .59≤ r. p<.01. E. 6. (. )E. E .01 ≤.60. p<.01. .35≤ r. E 6. (. ) E .01. ≤.82. .46≤ r. p<.01 E. (. 6. ) E .01. ≤.75. .51≤ r. p<.01 E. (. 6. ) E .01 68. .35≤ r.

(80) ≤.76. p<.01 E (. 6. ) E .01. ≤.82. .51≤ r. p<.01 E. 6. (. (. (. ).. ). .. .. . E. .. E. (. ).. .. .. (6 (. 8. (. 8. E. ( 69. ..

(81) (. 8. .. . 2. E E. (. E. (. 8. E .. (. 8. .. 70. ..

(82) 3. 3. 2. 1. *. 9. 9. 9. 09. 3. 7. 5. 8. -6 2. .. 4. 1. 9 *. 71. 7. 3. 9. 09. 9. 3. 9. 3.

(83) .. 4-11 53.169(p=.000) 4-12. ***. SS. df. MS. 62641.213. 3. 20880.404. 91109.918. 232. 392.715. 153751.131. 235. F 53.169***. .000. p <.001. 4-12. .638 -. 63.8. 40.8%. . 24.0%. 72. .408.

(84) 15.5% 1.3% t t. .. R. R2. R2. F. B. β. t. R2 .490 .240. .237. .240. 73.833. 1.054. .442. .628 .395. .390. .155. 59.690. -. -.397. *. p <.05. **. .400. .013. p <.01. 73. 4.914. .243. **. 1.065 .638 .408. **. 6.695. 7.811 .146. *. 2.217.

(85) 74.

(86) (. ). . (. ). 2011. 2004 2009. . 236 5. . . t. pearson. (. ). .. 75.

(87) ( (. ). 8. .. 8 . (. ). (. ). 8 8. . .. 76. ).

(88) 0. 8. . 8. 0. .. % 8 77.

(89) 0 8. 8. 0. 4. 4. %. 8. 0 78.

(90) %. 1. 8. 79.

(91) %. .. .. . .. .. 80. 8.

(92) %. . %. . % .. -. .. 81. ..

(93) (. ). 4. ;. 8. .. 5. .. . 82.

(94) 4. 5. 83.

(95) 84.

(96) 1992 2(7) 2001 7. 61-86. 11. 1-31. 2007 1991 486. 25-33. 1993 2011. Ormrod, J. E. (2008) Educational Psychology: Developing. learners, 6thed. 2003 1991 2006. 1999 2006. :. 2001 166. 3481-3484 2012. : 85. -.

(97) 2-1-2-22. G. A. Davis, & S. B. Rimm,. 8. &D.Single. 2010. 2003. (. 2003 1993 2003. ). 3. 2001 1995 2007. -. Clark, B(1997).Crowing up gifted: developing the potentiall of children at home and at school. 2004 2003 2008 8 2006. ,6(1). 69-88. 1996 2000 86. 1. 67-89.

(98) 2001. :. 2011. 2014. :. 2009 1979 1986. : 2. 2002. 13. 251-264. :. 2012 43. 4. 805-832. 1996 60 1977 10. 91-106 2009. :. 2002 2005 27(1). 47-63. 2011 87. 31-36.

(99) 2002 2000 1987. 10. 121-141 2003. 1994. 1997. A. (2005) 1999. ( ). 2001 ( 2000. ). :. 77. 1-7. 1995 1997 10 567 1996. — 88. 525-.

(100) 2004. :. 2005 1978 11. 63-85. 1986 28. 117-136. (2013): 44. 3. 609-628. 1998 2. (. ). Ackerman, C. M. (1997). Identifying gifted adolescents using personality characteristics: Dabrowskis overexcitabilities. Roeper Review, 19(4), 229-236. Adams, R. R.(1994). Jimmy-A gifted child with behaveour difficulties. Gifted Education International, 10(1), 21-23. Ackerman, P. L.(1997). Intelligence,Personality, and interests : Evidence for overlapping traits. Psychological Bulletin, 121(2), 219-245. Arkoff, A. (1968). Adjustment and mental health. New York: McGram-Hill. Bouchet, N., &; Falk, R. F.. 2001. . The relationship among. giftedness, gender, and overexcitability. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45 4 , 260-267. Chen, C. Y. (1993). The development of twenty outstanding inventors. TPE: Hsin Li Pub. 89.

(101) Coddington, R. D. (1972). The significance of life events as etiologic factors in the diseases of children: I- a survey of professional workers. Journal of Psyshosomatic Research, 16, 7-13. Cox, T. (1990). Stress. Baltimore:University of Park Press. Cox, T. (1978). Stress. Baltimore: University of Park Press. Clark, B.(1996). Growing up gifted : Developing the potentiall of children at home and at school. New York : Macmillian. Dabrowski, K.(1964).Positive disintegration .Boston, MA: Little Browm. Davis,. . A., & Rimm, S. B.(1998). Education of the gifted and talent.. Needgam ,MA:Alley and Bacon. Davis,. . A., & Rimm, S. B.(2004). Education of the gifted and talent(5th. ed.).Needham Heights, MA:Ally and Bacon. Dabrowski, K.. 1964. .Positive disintegration. Boston, MA: Little Brown.. Dabrowski, K. & Piechowski, M. M. (1977), Theory of levels of emotional development (vol.I & II), New York: Dabor science publications. Falk, R. F., Manzanero, J. B. & Miller, N.B.(1997). Developmental Gross, M. U. M.(1998). The “Me” behind the mask :Intellectually gifted students and the search for identy. Roeper Review, 20(3),167-173. Harrison, G. E.,& Haneghan, J.P.(2011). The gifted and the shadow of the night: Dabrowski’s Overexcitabilities and their correlation to insomnia, death anxiety, and fear of the unknown. Journal of the Education of the Gifted, 34(4), 669-697. Holmes, T. H. & Rahe, R. H. (1967). The social readjustment rating scale.Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 213-218. Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resource:A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513-524. Holmes, T., & Rahe, R. (1967). The social readjustment rating scale, Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11, 213-218. 90.

(102) Lysy, K. Z. & Piechowski, M. M. (1983). Personal growth: An empirical study using Jungian and Dabrowskian measures. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 108 ,267-320. Lovecky,D.V.(1992). Exploring social and emotional aspects of giftedess in children. Roeper Review, 15(1),18-25. Lovecky,D.V.(1993). The quest for meaning: Counseling issues with gifted children and adolescents. In L. K. Silverman (Ed.),Counseling the gifted & talented. (pp.29-50). Denver, Colorado: Love Publishing. Lazarus, R. S. & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping.NY: Springer. Leroux, J. A. (1988). Voices from the classroom: Academic and social self-concepts of gifted adolescents. Journal for the education of the gifted, 11(3), 3-18. Lamborn, S. D., Mounts, N.S., Steinberg, L.,& Dornbusch, S.M. (1991). Patterns of competence and adjustment among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful families. Child Development, 62, 1049-1065. Magery, J. F., & Freehill, M. F.(1972). Critical questions and answers relating to school and society in the education of the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly,16,185-194. Moneta, G. B. (2001). Longitudinal study of the self-concept and experiential components of self-worth and affect across adolescence.Applied Developmental Science, 5(3), p125-142. Manaster , G. J. & Powell, P. M.(1983). A frame work forunderstanding gifted adolescents’ psychological maladjustment. Roeper Review, 6(2),70-73. Miller, N. B., Silverman, L.K., & Falk, R. F. (1994). Emotional development. intellectual ability and gender. Journal for the 18(1), 20-38. 91. Education of the Gifted,.

(103) Potential in venezuelan and American artists: A cross-cultural validity study. Creativity Research Journal, 10 (2-3),201-206. Piechowski, M. M. & Colangelo, N. (1984). Developmental potential of the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28(2),80-88. Peichowski, M. M., Silverman, L. K., & Falk, R. F. (1985). Comparison of intellectually and artistically gifted on five dimensisons of mental functioning. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 60, 539-549. Piechowski, M. M. & Cunningham, K. (1985).Patterns of overexcitability in a group of artists.The Journal of Creative Behavior, 19(3), 153-175. Powell, P. M. & Haden, T. (1984). The intellectual and psychsocial nature of extreme giftedness. Roeper Review, 6 (3) ,131-133. Piechowski, M. M. (1997). Emotional development and emotional giftedess. In N, Colangelo & G.A. Davis(Eds.), Handbook of Gifted education(pp.285-306). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Piechowski, M. M. (2002). Experiencing in a higher key: Dabrowski's theory of and for the gifted, Gifted Education Communicator, Spring(2), 28-31, 35-36. Silverman, L. K. (1993). The gifted individual. In L. K. Silv- erman (ED.). Counseling the gifted and talented ,3-28. Silverman, L. K. (1983). Issues in affective development of the gifted. In J. Van Tassel-Baska(Ed.), A practiceal guide for counseling the gifted (pp.6-21). Reston, VA: CEC Press. Silverman, L. K. (1993). The gifted individual, In L. K. Silverman (Ed.), Counseling the gifted and talented , 3-28, Denver, CO: Love. Sutherland V. J. & Cooper C. L. (1990). A psychological perspective for health professionals. London: Champn & Hall. Slavin, L. A., Rainer, K. L., McCreary, M. L. & Gowda, K. K. (1991). Toward a multicultural model of the stress process. Journal of 92.

(104) Counseling & Development, 70, 156-164. Stone, A. A., Kessler, R. C. & Haythornthwaite, J. A. (1991). Measuring daily events and experiences: decisions for the researcher. Journal of Personality, 59(3),575-609. Shaffer, R.D. (2002). Developmental Psychology. Belmont, CA: Wardsworth/Thomson Learning. Terman, L. M., & Oden, M. H.(1959). Genetic studies of genius:Vol.5. The gifted grows at midlife. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Tieso, C. L.. 2007. . Overexcitabilities: A new way to think about talent ?. Roeper Review, 29(4), 232-239. Treat, A. R.(2006). Overexcitability in gifted sexually diverse opulations. Journal of Advanced Academicw,17 (4) , 244-257. VanTassel-Baska, J. & Stambaugh, T.(2006). Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners (3rd ed). Boston: Ally and Bacon. Wirthwein, L. &; Rost, D. H. (2011). Focussing on overexcitabilities: Studies with gifted and academically talented adults. Journal of Personality and Individual Differences, 51(3), 337-342.. 93.

(105) 3. 9. ). (. 7. . 9. 7. ( (. 4. 7. ¨. 94. ¨. . . . .

(106) *. 2 ). 5 2. *. 52 *. 2. ). 2. 95. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(107) 2. (. 2. *. 5 *. 2 9. 52. (. 96. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(108) 2. * 2. 0 *. 2 *. 8 6. 2. 97. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(109) *. 5. (. 2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2. 98. . . . . . .

(110) 1 2. (. 2 2(. 99. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(111) 9. 2. * *. *. *: :* *: ). ¨ 2. 2. 100. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨ ¨.

(112) 5. .. 101. ¨ ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨ ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨.

(113) 2. /. 102. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨. ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨. ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨. ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨. ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨. ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨ ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨. ¨.

(114) 103.

(115) 104.

(116) 105.

(117)