• 沒有找到結果。

介面保護與雷射退火增進高效能N型鍺電晶體之研究

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "介面保護與雷射退火增進高效能N型鍺電晶體之研究"

Copied!
126
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

電子工程學系 電子研究所

博 士 論 文

介面保護與雷射退火增進高效能 N 型鍺電晶體之研究

The Research of High Performance Ge nMOSFET

Improved by Interface Passivation and Laser Annealing

研 究 生:陳維邦

指導教授:荊鳳德 教授

(2)

介面保護與雷射退火增進高效能 N 型鍺電晶體之研究

The Research of High Performance Ge nMOSFET Improved by Interface

Passivation and Laser Annealing

研 究 生:陳維邦 Student:Wei-Barn Chen

指導教授:荊鳳德 Advisor:Albert Chin

國 立 交 通 大 學

電子工程學系 電子研究所

博 士 論 文

A Dissertation

Submitted to Department of Electronics Engineering and Institute of Electronics

College of Electrical and Computer Engineering National Chiao Tung University

in partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of

Doctor of Philosophy in

Electronics Engineering

Oct. 2010

Hsinchu, Taiwan, Republic of China

(3)

介面保護與雷射退火增進高效能 N 型鍺電晶體之研究

研究生:陳維邦 指導教授:荊鳳德教授

國立交通大學

電子工程學系 電子研究所

摘要

隨著半導體元件尺寸的不斷縮微,並且符合目前邏輯電路與高效能場效電晶 體的發展,高效能的金氧半互補式場效電晶體 (CMOSFET) 的研發是勢在必行 的。當以矽 (Si) 為基板與二氧化矽(SiO2) 為介電材料的半導體元件發展到一 個瓶頸時,為了符合未來尺寸的微縮與高效能電晶體與的趨勢,高介電系數材料 與高載子遷移率材料的開發似乎是不二法門。但增加介電常數和減少元件厚度所 伴隨而來的高漏電與如何整合這些高介電材料在新基板更是目前研究的主要議 題。而目前許多高介電材料如 HfO2、 Al2O3、 La2O3、 TiO2等都被廣泛的研究。

除此之外,一些高電子遷移率的基板,如矽鍺 (SiGe)、鍺 (Ge) 與砷化鎵 (GaAs)

等,再近幾年也都陸陸續續被提出一些相關的研究文件,然而如何成功的整合這 些新材料與新基板應用於大型積體電路上依然是一個困難的課題。 因此,我們針對新材料與基板所產生的問題,開發出一系列和氧化鑭相關 (La2O3-based)的高介電材料,其中包括了鑭化鋁氧化物(LaAlO3)、鑭化鈦氧化物 (TiLaO) 和 二氧 化鋯 (ZrO2) 。 除 此 之 外 ,我們 也 成 功 的 研 究出 整合 介 面 工 程 (Interface engineering) 與高介電材料的方法,成功的運用在鍺基板與高介電材料

(4)

之間沈積一層很薄的二氧化矽保護層來做出高性能的 N 型鍺互補式金氧半場效 電晶體 (Ge nMOSFET),不但在漏電上有大幅的降低,更改善了鍺基板介面的一 些平帶電壓(Flatband Voltage)的不理想效應,大大的增進了電容密度,使等效氧 化曾厚度(EOT)在鍺基板可以微縮到 0.85 奈米 並且得到了高的電子遷移率。 最後,由於前面成功的實驗,我們再加以運用雷射退火(Laser Annealing)的方式, 使電晶體的特性更進一步的改善。

(5)

The Research of High Performance Ge nMOSFET

Improved by Interface Passivation and Laser

Annealing

Student:Wei-Barn Chen Advisor: Albert Chin

Department of Electronics Engineering & Institute of

Electronics National Chiao Tung University

Abstract

The development of the high performance complementally

metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistors (CMOSFET) is expected to be

imperative as the semiconductor devices continuously decrease in size along with the

development of current logical circuits and high performance MOSFET. However, the

size reduction of the Si-substrate and silicon dioxide (SiO2)-dielectric-material-based

semiconductor devices has come to a bottleneck due to their low carrier mobility and

the lower dielectric permittivity constants (=3.9), hence the development of

materials with higher dielectric constant materials and higher carrier mobility is

unavoidable.

The high leakage currents accompanying the reduction of the thickness of the

devices and the increase in the dielectric constants, and the integration of these high

(6)

the recent studies. The researches of high dielectric constant materials, such as HfO2,

Al2O3, La2O3, and TiO2 have been studied for decades. Furthermore, high carrier

mobility substrates, such as SiGe, Ge, and III-V compounds (GaAs), have been

widely proposed in some recent research articles. Nevertheless, successful integration

of high dielectric constant materials onto new substrates for the VLSI technology still

proves to be quite a difficult issue.

In order to overcome the problems of integrating the new high dielectric constant

materials and the substrates, we used a series of Lanthanum Oxide (La2O3)-based

high- materials such as LaAlO3, TiLaO and ZrO2. We had also studied the interface

engineering and successfully fabricated high performance Ge nMOSFET by

depositing an ultra thin SiO2 passivation layer between the Ge substrates and the high

dielectric materials. Using the interface passivation not only reduces the electric

leakages, but also improves the unwanted flat-band voltage (Vfb) shifts on the Ge

substrates as well as the capacitance density, enabling the equivalent oxide thickness

(EOT) to scale down to 0.85 nm with higher carrier mobility. Finally, we used the

laser annealing (LA) method to further improve the transistor characteristics of the

(7)

Acknowledgements

首先我要感謝我的指導教授荊鳳德教授,我才能順利的完成此博士論文。 在荊教授耐心的教導之下,學到了許多實驗的研究方法,遇到問題學會去思考並 且尋求解決之道,以及待人處世應有的腳踏實地與務實的態度,讓我博士班生涯 受益良多。 再來我要感謝淳護、迺超和明峰等學長的指導和思麟同學的相互鼓勵,還有 竣揚、坤億、博璿、柏君、智偉、阿爆、和佳芸各位學弟妹在實驗上熱情的幫忙 與給我意見,讓我可以更有信心並且順利的完成我的實驗。由於也因有為你們這 群好學長、好同學與好學弟妹讓我4年的碩博士班生涯過的很充實也很有意義, 也希望你們未來的實驗都很順利。同時也感謝Joyce Chiang英文撰寫的幫忙。 我也由衷感謝交通大學奈米中心與國家實驗研究院-國家奈米元件實驗室, 能讓我有完善的儀器設備與環境來達成我的實驗。 最後我要對我親愛的父母親以及大姊莉玲,大哥維新以及盈燕一路無悔的支 持我念完博士班致上最高的感謝,並且支持我所做的一切,讓我可以全心全力無 後顧之憂的朝自己的夢想努力與邁進。

(8)

Contents

Abstract (Chinese)……….……….……….………i

Abstract (English) ………..……….……….………….…iii

Acknowledgement……….……….……….………v

Contents……….……….………….……vi

Table Captions……….……….……….…ix

Figure Captions……….……….……….……x

 Chapter 1 Introduction

1.1

Motivation of High- Dielectrics………...……….1

1.2

Overview of Metal Electrode...………...……….6

1.3

The Challenge of Ge n-type MOSFETs…………...…………...7

1.4

Dissertation Organization ………...………10

 Chapter 2 High Performance Gate-First Epitaxial Ge n-MOSFETs on Si with LaAlO3 Gate Dielectrics

2.1

Introduction………..…….………14

2.2

Experimental Procedure………..………...…………15

2.3

Results and Discussion…………..……….…………16

2.4

Conclusion………..……….…..……21

(9)

TiLaO Ge/Si N-Type Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Capacitors at Small

Equivalent-Oxide Thickness

3.1

Introduction………….………..………..…29

3.2

Experimental Procedure………..………..…30

3.3

Results and Discussion………..………...………..………31

3.4

Conclusion………..……….…..……33

 Chapter 4 High Performance of Ge n-MOSFETs Using SiO2 Interfacial Layer and TiLaO Gate Dielectric

4.1

Introduction………..………...………..……39

4.2

Experimental Procedure……….…………..………..………40

4.3

Results and Discussion………..………41

4.4

Conclusion………...………..…42

 Chapter 5 High Field Mobility Metal-Gate/high-κ Ge n-MOSFETs with Small Equivalent-Oxide-Thickness

5.1

Introduction………..………...………..……48

5.2

Experimental……….…………..………..……49

5.3

Results and Discussion………..………50

5.4

Conclusion……….……….………..… 54

(10)

Annealing

6.1

Introduction………..….………62

6.2

Experimental Procedure………..………...…………63

6.3

Results and Discussion…………..……….…………64

6.4

Conclusion………..……….…..……66

 Chapter 7 Higher Gate Capacitance Ge n-MOSFETs Using Laser Annealing

7.1

Introduction………..….……….……72

7.2

Experimental Procedure...73

7.3

Results and Discussion...74

7.4

Conclusion...76

 Chapter 8 Conclusions………….……….……….81

 References……….………83

 Vita……….………109

(11)

Table Captions:

Chapter 1 Introduction

Table 1-1. Comparisons of Si, Ge and GaAs [1-19]...13

Chapter 2 High Performance Gate-First Epitaxial Ge n-MOSFETs

on Si with LaAlO

3

Gate Dielectrics

Table 2-1. Comparison of device integrity data for various metal-gate/high-κ Ge

n-MOSFETs...22

Chapter 5 High Field Mobility Metal-Gate/high-

Ge n-MOSFETs

with Small Equivalent-Oxide-Thickness

Table 5-1. Comparison of device integrity data for various metal-gate/high-κ Ge

n-MOSFETs...55

Chapter 6 Gate-First TaN/La

2

O

3

/SiO

2

/Ge n-MOSFETs Using Laser

Annealing

Table 6-1. Comparison of device data of various metal -gate/high-κ/Ge

(12)

Figure Captions:

Chapter 1 Introduction

Fig. 1.1 Leakage current versus voltage for various thicknesses of SiO2 layers...11

Fig. 1.2 International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductor (ITRS), [Online] Available: http://public.itrs.nrt/...11 Fig. 1.3 Static dielectric constant versus band gap for candidate gate oxides [1-10]. Fig. 1.4 The band offset of popular high- materials...12 Fig. 1.5 Bond enthalpy for M-O, M-N and M-C in the Periodic Table...13

Chapter 2 High Performance Gate-First Epitaxial Ge n-MOSFETs

on Si with LaAlO

3

Gate Dielectrics

Fig. 2.1 C-V characteristics of (a) TaN/HfAlO/Ge/Si and control TaN/HfAlO/Si n-MOS capacitors and (b) TaN/LaAlO3/Ge/Si n-MOS capacitors at 100 kHz

after 450~550oC RTA...23 Fig. 2.2 (a) J-V characteristics of TaN/LaAlO3/Ge/Si and TaN/HfAlO/Ge/Si n-MOS

capacitors after 450oC~550oC RTA. (b) J-EOT characteristics of TaN/LaAlO3/Ge/Si n-MOS capacitors after550oC RTA...24

Fig. 2.3 Cross-sectional TEM of (a) TaN/HfAlO/Ge/Si capacitor, (b) control TaN/HfAlO/Si and (c) TaN/LaAlO3/Ge/Si capacitors after 550oC RTA...25

Fig. 2.4 (a) Id-Vd and (b) Id-Vg characteristics of gate-first TaN/LaAlO3/Ge/Si

n-MOSFETs after 550oC RTA. The gate length and width are 10 and 100 m, respectively...26 Fig. 2.5 Electron mobility vs. effective electric field of TaN/LaAlO3/Ge/Si

n-MOSFET and other published data for comparison……...27

(13)

Chapter 3 Interfacial Layer Dependence on Device Property of

High-



TiLaO Ge/Si N-Type Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor

Capacitors at Small Equivalent -Oxide Thickness

Fig. 3.1. C-V characteristics of TaN/TiLaO Ge/Si n-MOS capacitors with or without

the inserted GeO2 and SiO2 interfacial layer and after 450 or 550oC RTA.

The device size is 100-mx100-m...35 Fig.3.2. Cross-sectional TEM images of TaN/TiLaO/GeO2/Ge/Si n-MOS capacitors

(a) before and (b) after 550oC RTA. (c) TaN/TiLaO/SiO2/Ge/Si n-MOS

capacitors after 550oC RTA...36 Fig. 3.3. SIMS profile of TaN/TiLaO Ge/Si n-MOS structure with inserted (a) GeO2

and (b) SiO2 interfacial layer before and after 550oC RTA...37

Fig. 3.4. The Ge 2p3 XPS spectra of TiLaO/GeO2/Ge/Si structure before and after

550oC RTA...38

Chapter 4 High Performance of Ge n-MOSFETs Using SiO

2

Layer

and TiLaO

Gate Dielectric

Fig. 4.1. C-V and of the TaN/TiLaO on Si-Capped Ge/Si n-MOS capacitors after 450~550oC RTA...44 Fig. 4.2. (a) The C-V and (b) J-V characteristics of the TaN/TiLaO/SiO2 on Ge/Si

n-MOSFETs 450~550oC RTA. The inserted figure in (b) is the J-CET plot at 1 V above Vfb...45

Fig. 4.3. (a) The Id-Vd and (b) Id-Vg characteristics of the TaN/TiLaO/SiO2 on Ge/Si

n-MOSFETs...46

Fig.4. 4. The electron mobility as a function of effective electric field for the TaN/TiLaO/SiO2 on Ge/Si n-MOSFETs...47

(14)

with Small Equivalent-Oxide-Thickness

Fig. 5.1 (a) Schematic image of TaN/La2O3/SiO2/Ge n-MOSFET and (b) process

flow of gate-last Ge-n MOSFET...56 Fig. 5.2. (a) C-V and (b) J-V characteristics of TaN/La2O3/SiO2/Ge n-MOS capacitors

with different PDA temperatures...57 Fig. 5.3. (a) SIMS depth profile of TaN/La2O3/SiO2/Ge at a 400oC PDA. (b)

Cross-sectional TEM of TaN/La2O3/SiO2/Ge after a 400oC PDA...58

Fig. 5.4. (a) Id-Vd and (b) Id-Vg plots of TaN/La2O3/SiO2/Ge n-MOSFET...59

Fig. 5.5. The electron mobility as a function of effective electric field of TaN/La2O3/SiO2/Ge n-MOSFETs...60

Fig. 5.6. The comparison of electron peak mobility of Ge n-MOSFETs...61

Chapter 6 Gate-First TaN/La

2

O

3

/SiO

2

/Ge n-MOSFETs Using Laser

Annealing

Fig. 6.1. (a) Sheet resistance and (b) n+/p junction characteristics of As+-implanted Ge after laser annealing...68 Fig. 6.2. (a) C-V and (b) J-V characteristics of TaN/La2O3/SiO2/Ge n-MOS capacitors

before and after laser annealing. The insert figure is the cross-sectional TEM after laser annealing...69 Fig. 6.3. (a) Id-Vd and (b) Id-Vg of gate-first TaN/La2O3/SiO2/Ge n-MOSFET using

laser annealing...70 Fig. 6.4. The electron mobility as a function of effective electric field of

TaN/La2O3/SiO2/Ge n-MOSFETs using laser annealing...71

Chapter 7 Higher Gate Capacitance Ge n-MOSFETs Using Laser

Annealing

(15)

TEM after LA...77 Fig. 7.2. The n+/p junction characteristics of P+-implanted Ge after LA...78 Fig. 7.3. (a) Id-Vd and (b) Id-Vg of TaN/ZrO2/La2O3/SiO2/Ge n-MOSFET using LA...79

Fig. 7.4. The electron mobility as a function of effective electric field of TaN/ZrO2/La2O3/SiO2/Ge n-MOSFET using LA...80

(16)

Chapter 1

Introduction

1.1. Motivation of High-

Dielectrics

The scaling down of Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Field Effect Transistor

(MOSFETs) using metal gate with high  has been the major way to improve the

performance of integrated circuits in the last few decades. Si dioxide (SiO2) as a gate

dielectric offers some merits in CMOS processing including a thermodynamically and

electrically stable, high-quality Si–SiO2 interface as well as superior electrical

isolation properties. In order to scale down the MOSFETs, reducing the thickness of

gate dielectric becomes the trend for the state-of-the-art devices. However, the direct

tunneling of gate leakage at 2V bias exceeds 1A/cm2 below the 2.0 nm thickness of

SiO2 (Fig.1-1) which becomes the critical issue for CMOS scaling down [1-1].

From the below electrical fundamental equation, we can solve the obstacle by

using the materials with high dielectric constant (high-):

(1) Where (8.85x10-14 f/cm2) is the permittivity of free space, is the dielectric constant (also referred to relative permittivity in this article), A is the area of capacitor,

(17)

be increased without the reduction of capacitance density if using the higher dielectric

constant material. Higher C value enables the MOS structure to gain more inversion

carriers and reaches the higher drive current of MOSFETs. In the other hand to

increase the C, we can reduce the overall t thickness. The components of t can be

represented as the following equation,

t = t

qm

+ t

ox

+ t

poly-si

(2)

where tpoly-si is from the poly-Si depletion, tox is the equivalent oxide thickness

(EOT) of the dielectric and tqm is the quantum effect of carriers in the channel. tqm is

the intrinsic physic quantum effect and is not avoidable. We can reduce tox and tpoly-Si

to increase the capacitance density. Using metal gates to replace the poly-Si gate have

been proposed to solve the issue in recent years. Reducing the EOT becomes the most

important way to reach higher C. The EOT of materials is defined as the thickness of

SiO2 required to reach the same capacitance. EOT can be written as an equation,

(3) where thigh-dielectric and high-dielectric are the high  material of physical thickness and

relative dielectric constant, respectively.

According to the ITRS (International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductor)

shown in Fig. 1.2, the EOT for metal gate has to be below 10 Å after 2010. Therefore,

(18)

technology.

Although a lot of researches of high dielectric constant materials have been

reported, we still need to understand before these materials can be adopted by industry.

There are some key points listing below [1-2].

 Permittivity

The relative dielectric constant of the new material should be between 10 and 30.

Higher  dielectric materials will give rise to fringe fields from the gate to the

drain or source and it will degrade the short channel device performance.

 Band gap

The band gap of new dielectric materials must be greater than 5 eV and the band

offsets with silicon must be sufficient. Generally, Fig. 1.3 shows the higher 

value materials will have a smaller band gap, and there is an inverse relationship

between band gap and dielectric constant. Fig.1.4 shows that increasing

dielectric constant will cause lower conduction band and valence band when in

contact with silicon. In order to reduce the leakage current from each band, the

barrier height must be bigger than 1 eV.

 Thermodynamic stability

Good thermodynamic stability is required for new high dielectric materials to

(19)

High- dielectric materials must have a large Gibbs free energy to prevent

interaction with silicon, and the diffusion coefficient of materials must be low

with less interface reaction.

 Interface quality

The interface between high dielectric material and silicon is also an important

issue. Interface states will cause flat-band voltage shift and degrade the mobility

of MOSFETs. Low interface trap defect density, Dit, should be lower than 1011

cm-1 eV-1.

 Compatibility with the current or expected materials to be used for CMOS

devices

Therefore, alternate high  dielectric materials such as Si3N4 (= 7.5), SixOyNz

(= 3.9-7.5), Al2O3 (= 10), HfO2 (= 26), La2O3 (= 30), Ta2O5 (= 25), TiO2 (=

50), and ZrO2 (= 25) [1-3]-[1-8], or other dopant metal oxides have been proposed

to replace SiO2 for gate dielectric materials in the recent researches. Fig. 1-5 shows

the bond enthalpies for various metal/dielectric combinations. High dielectric constant

materials have higher bond enthalpies, which can prevent higher leakage currents and

degradations after high temperature processes. In general, the metal oxides exhibit

strong bond enthalpies than other compounds.

(20)

CMOS devices. Such as, Al2O3,is not thermodynamically stable in direct contact with

Si with a lower dielectric constant and Ta2O5 has a smaller conduction band offset

with silicon (c~0.3 eV) that will cause the increasing leakage currents from

electron tunneling.

In this study, we used different high k dielectric LaAlO3 (LAO) and TiLaO for

gate dielectrics for comparisons. As we know, La2O3 has a high k value (k ~30) and

the negative flat-band voltage for nMOSFETs [1-9]. However, La2O3 easily absorbed

water vapor from air and results in an uncontrolled reaction [1-10]. Moreover, the

band gap of La2O3 is relatively small (4.3 eV) and the structure transition from the

amorphous to crystalline phase occurs at a lower temperature than that of Al2O3 [1-11]

which induces large leakage current from the grain boundary after high thermal

budget. Lanthanum aluminate LaAlO3 (LAO), as a compound of La2O3 and Al2O3,

has a reasonably larger  value of 25, band-gap of over 5 eV, high thermal stability up

to 2100oC. It presents the chemical and dielectric properties of La2O3 and Al2O3 and

overcome the obstacles of individual materials [1-12]-[1-14].

On other hand, although TiO2 has a high dielectric constant value of 86, it is

easily to form anatase phase at the temperature of 400oC with high leakage current

and low bandgap (3.5 eV) for amorphous film [1-15]. Besides, the smaller conduction

(21)

the La2O3 dopant into TiO2 with a value of 45 and maintains the high permittivity

constant of TiO2 and negative flat-band voltage from La2O3 [1-16]. We will focus on

the Lanthanum (La) based high  dielectric for advanced gate stacks application with

alternative channel material in this thesis.

1.2. Overview of Metal Gate Electrode

As complementally metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistors

(CMOSFETs) scaling down to 100 nm technology node or beyond, the conventional

poly-Si gate electrode has concerned due to following issues [1-17]:

 Poly-Si depletion effects.

 Boron penetration effects.

 High sheet resistance.

An obvious way to alleviate the problems of poly-Si is to use metal or metal

nitride gates. The requirement of the new technology metal gates should suit for the

follows:

 Favorable work functions (Φm) [candidate metals need to have vacuum

work-functions smaller (larger) than 4.05 V (5.17 V) for the NMOS (PMOS)]

[1-16].

 Low sheet resistance.

(22)

 Compatibility with high- dielectric and integration with VLSI technology.

In selecting metal-gate materials for device integration, the metal work function

(Φm) is an important consideration since it directly affects the threshold voltage and

the performance of a transistor. Using TaN for gate electrode has been widely

studied for recently years. It shows promising results as gate electrodes for high-

gate dielectrics in terms of thermal stability and compatibility with the high-k gate

dielectrics. Besides, there is a significant variance in reported work-function from

4.13 eV (close to n+ poly-Si) to 5.05 ev (close to p+ poly-Si) [1-17]-[1-18]. Causing

these large discrepancies are due to different deposition methods, different nitrogen

ratios and post metal deposition annealing (PMA). In this article, we used the TaN

for integration of metal gates / high-to study the characteristics of MOSFETs.

1.3. The Challenge of Ge n-type MOSFETs

As we knew, carrier mobility is an important issue for high performance devices.

Many studies of strained-Si had been proposed to enhance the mobility of devices.

Germanium as channel is attractive because of its significant enhancement in bulk

mobility relative to Si. It can enhance the electron mobility (2X) and hole mobilities

(4X) higher than Si. Besides, the Ge has ~50X higher density of state than InGaAs to

deliver high transistor current. Although the III-V compounds show the higher

(23)

obstacles which degrade the MOSFET performance and cannot meet the trend for

ITRS. The comparisons of Si, Ge and GaAs are listed in the Table 1 [1-19]. Therefore,

several successful demonstrations of high materials gate stacks on Ge have been

reported recently [1-20]-[1-25]. However, there are still some problems on Ge

substrates for the MOSFET fabrication needed to be solved and listed below [1-25]:

(a) Germanium oxide (GeOx x < 2) is thermal unstable and water soluble.

(b) Large off state leakage currents due to small bandgap (0.66 eV).

(c) The poor interface between Ge and high- dielectric materials.

(d) Activation is insufficient for source/drain and the low contact resistivity is hard to

form for Ge nMOSFETs.

Therefore, reduction of interface reaction between Ge and high- dielectric

material to form GeOx is becoming a critical issue. There are some reports

demonstrate the Ge surface passivation to suppress the unstable GeOx formation

during high- deposition. Surface nitridation using NH3 for Ge passivating had been

studied [1-26]. However, the nitrogen involvement caused the degradation of mobility.

Using a thin Si passivation layer on Ge also had been proposed to solve the interface

states [1-27]. Unfortunately, the Si layer is not easily to control during the process

thermal budget and causes the equivalent oxide thickness (EOT) degradation. Using

(24)

are also alternative ways for the solution [1-28]-[1-29]. Such reports have been

successfully proposed the high performance devices and show the high low-field

mobilities. However, the degradation of EOT is still the issue for Ge technology. As

mention above, another obstacle for Ge MOSFET is about the dopant activation of

source/drain junction. As we knew, the boron activation using conventional rapid

thermal annealing (RTA) is at a low 400oC temperature. However, the higher activation temperature is needed ( 600o

C) for phosphorus or arsenic [1-30]. Such

high temperature not only caused the unwanted interface reaction but also degrade the

device performance. Besides, the insufficient n type dopant activation by using RTA

had also been reported [1-31]. Furthermore, the diffusion coefficient for the n-type

dopant (phosphorus or arsenic) is faster than the p-type dopant (boron) [1-30].

Therefore, it is hard for n type dopants to form the shallow junction with a low sheet

resistance by RTA [1-31]. In order to increase the efficiency of dopant activation, the

method of using Excimer laser annealing (LA) had been demonstrated successfully to

enhance the source/drain complete activation [1-32]-[1-33]. We had demonstrated the

LA for S/D junction activation. Furthermore, the LA also was applied for increasing

the  value for gate stacks due to crystallization-induced.

1.4. Dissertation Organization

(25)

In chapter 2, we discussed the n MOSFET for depositing the high-dielectric

LaAlO3 for the gate material without passivation layer on Ge channel. Although it was

successful for surface passivation for Ge channel MOSFET, the EOT degraded.

In order to further scale down the EOT for Ge channel MOSFET, we used the

TiLaO higher  material and SiO2 interfaciallayer for surface passivation. These not

only improved the interface but also reached the same mobility. Therefore, we

discussed the effect of SiO2 passivation layer and less flat-band (Vfb) shift in chapter 3

and the performance of Ge n channel MOSFET in chapter 4.

However, the mobility was still not high for strained-Ge. In chapter 5 and chapter

6, we used the La2O3 with SiO2 for gate stacks on Ge substrate by conventional RTA

and laser annealing (LA) for source and drain activation.

Finally, we used the ZrO2/La2O3/SiO2 on Ge substrate for further EOT scaling

down by LA in chapter 7. The LA was applied on gate stacks for increasing the

capacitance density due to the crystallization-induced and the efficient activation for

source/drain.

(26)

Fig. 1.1 Leakage current versus voltage for various thicknesses of SiO2 layers.

Fig. 1.2 International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductor (ITRS), [Online]

(27)

Fig. 1.3 Static dielectric constant versus band gap for candidate gate oxides [1-34].

(28)

Fig. 1.5 Bond enthalpy for M-O, M-N and M-C in the Periodic Table.

Si Ge GaAs

Dielectric constant () 11.9 16 13.1

Band gap (eV) 1.12 0.66 1.42

Hole mobility (cm2/Vs) 480 1900 400 Electron mobility(cm2/Vs) 1350 3900 8500 Density of states in valence band (cm-3) 1.04 x 1019 6.0 x 1018 7.0 x 1018 Density of states in conduction band (cm-3) 2.8 x 1019 1.04 x 1019 4.7 x 1017 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Metal-Oxide Metal-Nitride Metal-Carbide B o n d E n th a lp y ( K J /m o l) Atomic Number Ti Ta Hf La Yb Tb Ir Zr Si

(29)

Chapter 2

High Performance Gate-First Epitaxial Ge

n-MOSFETs on Si with LaAlO

3

Gate Dielectrics

2.1. Introduction

New channel materials with higher mobility are required to improve the

performance of strained Si MOSFETs. The small band-gap (EG) Ge [2-1]-[2-24] had a

higher electron and hole mobility than Si, and ~50 times higher density of state than

InGaAs for higher current. However, overcoming the large transistor leakage current

in small EG Ge and low electron mobility at high effective electric field (Eeff) were

major challenges. The leakage current of small EG Ge MOSFETs could be lowered by

decreasing the Ge body thickness in a Ge-on-insulator (GOI) structure [2-1], [2-9] or

using thin-body epitaxial Ge on Si [2-21]-[2-22]. Mobility, higher than that of Si

universal mobility has been reported recently, at large equivalent-oxide thickness

(EOT) [2-18]-[2-20]. Nevertheless, achieving good electron mobility in small EOT

was still a challenging issue especially at high Eeff. Such high-field operations were

unavoidable for 45~32 nm CMOS nodes with highly scaled 1 nm EOT. Several

interface passivation methods have been used to improve mobility [2-6], [2-10],

[2-12], [2-21]-[2-22]. However, these interface treatments resulted in an extra

(30)

This paper reported good high-field mobility of Ge n-MOSFETs without using

interfacial layer. This was achieved in gate-first metal-gate/high-κ/Ge/Si n-MOSFETs

with LaAlO3 dielectric [2-25]-[2-27]; high electron mobility of 218 cm2/V-s at 0.5

MV/cm Eeff, very low transistor off-state leakage (IOFF) of 710-10 A/μm, small

sub-threshold swing (SS) of 108 mV/dec and a small EOT of 1.6 nm were reached

simultaneously. Here the LaAlO3 was formed by mixing Al2O3 and La2O3 that that

have been used widely to form the Al2O3/HfSiO(N) and La2O3/HfSiO(N) gate

dielectrics for low-Vt gate-first high-κ/Si p- and n-MOSFETs used for 32~28 nm

nodes. Such good SS and high-field mobility were even better than those using a SiO2

interfacial layer [2-22] that had one of the best reported results of gate-first Ge

n-MOSFETs [2-1]-[2-24]. In sharp contrast, much higher gate leakage current at

larger EOT was measured using HfAlO dielectric [29]-[30] that indicating how

important it was to choose high-κ gate dielectric for Ge n-MOSFET.

2.2. Experimental procedure

This study used 6-inch p-type Si wafers (5×1015 cm-3 doping) in these

experiments. After RCA cleaning, the 200 nm undoped Si buffer and 6 nm Ge were

epitaxially grown on Si substrate by ultra-high vacuum chemical-vapor-deposition

(UHVCVD) at 500oC [2-21]-[2-22]. After dipping in dilute HF, a 5 nm thick LaAlO3

[2-25]-[2-27] was deposited by sputtering and followed by a 400oC post-deposition

(31)

sputtering and patterned to form the metal gate. High-κ HfAlO capacitors were

fabricated [2-29]-[2-30], for comparison. After gate patterning, the n+ source-drain

regions were formed by using a 25 KeV As+ implant at a dosage of 5×1015 cm-2 and a

550oC RTA activation for 30 sec. Such a low temperature RTA ensured the epitaxial

Ge on Si substrate under pseudomorphic conditions with a smooth surface and

reduced generation of dislocations. Finally, Al contact metal was added on the

source-drain. The fabricated devices were characterized by capacitance-voltage (C-V)

and current-voltage (I-V) measurements using an HP4284A precision LCR meter and

HP4156C semiconductor parameter analyzer.

2.3. Results and discussion

Fig. 2.1 (a) shows C-V characteristics of TaN/HfAlO/Ge/Si and control

TaN/HfAlO/Si n-MOS capacitors after different RTA temperatures. Compared with

control device on Si, the HfAlO dielectric on Ge had a lower capacitance density and

lower unwanted flat-band voltage (Vfb) shift of ~0.7 V even at a low temperature

450oC RTA. Increasing the RTA temperature to 550oC led to severe C-V distortion by

high density interface states and was accompanied by a greater Vfb shift. However,

such annealing temperature was required for doping activation at the ion-implanted

source-drain. The severe Vfb shift and interface trap generation at only 550oC were

related to the strong interface reaction shown in the cross-sectional TEM of following

(32)

RTA temperatures. The negative Vfb is the unique characteristics of La2O3-containing

high-κ gate dielectric [2-31]-[2-32]. Although similar Vfb shift and slightly lowered

capacitance density were detected in TaN/LaAlO3/Ge/Si n-MOS capacitors, the C-V

distortion and Vfb value were significantly better than TaN/HfAlO/Ge/Si device. An

EOT of 1.6 nm was obtained from Quantum-Mechanical (QM) C-V simulation with

Ge parameters [2-22].

Fig. 2.2 shows the measured gate dielectric leakage current of

TaN/LaAlO3/Ge/Si and TaN/HfAlO/Ge/Si capacitors. A leakage current of 610-4

A/cm2 at -1 V was reached for TaN/LaAlO3/Ge/Si capacitor with a small 1.6 nm EOT

that was 67 times lower than that of TaN/HfAlO/Ge/Si capacitor after the same 550oC

RTA with a larger 2.6 nm EOT. The poor current leakage with HfAlO gate dielectric

was related to the much-degraded interface property by large EOT and Vfb shift as

shown in Fig. 2.1(a). Although detailed mechanism is still under investigation, such

degradation may have been related to the interface reaction of GeO2 with HfO2 to

form volatile GeO [2-23]-[2-24] and charged oxygen-deficient GeOx. This in turn

generated interface charge [2-31], increased the Ge diffusion into HfO2 and

roughened the interface [2-23]-[2-24]. The poor interface and gate dielectric quality

also degraded the leakage current of the gate capacitor. Fig. 2.2(b) shows the leakage

(33)

down to 1.05 nm. The extrapolated leakage current at 1.0 nm EOT was >3 orders of

magnitude lower than that of SiO2. This permitted the addition of interfacial GeO2 or

SiO(N) [33] to reduce the remote phonon scattering from high-κ gate dielectric,

similar to Intel’s device [2-34].

To grasp the large differences between capacitor using LaAlO3 and HfAlO gate

dielectrics on Ge/Si, these high-κ capacitors were examined by cross-sectional TEM.

Figs. 2.3(a), 2.3(b) and 2.3(c) show cross-sectional TEM images of TaN/HfAlO/Ge/Si,

control TaN/HfAlO/Si and TaN/LaAlO3/Ge/Si capacitors after the same 550oC RTA,

respectively. The HfAlO on Ge/Si had a thicker high-κ layer than HfAlO on Si,

deposited side-by-side after the 550oC RTA, suggesting a strong interface reaction or

Ge out-diffusion between HfAlO and Ge/Si [2-23]-[2-24]. The thicker interfacial

layer formed on Ge/Si than Si was not due to the oxygen diffusion since the same

HfAlO gate dielectric was used and deposited side-by-side on Ge/Si and Si. The Ge

out-diffusion [2-21] may have been due to the lower melting point of Ge than Si that,

in turn, scaled with cohesive energy (372 kJ/mol for Ge and 446 kJ/mol for Si) to

separate a single atom from the crystal lattice. However, the LaAlO3 on Ge/Si showed

very close high-κ thickness with the control HfAlO on Si, although a very thin

interfacial layer was formed. This was consistent with the much smaller EOT and

(34)

these two high-κ dielectrics was the addition of La2O3 or HfO2, this suggested a

stronger reaction between HfO2 and Ge to enhance interface reaction or Ge

out-diffusion. Although no data of Hf-Ge or germanide formation could be available

in the literature, the bond enthalpy to group-IV Carbon was significantly higher for

Hf-C (540 kJ/mol) than for La-C (462 kJ/mol). The formed interfacial layer of

LaAlO3 on Ge/Si explained the Vfb shift after a higher 550oC RTA temperature that

was also found in high-κ/Si after RTA [2-31].

Based on the largely improved high-κ dielectric property, we fabricated the Ge

n-MOSFETs using LaAlO3 gate dielectric. Figs. 2.4(a) and 2.4(b) present the Id-Vd

and Id-Vg characteristics, respectively. Small sub-threshold swing (SS) of 108 mV/dec

and very low IOFF of 710-10 A/μm were measured. This small IOFF leakage and good

SS were vital for small EG and high mobility new channel MOSFET used for low

power Green Transistor application. Further improving ION/IOFF may be reached by

chemical interface passivation using H, S, or Se. It is noticed that the SS was one of

the best-reported data for gate-first Ge n-MOSFET [2-1]-[2-24] that was even better

than the TaN/TiLaO/SiO2/Ge/Si n-MOSFET using SiO2 interfacial layer at a smaller

EOT of 0.81 nm. Here the SS is expressed as [2-32]:

) 1 ( 10 ln i it dep C C C q KT SS     (1)

(35)

where Cdep was the depletion capacitance density, Cit was the capacitance density

from charged interface traps and Ci was the gate capacitance density. The improved

SS at larger EOT was an indication of improved interface properties of LaAlO3 gate

dielectric on Ge/Si compared with previous TiLaO/SiO2 with an ultra-thin SiO2

interfacial layer on Ge/Si [2-22].

Fig. 2.5 shows mobility as a function of Eeff. The mobility was calculated

directly from the Id-Vg curves [35]. For comparison, the mobility data from related

literatures were also plotted [2-10], [2-13]-[2-14], [2-22]. The lower peak mobility

could be attributed to the remote phonon scattering in the high-κ dielectric that was

also found in high-κ/Si MOSFET. Therefore, an ultra-thin SiO(N) [2-33] or GeO2

[2-14]-[2-17], [2-19]-[2-20] interfacial layer was needed to further improve the peak

mobility and ION/IOFF. Although higher peak mobility values were published [2-10],

[2-13]-[2-14], the mobility decreased rapidly with an increase in Eeff due to the

interface scattering. However, the MOSFET was destined to operate at high Eeff due to

the small 1 nm EOT used for 45~32 nm nodes [2-34]. In sharp contrast, the Ge

n-MOSFET using LaAlO3 showed the superior high field mobility of 218 cm2/Vs at

0.5 MV/cm that was one of the best reported high-field mobility data for gate-first Ge

n-MOSFETs [2-1]-[2-24].

(36)

bias-temperature instability (BTI) testing. A small threshold-voltage shift (Vt) of 31

mV was measured at a 1.2 V gate overdrive (Vg-Vt) and 85oC for 1 hr. Table 1

summarizes and compares the important device parameters of metal-gate/high-Ge

n-MOSFETs [2-10], [2-13]-[2-14], [2-17]-[2-20], [2-22]. The TaN/LaAlO3/Ge/Si

n-MOSFET had superior high-field mobility of 218 cm2/Vs at 0.5 MV/cm, record low

SS of 108 mV/dec, small 1.6 nm EOT, very low IOFF of 710-10 A/μm, simple

gate-first process and useful for 12-in integration.

2.4. Conclusion

This study has demonstrated a high performance gate-first epitaxial Ge

n-MOSFET on Si. Using high-κ LaAlO3, this study achieved good device

performance of a record small SS and high mobility at high Eeff among reported

gate-first Ge n-MOSFETs, as well as the very low IOFF for low power application and

a small 1.6 nm EOT. The self-aligned, gate-first TaN/LaAlO3/Ge/Si n-MOSFETs had

(37)

Process Metal Gate High-EOT (nm) Ioff (A/m) SS (mV/dec) Peak Mobility (cm2/V-s) Mobility 0.5 MV/cm (cm2/V-s) [2-10] Gate-first TaN HfAlO 3.0 - 110 412 low [2-13] Gate-last Au GeO2 large - - 270 low

[2-14] Gate-first Al Al2O3+ GeO2 large 1.24x10-9 - 404 133

[2-17] Gate-first Al Al2O3+GeO2 large 9x10-10 - 488 363

[2-18] Gate-last Al GeO2(70-atm) large - 125 790 460

[2-19] Gate-last Al Al2O3+GeO2 large 7x10-11 193 804 269

[2-20] Gate-last Al SiO2+GeO2 large 8.3x10-10 - 540 201

[2-22] Gate-first TaN TiLaO+SiO2 0.81 3.5x10-10 126 271 201

This

work Gate first TaN LaAlO3 1.6 7x10

-10

108 296 218

Table 2-1. Comparison of device integrity data for various metal-gate/high-κ Ge

(38)

-1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 EOT=2.6 nm 500oC RTA 550oC RTA 450oC RTA 500oC RTA 550oC RTA C (F /c m 2 ) Voltage (V)

Control HfAlO on Ge/Si and Si

HfAlO/Si control 450oC RTA Vfb roll off Vfb = 1.46V V fb shift 1.2V

(a)

-2 -1 0 1 2 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 TaN/LaAlO3/Si Vfb = 0.41V 4500C RTA 5000C RTA 5500C RTA C (F /c m 2 ) Voltage (V) Sweep from -2V to 2V TaN/LaAlO 3 on Ge/Si QM-CV Simulation EOT = 1.6 nm 4500C RTA V fb shift 0.9 V

(b)

Fig. 2.1 C-V characteristics of (a) TaN/HfAlO/Ge/Si and control TaN/HfAlO/Si n-MOS capacitors and (b) TaN/LaAlO3/Ge/Si n-MOS capacitors at 100 kHz

(39)

-2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 10-8 10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 LaAlO3 @4500C RTA LaAlO3 @5000C RTA

1.6-nm-EOT LaAlO3 @5500C RTA

J (A /c m 2 ) Voltage (V)

2.6-nm-EOT HfAlO @550oC RTA

(a) 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 102 103 104 25X Intel 45 nm node [2-34] TaN/LaAlO3 on Ge/Si J g @ 1 V + V fb | (A /c m 2 ) EOT (nm) Poly-Si/SiO2 Benchmark (b)

Fig. 2.2 (a) J-V characteristics of TaN/LaAlO3/Ge/Si and TaN/HfAlO/Ge/Si n-MOS

capacitors after 450oC~550oC RTA. (b) J-EOT characteristics of TaN/LaAlO3/Ge/Si n-MOS capacitors after550oC RTA.

(40)

(a)

(b)

(c)

Fig. 2.3 Cross-sectional TEM of (a) TaN/HfAlO/Ge/Si capacitor, (b) control

TaN

HfAlO

Ge

Si

5nm

4.0 nm

TaN

Si

HfAlO

5nm

4.0 nm

TaN

Si

HfAlO

5nm

4.0 nm

TaN

5nm

LaAlO

3

Ge

Si

4.0nm

(41)

0 1 2 3 0 10 20 30 40 Vg-Vt=0.3V Vg-Vt=0.6V Vg-Vt=0.9V I d (A/m ) Vd (V) V g-Vt=1.2V Length=10m TaN/LaAlO 3 on Ge/Si

(a)

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 10-10 10-9 10-8 10-7 10-6 10-5 Vd = 0.1V L=10m I d ( A/m ) V g (V) SS=108 mV/dec Vt = 1.45V TaN/LaAlO3 on Ge/Si

(b)

Fig. 2.4 (a) Id-Vd and (b) Id-Vg characteristics of gate-first TaN/LaAlO3/Ge/Si

n-MOSFETs after 550oC RTA. The gate length and width are 10 and 100 m, respectively.

(42)

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0 100 200 300 400 500 This work Reference  Reference  Reference  Reference   eff (cm 2 /V -s e c ) Eeff (MV/cm)

Fig. 2.5 Electron mobility vs. effective electric field of TaN/LaAlO3/Ge/Si

(43)

10

0

10

1

10

2

10

3

10

4

10

-1

10

0

10

1

10

2

10

3 nMOSFET, V g=Vt+1.2V and 85 0 C TaN/LaAlO3on Ge/Si

V

t

‎‎‎

Time (sec)

50 mV

(44)

Chapter 3

Interfacial Layer Dependence on Device Property of

High-



TiLaO Ge/Si N-Type

Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor Capacitors at Small

Equivalent-Oxide Thickness

3.1. Introduction

Germanium (Ge) has attracted much attention for Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor

Field-Effect Transistor (MOSFET) [3-1]-[3-14] application due to both higher

electron and hole mobilities than Silicon (Si). However, the difficult challenges are

the high leakage current of small energy bandgap (EG) Ge and the poor interface

property with high dielectric-constant () material. To lower the leakage current, we

pioneered the defect free Ge-on-insulator (GOI or GeOI) [3-1] structure, and the

leakage current decreases with decreasing the Ge body thickness [3-5]. Nevertheless,

the degraded interface property is still a tough challenge especially for the Ge n-type

MOSFET (n-MOSFET) [3-6]-[3-12] at a small equivalent oxide thickness (EOT). The

interface property is highly dependent on high- dielectrics, where Al2O3 [3-1] and

La2O3 [3-8]-[3-11]show lower interface trap density than HfO2. This is related to the

different Metal-Oxygen-Ge and defect formations [3-11] after a rapid-thermal anneal

(45)

such as plasma nitridation,[3-4]-[3-8] NH3 treatment, SiH4 annealing and interfacial

GeO2 layer [3-8]-[3-10], [3-12]-[3-14] at larger EOT, but small EOT less than 1 nm is

needed for 32 nm node and beyond. In this paper, we have applied the ultra-thin GeO2

and SiO2 interfacial layers [3-15] into high- TiLaO [3-16] epitaxial-Ge/Si n-type

MOS (n-MOS) capacitors, where the ultra-thin body Ge of 5 nm is directly grown on

Si to reach low leakage current. The TiLaO gate dielectric has the merits of unique

negative flat-band voltage (Vfb) from La2O3 [3-17] and the much higher  by adding

TiO2 [3-16]. Such negative Vfb is needed for low threshold voltage (Vt) MOSFET. The

control TaN/TiLaO/Ge/Si n-MOS capacitor without the ultra-thin GeO2 or SiO2

interfacial layer showed poor EOT and large Vfb degradation after a 550oC RTA,

which is required to activate ion-implanted source-drain in the MOSFET. Such

degradations are related to interface reaction and oxygen vacancy formation

[3-18]-[3-19] that are much improved by inserting the ultra-thin GeO2 or SiO2 [3-15]

interfacial layer. However, the high-TiLaO Ge/Si n-MOS capacitor with interfacial

GeO2 showed much poorer capacitance-voltage (C-V) hysteresis than that using SiO2

at a smaller EOT less than 1 nm. This is due to the Ge out-diffusion and intermixing

of high-TiLaO/GeO2 as observed by cross-sectional Transmission Electron

Microscopy (TEM) and Secondary Ion Mass Spectroscopy (SIMS).

3.2. Experimental procedure

(46)

capping layer were epitaxial grown on 6-in p-type Si substrate (10 ohm-cm) by

ultra-high-vacuum chemical-vapor-deposition (HUVCVD). After removing the native

oxide of Si-capping layer, various thick GeO2 or SiO2 and 5 nm high- TiLaO [3-16]

were deposited by physical vapor deposition (PVD) and followed by post-deposition

annealing (PDA) at 400oC in oxygenambient to improve gate dielectric quality. Here

the ultra-thin Si capping is used to prevent Ge oxidation and process loss, where no

interfacial Si was found by cross-sectional TEM after device process. Then a 50 nm

TaN was deposited and patterned to form the metal gate. The formed gate stack was

applied by a 550oC RTA that is needed for Ge n-MOSFET fabrication. Finally,

Aluminum (Al) was deposited on wafer backside to form the MOS capacitors. For

comparison, control device without GeO2 or SiO2 interfacial layer was also made. The

fabricated gate stack was examined by SIMS, TEM, X-ray Photoelectron

Spectroscopy (XPS) and C-V measurements to investigate the physical, chemical

bonding and electrical properties, respectively.

3.3. Results and discussion

Figure 3.1 shows the measured C-V characteristics of high- TiLaO Ge/Si

n-MOS capacitors with or without the interfacial GeO2 or SiO2 layer. For device

without the inserted GeO2 or SiO2 layer, both the capacitance density and Vfb were

severely degraded. Such V

fb roll-off at high temperature was previously reported due

(47)

capacitor with GeO2 or SiO2 layer shows much improved V

fb roll-off even after a

550oC RTA. Besides, the needed negative Vfb of -0.48 V is obtained and important for

low Vt Ge n-MOSFET. However, the device with GeO2 interfacial layer shows poorer

C-V hysteresis of 93 mV at 1.1 nm EOT than the much improved 19 mV hysteresis at

smaller 0.81 nm EOT for device using SiO2 interfacial layer, by taking account of

quantum-mechanical effect with parameters of Ge [3-7]. The C–V hysteresis and

negative Vfb value are among the best reported data for Ge n-MOS capacitors at the

smallest EOT and after a 550oC RTA [3-1]-[3-14],to our best knowledge.

We have used TEM to study the better electrical performance for device using

interfacial SiO2 layer. Figures 3.2(a) and 3.2(b) show the TEM images of

TaN/TiLaO/GeO2/Ge/Si n-MOS structure before and after a 550oC RTA. Sharp GeO2

interfacial layer of 0.76 nm thickness was found for as-deposited sample but becomes

blurred after the 550oC RTA. The high- layer is also thicker after the 550oC RTA,

where intermixing of high- TiLaO and GeO2 is observed. The thicker high- layer

explains the lower capacitance density after a 550oC RTA. In strong contrast, sharp

SiO2 interface shown in Fig. 3.2(c) is still preserved even after the 550oC RTA.

We have further used SIMS to study the large difference for devices with

different interfacial GeO2 and SiO2. Figures 3.3(a) and 3.3(b) show the measured

(48)

respectively. Severe Ge out-diffusion was found for device structure with interfacial

GeO2 layer after a 550oC RTA, while much improved Ge out-diffusion was achieved

using ultra-thin SiO2 interfacial layer even at a smaller 0.81 nm EOT.

The degraded interface property with ultra-thin interfacial GeO2 was also

examined by XPS. Figure 3.4 shows the Ge 2p3 XPS spectra of TiLaO/GeO2/Ge/Si

n-MOS structure before and after the 550oC RTA. The as-deposited sample shows a strong Ge peak at 1217.4 eV, and a small higher energy side peak is attributed to

Ge-O bonds of GeO2 [3-20]. However, this Ge-O peak becomes much weaker for the

sample after the 550oC RTA. This is consistent with the largely thinned GeO2 and

intermixed TiLaO/GeO2 interface found from cross-sectional TEM and the large Ge

out-diffusion measured by SIMS. The thinner interfacial GeO2 after the high

temperature 550oC RTA may be related to the measured reaction at 758~589K [3-21]:

GeO2(s) + Ge(s) 2 GeO(g) (2)

In contrast, the interface reaction between ultra-thin SiO2 layer and Ge is unfavorable

due to the much higher bond enthalpy of SiO2 (800 kJ/mol) than GeO2 (659 kJ/mol)

[3-22].

3.4. Conclusion

In conclusion, we have studied the high- TiLaO on Ge/Si MOS structure with

GeO2 and SiO2 interfacial layers. Low EOT of 0.81 nm, small C-V hysteresis of 19

(49)

device with ultra-thin interfacial GeO2 shows inferior device performance of larger

EOT and poor C-V hysteresis, which is due to the severe Ge out-diffusion through

GeO2 from SIMS profile, thicker gate dielectric from TEM observation and thinned

(50)

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

C

(

F

/c

m

2

)

Voltage (V)

TiLaO/SiO 2 on Ge/Si TiLaO/GeO 2 on Ge/Si TiLaO on Ge/Si Solid: 450oC RTA; Open: 550oC RTA

100KHz Frequency

Fig. 3.1. C-V characteristics of TaN/TiLaO Ge/Si n-MOS capacitors with or without

the inserted GeO2 and SiO2 interfacial layer and after 450 or 550oC RTA.

(51)

(a)

(b)

(c)

Fig.3.2. Cross-sectional TEM images of TaN/TiLaO/GeO2/Ge/Si n-MOS capacitors

(a) before and (b) after 550oC RTA. (c) TaN/TiLaO/SiO2/Ge/Si n-MOS

(52)

0 1000 2000 3000 4000 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 In te n s it y ( C /S ) Sputter Time (S) Si 550oC RTA Si as-deposited Ge 550oC RTA Ge as-deposited O 550oC RTA O as-deposited Ta 550oC RTA Ta as-deposited Ge out-diffusion (a) 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 In te n s it y ( C /S ) Sputter Time (S) Si 550oC RTA Si as-deposited Ge 550oC RTA Ge as-deposited O 2 as-deposited O2 550oC RTA Ta 550oC RTA Ta as-deposited (b)

Fig. 3.3. SIMS profile of TaN/TiLaO Ge/Si n-MOS structure with inserted (a) GeO2

(53)

12107 1215 1220 1225 1230 1235 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Ge-Ge as-deposited 550oC RTA In te n s it y ( C /S ) Binding Energy x103 Ge-O TaN/TiLaO/GeO 2 on Ge/Si

Fig. 3.4. The Ge 2p3 XPS spectra of TiLaO/GeO2/Ge/Si structure before and after

(54)

Chapter 4

High Performance of Ge n-MOSFETs Using SiO2

Interfacial Layer and TiLaO Gate Dielectric

4.1. Introduction

The Ge channel MOSFETs [4-1]-[4-11] have attracted much attention due to

higher bulk electron and hole mobilities than Si counterparts. Nevertheless, the

technical challenges for Ge MOSFETs are severe, which include the integration of

defect-free Ge on Si substrate, the large leakage current of small energy bandgap (EG)

Ge and the poor electron mobility at high effective electric field. The integration of

defect-free Ge on Si was demonstrated by us using wafer-bonded Ge-on-insulator

(GOI or GeOI) technology [4-1]. The leakage current of small EG Ge MOSFET is also

lowered by thinning Ge body thickness in GOI [4-5]. However, the electron mobility

degradation at high effective field is still a severe issue, which is especially important

for MOSFET at small equivalent-oxide thickness (EOT). In order to improve the

mobility, many interface passivation methods have been proposed such as NH3

surface treatment, SiH4 annealing [4-4], Si capping layer [4-6], [4-9] and GeO2

interfacial layer [4-7]-[4-8]. Unfortunately, these methods still got relative low

mobility at high effective field. The SiOx interfacial layer has been used for Ge

(55)

field mobility are still the major challenges for Ge n-MOSFET. In this paper, we

report high mobility at high effective field for Ge n-MOSFETs with small

capacitance-equivalent-thickness (CET), which was achieved by using higher 

TiLaO dielectric [4-12]-[4-13] and SiO2 interfacial layer. In contrast, much degraded

CET and unwanted flat-band voltage (Vfb) shift were measured for control device

without the SiO2 interfacial layer.

4.2. Experimental procedure

After standard clean, an undoped 200 nm Si buffer, undoped 5 nm Ge and

undoped 1.5 nm Si capping layer were grown on p-type (100) Si wafers (5×1015 cm-3

doping) by ultra-high-vacuum chemical-vapor-deposition (HUVCVD) at 500oC and

5×10-4 torr. An ultra-thin 0.8 nm SiO2 was deposited by Physical Vapor Deposition

(PVD) using Electron-Beam Evaporation at the room temperature and 2×10-6 torr

pressure [3-14], where the native oxide of Si-capping layer was removed using dilute

HF solution. Here the Si-capping is to prevent the thin Ge loss during process, since

Ge can be oxidized by water and air similar to Si case and GeO2 is dissolvable by

water. No Si-capping layer was found by cross-section TEM after process. A 5 nm

thick TixLa1-xO (x~0.67) [3-12] with  of 45 was deposited and followed by a 400oC

post-deposition anneal (PDA) in an oxygen ambient for 5 min. Then a 200 nm TaN

was deposited by PVD and patterned to form the metal gate. For comparison, the

(56)

25 KeV As+ion implantation was applied at a 5×10

15

cm

-2

dosage and 550oC RTA.

From the X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) study, the TiLaO is amorphous after 550oC RTA.

Finally, non-alloyed Al contact metal was added. The fabricated devices were

characterized by capacitance-voltage (C-V) and current-voltage (J-V) measurements.

4.3. Results and Discussion

In Fig. 4.1 we showed the C-V characteristics of TaN/TiLaO on Si-capped Ge/Si

capacitors after 450~550oC RTA. These devices showed severe degradations of

capacitance density, Vfb shift, and hysteresis after a 550oC RTA, which was related to

interfacial layer formation as found by TEM. However, this temperature is required to

activate the ion implanted dopants at source-drain of Ge MOSFET.

To address the interface reaction, we added an ultra-thin SiO2 interfacial layer

between high- and Ge. Figures 4.2(a) and 4.2(b) showed the C-V and J-V

characteristics of the TaN/TiLaO/SiO2 on Ge/Si n-MOS devices. Much smaller

unwanted Vfb shift and less interface states generation are reached than the devices

without SiO2 interfacial layer shown in Fig. 4.1. The good high- and interface

quality is also evident from the small C-V hysteresis of only 19 mV from -3 to 1 V

sweep. Such large difference is due to the dense and strong bonding SiO2 to prevent

the Ge out diffusion during the process, from SIMS measurements. Besides, a small

(57)

Figures 4.3(a) and 4.3(b) show the respective Id-Vd and Id-Vg characteristics. Good

transistor characteristics of relatively high drive current, small sub-threshold swing

(SS) of 126 mV/dec and a record low IOFF leakage of 3.5×10-10 A/m [4-6]-[4-8] were

measured simultaneously. This is due to the ultra-thin body (UTB) of conductive Ge

channel on Si substrate that is well predicted by UTB GOI MOSFETs [4-5]. Such low

leakage current is mandatory for future generation low power green transistor.

Figure 4 shows the electron mobility versus effective electric field, where the data

was directly derived from measured Id-Vg curves [4-15]. Good high field mobility at

0.5 MV/cm is 201 cm2/V-s [4-6]-[4-8] at a small 1.1 nm CET. The good high field

mobility is consistent with the needed negative Vfb, small C-V hysteresis and SS; here

the SS of 126 mV/dec is one of the best reported data for Ge n-MOSFET in literature

[4-1]-[4-11]. The good high field mobility is vital for MOSFET at a small EOT,

where a still high 0.65 V drain voltage is needed even for 11 nm node technology

according to ITRS.

4.4. Conclusions

We have demonstrated high performance epitaxial Ge n-MOSFET on Si using

higher  TiLaO and SiO2 interfacial layer.Good device performance is reached in

terms of small CET, record low IOFF and the highest mobility at high effective electric

field. Besides, this self-aligned and gate-first transistor has the advantages of simple

(58)
(59)

-2 -1 0 1 2 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 450oC RTA From -2V to 2V 450oC RTA From 2V to 2V 500oC RTA From -2V to 2V 500oC RTA From 2V to 2V C

(

F /c m 2

)

Voltage (V)

TiLaO on Si-capped Ge/Si

100kHz frequency

550oC RTA From -2V to 2V 550oC RTA From 2V to 2V

Fig. 4.1. C-V and of the TaN/TiLaO on Si-Capped Ge/Si n-MOS capacitors after

數據

Fig. 1.1 Leakage current versus voltage for various thicknesses of SiO 2  layers.
Fig. 1.3 Static dielectric constant versus band gap for candidate gate oxides [1-34].
Fig. 1.5 Bond enthalpy for M-O, M-N and M-C in the Periodic Table.
Fig.  2.1  C-V  characteristics  of  (a)  TaN/HfAlO/Ge/Si  and  control  TaN/HfAlO/Si      n-MOS capacitors and (b)  TaN/LaAlO 3 /Ge/Si  n-MOS capacitors at 100 kHz
+7

參考文獻

相關文件

S1 Singlet-triplet energy gap (in kcal/mol) of n-cyclacene as a function of the number of benzene rings, calculated using TAO-LDA and KS-LDA.. For com- parison, the CASPT2, KS-M06L,

Total energies and Cartesian coordinates for the lowest singlet and triplet states of n-acenes (n = 2 to 46) by spin-unrestricted TAO-LDA (θ = 7 mHartree)/6-31G ∗ (S3 to S88)..

雙極性接面電晶體(bipolar junction transistor, BJT) 場效電晶體(field effect transistor, FET).

„ However, NTP SIPv6 UA cannot communicate with CISCO PSTN gateway, and CCL PCA (IPv6 SIP UA) cannot communicate with CISCO PSTN gateway and Pingtel hardware-based SIP phone. „

 “More Joel on Software : Further Thoughts on Diverse and Occasionally Related Matters That Will Prove of Interest to Software Developers, Designers, and Managers, and to Those

n Media Gateway Control Protocol Architecture and Requirements.

This study aimed to establish the strength models of High-Performance Concrete (HPC) using Nonlinear Regression Analysis (NLRA), Back-Propagation Networks (BPN) and

“Polysilicon Thin Film Transistors Fabricated at 100℃ on a Flexible Plastic Substrate,” IEEE Electron Device Meeting, p. “Polysilicon Thin Film Transistors