• 沒有找到結果。

The Impact of Corporate Diversification on Corporate Performance 陳紹俞、張椿柏

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "The Impact of Corporate Diversification on Corporate Performance 陳紹俞、張椿柏"

Copied!
2
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

The Impact of Corporate Diversification on Corporate Performance 陳紹俞、張椿柏

E-mail: 365778@mail.dyu.edu.tw

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to discuss whether internationalization and diversification would affect its firm performance according to the data of listed companies in Taiwan from 1986 to 2001. The regression results shows diversification will affect financial performance. The diversification had a quadratic curve relation with firm performance. Firm performance increased in the beginning of diversification:

but firm performance falls while the products diversification is too high. There is no significant relationship between internationalization and firm performance . Firm performance would fall down while internationalization goes too far.

Keywords : diversification、products diversification、internationalization Table of Contents

目錄 封面內頁 簽名頁 中文摘要--- I 英文摘

要---II 誌謝---III 目 錄---IV 圖目

錄---V 表目錄---V 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的 4 第三節 研究流程 6 第二章 相關理論及文獻回顧 8 第一節 企業 績效 8 第二節 多角化策略相關文獻探討 11 第三節 國際化之相關文獻回顧 13 第四節 國際化程度與企業績效關係相關文獻 探討 15 第三章 研究設計 20 第一節 資料來源與樣本選取 20 第二節 研究變數的定義與衡量 21 第三節 資料分析方法 26 第 四章 實證結果與分析 29 第一節 基本敘述統計分析 29 第二節 皮爾森相關分析 30 第三節 線性迴歸模型 33 第四節 非線性迴 歸模型 42 第五章 結論與未來研究方向 48 參考文獻 50

REFERENCES

參考文獻 資料庫及書籍 CMoney法人投資決策支援系統 期刊論文 英文部分 Agrawal, A. and C. R. Knoeber, 1996. Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholder, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 31, 377-397.

Brickley, J.A., R.C. Lease and C.W. Smith, Jr., 1988. Ownership Structure and Finance Economics, Journal of Finance Economics, 267-291.

Brickley, J.A. and C.M. James, 1987. The Takeover Market, Corporate Board Composition, and Ownership Structure: The case of banking, Journal of Law Economics, 30, 161-180. David J. Denis and A. Sarin, 1999. Ownership and Board Structures in Publicly Traded Corporations, Journal of Financial Economics, 187-223. Friend, I. L. and H.P. Lang, 1988. An Empirical Test of the Impact of Managerial Self-Interest on Corporate Capital Structure, Journal of Finance, 271-281. Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., and Ireland, R. D., 1994. A mid-range theory of interactive effects of internationaland product diversification on innovation and performance, Journal of Management, 20, 297–326. Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., and Kim, H, 1997. International diversification: effects on innovation and firm performance in product diversified firms,

Academy of Management Journal, 40, 767–798. Ike Mathur, Manohar Singh, Kimberly C. Gleason, 2001. The evidence from Canadian firms on multinational diversification and performance , The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 41, 561–578. James P. Walsh and James K.

Seward, 1990. On the Efficiency of Internal and External Corporate Control Mechanisms, Academy of Management Review, 15, 421-458. James D.Westphal, 1999. Collaboration in the Boardroom : Behavioral and Performance Consequences of CEO-Board Social Ties, Academy of Management Journal, 42, 7-24. Jensen, Michael C. and William H. Meckling, 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360. Jensen, and R. Ruback, 1983. The Market for Corporate Control, Journal of Financial and Economics, 5-50. John J. McConnell and Henri Servaes, 1990. Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value, Journal of Financial Economics , 595-612. Jones,G.R and Georgr, J.M., 2008. Contemporary Managrment , 5th ed, McGraw-Hill , 8, 320-323.

Kim, W.S. and E.H. Sorensen, 1986. Evidence on the Impact of the Agency Costs of Debt on Corporate Debt Policy, Journal of Quantitative Analysis, 131-144. Lloyd, W. P, J. H. Hand, and N.K. Modani, 1987. The Effect Degree of Ownership Control on Firm Diversification, Market Value, and Merger Activity, Journal of Business Research, 303-312. Morck, R., A. Shleifer and R.W.Vishny, 1988, Management Ownership and Marketing Valuation, Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 293-315. Paul Mallette and K. L. Fowler, 1992. Effects of Board Composition and Stock Ownership on the Adoption of Poison Pills, Academy of Management Journal, 1010-1035. Patton, A. and J. C. Baker, 1987. Why Won’t Directors Rock the Boat?, Harvard Business Review, 10-18. Pitts, R. A., and Lei ,D. ,2000. Strategic Management:Building And Sustaining

(2)

Competive Advantage , Chapter 6, 165-207. Pound, J., 1988. Proxy Contests and The Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight, Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 237-265. Salancik, G. R. and J. Pfeffer, 1980, The Effects of Ownership and Performance on Executive in U.S. Corporations, Academy of Management Journal , 23, 653-664. Scott W. Barnhart and S. Rosenstein, 1998. Board conposition, Managerial Ownership,and Firm Performance: An Empirical Analysis, The Financial Review33, 1-16. Shleifer, Andrei and Robert W. Vishny, 1986. Large Shareholders and Corporate Control, Journal of Political Economy 3, 461-488. Stuart Rosenstein and Jeffrey G. Wyatt, 1990. Outside Directors, Board

Independence ,and Shareholder Wealth, Journal of Financial Economics , 26, 175-191. 中文部分 王元章、張椿柏(2011),「從核心代理問 題的角度探討股權結構,董事會特性對公司價值之影響」,證券市場發展季刊,第二十三卷,第二期,頁137-174。 余宗翰(2003),

「國際化與多角化對績效影響之研究-以國內食品廠商為例」,私立實踐大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 林佳亨(2003),「台灣地

區國際合資公司績效與存續之研究」,私立銘傳大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。 邱毅、張訓華(1991),「股權結構 董事會組成與

企業財務績效」,台北市銀月刊,第二十二卷,第五期,頁11-32。 俞海琴(1994),「內部人士持股比率與融資策略關係之實證研究

」,管理評論,第十三卷,第二期,頁109-131。 陳瓊蓉(2011),「臺灣上市公司初次多角化策略之前因與後果之探討」,臺灣銀行 季刊,第六十二卷,第一期,頁223-241。 彭智強(2003),「多角化與國際化策略配合對企業企業績效關係之研究-以技術生命週期 觀點分析之」,私立中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 黃一芳(2004),「產業環境、多角化策略與企業績效之研究-以台灣汽車 產業為例」,國立成功大學企業管理學系(EMBA)專班碩士論文。 黃馨嬅(2009),「公司治理品質、企業績效對企業績效之影響-以通 過中華公司治理協會公司治理評鑑之上市櫃公司為例」, 國立臺北大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 蔡奇勝(2003),「 營運績效與多 角化策略對企業併購短中期股價報酬率影響之研究」,私立真理大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。

參考文獻

相關文件

In this study, the impact of corporate social responsibility to corporate image, service quality, perceived value, customer satisfaction and customer loyalty was explored

The regression analysis results indicated that after the corporate image, service quality, satisfaction, perceived value and loyalty between each dimension and is

Prioritising improvement of service attributes using impact-range-performance analysis and impact asymmetry analysis. Hospitality and travel

This paper presents a Knowledge Value-Adding Model (KVAM) for quantitative performance evaluation of the Community of Practice (CoP) in an A/E consulting firm.. The

Wilson (1996), “A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Market Structure, Firm Structure, Strategy, and Market Orientation Culture on Dimensions of Small-Firm Performance,” Journal

Tan et al, (1998), “ Supply Chain Management: Supplier performance and Firm Performance ”, International Journal of Purchasing and Material Management , 34(2) , pp. Frankel,(

The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Understanding human resource management in the contexe

This study aims to explore whether the service quality and customer satisfaction have a positive impact on the organizational performance of the services and whether the