• 沒有找到結果。

對未來研究上的建議

在文檔中 中 華 大 學 (頁 103-112)

第五章、 結論及未來展望

5.2 研究建議

5.2.2 對未來研究上的建議

規則空間模型運用在教學上,可作為一種有效的認知診斷評量方法,並隱含對補 救教學的發展契機,後續研究者可以針對其它單元繼續分析研究,將學生習得的概念 及既有的認知結構用科學的方式表徵出來,以期精進教學。

規則空間模型常運用在國小數學教學上,用在國中英語教學中似乎付之闕如,因 為英語的學習包含「聽、說、讀、寫」四大主題,但本研究為了配合國中會考,只能針 對「讀」的部份做分析與推導,建議未來的研究者可以對其它部份加以繼續研究。

建議未來的研究者,前期的準備工作具有決定性的關鍵,可以事先將教材內容的 屬性分類與屬性關係圖做好分類,並多收集鑑別度高、難度適中、具有信度和效度的 題目,安排好教學進度與流程,進行學習前,學習中,和學習後的認知測驗評量,運 用規則空間模型來分析學生的學習成效,使學生知道自己的學習強項和落後點,並適 時地給予學生個別學習診斷建議,才能提高教學效能。

參考文獻

一、中文參考文獻

毛佩琦譯,2007,《英語教學法大全(Technigues and Principles in Language Teaching,

by Diane Larsen-Freeman)》,臺北市,師德文教。

王金國,2001,”成功學習的關鍵~自我調整學習”,《課程與教學(季刊)》,5 卷 1 期,

2001 年 1 月,pp.145-164。

財團法人語言訓練測驗中心,2000,《全民英語能力分級檢定測驗研究-中高級測驗研 究報告》,財團法人語言訓練測驗中心。

余民寧,1993,”測驗理論的發展趨勢”。政大心理系承辦「心理測驗之學術及實務研 討會」之論文宣讀。

余民寧,1993,”測驗理論的發展趨勢”,《心理測驗的發展與應用》,中國測驗學會主 編,pp.23-62,台北市,心理出版社。

余民寧,1994,”IRT 的未來(The Future of IRT)”,《研習資訊》(第 11 卷第 3 期,

pp.7-11

余民寧,2009,《試題反應理論 IRT 及其應用》。臺北市,心理出版社。

沈孟樺,林淑玲,2013,”國中生家庭社會資本與自我調整學習關係之研究”,《家庭 教育雙月刊》(第 41 期,2013.1 pp.6-30) 台南市。

吳幸宜譯,1994,《學習理論與教學應用。(Learning and instruction: theory into practice.,1991)》,By Gredler,M. E)臺北市,心理出版社。

吳美虹,2005,”國小六年級學童英語字彙記憶策略與背景因素之研究-以台中縣為 例”,《國立台北師範學院兒童英語教育研究所碩士論文》,台北。

吳慧珉、施淑娟、曾建銘、林姮君、詹家怡,2013,《以 DINA 模式為基礎之電腦化 認知診斷測驗編製及補救教學模式探究》,臺北,國家教育研究院。

林建平,2010,”低成就學童的家庭環境與自我調整學習之研究”,《新竹教育大學教 育學報》(第 27 卷第 1 期),pp.93-126。

林清山譯,梅爾(Mayer,R.E.)著,1997,《教育心理學—認知取向(3 版)》,臺北 市,遠流。

林梅琴與黃佩娟,2000,”專科學生學習低成就的成因及學習困境之研究—以德明商 專為例”,《德明學報》,16,pp.373-396。

林壽華,1996,《外語教學概論》,書林出版社。

林壽華,2000,《英語教學理論》,書林出版社。

涂金堂,2003,認知診斷評量探究,《南師學報第 37 卷第二期教育類》,pp.76-81。國 立臺南師範學院。

國家教育研究院,2014,"雙語詞彙、學術名詞暨辭書資訊網"

http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1678765/,臺北市。

教育部,2008,”國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要語文學習領域(英語)”,台北:教育 部。

陳淑娟,林玉如,2005,”學習動機在教學策略上的應用”,《松山工農學報,(2005.04)》, pp.106-111。

陳烜之(主編),2007,《認知心理學》,臺北市,五南。

陳聖麟,2014,”程式設計課程實施運用認知診斷分析之行動研究”,《中華大學學位 論文》,中華大學。

陳學志、邱發忠、劉政宏、林宜利、陳萩卿、林奕宏、陳淑蓉(譯),2006),《認知 心理學(原作者:Mark H. Ashcraft )》,臺北市,學富文化。

郭威駿,2012,”木桶理論應用於國中生英語學習成效之行動研究”,南華大學 社會 學研究所《網路社會學通訊期刊》第一零五期,第 9 篇,2012/06/15 發刊。

郭伯臣、吳慧珉、陳俊華,2012,”試題反應理論在教育測驗上之應用”。《新竹縣教 育研究集刊》,第十二期,pp.05-40。

馮和平主編,2014,《國中第二冊 English 1 下》,臺北市,康軒文教。

張苾含、胡潔芳、陳俊光,2013,”英漢雙語學童聲韻覺識及構詞覺識與英漢認字能 力之相關研究”。《國立臺灣師範大學 教育心理與輔導學系 教育心理學報》,

2013,4 5 卷,2 期,pp.201-220。

張春興,1994,《教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實際》。臺北市,東華書局。

張春興,1995,《現代心理學。臺北市》,東華書局。

張景媛,1991,”大學生認知風格、動機與自我調整因素、後設認知與學業成績關係 之研究”。《臺灣師大教育心理學報》,24,pp.145-161。

張新仁,1990,”從資訊處理談有效的學習策略”,《教育學刊》,9,pp.47-66。

張新仁主編,2003,《學習與教學新趨勢》。臺北市,心理出版社。

曾建銘,2013,《以認知診斷模式分析縣市學力檢測資料研究報告》,臺北市,國家教 育研究院。

曾建銘、陳清溪,2009,”2007 年臺灣學生學習成就評量結果之分析”,《教育研究與 發展期刊》,第五卷第四期,pp.1-38。

黃志偉,2002,《從社會語言學來談母語教育》,南一新講台,pp.19-22。

黃希庭、李文權、張慶林譯著,1992,《認知心理學,(原著 Robert L. Solso,1979,Cognitive Psychology)》,臺北市,五南圖書出版。

黃祺庭,2005,”國民小學六年級學童英語學習適應情形之研究-以一個班級為例”,

《國立台中教育大學國民教育研究所碩士論文》,國立台中教育大學。

曾靖雯,2000,”概念構圖課程與教學策略對國中二年級學生地理科學習表現之影 響”,《國立東華大學國民教育研究所論文》,國立東華大學。

溫世頌,1997,《教育心理學》,臺北市,三民。

葉重新,2001,《教育研究法》,臺北市,心理出版社。

詹志禹,1993,”認知學派在教學方法上的應用”,《尖端教學法》,台北市教師研習中 心(編印),pp.201-214,1993。

趙居蓮譯,1996,《學習與教學,(Gagne, R. The Conditions of Learning, and theory of instruction.)》,臺北市,心理出版社。

蔡綉珍,2005,”國小三年級閩南語教學之研究---語言人權的觀點”,《國立臺北教育 大學社會科教育學系碩士論文》,國立臺北教育大學。

盧雪梅,2012,”國中基測英語科題組結構與學生表現之分析”,《教育實踐與研究》

第 25 卷第 1 期,pp.67-96)。

鄭昭明,1996,《認知心理學-理論與實踐(2 版)》,臺北市,桂冠圖書。

鄭麗玉,1993,《認知心理學-理論與應用》,臺北市,五南圖書。

劉湘川、林原宏,1995,”從試題特徵曲線進行認知診斷之理論與應用”,《測驗統計 年刊》,第三輯 1995 年 12 月,pp.1-13。

盧雪梅,2007,”國民中學學生基本學力測驗國文科和英語科成就性別差異和性別差 別試題功能(DIF)分析”,《教育研究與發展期刊》,第三卷第四期,(2007.12)

pp.79-112。

羅幼瓊,2004,”提升課業任務價值之課業學習諮商的當事人任務分析--以高中學生學 習英文科為例”,《彰化師範大學輔導與諮商研究所博士論文》,彰化師範大學。

二、外文參考文獻

A.D. Norman, (1993), Things that Make Us Smart. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Alty, J. L., Al-Sharrah, A., & Beacham, N. (2006). When humans form media and media form humans: an experimental study examining the effects different digital media have on the learning outcomes of students who have different learning styles.

Interacting with Computers, 18(5), pp.891-909.

Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, David R., Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M.C. (Eds.), (2000), A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives, New York, USA: Longman.

Anastasi, A. (1967). Psychology, psychologists, and psychological testing. American Psychologist, 22(4), pp.297.

Anderson, Lorin W.,Krathwohl, David R.,Bloom, Benjamin Samuel ,(2000), A Taxonomy for Learning: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Prentice Hall (2000/12/01).

Atkinson, J. W. (1964), An introduction to motivation, Princeton: Van Nostrand Ayersman, D. (1994), Cognitive psychology and hypermedia: merging the disciplines,

Unpublished dissertation at West Virginia University.

Bandura, A. (1977), Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Bloom, B.S., and others(With MESA Student Group.) ,(1980), The State of Research on Selected Alterable Variables in Education., Department of Education, Chicago, University of Chicago, MESA Publication.

Bloom, B.S. (1980), The new direction in educational research: Alterable variables, Phi Delta Kappan, 62, pp.382-385.

Bloom, B.S.,(1981), All Our Children Learning, New York: McGraw-Hill. 1981.

Bloom, B.S., Hastings, J.T. & Madaus, G.F., (1971), Handbook on Formative and Summative Evaluation of Student Learning, New York: McGraw-Hill.

Bloom, B.S., Madaus, G.F. & Hastings, J.T., (1981), Evaluation to Improve Learning. New

York: McGraw-Hill.

Buck, G. & Tatsuoka, K., (1998), “Application of the Rule-space Procedure to Language Testing: Examining Attributes of a Free Response Listening Test.” Language Testing,15(2), pp.119-157.

Buck, G., (1991), The testing of listening comprehension: An introspective study.

Language Testing, 8, pp.67-91.

Buck, G., (2001), Assessing Listening, New York: Cambridge University Press.

Buck, G., VanEssen, T., Tatsuoka, K., Kostin, I., Lutz, D., & Phelps, M. (1998),

Development, selection and validation of a set of cognitive and linguistic attributes for the SAT-I verbal: Sentence completion section , (ETS Research Report No.

RR-98-23), Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

de la Torre,J., (2009), A cognitive diagnosis model for cognitively based multiple-choice options, Applied Psychological Measurement,33(3), pp.163-183

de la Torre, J. & Lee, Y. S., (2010), A note on the invariance of the DINA model parameters, Journal of Educational Measurement, 47(1), pp.115-127.

Demirbas, O. O., & Demirkan, H., (2007), Learning styles of design students and the relationships of academic performance and gender in design education. Learning and Instruction, 17, pp.345-359

Diaz, D. P., & Cartnal, R. B.,(1999), Students' Learning Styles in Two Classes: Online Distance Learning and Equivalent On-Campus. College Teaching, 47(4), pp.130-135.

Ebel, R.,(1979), Essentials of educational measurement, Englewood cliffs, NJ:

Prentice-Hall.

Gagne, R., (1977). The conditions of learning (3rd ed.), New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Gagne, R. M., (1985), The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction, 4th ed, New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Gierl M. J., Leighton J. P. & Hunka S. M.,(2000), “Exploring the logic of Tatsuoka’s Rule-Space Model for test development and analysis.”, Educational Measurement:

Issues and Practice, pp.34-44, 2000.

Goldsmith, T. E., & Davenport, D. M., (1991), Assessing structural similarity of graph. In R. W. Schvaneveldt (Ed.), Pathfinder associative networks ,(pp.75-88), Norwood, NJ:

Ablex.

Goldsmith, T. E., Johnson, P. J., & Acton, W. H., (1991), Assessing Structural Knowledge.

Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), pp.88-96. Gronlund, N. E., & Linn, R. L., (1990), Measurement and evaluation in teaching, New York: Macmillan.

Han,L. & Hoover,H.D.,(1994), “Gender Differences in Achievement Test Scores”, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education(New Orleans, April 5-7 1994)

Hoover,W., & Gough,P.,(1990), The simple view of reading. Reading & Writing, 2, pp.127-160.

Hoover, W. A., & Gough,P. B.,(1990), The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing:

An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, pp.127-160.

Hoover,H. D., Dunbar, S. B., & Frisbie,D. A.,(2001), Iowa test of basic skills: Form A.

Itasca, IL : Riverside.

Hoover-Dempsey,K. V., Bassler,O. C., & Brissie,J. S., (1987), Parent involvement:

Contribution of teacher efficacy,schoo1 socioeconomic status, and other school characteristics. American Educational Research Journal, 24, pp.417-435.

Keefe, J. W., (1978), Learning style: An overview. In J. W. Keefe (Eds), Students Learning Styles: Diagnosing and Prescribing Programs, 1-17. Reston, VA: National

Association of Secondary School Principals.

Keefe, J. W., (1979), Learning style: An overview. In National Association of Secondary School Principals (Eds), Student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs (pp. i-ii). Reston, Virginia: National Association of Secondary School Principals.

Kember, D., (2006), Excellent university teaching, Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.

Krashen, S. D., (1992), Fundamentals of language education. Torrence, CA: Laredo Publishing.

Leighton, J. P., Gierl, M. J., & Hunka, S. (2004), The Attribute Hierarchy Method for cognitive assessment: A variation on Tatsuoka's rule-space approach. Journal of Educational Measurement, 41, pp.205-237.

Liu, M., & Reed, W. M., (1994), The relationship between learning strategies and learning styles in a hypermedia environment, Computers in Human Behavior, 10(4),

pp.419-434.

Martin,D. J., & Hoover,H. D., (1987), Sex differences in educational achievement: A longitudinal study. Journal of Early Adolescence, 7, pp.65–83.

Mayer,R.E., (1981), The promise of cognitive psychology, San Francisco, CA: Freeman.

McDonough, S. H.,(1981), Psychology in foreign language teaching, London: George Allen & Unwin Publishers.

Miller, P. (2001). Learning Styles: The Multimedia of the Mind. Research Report. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED451-140)

Mills,J., Ayre,M., Hands,D., and Carden,P., (2010), Learning about Learning Styles:Can it Improve Engineering Education, Mountain R.

Nichols, P. D. (1994), A framework for developing cognitively diagnostic assessment.

Review of Educational Research, 64, pp.575-603.

Noll, V., Scannell, D., & Craig, R., (1979), Introduction to Educational Measurement. (4th ed.),Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Norman, D. A. (1983). Design role based on analyses of human error, Communication of ACM. 26, 254-258.

Pintrich, P. R.(1989), “The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom”, In Ames, C. & Maehr, M. (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation - enhancing environments, reenwich, CT: JAI, Vol. 6, pp.117-160.

Reigeluth, C. M. (1994), Instructional design theories, The International Encyclopedia of Education (2nd ed.),Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Richard M. Felder & Barbara A. Soloman , (2014),Index of Learning Styles , North Carolina State University.

http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/ILSpage.html

Robert M.Gagné, (1965), The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction, New York:

Holt, Rinehard. And Winston.

Sheehan, K. M., (1997), A tree-based approach to proficiency scaling and diagnostic assessment, Journal of Educational Measurement, 34(4), pp.333-352.

Tatsuoka, K. K., (1983), Rule space: An approach for dealing with misconceptions based on item response theory, Journal of Educational Measurement, 20, pp.345-354.

Tatsuoka, K. K., (1995), Architecture of knowledge structures and cognitive diagnosis, In P.

D. Nichols, S. F. Chipman, & R. L. Brennan (Eds.), Cognitively diagnostic assessment, (pp. 327-359), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum., Zimmerman, B. J. (1986).

Becoming a self-regulated learner: Which are the key subprocesses? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, pp.307-313

Ulric, N. Neisser, (1967), Cognitive psychology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:

Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Wang, L. C. & Chen, M. P. (2008). Promoting ICT skills learning through compensating weaker learning style. Proceedings of the 7th WSEAS International Conference on Applied Computer and Applied Computational Science.

Zimmerman, B. J., (2000), Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective, In M.

Boekaerts, & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

附錄

在文檔中 中 華 大 學 (頁 103-112)