• 沒有找到結果。

第六章 結論與建議

第二節 建議

從探究結果的啟示,本研究針對以下三點提出建議:

一、深入觀察並理解學校環境教育的協作團隊

無論是專業學習社群或是任何形式的團隊,都應該對協作內涵有深入的認識。對協 作更認識也許可避免教師與同儕互動時的無措、排斥或挫折。理解協作過程有不同的活 動、模式和程度,可循序漸進並做多元調整。更可從協作特性、類型來檢視自我團隊。

因此能用更長遠的眼光,積極地看待團隊互動,減少挫敗和停滯。

本研究雖然能呈現教師的經驗,但仍然不能專注於一個團隊來檢視每個成員對協作 的理解和體悟。研究者鼓勵教師,應該將協作視為專業成長的一環,結合行動研究來探

討自我參與的團隊,嘗試追求更豐富的協作,並促成更深刻的職涯學習。研究者也建議 行政者能對協作團隊有更細微的觀察,並在資源和情緒上給予支持;尤其環境教育科際 整合學習的需求,特別需要行政者給予領域間教師協作的空間。

二、將協作和促進者的概念投入環境教育者的專業訓練中

環境教育者在學校常常做為促進者,在他們規劃和帶動學校環境教育學習時,也格 外需要操作多元的協作;然而協作在環境教育的專業學習中,卻是缺乏或草草帶過的。

受訪教師對協作的概念基本上是陌生的,想必他們也不知該如何檢視與同儕間的互動。

環境教育者應該在專業訓練中培養更多對協作和促進者的認識。甚至環境教育人員的培 訓,都應該將他們的角色視為能學校中環境教育協作的促進者,而非單純寫計畫呈報的 事務員。教育部和教育機構正在提升專業學習社群的討論,也積極改變學校的文化,相 信環境教育者並不需要完全重新學習,而能從教育學領域找到豐富的範本與協助。

三、應增加環境教育研究中對協作的討論

研究者在蒐集文獻時,也明顯發覺研究的缺乏。協作太常被當成沒有下文的處方,

又需要時間仔細觀察,變很難成為研究的主題,然而我們不能忽視這樣的研究對環境教 育者的專業成長極有幫助。但從研究者的觀察中發現,協作是非常質化的學問,也很難 用量化的眼光與工具來評量。在協作互動中,每個成員的觀點其實都應該被納入參考。

而各個觀察協作的元素間,有時又是矛盾的,需要美妙的平衡,但這個平衡卻沒有公式 可循,必須對應成員互動的特性與需求。研究者期許,在協作相關研究增加時,也能小 心研究協作的方式,不至於違反協作的原理,或破壞它的意義與美感。

參考資料

中文

王順美(2003)。釐清與帶動環境教育。

王順美(2009)。綠色學校指標及其評量工具發展歷程之研究。環境教育研究,6(1),

119-160。

行政院環保署(2012)。環境教育已通過法規。取自環境教育管理資訊系統:

http://eeis.epa.gov.tw/。

吳鈴筑(2010)。國內外環境教育法比較之研究(碩士論文)。取自國立臺灣師範大學博 碩士論文系統。(系統編號GN0697460023)

李文怡(2010)。綜合活動學習領域地方輔導團成員對中央輔導團變革促進者角色知覺 之研究(碩士論文)。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。(系統編號098NCUE5464020)

汪靜明(2000)。學校環境教育的理念與原理。環境教育季刊,43,11-27

周智勇(2003)。一所國民小學校長、行政人員、教師對發展學校環境教育本位課程觀 點之研究(碩士論文)。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。(系統編號091NTCTC147027)

林益興(2002)。建構式領導成長團體動力研究(碩士論文)。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。

(系統編號090NTPTC476026)

林淑梤(譯)(2003)。運用共同產生對話為教與學創造社會與文化適應的課室以及分配 的責任(原作者:K. Tobin)。載於郭重吉(主編),科學教師之路─由實習輔導到專 業成長(261-274 頁)。臺北市:心理。

徐易男、蔡惠淑(2009)。美國 No Child Left Inside 法案及對環境教育之啟示。北縣教 育,68,102-104。

晏涵文、馮嘉玉、劉潔心(2006)。我國學校環境教育指標之研究。師大學報:教育類,

51(1),85-102。

桂冠前瞻教育叢書編譯組(譯)(1999)。教師角色(原作者:S. F. Heck & C. R. Williams)。

臺北市:桂冠圖書。(原著出版年:1984)

高佩瑤(2011)。學術型環境組織倡導《環境教育法》之溝通行動研究:以中華民國環 境教育學會為例。環境教育研究,9(1),109-142。

崔如璋(2005)。台北縣國民中學自然與生活科技領域課程統整實施現況及問題研究(碩 士論文)。取自國立臺灣師範大學博碩士論文系統。(系統編號GN0592003008)

張德銳等人(2002)。協同教學:理論與實務。臺北市:五南。

教育部(1998)。國民教育階段九年一貫課程總綱綱要。取自國民教育社群網:

http://teach.eje.edu.tw/。

教育部(2008)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要重大議題(環境教育)課程綱要草案。

取自國民教育社群網:http://teach.eje.edu.tw/。

教育部(2012)。雙語詞彙 Bilingual Glossary。

http://english.moe.gov.tw/lp.asp?ctNode=811&CtUnit=458&BaseDSD=13&mp=1 教育部(2013)。關於綠色學校。http://www.greenschool.moe.edu.tw/

教育部環保小組(2011)。學校執行環境教育法常見問答。http://www.edu.tw/environmental/

許文勇(2001)。國小教師發展環境教育融入自然科課程之行動研究(碩士論文)。取自 臺灣博碩士論文系統。(系統編號089NTPTC611003)

陳立國(2003)。環境教育融入學校本位課程發展之研究─以發展昆蟲教學模組課程為例

(碩士論文)。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。(系統編號091NTPTC611027)

陳豐漳(2007)。台北縣國民小學自然與生活科技領域輔導團組織運作與成效之研究(碩 士論文)。取自臺灣博碩士論文系統。(系統編號095NTPTC611076)

黃愈娟(2002)。國民小學學校本位教師環境教育專業發展模式初探─以一所山區小學為 例(碩士論文)。取自國立臺灣師範大學博碩士論文系統。(系統編號91NTNU0587005)

黃維(譯)(2003)。實踐社群(原作者:E. Wenger, R. McDermott, & W. M. Snyder)。臺 北市:天下文化。(原著出版年:2002)

熊召弟(2007)。一位師資培育者在研究學校本位實習輔導教師培育方案的學與思歷程─

自然與生活科技領域。載於郭重吉(主編),科學教師之路─由實習輔導到專業成長

(93-136 頁)。臺北市:心理。

環境教育人員認證及管理辦法(民100 年 6 月 22 日)。

環境教育法(民99 年 6 月 5 日)。

謝慈玟(2006)。國小教師經由教師成長團體推動環境教育之個案研究(碩士論文)。取 自國立臺灣師範大學博碩士論文系統。(系統編號094NHLT1646008)

英文

Abrams, R. (1996, November). Professional Isolation & Connection: Implications for EE. In P.

Zeph (Chair), Environmental Education for the Next Generation. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the North American Association for Environmental Education, San

Francisco Bay Area, CA.

Adams, D. (translate) (2010). Philosophical basics of ecology and economy. London, UK &

New York, USA: Routledge. (Faber, M. and Manstetten, R., 2010)

Barraza, L., Duque-Aristizabal, A., & Rebolledo, G. (2003). Environmental education: from policy to practice. Environmental Education Research, 9(3), 347-357. Retrieved from:

EBSCOhost.

Billingham, R. (translate) (2008). Education for sustainable development: nature, school and

democracy. La Vergne, TN: Lightning Source. (Sandell, K., Ohman, J., & Ostman, L.,

2005).

Blumstein, D. T., & Saylan, C. (2007). The failure of environmental education (and how we can fix it). PLoS Bilology, 5(5), 973-976. Retrieved from: EBSCOhost.

Clark, et al. (2011). College and university environmental programs as a policy problem (Part 1): integrating knowledge, education, and action for a better world? Environmental

Management, 47, 701-715. DOI 10.1007/s00267-011-9619-2.

Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating

quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.

Crouch, R. C. (2007). The politics of federal environmental education policy. Michigan:

ProQuest Imformation and Learning Company.

Doppenberg, J. J., den Brok, P. J., & Bakx, A.W.E.A. (2012). Collaborative teacher learning across foci of collaboration: Perceived activities and outcomes. Teaching and Teacher

Education, 28, 899-910.

DuFour, R., DuFour, R. B., & Eaker, R. (2008). New insights into professional learning communities at work. Revisiting professional learning communities at work: New Insights

for improving schools (pp.13-30). Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.

Engleson, D.C., & Yockers, D.H. (1994). A guide to curriculum planning in environmental

education. Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.

Farr, W. J. (2004). Collaboration among teachers of literacy. (Doctoral dissertation).

Retrieved from: EBSCOhost database. (UMI No. 3127582)

Fishbaugh, M. S. (1997). Models of collaboration. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Fullan, M., Bennet, B.J., Y Rolheiser-Bennet, C. (1990). Linking classroom and school improvement. Educational Leadership, 47(8), 13-19.

Fullan, M. (1992). Visions that blind. Educational Leadership, 49(5), 19-20.

Gayford, C., & Dylon, P. J. (1995). Policy and the practice of environmental education in England: a dilemma for teachers. Environmental Education Research, 1(2), 173-183.

Retrieved from: EBSCOhost.

Heron, J. (1989). The facilitators’ handbook. London: Kogan Page.

Hipp, K. K. & Huffman, J. B. (2010). Demystifying the concept of professional learning communities. Demystifying professional learning communities (pp. 11-21). Lanham, MD:

Rowman and Littlefield.

Hollweg, K. S., Kubota, C., & Ferrell, P. (1998). Changing what we do: constructing a

team-based, problem-centered professional development experience. Troy, Ohio : North

American Association for Environmental Education.

Hord, S. M., & Sommers, W. A. (2008). What is a PLC? Leading professional learning

communities: Voices from research and practice (pp.5-25). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin

Press.

Hubner, M. (1996). Environmental education--aspirations and reality in educational policy.

European Education, 28(3), 95-97. Retrieved from: EBSCOhost.

Hungerford, H.R., & Volk, T. L. (1990). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8-21.

Jensen, B.B., & Schnack, K. (1997). The action competence approach in environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 3(2), 163-178. Doi:

1350-4622/97/020163-16.

Kreuter, M.W., Lezin, N.A., & Young, L.A. (2000). Evaluating community-based

collaborative mechanisms: Implications for practitioners. Health Promotion Practice, 1, 49-63.

Lawson, H. (2004). The logic of collaboration in education and the human services. The

Journal of Interprofessional Care, 18, 225-237.

Little, J.W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers' professional relations. Teachers College Record, 91(4), 509-536.

Moolenaar, N. M., Sleegers, P. J. C., & Daly, A. J. (2012). Teaming up: Linking collaboration networks, collective efficacy, and student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education,

28, 251-262.

North American Association for Environmental Education (2010). Guidelines for the preparation and professional development of environmental educators 2000, 2004, North American Association for Environmental Education (2013). (WEB)

Palmer, J. A. (1998). History and development of environmental education. Environmental

education in the 21

st

century, 17-31.

Petegem, P. V., Blieck, A., & Pauw, J. B. D. (2007). Evaluating the implementation process of environmental education in preservice teacher education: two case studies. Journal of

Environmental Education, 38(2), 47-54.

Perry, C., Komesaroff, L., & Kavanagh, M. (2002). Providing space for teacher renewal: the role of the facilitator in school -university partnerships. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher

Education, 30(3), 243-257.

Pharo, E., & Bridle, K. (2012). Does interdisciplinarity exist behind the façade of traditional disciplines: A study of natural resource management teaching. Journal of Geography in

Higher Education, 36(1), 65–80.

Rigelman, N. M. & Ruben, B. (2012). Creating foundations for collaboration in schools:

Utilizing professional learning communities to support teacher candidate learning and visions of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 979-989.

Rose, J. (2011). Dilemmas of inter-professional collaboration: can they be resolved? Children

& Society, 25, 151–163. Retrieved from: EBSCOhost.

Saprio, V. (2004). Interdisciplinary and collaborative teaching at the UW-Madison:

overcoming barriers to vitality in teaching and learning. Retrieved from: EBSCOhost.

Schram, D. (2000). What is qualitative research? Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical

Handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Scott, W., & Reid, A. (1998). The revisioning of environmental education: a critical analysis of recent policy shifts in England and Wales. Educational Review, 50(3), 213-223.

Retrieved from: EBSCOhost.

Sormad, M. (2012). The environmental education network in Thailand. European Journal of

Social Sciences, 34(1), 141-149.

Stapp, W. B., & Cox, D. A.(1969). The emerging philosophy of environmental education.

Environmental education activities manual.

Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Change, 7, 221–258 UNESCO (1978). Framework for environmental education: Declaration of Tbilisi

Intergovernmental Conference on Environmental Education.

UNESCO (2006). UN decade of education for sustainable development: the DESD at a

glance.

UNESCO-UNEP (1976). The Belgrade Charter.

University of Michigan, Undergraduate Curriculum Development Testbed. (2003). From Saprio, V. (2004). Interdisciplinary and collaborative teaching at the UW-Madison:

overcoming barriers to vitality in teaching and learning. Retrieved from: EBSCOhost.

Yueh, M. M., Cowie, B., Barker, M., & Jones, A. (2010). What influences the emergence of a new subject in schools? The case of environmental education. International Journal of

Environmental & Science Education, 5(3), 265-285. Retrieved from: EBSCOhost.

在文檔中 學校環境教育中的教師協作 (頁 148-155)