第五章 結論與建議
第二節 後續研究建議
考量到研究的影響限制，本研究提出三項未來研究建議：
一、擴大取樣範圍
本研究的資料蒐集範圍以桃園市的國小與國中學生為主，因此，未來可擴大 取樣地區與學齡層範圍，以強化本研究結果的推論性。
二、採用質量混合的研究方法
本研究屬於量化研究，研究中僅透過統計驗證結果來討論構面宇構面之間的 關係，而對於影響補習學習者知更深層因素，在本研究中無法獲得，因此未來可 增加如深度訪談、焦點團體與觀察法等質性研究方法 來探討影響學習投入與持續 補習意願的影響因素。
三、探討補習與學習成效之關係
另外，在研究中並未討論到補習與學習成效之間的關係，然而學習成效是檢 視教育成果重要的一環。因此，本研究亦建議未來可探討二者之間的關係性。
參考文獻
壹、中文文獻
丁嘉琳（2008 年 11 月）。如何做健康的「直升機父母」。天下雜誌，
410，200-202。
仲雪梅（2011）。我國研究生學習投入的影響因素分析（未出版之碩士 論文）。華東師範大學，中國上海市。
池麗萍（2005）。幼兒父母的教養行為對子女控制感的關係。中華女子 學院學報，17（6），82-85。
余民寧（2006）。潛在變項模式: SIMPLIS 的應用。臺北市：高等教育。
余安邦、楊國樞（1987）。社會取向成就動機與個我取向成就動機：概 念分析與實徵研究。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，64，51-98。
網路溫度計（2015 年 2 月 7 日）。你是媽寶嗎？十大媽寶病徵！。取自 http://dailyview.tw/Daily/2015/02/07
吳明隆（2003）。SPSS 統計應用學習實務。臺北：知城。
吳明隆（2009）。結構方程模式：AMOS 的操作與應用（第二版）。臺 北市：五南圖書。
吳政峰、陳姿伶（2002）。影響兒童才藝費用因素之探討，以台灣地區 為例。國教輔導，41（6），16-22。
吳舒靜（2014）。臺灣大專校院學生學習投入對學習發展影響之研究
（未出版之博士論文）。國立暨南國際大學，南投縣。
吳麗芬（1993）。國小學生補習狀況問卷分析。人文教育札記，43，12-18。
呂怡蒨（2010）。獨生子女與非獨生子女父母教育期望與子女成就動機 之影響研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立嘉義大學，嘉義市。
李 佩 芬 （ 2014 ） 。 媽 寶 來 了 ︰ 當 員 工 滯 留 於 青 春 期 。 取 自 http://www.fannyeq.com.tw/2014/07/10/1881/
李佩芬、陳念怡（2010 年 6 月）。你家也有「慣寶寶」嗎？親子天下雜 誌。取自 http://www.parenting.com.tw/article
李佩芬、陳念怡（2014 年 6 月）。「爹寶」、「媽寶」養成關鍵：爸媽
取自 http://www.fannyeq.com.tw/2014/07/10/1881/
邱皓政（2003）。結構方程模式：LISREL 的理論、技術與應用。台北：
雙葉書廊。
胡清暉、曹婷婷（2015 年 10 月 5 日）。媽寶大學生高職底較少。中時電 子 報 。 取 自 http://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20151005000335-260114
倪浩倫（2016 ）。依賴父母無法獨立拒工作永恆少女爆增 2 成。中國時 報 。 取 自 https://www.chinatimes.com/newspapers/20160721000545-260114?chdtv.
唐 宜 嘉 （ 2015 ） 。 媽 寶 大 學 新 課 題 ， 喀 報 。 取 自
http://castnet.nctu.edu.tw/castnet/article/8983?issueID=591
張偉豪（2011）。SEM 論文寫作不求人。臺北市：鼎茂。
張紹勳（2001）。研究方法。臺中：滄海書局。
張鈿富（2012）。大學生學習投入理論與評量實務之探討。高等教評鑑，
游慧仙（2007）。家族治療之家庭生命週期（family life cycle）概念。取 自 http://www.nhu.edu.tw/~society/e-j/64/64-17.htm
黃小清（2016）。爸媽必看：寫完這 25 題親子測驗就知道你自己有沒有
詹志禹（2004）。臺灣發明家的內在動機、思考取向及環境機會：演化
貳、 英文文獻
Amoroso, D., & Lim, R. (2017). The mediating effects of habit on continuance intention. International Journal of Information Management, 37(6), 693-702.
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
Angell, L. R. (2009). Construct validity of the community college survey of student engagement (CCSSE). Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 33, 564-570.
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Learning engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45(5), 369-386.
Asikainen, H., & Gijbels, D. (2017). Do students develop towards more deep approaches to learning during studies? A systematic review on the development of students’ deep and surface approaches to learning in higher education. Educational Psychology Review, 29(2), 205-234.
Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior.
Psychological Review, 64(6), 359-372.
Bagozzi, R.P., & Yi, Y. (1990). Assessing method variance in multitrait-multimethod matrices: The case of self-reported affect and perceptions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 547-560.
Baker-Eveleth, L. & Stone, R. W. (2015). Usability, expectation, confirmation, and continuance intentions to use electronic textbooks. Behaviour &
Information Technology, 34, 992-1004.
Baragash, R. S., & Al-Samarraie, H. (2018). Blended learning: Investigating the influence of engagement in multiple learning delivery modes on students’ performance. Telematics and Informatics, 35(7), 2082-2098.
Bataineh, A. Q., Al-Abdallah, G. M., & Alkharabsheh, A. M. (2015).
Determinants of continuance intention to use social networking sites SNS's: Studying the case of Facebook. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 7(4), 121.
Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA:
Multivariate Software.
Bentler, P.M. (1980). Multivariate analysis with latent variables: Causal
Bhote, K. R. (1996). Beyond customer satisfaction to customer loyalty - the key to create profitability. New York, NY: American Management Association.
Blackwell, R. D., Miniard, P. W., & Engel, J. F. (2001). Consumer behavior.
Worth, Texas, TX: Dryden Press, Harcourt College Publishers, Ft.
Blut, M., Frennea, C. M., Mittal, V., & Mothersbaugh, D. L. (2015). How procedural, financial and relational switching costs affect customer satisfaction, repurchase intentions, and repurchase behavior: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 32(2), 226-229.
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations withlatent variables. NY: Wiley &
Son
Boulton, C. A., Kent, C., & Williams, H. T. (2018). Virtual learning environment engagement and learning outcomes at a ‘bricks-and-mortar’university. Computers & Education, 126, 129-142.
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New Nork, NY: Guilford Press.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage Focus Editions, 154, 136-136.
Browne, M.W. and Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit.
In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-161). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Brussoni, M., & Olsen, L. L. (2013). The perils of overprotective parenting:
Fathers’ persrectives explored. Child: Care, Health and Development, 39(2), 237-245.
Byrne, B. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.
New Nork, NY: Guilford Press.
Carillo, K., Scornavacca, E., & Za, S. (2017). The role of media dependency in predicting continuance intention to use ubiquitous media systems.
Information & Management, 54(3), 317-335.
Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64, 723-733.
Chapman, E. (2003). Assessing student engagement rates. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED482269.pdf
Chen, I. S. (2017). Computer self-efficacy, learning performance, and the mediating role of learning engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 362-370.
Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. R.
Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self processes and development (Vol.23, pp. 43-77) . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cronin Jr, J. J., Brady, M. K., & Hult, G. T. M. (2000). Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments. Journal of Retailing, 76(2), 193-218.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). The flow experience and its significance for human psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Dadvari, A., & Do, B. R. (2019). Modeling gen Z continuance intention toward ubiquitous media system: Applying technology readiness and technology acceptance model. International Journal of Information and Management Sciences, 30(1), 37-56.
Daugherty, P. J., Stank, T. P., & Ellinger, A. E. (1998). Leveraging logistic/
distribution capabilities: the effect of logistics service on marker share.
Journal of business Logistics, 19, 335-51.
David, J. L. (1989). Synthesis of research on school-based management. Educational Leadership, 46(8), 45-53.
Dick, A. S., & Basu, K. (1994). Customer loyalty: Toward an integrated conceptual framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22, 99-113.
Ding, L., Kim, C., & Orey, M. (2017). Studies of student engagement in gamified online discussions. Computers & Education, 115, 126-142.
Dmitrieva, J., Chen, C., & Greenberger, E. (2008). Whither the ‘‘Whiz Kids’’went: Asian American students’ transition to college. In G. Li & L.
Wang(Eds.), Model minority myths revisited: An interdisciplinary approach todemystifying Asian American education experiences.
Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Dodds, W. B., & Monroe, K. B. (1985). The effect of brand and price information on subjective product evaluations. ACR North American Advances. 12(1),85-90.
Doll, W. J., Xia, W., & Torkzadeh, G. (1994). A confirmatory factor analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. MIS Quarterly, 18(4), 453-461.
Falloon, G. (2019). Using simulations to teach young students science concepts:
An Experiential Learning theoretical analysis. Computers & Education, 135, 138-159.
Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 56-83.
Farrell, E. F. (2007). Some colleges provide success coachsfor students. The Education Diger, 73(3), 44-47.
Fingerman, K. L., Cheng, Y.-P., Wesselmann, E. D., Zarit, S., Fustenberg, F.,
& Birditt, K. S. (2012). Helicopter parents and landing pad kids: Intense parental support of grown children. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74, 880-896.
Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59, 117-142.
Finn, J. D. (1993). School engagement and students at risk. Washington, DC:
National Center for Education Statistics.
Fornell, C. (1992). A national customer satisfaction barometer: the Swedish experience. Journal of marketing, 56(1), 6-21.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
Francken, D. A. (1983). Postpurchase consumer evaluation, complaint actions and repurchase behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 19(4), 273-290.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement:
Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59-109.
Furrer, C. J., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 148-162.
Green, C. P., Navarro-Paniagua, M., Ximénez-de-Embún, D. P., & Mancebón, M. J. (2014). School choice and student wellbeing. Economics of Education Review, 38, 139-150.
Greene, T. G., Marti, C. N., & McClenney, K. (2008). The effort-outcome gap:
Differences for African American and Hispanic community college students in student engagement and achievement. Journal of Higher Education, 79, 513-539.
Grolnick, W. S. (2009).The role of parents in facilitating autonomous self-regulation for education. School Field, 7(2), 164-173.
Guo, J. (2018). Building bridges to student learning: Perceptions of the learning environment, engagement, and learning outcomes among Chinese undergraduates. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 195-208.
Hadjistavropoulos, H. D., Frombach, I. K., & Asmundson, G. J. (1999).
Exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic investigations of the Illness Attitudes Scale in a nonclinical sample. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37(7), 671-684.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998).
Mutltivariate Data Analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis: Pearson new international edition. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.
Halliday, S. E., Calkins, S. D., & Leerkes, E. M. (2018). Measuring preschool learning engagement in the laboratory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 167, 93-116.
Han, M., Wu, J., Wang, Y., & Hong, M. (2018). A Model and Empirical Study on the User’s Continuance Intention in Online China Brand Communities Based on Customer-Perceived Benefits. Journal of Open Innovation:
Technology, Market, and Complexity, 4(46), 1-20.
https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc4040046
Heflin, H., Shewmaker, J., & Nguyen, J. (2017). Impact of mobile technology on student attitudes, engagement, and learning. Computers & Education, 107, 91-99.
Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Kuo Y. C., & Hsu, W. Y. (2015).
Parentalmonitoring and helicopter parenting relevant to vocational student'sprocrastination and self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 42, 139-146.
Hsu, C. L., Lin, Y. H., Chen, M. F., & Suraphatchara, K. (2019).
Understanding foreign students’ continuance intention toward mobile telecommunication service: an integrative theoretical model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies, 9(2), 93-118.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.
Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.
Hudson, J. L., & Rapee, R. M. (2001). Parent-child interactions and anxiety discorders: Anobservational study. Behavior Research and Therapy, 39, 1411-1427.
Hunt, J. (2008). Make room for daddy and mommy: Helicopter parents are here!189. The Journal of Academic Administration in Higher Education, 4(1), 9-11.
Jackson, J. M., & Williams, K. D. (1985). Social loafing on difficult tasks:
Working collectively can improve performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(4), 937-942.
Jones, T. O., & Sasser, W. E. Jr. (1995). Why satisfied customers defect.
Harvard Business Review, 73(6), 88-99.
Joreskog, K.G., & Sorbom, D. (1984). LISREL VI: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood. Mooresville, IN:
Scientific Software Inc.
Jung, Y., & Lee, J. (2018). Learning engagement and persistence in massive open online courses (MOOCS). Computers & Education, 122, 9-22.
Kearsley, G., & Shneiderman, B. (1999). Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Retrieved from http://home.sprynet.com/~gkearsley/engage.htm
Kennedy, I. (2001). The report of the public inquiry into Children’s Heart Surgery
at the Bristol Royal Infirmary 1984-1995: Learning from Bristol (Publication
No. Cm 5207). London: Department of Health. Retrieved from http://www.wales.nhs.uk/sites3/documents/441/The%20Kennedy%20Report.Kim, W. C., & Hwang, P. (1992). Global strategy and multinationals' entry mode choice. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(1), 29-53.
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.
New Nork, NY: Guilford.
Kotler, P. (2000). Marketing management: Analysis, planning, implementation, and control (9th Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Kuh, G. D. (2003). What we're learning about student engagement from NSSE:
Benchmarks for effective educational practices. Change, 35(2), 24-32.
Kuh, G. D. (2009). What student affairs professionals need to know about student engagement. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 683-706.
Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., & Whitt, E. J. (2005). Assessing conditions to enhance educational effectiveness: The inventory for student engagement and success. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Kusuma, T. A. H., Sandhyaduhita, P, & Komputer, F.I. (2017). Factors influencing continuance intention of travel agency information system use:
A case study of Powersuite. Paper presented at 2017 Second International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC), Jayapura, Indonesia.
Kwon, K. A., Yoo, G., & Bingham, G. E. (2016). Helicopter parenting in emering adulthood: Support or barrier for Korean college student’s psychological adjustment. Journal of Child and Family studies, 25(1), 136-145.
Laible, D. J., Carlo, G., & Roesch, S. C. (2004). Pathways to self-esteem in late adolescence: The role of parent and peer attachment, empathy, and social behaviours. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 703-716.
Lee, Y., & Kwon, O. (2011). Intimacy, familiarity and continuance intention:
An extended expectation–confirmation model in web-based services. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 10(3), 342-357.
LeMoyne, T., & Buchanan, T. (2011). Does “hovering” matter? Helicopter parenting and its effect on well-being. Sociological Spectrum, 31(4), 399-418. doi: 10.1080/02732173.2011.57403
Liu, C., Lim, R., Taylor, S., & Calvo, R. A. (2019). Students' behavioural engagement in reviewing their tele-consultation feedback within an online clinical communication skills platform. Computers in Human Behavior, 94, 35-44.
Liu, Q. H., Zhanh, F. G., Mao, M.S., Xue, G. Y., & Lin, Z. F. (2018). An empirical study on factors affecting continuance intention of using Yu’e Bao. Tehnicki Vjesnik, 25(5), 1414-1420.
Love, H. (2016). A new approach to measuring helicopter parenting: The multidimensional helicopter parenting scale (Unpublished master's thesis).
Illinois, IL:Illinois State University.
Luebbe, A. M., Mancini, K. J., Kiel, E. J., Spangler, B. R., Semlak, J. L. &
Fussner, L. M. (2016). Dimensionalitty of helicopter parenting to emotional, decision-making, and academic functioning in emering adults.
Assessment. Retrieved from
http://journal.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.177/1073191116665907.
Lum, L. (2006). Handling “helicopter parents”. Diverse: Issues in Higher Education, 23(20), 40-43.
MacCallum, R. C., & Hong, S. (1997). Power analysis in covariance structure modeling using GFI and AGFI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(2), 193-210.
Malau-Aduli, B. S., Preston, R., Adu, M., Alele, F., Gratani, M., Drovandi, A.,
& Heslop, I. (2019). Pharmacy students' perceptions of assessment and its impact on learning. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 11(6), 571-579.
Marsh, V., Mutemi, W., Some, E. S., Haaland, A., Snow, R. W. (1996).
Methods and evaluation of a community education programme during a randomized controlled trial of insecticide treated bed nets on the Kenyan coast. Health Policy and Planning, 11, 280-291.
McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for
“intelligence”. American Psychologist, 28(1), 1-14.
McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological methods, 7(1), 64-82.
McElhaney, K. B., & Allen, J. P. (2012). Sociocultural perspectives onadolescent autonomy. In P. Kerig, M. Shulz, & S. T. Hauser (Eds.), Adolescence and beyond (pp. 161-176). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
McIver, J., & Carmines, E. G. (1981). Unidimensional scaling(No. 24).
Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
McLeod, B. D., Wood, J.J., & Weisz, J. R. (2007). Examining the association between parenting and childhood anxiety: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 27, 155-172. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2006.09.002
Moreira, P. A., Dias, A., Matias, C., Castro, J., Gaspar, T., & Oliveira, J.
(2018). School effects on students' engagement with school: Academic performance moderates the effect of school support for learning on students' engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 67, 67-77.
Mulaik, S. A. (2009). Linear causal modeling with structural equations. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
Newmann, F. M., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. M. Newmann (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 11-39).
New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Nora, A. (2006). The nora student engagement model. Retrieved from http://cahsi.cs.utep.edu/Portals/0/The%20Nora%20Student%20Engageme nt%20Model.pdf
Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence consumer loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 63(4), 33-44.
Omotayo, F. O., & Adeyemi, R. O. (2018). Determinants of continuance intention to use online shops in Nigeria. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 23(2), 1-44.
Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Nelson, L. J. (2012). Black hawk down?
Establishinghelicopter parenting as a distinct construct from other forms of parentalcontrol during emerging adulthood. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1177-1190. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.03.007.
Paloș, R., Maricuţoiu, L. P., & Costea, I. (2019). Relations between academic performance, student engagement and student burnout: A cross-lagged analysis of a two-wave study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 60, 199-204.
Pan, Y., Gauvain, M., & Schwartz, S. J. (2013). Do parents' collectivistictendency and attitudes toward filial piety facilitate autonomous motivationamong young Chinese adolescents? Motivation and Emotion, 37(4),701-711.
Pavlou, P. A., & Fygenson, M. (2006). Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. MIS Quarterly, 30(1), 115-143.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Goot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
Putwain, D. W., Symes, W., Nicholson, L. J., & Becker, S. (2018).
Achievement goals, behavioural engagement, and mathematics achievement: A mediational analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 68, 12-19.
Ryan, A. M., Deci, E. L., & Grolnick, W. S. (1991). Inner resources of school achievement Motivational mediators of children’s perceptions of their parents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 508-517.
Schiffrin, H. H., Liss, M., Miles-McLean, H., Geary, K. A., Erchull, M. J., &
Tashner, T. (2014). Helping or hovering? The effects of helicopter parenting on college students’ well-being. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23, 548-557. doi:10.1007/s10826-013-9716-3.
Schlechty, P. C. (2011). Engaging students: The next level of working on the work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R.G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Scott, W.R. (1995) Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE
Scott, W.R. (1995) Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE