第五章 結論與建議
第三節 研究限制與建議
本研究因所需研究工具為 iOS 系統之手持式行動裝置，且研究對象頇 為技專學生，故研究上受到相當限制，有效問卷回收總數僅有 243 份，無 法對研究對象進行更詳盡的差異性分析，相信在科技不斷進步、產品不斷 更新之下，日後擁有 iOS 系統之手持式行動裝置的人數會不斷增加，對於 後續相關研究在樣本收集上會更加容易。
另外本研究的設計仍未完善，尚有值得繼續深入探討的部分，因此提 出後續研究建議，供後續研究者做為參考。
一、研究對象
本研究的研究對象鎖定技專院校使用「學英文@師大」App 學習英文 字彙的學生，並未針對其他族群進行探討，因此未來可針對不同族群使用
「學英文@師大」App 學習英文字彙的看法和使用經驗進行探討。
二、研究方法
本研究所使用的研究方法為量化的問卷調查法，問卷僅採用量表填答 的方式了解使用者對於使用「學英文@師大」App 學習英文字彙的看法和 使用經驗，並無法得知使用者在使用上的建議及其他看法，因此建議未來 可使用訪談法等質性研究的方法進行研究，來了解使用者對於使用「學英 文@師大」App 學習英文字彙在使用上的建議或其他看法。
89
參考文獻
中文參考文獻
吳文雄（1999）。在電腦技能訓練中學習者自律（未出版之博士論文）。
國立中山大學，高雄市。
吳明隆、涂金堂（2005）。SPSS 與統計應用分析。臺北市：五南。
吳武典（1971）。從心理動力學的觀點談影響學生學習的因素。教育文摘，
16(5)，5-11。
吳美虹（2005）。國小六年級學童英語字彙記憶策略與背景因素之研究-以 台中縣為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北師範學院，臺北市。
沈姵文(2001)。宜蘭縣國中生父母管教態度、英語焦慮與英語學習動機之 關係研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立高雄師範大學，高雄市。
周子敬（2006）。結構方程模式（SEM）－精通 LISREL。臺北縣：全華。
林至誠（2011）。多媒體輔助字彙學習：文獻回顧。師大學報語言與人文 類。56(1)，1-20。
林煌尊(2007)。商職學生英語焦慮、英語學習動機與英語學習策略之關係 研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學，彰化縣。
林震城（1997）。兩岸大學生電腦態度與電腦素養之比較研究（未出版之 碩士論文）。國立中央大學，桃園縣。
邱上真（1989）。後設認知研究在輕度障礙者教學上的應用。特殊教育季
90
刊，30，12-16。
邱浩政（2006）。量化研究與統計分析。臺北市：五南。
孫志麟（1991）。自我效能的基本概念及其在教育上的應用。教育研究雙 月刊，22，47-54。
張春興（1991）。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐。台北市：東華。
張春興（1996）。教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐。臺北市：東華。
張春興（1999）。現代心理學。臺北市：東華。
梁茂森（1998）。國中生自我學習自我效能量表之編制。教育學刊，14，
155-192。
莊蕙瑜（2007）。國小高年級學生英語焦慮、英語學習動機與英語學習策 略之相關研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立嘉義大學，嘉義市。
鄭麗玉（1993）。認知心理學－理論與應用。臺北市：五南。
91
英文參考文獻
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1999). Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies? Decision Sciences, 30(2), 361-391.
Aida, Y. (1994). Examination of Horwitz, Horwitz, and Cope’s construct of foreign language anxiety: The case of students of Japanese. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 155-168.
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J.
Kuhl, J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp.
11-39). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
Anani, A., Zhang, D. Y., & Li, H. B. (2008). M-learning in review: Technology, standard and evaluation. Journal of Communication and Computer, 5(11), 1-6.
Bagozzi, R. P. (2007). The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift. Journal of the Association for Information System, 8(4), 244-254.
Bailey, K. (1983). Competitiveness and anxiety in adult second language learning. In H. W. Seliger & M. H. Long (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp.67-102). New York, NY:
Newbury House.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and Action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy. Journal of Harvard Mental Health Letter,
92
13(9), 4-6.
Bartlett, F. C. (1943). Fatigue following highly skilled work. Proceedings of the Royal Society, Series B, 131, 247-257.
Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert, & R.H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 21-29). Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum.
Compearu, D. R., Higgins, C. A., & Huff, S. (1999). Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study.
MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 145-158.
Compearu, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 118-143.
Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy:
Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.
Craig, A., & Cooper, R. E. (1992). Symptoms of acute and chronic fatigue. In A. P. Smith, & D. M. Jones (Eds.), Handbook of human performance: Vol.
3. State and trait (pp. 289-339). London, England: Academic Press.
Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information system: Theory and results. (Ph.D. Dissertation) MIT Sloan School of management, Cambridge, MA.
93
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132.
Fairclough, S.H. (2001). Mental effort regulation and the functional impairment of the driver. In P.A. Hancock & P.A. Desmond (Eds.), Stress, workload, and fatigue (pp.479–502). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Boston, MA: Addison- Wesley.
Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognition aspects of problem solving. In L. B.
Resnick (Eds.), The nature of intelligence (pp.231-235). Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In P. Dickson (Ed.). Children’s oral communication skills (pp. 35-60). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Flavell, J. H. (1985). Cognitive development (2nd Ed). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice-Hall.
Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1993). On the measurement of affective variables in Second Language Learning. Language Learning, 43(2), 157-194.
Gregersen, T (2004). Nonverbal cues: Clues to the detection of foreign language anxiety. Foreign Language Annals, 38 (3), 388-400.
94
Hair, J., Anderson, R., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Hair, J., Black, B., Babin, B., Anderson, R.E., & Tatham, R.L. (2009).
Multivariate Data Analysis (7 ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Hsu, H. F., Wong, W. T., & Chen, M. Y. (2011).
Applying the technology acceptance model in a study of the factors affecting usage of the Taiwan digital archives system. Computers &
Education, 57, 2086-2094.
Horwitz , E. K., & Horwitz , M. B., & Cope , J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70 ( 2 ), 125-132.
Horwitz, E. (1986). Preliminary evidence for the reliability and validity of a foreign language anxiety scale. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 559-562.
Horwitz, E.K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. Modern Language Journal, 70, 125-132.
Job, R. F. S., & Dalziel, J. (2001). Defining fatigue as a condition of the organism and distinguishing it from habituation, adaptation, and boredom.
In P. A. Hancock & P. A. Desmond (Eds.), Stress, workload, and fatigue (pp. 466-475). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Laufer, B. (1997). What’s in a word that makes it hard or easy: Some intralexical factors that affects the learning of words. In Schmitt & M.
McCartly (Eds.). Vocabulary Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy (pp.
140-155). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, M. C. (2010). Explaining and predicting users’ continuance intention toward E-Learning. Computers & Education, 54, 506-516.
95
Lee, S. (2012). An integrate adoption model for e-Books in a mobile environment. Telematic and Informatics, 2012, 1-30.
Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Journal of Reading &
Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 119-137.
Liu, S. H. & Liao, H. L., & Pratt, J. A. (2009). Impact of media richness and flow on e-learning technology acceptance. Computers & Education, 52, 599-607.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Gardner, R. C. (1989). Anxiety and second language learning: Toward a theoretical clarification. Language Learning, 39, 251-75.
Martinez-Torres, M. R., Toral, S. L. T. Marin., Garcia, F. B., Vazquez, S. G., Oliva, M. A., & Torres, T. (2008). A technological acceptance of E-Learning tools used in practical and laboratory teaching. Behavior &
Information Technology, 27, 495-505.
Matthews, G., Davies, D. R., Westerman, S. J., & Stammers, R. B. (2000).
Human performance: Cognition, stress and individual differences.
Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.
Mcneil, D. W., Turk, C. L., & Rice, B. I. (1994). Anxiety and fear. Human Behavior, 14(1), 151-163.
Munn, N.L., Fernald, Jr. L. D., & Fernald, P. S. (1969). Introduction to Psycchology. Oxford, England: Houghton Miffin.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY:
96
McGraw-Hill.
Obilinger, D. G. (2003). Boomers & gen-Xers, millennials: Understanding the
“new students”. Educause Review, 38(4), 37–47.
Oblinger, D. G. (2004). The next generation of educational engagement.
Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 8, Retrieved March 17, 2012 from http://www-jime.open.ac.uk/2004/8/oblinger-2004-8-disc-t.html
Pajares, F., & Miller, M.D. (1994). The role of self-efficacy and self-concept belief in mathematical problem-solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 193-203.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students’motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom tasks. In D. Schunk & J. Meece(Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom: Causes and consequences (pp.149-183). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. New York, NY:
McGraw-Hill.
Presley, A., & Presley, T. (2009). Factors influencing student acceptance and use of academic portals. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21, 167-182.
Reigeluth, C. M. (1983). Instructional- design theories and models. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: Free Press.
97
Sarason, I. G. (1984). Stress, anxiety, and cognitive interference: Reactions to Tests. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 929-938.
Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness.
Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475.
Schunk, D. H. (1988). Perceived self-efficacy and related social cognitive processes as predictors of student academic performance. (Education Resources Information Center Document No. ED293886)
Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Journal of Educational Psychologist Review, 1, 173-208.
Shin, D. H. (2007). User acceptance of mobile Internet: Implication for convergence technologies. Interacting with Computer, 19(2007), 472-483.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage:
A test of competing models. Information System Research, 6(2), 145-176.
Thomas, S. (2005). Pervasive, persuasive eLearning: Modeling the pervasive learning space. Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on pervasive computing and communications workshops (PERCOMW’05) (pp. 332–336). Kauai Island, Hawaii: IEEE Computer Society.
Triandis, H. C. (1977). Interpersonal behavior. Monterey, CA:Brooks/ Cole.
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decisioin Sciences, 39(2), 273-315.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies.
Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User
98
acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view1.
Management Information Systems Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478.
Vermeer, A. (1992). Exploring the second language learner lexicon. In L.
Verheoeven and J, De Jong (Ed.). The construct of language proficiency:
Applications of psychological models to language assessment. Amsterdam, Holand: John Benjamins.
Wellman, H. M., Collins, J., & Gliberman, J. (1981). Understanding the combination of memory variables: Developing conceptions of memory limitations. Child Development, 52, 1313-1317.
Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology Review, 6, 49-78.
Wilkins, D. (1972). Linguistics and language teaching. London, England:
Edward Arnold.
Yang, S. T., Fang, H. C., Chuang, C., & Li, H. A. (2011). Applying the technology acceptance investigate consumers’ acceptance of digital learning system. Energy Procedia, 13, 3166-3173.
Young, D. J. (1991). An investigation of students’ perspectives on anxiety and speaking. Foreign Language Annuals, 23, 539-553.
99
附錄
「學英文@師大」使用狀況問卷
各位親愛的同學們大家好：
首先感謝您撥冗填答，這是一份學術性的研究問卷，主要是想了 解您使用「學英文@師大」學習英文的使用情形，需要您鼎力相助並 尌以下問題提供寶貴意見，在此希望佔用您些許的時間來協助本研究 之進行。其中個人資料僅作為本問卷參考之用，絕對保密，由於您詳 實的填答資料，將對本研究有莫大的助益，有勞之處，僅致謝忱。
敬祝 順心如意
國立臺灣師範大學工業教育學系 指導教授：洪榮昭博士
研 究 生：戴凱欣 敬上
100
101
102
103
104
105