• 沒有找到結果。

我國國民中小學學校行政規則現況之探討

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "我國國民中小學學校行政規則現況之探討"

Copied!
28
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)165 90. 46(2). 165-192. 124. 1. (1) (2) (3) (4) 2. (1) (2) 16 (3).

(2) 166. 3. (4). (1) (2). (5). (3) (4). 1. 2000 1999 2000 2000. 2000. 2000. 2000. 1999. 2000. 2000. 2001. 1999. 2000. 1997. 2001. 1996. 2001. 1 1. 1. 36. 116. 125. *. 170~172. (. ). *. 59. 1999. 1. 2.. 2~11. 25~32. 1.. 1. 2.. + +. 2. 2000. 150~162. (. ). 2000. 150~162. (. ) (. 73 *. +. ).

(3) 167. 1 a. b. c. d. e. f. 1 2000 7 2000. 2000 1997. 2001. 16 1999 2000. 2000 2. ( ). 150. 159.

(4) 168. 2. ( ) 2000. 460. ( ) 1999 2000 1999. 2000. 2001 2000 2. ( ) 1997. 2000. 2 3 1997 26 27 3. ( ). 3 22 2000 1999. 1997 78. 50.

(5) 169. 3. 1.. 1.. 2.. 2.. 3.. 3.. 4.. 4. 5. 6. 7.. 2000. 2000 4. 4. 1999. 5. 1995. 21 1997.

(6) 170. 5. 1999. 6. 2000. 3. 5 2000. 6 ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. 2000 5 159. 2 2000 2000 2000.

(7) 171. 2001. 7. 2000 ( ). 2000. ( ) 2000. 1997 7. 7 8 23. 37. 8. / (. ). (. ).

(8) 172. 9. ( ). ( ) 8 21 21 3 1 4 10 2 29 21 24 16 12 10 10 3 11 21 27 3 4 7. 8. 9 17 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 5 21 10.

(9) 173. 2000 ( ) 16 ( ) 14 13 22 (. ) 16 21 2000. ( ). 1997. 9 2000. 3 1996 1998. 2000 2000. 2000. 160 10 11. 10. 11 /.

(10) 174. 2 2. 1. 2.. 1. 2.. 3.. 3.. 4.. 4.. 88 5. 51. 51~. 26 26~ 76 76. 5.. 25 3,304 12. 6.. 124 56.36%. 2. 22.58%. 77.42%. 12 %. %. %. %. 2,586. 78.27. 170. 77.27. 96. 77.42. 56.47. 718. 21.73. 50. 22.73. 28. 22.58. 56.00. 3,304. 220. 13 26 17. 51. 124. 56.36.

(11) 175. 13 %. %. %. 13. 10.48. 31. 25.00. 2. 7.1. 12. 9.68. 38. 30.65. 18. 64.3. 26~. 99. 79.84. 39. 31.45. 8. 28.6. 51~. 8. 6.45. 40. 41.7. 8. 6.45. 41. 42.7. 15. 15.6. (1-12). a. 42. 33.9. (13-48) 59. 47.6. (49-). 18.5. 23. a. % 26. 76. %. 13. 10.5. (0%). 82. 66.1. 51. 54. 43.5. (1-2%). 19. 15.3. 76. 20. 16.1. (3-7%). 14. 11.3. 37. 29.8. (8%. 9. 7.3. ). =. p < .05 C. Vc. V. SPSS for Windows 10.0. ( ) ( ). F p < .05. ( ). 2. 10% ~23% 14. 46%. 70.97% 67.74%. 3. 12%. 2.

(12) 176. 14. N = 124 %. %. %. %. 11.. 88. 70.97. 1.. 12. 9.68. 0. 14. 11.29. 6. 3. 2.42. 10.. 84. 67.74. 8.. 11. 8.87. 1. 19. 15.32. 7. 1. 0.81. 5.. 43. 34.68. 2.. 11. 8.87. 2. 34. 27.42. 6.. 28. 22.58. 3.. 2. 1.61. 3. 24. 19.35. 4.. 16. 12.90. 9.. 1. 0.81. 4. 18. 14.52. 7.. 15. 12.10. 5. 11. 8.87. 46 10. 11%. 2.42%. 14. 11.29%. 15. +. 15 50%. 15. N = 124 %. +. +. +. +. +. + + +. +. +. +. + +. +. 2. 19. 15.32. 0. 14. 11.29. 1. 14. 11.29. 3. 8. 6.45. 3. 6. 4.84. 1. 3. 2.42. 2. 3. 2.42. 2. 3. 2.42. 4. 3. 2.42. 5. 3. 2.42. 76. 61.29. 2%. 11. 10% 14. 16. 66.1% 70.97%. 16. +. 15% +. 67.74% 11.3%. +. +.

(13) 177. 16. N = 124 a. % 47. 37.90. +. 84. 67.74. +. +. 49. 39.52. +. +. 88. 70.97 +. a. % +. +. 2. 21. 16.9. 4. 19. 15.3. 1. 15. 12.1. 0. 14. 11.3. 3. 14. 11.3. 3. 13. 10.5. 96. 77.4. 10% 2. = 11.93. 17. p < .05. 69.0% 2. = 21.99. p < .001 1. 1. 67.8% 60.9%. 84.6% 17. 70.7%. 0.39. F = 3.48. 21%. p < .05. M = 3.31. M = 2.32. 17. N = 124. / 3.68 /. 21.99*** C = 0.39. ***. = 0.21. F. 11.93*. 7.63. 9.11. *. C = 0.30. **. 5.23. 11.31. 15.73. 7.75. 14.03. 7.32. 1.61. 3.80. 9.23. 5.69. 10.58. 16.12. 0.29. 1.52. 2.52. 2.64. 3.93. 6.77. 1.41. *. 2.27. 2.25. 2.63. 1.07. 3.48. /ANOVA. > 2. 1 *. 8.61. **. p < .05 p < .01. C. ***. p < .001. 8 17 18 22. 90% 1. 1.

(14) 178. 16. 6. 18. N = 124 % abc. 9. 6.. a. , a. , c. 13. 3. 16.. c. 17.. %. %. 121 97.58 123 99.19. 11.. 120 96.77 119 95.97. 21.. 118 95.16 116 93.55. 10.. 91 73.39 69 55.65. 116 93.55 107 86.29. 4.. 88 70.97 75 60.48. 115 92.74 119 95.97. 12.. 86 69.35 98 79.03. 114 91.94 95. 23.. 77 62.10 59 47.58. 76.61. 101 81.45 100 80.65 (. 1.. 112 90.32 118 95.16. 5.. 7.. 112 90.32 106 85.48. 19.. 20.. 110 88.71 105 84.68. 8. ( ). 14.. /. 109 87.90 105 84.68. 22.. 2.. 103 83.06 99. 79.84. 18.. 15.. 102 82.26 82. 66.13. a. b. 19 17. 18. 15 18. 72 58.06 29 23.39 69 55.65 25 20.16. a. 67 54.03 35 28.23 57 45.97 25 20.16. 18 12.10% 12.90%. 16. 19. 21 18. 10.48%. 76 61.29 40 32.26 b. 13.71% 16. 12.10%. 93 75.00 87 70.16. c. 22. 10.48%. ). 17.74%. 23. %. 16.96%. 12. 23. 14. 19. 15.32% 18 0 2. 12.10%. 20 82.27%. 93%.

(15) 179. 19. N = 124. %. % 2. %. 23. 22 17.74. 1.61. 2. 22. 15 12.10. 17. 13 10.48. 12. 9.68. 12. 9.68. 18. 11. 8.87. 15. 12.10. 13. 10.48. 19. 10. 8.06. 8. 6.45. 6. 4.84. 20. 9. 7.26. 7. 5.65. 5. 4.03. 21. 8. 6.45. 5. 4.03. 3. %. 1.61. %. %. %. %. 5. 1. 0.81. 2. 1.61. 9. 7.26. 10. 1. 0.81. 1. 0.81. 1. 0.81. 1. 0.81. 8. 6.45. 2. 15. 12.10. 3. 12. 9.68. 4. 11. 8.87. 2.42. 1. 9. 7.26. 6 1. 0.81. 16. 7. 5.65. 16. 12.90. 16. 12.90. -1. 8. 6.45. 14. 7. 5.65. 12. 9.68. 10. 8.06. -2. 4. 3.23. 12. 7. 5.65. 8. 6.45. 13. 10.48. -3. 3. 2.42. 13. 4. 3.23. 12. 9.68. 11. 8.87. -20. 1. 0.81. 17. 13.71. 11. 8.87. -19. 1. 0.81. 3. 2.42. 19. 15.32. -15. 1. 0.81. 15. 3. 2.42. 0. 3. 2.42. 11. 2. 1.61. 3. 2.42. 8. 6.45. 3. 2.42. -7. 1. 0.81. 8. 2. 1.61. 1. 0.81. 1. 0.81. 4. 3.23. -5. 1. 0.81. 7. 1. 0.81. -4. 1. 0.81. 9. 2. 1.61. 2. 1.61. 8. 6.45. 2. 1.61. 4. 3.23. 3. 2.42. 19. 16. 15. 2. 7.98. 15.61. 14.46. 2.36. -1.49. -0.44. -1.03. -1.38. 3.12. 0.62. 2.03. 6.57 =. 20. N = 124 / %. /. 121. 97.58. 8.49. 7.17. 26.11. 12.53. 23.13. 23.14. 116. 93.55. 2.25. 9.34. 9.11. 9.72. 13.95. 6.61. 121. 97.58. 6.77. 13.16. 20.65. 18.53*. 24.86. 12.51. 10.58. 15.94. 10.17. 9.56. 0.39. 0.69. V = 0.27* 121. 97.58. 5.80. 10.61. 33.56* V = 0.26. 118. 95.16. 7.96. 7.44. 25.04. 14.21 *. 28.69*** V = 0.34. F. 0.27. /ANOVA 1 *. p < .05. ***. p < .001. 2. V. Vc. 1.59. 1.29. 2.83. ***.

(16) 180. 21. 98%. 20 2. 2. = 33.. p < .05. 56. = 43.40. 2 1. 25%. 87%. 50%. 3. 3. 66.6%. 4. 80.6% 3 4. 87% = 18.53. 65.8%. 100%. 0.26 2. p < .01. 79.7%. 1 2 2. p < .05. = 23.35. 35.7%. p < .01 2. 5 56.5% 2. 45.8%. p < .05. 15.64. 3. 45.2%. 62.7%. 0.27. 4. 78.3%. 2. 59.6% 2. = 28.69 4. 59.5%. 3. 0.25 2. p < .001. 87% 2. =. 74.6%. = 26.34. 3. 3. 0.34. p < .01. 26~50. 44.4%. 65%. 4. 61.5%. 70.3%. 21. N = 124 / %. /. 124. 100.00. 4.24. 6.77. 18.78. 14.54. 10.63. 16.18. 122. 98.39. 2.28. 6.13. 14.42. 5.19. 6.33. 7.51. 123. 99.19. 4.17. 13.44. 9.69. 7.66. 21.86. 12.96. 122. 98.39. 8.77. 9.16. 43.40**. 23.35**. 10.53. 14.16. V = 0.30** V = 0.31** 123. 99.19. 0.97. 8.12. 24.73. 15.64*. 26.34** *. F. 0.82. 3.62*. /ANOVA. 1.50. >. V = 0.25. V = 0.27. 4.03*. 1.01. 6.72 **. 1.21. > , >. 1 *. p < .05. **. p < .01. ***. 2. V. Vc. p < .001. p < .05 21 17.46. M= M = 15.23. F = 3.62. = 16.17 p < .05. M = 16.26 M = 14.48. F = 4.03. M.

(17) 181. 21 22 22. 88.71%. 92.74%. 52%. 37. 8. 10. 90%. 91.13% 50.81%. 91.94%. 22. 31. 10 6. 7. 5. 71.4%. 22. N = 124 %. 22.. 118. 5.. 117. 95.16 94.35. % 116 116. 93.55 93.55. % 24. 8.. a a. %. 103. 83.06. 80. 64.52. 103. 83.06. 72. 58.06. 7.. 115. 92.74. 110. 88.71. 4.. 102. 82.26. 102. 82.26. 3.. 114. 91.94. 113. 91.13. 37.. 100. 80.65. 91. 73.39. 36.. 114. 91.94. 110. 88.71. 17.. 100. 80.65. 53. 42.74. 29.. 114. 91.94. 54. 43.55. 16.. 97. 78.23. 73. 58.87. 28.. 113. 91.13. 111. 89.52. 25.. 97. 78.23. 71. 57.26. 2.. 113. 91.13. 108. 87.10. 31.. 96. 77.42. 81. 65.32. 1.. 113. 91.13. 100. 80.65. 32.. 96. 77.42. 77. 62.10. 15.. 112. 90.32. 111. 89.52. 6.. 95. 76.61. 46. 37.10. 14.. 111. 89.52. 105. 84.68. 9.. 93. 75.00. 75. 60.48. 18.. 111. 89.52. 97. 78.23. 10.. 87. 70.16. 64. 51.61. 21.. 110. 88.71. 110. 88.71. 13.. 85. 68.55. 63. 50.81. 23.. 107. 86.29. 97. 78.23. 12.. 83. 66.94. 67. 54.03. 19.. a. 107. 86.29. 94. 75.81. 33.. 83. 66.94. 45. 36.29. 107. 86.29. 89. 71.77. 26.. 78. 62.90. 57. 45.97. 20.. 105. 84.68. 81. 65.32. 30.. 74. 59.68. 100. 80.65. 27.. 104. 83.87. 102. 82.26. 34.. 65. 52.42. 19. 15.32. 104. 83.87. 84. 67.74. b. 11.. 35. a. b.

(18) 182. 20.97% 36 11.29% 27. 37. 9.68%. 13.71%. 4. 8.06%. 70.19%. 28. 8.87%. 33. 23. 22 8.06%. 28. 8.87%. 26. 8.06%. 24. 17. 12.10%. 13.72%. 2. 23. N = 124. %. %. %. %. %. 37. 26. 20.97. 2. 1.61. 2. 1.61. 16. 1. 0.81. 36. 17. 13.71. 2. 1.61. 2. 1.61. 11. 1. 0.81. 35. 9. 7.26. 6. 4.84. 5. 4.03. 19. 34. 9. 7.26. 4. 3.23. 3. 2.42. 29. 7. 5.65. 7. 5.65. 6. 4.84. 25. 7. 5.65. 5. 4.03. 5. 4.03. 27. 6. 4.84. 11. 8.87. 8. 6.45. 1 1. 0.81 0.81. % 1 3. 0.81. %. %. 2. 1.61. 1. 0.81. 2. 1.61. 4. 3.23. 2.42. 4. 3.23. 1. 0.81. 13. 3. 2.42. 1. 0.81. 2. 1.61. 9. 1. 0.81. 2. 1.61. 7. 5.65. 6. 1. 0.81. 1. 0.81. 8. 6.45. 5. 1. 0.81. 1. 0.81. 7. 5.65. 32. 6. 4.84. 2. 1.61. 3. 2.42. 3. 1. 0.81. 1. 0.81. 6. 4.84. 28. 5. 4.03. 14. 11.29. 11. 8.87. 8. 1. 0.81. 1. 0.81. 6. 4.84. 30. 5. 4.03. 4. 3.23. 2. 1.61. 18. 1. 0.81. 1. 0.81. 1. 0.81. 33. 4. 3.23. 10. 8.06. 8. 6.45. 15. 1. 0.81. 4. 3.23. 4. 3.23. 0. 4. 3.23. 4. 3.23. 23. 3. 2.42. 7. 5.65. 4. 3.23. 2. 15 12.10. 22. 3. 2.42. 6. 4.84. 6. 4.84. 4. 10. 8.06. 31. 2. 1.61. 5. 4.03. 5. 4.03. 1. 8. 6.45. 24. 2. 1.61. 4. 3.23. 4. 3.23. 17. 2. 1.61. 3. 2.42. 4. 3.23. 26. 1. 0.81. 5. 4.03. 10. 21. 1. 0.81. 4. 3.23. 14. 1. 0.81. 4. 20. 1. 0.81. 3. 10. 1. 0.81. 2. 12. 9.68. 12. 2. 1.61. -1. 6. 4.84. 7. 5. 4.03. 8.06. -2. 2. 1.61. 6. 4.84. -35. 1. 0.81. 3.23. 3. 2.42. 2.42. 4. 3.23. 1.61. 1. 0.81. 2. 4 3. 1.61. 3.23 2.42. 33. 27. 26. 4. 30.21. 25.35. 23.81. 4.85. -1.94. -0.84. -0.94. -1.78. 4.26. 0.43. 0.60. 8.51. -34. 1. 0.81. -31. 1. 0.81. -20. 1. 0.81.

(19) 183. 24. N = 124 / 120. % 96.77. 120 120 120 117. 96.77 96.77 96.77 94.35. 8.74. 9.79. 8.49 13.09 8.04 3.87 0.33. 13.18 9.30 6.05 8.19 0.18. 48.42* V = 0.31* 35.66 28.45 20.29 14.62 0.27. /. F. 10.86. 15.18. 23.72 18.01 6.86 3.04 0.37. 30.28 15.61 8.74 6.18 0.11. 39.90* V = 0.33* 37.18 25.69 18.76 16.78 1.61. /ANOVA 2. 1. V. *. Vc. 37. p < .05. 15.8% 1.2% 22. 0%. 0%. 3 4 24. 94%. 8.5% 0% 0.33. 24. 25 2. p < .05. 48.42 6. =. 96%. 5 2. 62.5% 7 8. 59%. = 53.55. 61.3% 73.7%. p < .05. 7%. 75%. 26. 11. 30.8% 5. 2. = 39.90. 0.38. p. 40%. 7. 26 33.4%. 35.1%. 1~3%. < .05. 25. N = 124 /. /. 120 123. % 96.77 99.19. 123 123 120. 6.31 9.93. 9.98 13.68. 32.83 44.35. 16.74 17.56. 99.19 99.19 96.77. 14.87 3.50 1.89 0.88. 23.89 5.00 5.72 1.00. 36.68 15.17 14.08 0.96. 18.76 10.82 5.45 2.54. V. Vc. F. 26.45 53.55* V = 0.38* = 0.07* 38.14 12.40 9.92 1.52. 18.02 38.95. 20.58 17.25 7.09 0.65. /ANOVA 1. 2. *. p < .05.

(20) 184. 63% 1.61%. 9.68%. 26. 26. N = 124. a. a. % 6.. 103. 83.06. 15.. 89. 12.. 79. 16.. a. %. %. 23.. 21. 16.94. 20.. 10. 8.06. 71.77. 5.. 19. 15.32. 11.. 9. 7.26. 63.71. 10.. 18. 14.52. 4.. 8. 6.45. 38. 30.65. 7.. 16. 12.90. 21.. 5. 4.03. 8.. 36. 29.03. 9.. 16. 12.90. 25.. 5. 4.03. 14.. 28. 22.58. 19.. 16. 12.90. 2.. 2. 1.61. 13.. 27. 21.77. 3.. 15. 12.10. 27.. 0. 0.00. 22.. 24. 19.35. 18.. 12. 9.68. 28.. 0. 0.00. 26.. 24. 19.35. 1.. 12. 9.68. 24.. 23. 18.55. 17.. 10. 8.06. a. 27 4. 15.32%. 14.52%. 2. 3. 13.71% 27. 3%. 5. +. +. 10.48% 107. 27. N = 124 %. %. 1. 9. 7.26. 11. 3. 2.42. 2. 17. 13.71. 12. 3. 2.42. 3. 19. 15.32. 13. 1. 0.81. 4. 18. 14.52. 14. 2. 1.61. 5. 13. 10.48. 17. 1. 0.81. 6. 12. 9.68. 18. 1. 0.81. 7. 12. 9.68. 20. 1. 0.81. 8. 5. 4.03. 9. 4. 3.23. 10. 3. 2.42. 1%. +. % + +. +. +. + +. +. +. +. 2. 7. 5.65. 3. 6. 4.84. 1. 4. 3.23. 3. 2. 1.61. 2. 2. 1.61. 4. 2. 1.61. 23. 18.55.

(21) 185. 28. 67%. N = 124 a. +. % 21 16.94 107 86.29 119 95.97. + +. +. +. 84 18 14 5. % 67.74 14.52 11.29 4.03. 3. 2.42. 29 2. = 47.35. p < .05 1. a. 2. 52.5% 3 4. 28 42.9%. 28 86%. 47.4%. 55.5%. 16.94%. 29. N = 124. / a. /. F. 8.45 4.72 12.94. 1.72 7.19 24.97. 16.56 31.43 48.44. 4.80 7.84 30.60. 20.31 13.58 42.51. 2.77. 0.45. 1.01. 1.64. 2.29. 20.62 16.84 47.35* V = 0.36* 1.41. /ANOVA a. 2. 1. V. Vc. *p < .05. 30. 69%. 30. 9. 5. 6. 2. 15. 7. 10. 16.. /. N = 124. 111 104 97 92 92 86 57. % 89.52 83.87 78.23 74.19 74.19 69.35 45.97. 4. 8. 3. 1. 13. 12. 14.. 55. 44.35. 11.. 47 47 44 27 25 22 16. % 37.90 37.90 35.48 21.77 20.16 17.74 12.90. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7. 1 1 11 11 11 15 14. % 0.81 0.81 8.94 8.94 8.94 12.20 11.38. 6. 4.84. 8. 16. 13.01. 9 10 11 12 14 15. 10 11 7 7 4 4. % 8.13 8.94 5.69 5.69 3.25 3.25.

(22) 186. 30. 10%. 3~5. 9. 6~8. 10 109. 2.42% +. 31 +. 9. 1.61. 31. N = 124. + + + + +. + +. 3. + +. +. 3 6. 3 3. % 2.42 2.42. 14. 3. 2.42. 9. 7.26. / +. +. +. +. +. +. + +. /. +. +. 2%. 16. 30. 77%. +. 32. +. 29%. + 32. 9.68% 18 +. +. +. +. 32. N = 124 a. %. a. 104. 83.87. +. +. +. 116. 93.55. +. +. +. 47. 37.90. +. 13. 91.13. +. 96. 77.42. % 4. 39. 31.45. 5. 36. 29.03. +. 3. 12. 9.68. +. 3. 12. 9.68. 99. 79.84. +. 9%. 30.48% 33. 1 2. = 6.37. 2. 41.7% 2. p < .05. 46.5%. .001. = 33.9. 69.2% 58.3%. 66.7% 4. 2. 0.23 25. = 27.02 5. p < .05 15.4%.

(23) 187. 26. 0.27. 71.4% 2. = 9.8. p < .05. 55.6%. 0~2%. 3%. 69.5%. 63.2%. 33. N = 124. / 8.99 /. 11.25. 16.86. 11.32. 8.61. 20.34. 1.50. 9.05. 12.44. 13.24. 17.37. 14.90. 3.77. 6.37*. 8.83. 4.63. 6.09. 9.80*. V = 0.23* 33.90***. 6.30. V = 0.37 2.65 F. 4.41. /ANOVA. 6.26. *. 5.03. >. >. **. V = 0.28* 23.03. 25.86. ***. *. p < .05 **p < .01. ***. V. 23.64 *. V = 0.27 3.55 2.90. 2.26. *. > ,. 7.46 > ,. ***. 5.53. 5.89. 1.77. 3.76*. > ,. > 2. 1. 27.02*. > ,. >. Vc. p < .001. M = 9.13 33. M = 8.61 M = 7.16. F = 4.41. p < .01 M = 6.84. M = 5.75. ( ). = 7.8. M = 6.14. p < .05. M = 9.62 F = 5.03. >. M = 7.26 F = 2.9. p < .05. F = 7.46. p < .001. M = 8.89. M = 7.04 M = 9.03. M M = 8.86. M = 6.8 3.76. p < .05. F=.

(24) 188. 3. 37 10. 90%. 31. ( ) 6 1. 70.97% 67.74% 2. 3. 46%. 12%. 10%. ~23%. 1 3% 26 4.. 2. 22. 1.61% 10%. 2. 9.68%. 5. 0 90%. 5.. 17. 10%. 6~8. 3~5. 9. 25 26 3 26~50. 0~2%. 10.

(25) 189. ( ). ( ) ( ). 1.. 1996. 2000. 2000. 1998. 2001. ( ) 2. 26 22. ( ). 23% 10% 35%. 14. ( ) 1.. (. ) 2000. 2000.

(26) 190. 2000 2.. ( ) 1.. 3.. 2.. 3.. ( ) 1. 4. 16. 4 2..

(27) 191. 2000 2000. 1999 1997 2001. 2000. pp. 311-352. 2000. 2000 pp.447-530. 2000 1998. 2000. 15(4). 54-61. 2000. 1995. 10 2001. 1999 1999. 92-98. pp.46-55. 2000. 1997. 2000 pp.97-144. 1996. 90. 2000. 90. 2001. 90. 1997. 7 9 9. 13 1 26. 60 ,. ..

(28) 192. The School Rulemaking in Elementary and Junior High Schools in Taiwan Lain-Chyi Yeh. Shu-Ping Lin. Assistant Professor, Graduate Institute of Educational Policy and Administration, National Chi Nan University. Graduate Student, Graduate Institute of Educational Policy and Administration, National Chi Nan University. Abstract To improve the quality of legislation in school is one of the important strategies for educational reform. It is necessary to study the related issues, practical conditions, and school administrators' opinions about school rulemaking in elementary and junior high schools. Firstly, we reviewed the literature to study some important issues, which include the terminology of school law, classification of law, and procedure of rulemaking, and tried to propose several valuable ideas. Secondly, we used self-made questionnaires to explore the practical conditions in five topics about school rulemaking, school administrators' opinions, and the relations between school rulemaking and school background variables. The assessable samples were 124 elementary and junior high schools. The result showed that most schools used few tactics, most school administrators argued to need more school laws about organization and affair, most schools used few terminology of law. In sum, we proposed several noticeable phenomena that it had no uniform terminology about school law, it had incomplete procedure about school rulemaking, few schools had less understanding and attention upon school rulemaking, school background variables were relative to school rulemaking. Finally, we proposed some suggestions to elementary and junior high schools, administrative agencies, teacher education organizations, and researchers. Keywords: administrative law educational law legislation school regulation.

(29)

參考文獻

相關文件

By using Balanced Scorecard (BSC), the purpose of this study is to construct indicators of school management with Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for L junior high school in

The study applies Discriminate Analysis to discuss the aspects of Junior high school students living Adjustment Scale and then develops a scale to be the standard of Junior

In order to serve the fore-mentioned purpose, this research is based on a related questionnaire that extracts 525 high school students as the object for the study, and carries out

This research tries to understand the current situation of supplementary education of junior high school in Taichung City and investigate the learning factors and

But, literacy is an important learning target, and it can measure the quality of nationals, so it can not being ignored.A junior high school student typed with

This study was conducted to understand the latest situation between perception of principal‘s leading role and school effectiveness in junior high schools, and

It aims to understand the authentic English learning adjustment of junior high school students in remote area and to compare the difference between the family background and

The purpose of this study was to investigate the current situation of multicultural literacy and intercultural sensitivity of junior high school teachers in Taichung