高級中等學校校長正向領導量表之發展與運用 - 政大學術集成

全文

(1)29. 國立政治大學「教育與心理研究」 2016 年 12 月，39 卷 4 期，頁 29-59 DOI. 10.3966/102498852016123904002. 高級中等學校校長正向領導量表之發展與運用賴協志*. 摘. 吳清山**. 要. 本研究旨在發展適切的高級中等學校校長正向領導量表，並運用此量表評估高級中等學校校長正向領導整體與各層面現況及其差異情形。首先，參酌相關文獻確立量表之概念結構，據以發展測量題項，再利用預試結果進行項目分析及探索性因素分析，確立校長正向領導量表之因素層面。其次，以1,218位高級中等學校教師為研究樣本進行資料分析；為確認測量模式之適切性，透過模型競爭之策略，選定多因素斜交模型做為高級中等學校校長正向領導量表之驗證模型；並經由個別項目信度、組成信度、平均變異數抽取量、幅合效度、區別效度、複核效化等方式，檢驗模型之信度與效度。最後，依據所發展之量表，評估校長正向領導之實際表現。本研究結果顯示，高級中等學校校長正向領導量表包含引導正面思緒、善用溝通知能、營造互動氛圍及創造意義價值等四個潛在因素，共計24題，且具良好之信度與效度。另外，高級中等學校校長正向領導整體及各層面的表現為中上程度，而. *. 賴協志（通訊作者）：國家教育研究院教育制度及政策研究中心助理研究員吳清山：臺北市立大學教育行政與評鑑研究所教授誌謝：本研究係由科技部專題研究計畫（編號：MOST 103-2410-H-656-002-）之成果報告改寫而成，特此致謝！另特別感謝兩位匿名審查者提供之修正建議！電子郵件：ericlai@mail.naer.edu.tw **. 收件日期：2015.10.14；修改日期：2016.08.03；接受日期：2016.09.12.

(2) 30. 不同最高學歷、擔任職務及學校類別之高級中等學校教師在知覺校長正向領導各層面的表現上有顯著差異。. 關鍵詞：正向領導、校長領導、高級中等學校.

(3) 31. Journal of Education & Psychology December, 2016, Vol. 39 No. 4, pp. 29-59. The Principals’ Positive Leadership Inventory and Its Application in Senior and Vocational High Schools Hsieh-Chih Lai*. Ching-Shan Wu**. Abstract. The main purposes of this research are to develop the appropriate inventory of principals’ positive leadership in senior and vocational high schools, and to use the inventory to assess the current situation and differences of principals’ positive leadership in senior and vocational high schools. Firstly, a preliminary inventory is developed based on a review of the relevant literature, and the factor structure of the principals’ positive leadership inventory can be established after performing items analysis and the exploratory factor analysis. Secondly, 1,218 teachers from senior and vocational high schools in Taiwan are sampled for data analysis. For the further validation of the appropriateness on measurement model, through comparing the strategy of competing models, corrected factors model has been chosen as the measurement model for the principals’ positive leadership inventory. Then through the verifying methods of the individual item reliability, composite reliability, average variance extracted, convergent validity, discriminant validity and cross-validation, the reliability and validity of the *. Hsieh-Chih Lai (Corresponding Author): Assistant Research Fellow, Research Center for Education System and Policy, National Academic for Education Research ** Ching-Shan Wu: Professor, Graduate School of Educational Administration and Evaluation, University of Taipei E-mail: ericlai@mail.naer.edu.tw Manuscript received: 2015.10.14; Revised: 2016.08.03; Accepted: 2016.09.12.

(4) 32. model can be measured. Finally, according to the inventory that has been developed, to assess actual performance of principals’ positive leadership. This result shows that the principals’ positive leadership inventory contains four latent factors, including the guide of positive thinking and emotion, the use of communication knowledge and ability, the construction of interactive atmosphere, and the creation of positive meaning and value, and twenty four measurement items all together, which has good reliability and validity. In addition, the degree of principals’ positive leadership is at medium high level in senior and vocational high schools, and the teachers of different academic degrees, positions, school category have significant and different perceptions on principals’ positive leadership in senior and vocational high schools.. Keywords: positive leadership, principals’ leadership, senior and vocational high schools.

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

(10)

(11)

(12)

(13)

(14)

(15)

(16)

(17)

(18)

(19)

(20)

(21)

(22)

(23)

(24)

(25)

(26)

(27) 高級中等學校校長正向領導量表之發展與運用. (三) 繼續探究影響校長正向領導相關因素，提供校長領導參考根據本研究結論，不同最高學歷、擔任職務及公、私立學校類別之高級中等學校教師在知覺校長正向領導具有顯著差異，對於了解影響校長的正向領導是有其幫助，未來可以從校長的人格特質、專業社群、學校文化、組織公民行為等面向，進一步繼續探究對校長正向領導的影響或彼此關聯性，深信有助於了解影響校長正向領導相關因素之. 55. and transformational leadership on teachers’ occupational well-being and school organizational effectiveness: The analysis of mediating effect of teachers’ emotional labor. Journal of Education Administration Research, 4(2), 1-39.】. 吳政達（2014b）。國民中學教師反績效行為與組織公民行為關係及其影響因素之研究。教育與心理研究，37（2）， 1-31。【Wu, C. T. (2014b). The relationship between counterproductive and citizenship behavior for junior high school teachers in Taiwan: Meditators and its antecedents. Journal of Education and Psychology, 37(2), 1-31.】. 吳清山（2013）。正向領導。教育研究月刊，230，136-137。. 全貌。. 【Wu, C. S. (2013). Positive leadership. Journal of Education Research, 230, 136-137.】. 參考文獻. 吳清山（2014）。學校行政（七版）。臺北市：心理。. 吳明隆、涂金堂（2012）。SPSS與統計應用分析。臺北市：五南。【Wu, M. L., & Tu, C. T. (2012). SPSS & the application and analysis of statistics. Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】. 吳勁甫（2015）。國小校長正向領導對學校效能影響之研究：教師心理資本的多層次中介效果。教育與心理研究，38 （3），1-37。【 Wu, J. F. (2015). Impact of principals’ positive leadership on school effectiveness in elementary schools: The multilevel mediation effects of teachers’ psychological capital. Journal of Education and Psychology, 38(3), 1-37.】. 吳政達（ 2014a ）。國民中學校長情緒智能、轉型領導對教師職業幸福感與學校組織效能之影響：教師情緒勞務的中介效果分析。教育行政研究，4 （2），1-39。【Wu, C. T. (2014a). The effect of junior high school principals’ emotional intelligence. 【Wu, C. S. (2014). School administration (7th ed.) . Taipei, Taiwan: Psychological.】. 李菁菁（2014）。高級中學校長正向領導、教師職場希望感與學校效能之相關研究（未出版之博士論文）。國立臺南大學，臺南市。【 Lee, C. C. (2014). The study on the relationships among principals’ positive leadership, teachers’ workplace hopes and school effectiveness of senior high school (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). National University of Tainan, Tainan, Taiwan.】. 林明地（2012）。校長思考的重新建構。教育研究月刊，213，41-49。【 Lin, M. D. (2012). Reconstruction of principals’ thinking. Journal of Education Research, 213, 41-49.】. 林思伶（2012）。校長的正向領導模式：愛、服務、歡笑。師友月刊，538， 14-19。【Lin, S. L. (2012). The model of principals’ positive leadership: Love, serve, laugh..

(28) 56 教育與心理研究. 39 卷 4 期. The Educator Monthly, 538, 14-19.】. 林新發（2010）。校長正向領導的策略與技巧。國民教育，50（6），1-7。【Lin, H. F. (2010). Strategies and skills of principals’ positive leadership. Elementary Education, 50(6), 1-7.】. 林新發、王秀玲、黃秋鑾、仲秀蓮、林佳芬、梁玟燁、鍾雲英、顏如芳（2010）。華人地區小學校長正向領導、學習文化對學校創新經營效能影響之研究：以臺北市、上海市和香港地區為例（I）。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究成果報告（NSC 98-2410H-152-001）。臺北市：國立臺北教育大學。. schools (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.】. 秦夢群（2013）。教育領導理論與應用（二版）。臺北市：五南。【Chin, M. C. (2013). Educational leadership theory and application (2nd ed.). Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】. 張奕華、許正妹、顏弘欽（2011）。「國民小學教師學術樂觀量表」之發展與衡量。測驗學刊，58，261-289。【Chang, I. H., Hsu, C. M., & Yen, H. C. (2011). Development of the teacher academic optimism inventory and validation study in elementary schools. Psychological Testing, 58, 261-289.】. 【Lin, H. F., Wang, H. L., Hwang, C. R., Chung, H. L., Lin, C. F., Liang, W. Y., Zhong, Y. Y., & Yen, J. F., (2010). The impact of Chinese region elementary school principals’ positive leadership and learning culture on effectiveness of school innovation management: Taking Taipei, Shanghai and Hong Kong for examples (I). Report by the National Science Council (NSC 98-2410-H-152-001). Taipei, Taiwan: National Taipei University of Education.】. 教育部統計處（2015）。高級中等學校概況（103學年度）。取自https://stats.moe. gov.tw/files/main_statistics/high.xls. 邱皓政（2012）。因素分析。載於瞿海源、畢恆達、劉長萱、楊國樞（主編），社會及行為科學研究法（三）：資料分析（頁1-40）。臺北市：東華。. 【Fu, T. S. (2002). Issues related to principal component analysis and common factor analysis. Formosan Education and Society, 3, 107-132.】. 【Chiou, H. J. (2012). Factor analysis. In H. Y. Chiu, H. D. Bih, M. Liou, & K. S. Yang (Eds), Research methods on social and bahavior science (3): Data analysis (pp. 140). Taipei, Taiwan: Dong-Hwa.】. 姚麗英（2014）。高級中學校長正向領導、學校組織學習與教師創新教學關係之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。國立政治大學，臺北市。【Yao, L. Y. (2014). A study on relationships among principals’ positive leadership, school organizational learning and innovative teaching of teachers in the high. 【 Ministry of education and Statistics Department. (2015). Summary of senior and vocational high schools (2014-2015). Retrieved from https://stats.moe.gov.tw/ files/main_statistics/high.xls】. 傅粹馨（2002）。主成分分析和共同因素分析相關議題之探究。教育與社會研究，3，107-132。. 黃宗顯（2010）。學校領導研究的新視域：領導的美學實踐。教育研究集刊，56 （3），1-28。【 Huang, T. H. (2010). The new research horizon in school leadership: Leaders’ aesthetic practice. Bulletin of Educational Research, 56(3), 1-28.】. 黃芳銘（2010）。結構方程模式：理論與應用（五版）。臺北市：五南。【 Huang, F. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling: Theory and application (5th ed.). Taipei, Taiwan: Wu-Nan Book.】.

(29) 高級中等學校校長正向領導量表之發展與運用. 黃彥超（2013）。一所國立高中的校長領導與學校組織文化之探究。學校行政， 87，1-29。【Huang, Y. C. (2013). A study of organizational culture and leadership in senior high school. School Administrators Research, 87, 1-29.】. 黃財尉（2003）。共同因素分析與主成分分析之比較。彰化師大輔導學報，25， 63-86。【Huang, T. W. (2003). Comparisons between common factor analysis and principal component analysis. Guidance Journal of National Changhua University of Education, 25, 63-86.】. 黃韞臻、林淑惠（2014）。「大一新生學校生活適應量表」之發展。測驗學刊， 61（2），259-281。【 Huang, Y. C., & Lin, S. H. (2014). An inventory of school adaptation for college freshmen. Psychological Testing, 61(2), 259-281.】. 楊振昇、林松柏（2012）。中、小學校長領導核心能力建構之研究。教育行政研究，2（2），43-77。【Yang, C. S., & Lin, S. P. (2012). A study on the construction of principals’ leadership competence. Journal of Education Administration Research, 2(2), 43-77.】. 鄭彩鳳、鄭玉菁（2014）。校長轉型領導、教師對組織變革接受度與學校競爭優勢關係之研究。當代教育研究， 22 （1），1-46。【Cheng, T. F., & Cheng, Y. C. (2014). A study of the relationships among principal’s transformational leadership, teacher’s acceptance of organizational change and school competitive advantage. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 22(1), 1-46.】. 蕭文智（2015）。校長正向領導對學生創新表現影響之研究：以教師組織公民行為為中介變項。學校行政， 97 ， 1-. 57. 21。【Hsiao, W. C. (2015). A study of the effects of principal positive leadership on student innovative performance: Teacher organizational citizenship behavior as an intermediary variable. School Administrators Research, 97, 1-21.】. 賴協志、吳清山（2015）。國民中學學習領域召集人正向領導、教師教學省思與創新教學成效關係之研究。課程與教學，18（4），36-62。【Lai, H. C., & Wu, C. S. (2015). A study on the relationships among learning areas leaders’ positive leadership, teachers’ teaching reflection and innovative teaching effectiveness in junior high schools. Curriculum & Instruction Quarterly, 18(4), 36-62.】. 謝文全（2012）。教育行政學（四版）。臺北市：高等教育。【 Shieh, W. C. (2012). Educational Administration (4th ed.). Taipei, Taiwan: Higher Education.】. 謝傳崇（2011）。校長正向領導對教師教學影響之研究。教育資料與研究， 101，59-82。【 Hsieh, C. C. (2011). Principal’s positive leadership and its impact on teacher’s teaching. Educational Resources and Research, 101, 59-82.】. 謝傳崇、許文薇（2014）。國民小學校長正向領導、肯定式探詢與教師希望感關係之研究。教育研究學報，48（1）， 67-86。【Hsieh, C. C., & Hsu, W. W. (2014). A study on the relationships among principals’ positive leadership, appreciative inquiry and teachers’ hope in elementary schools. Journal of Education Studies, 48(1), 67-86.】 Abdullah, M. C. (2009). Leadership and PsyCap: A study of the relationship between positive leadership behaviors.

(30) 58 教育與心理研究. 39 卷 4 期. and followers’ positive psychological capital (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and theses database. (UMI No. 3378872) Abrahamsen, H., Aas, M., & Hellekjaer, G. O. (2015). How do principals make sense of school leadership in Norwegian reorganised leadership teams? School Leadership & Management, 35(1), 6278. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. Avey, J. B., Reichard, R. J., Luthans, F., & Mhatre, K. H. (2011). Meta-analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22 (2), 127-152. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equations models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94. Butler, J. P. (2011). Positive leadership in the military: An exploratory study (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and theses database. (UMI No. 3478081) Cameron, K., & Spreitzer, G. (2011). The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship. New York, NY: Oxford University. Cameron, K. S. (2012). Positive leadership: Strategies for extraordinary performance (2nd ed.). SanFrancisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler. Cameron, K. S. (2013). Practicing positive. leadership: Tools and techniques that create extraordinary results. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler. DeVellis, R. F.（1998). Scale development: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Dinkmeyer, D., & Losoncy, L. (1996). The skills of encouragement: Bringing out the best in yourself and others. Delray Beach, FL: St. Lucie. Donaldson, S. I., & Ko, I. (2010). Positive organizational psychology, behavior, and scholarship: A review of the emerging literature and evidence base. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 171-199. Feuerborn, L. L., Tyre, A. D., & King, J. P. (2015). The staff perceptions of behavior and discipline survey: A tool to help achieve systemic change through schoolwide positive behavior support. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 17(2), 116-126. Gordon, J. (2008). The case for positive energy. Retrieved from http://www.jon gordon.com/article-caseforpositiveenergy. html Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Headen, M. D. (2013). The role of the principal in the implementation of positive behavioral interventions and supports in exemplar elementary schools in north carolina (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and theses database. (UMI No. 3538270) Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in.

(31) 高級中等學校校長正向領導量表之發展與運用. covariance structure analysis: Sensitivity to under parameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424-453. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. (1996). LISREL approaches to interaction effects in multiple regression. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford. Ladd, K. (2014). Positive leadership principles for women. Eugene, OR: Harvest House. Luthans, F., Luthans, K. W., Hodgetts, R. M., & Luthans, B. C. (2001). Positive approach to leadership (PAL) implications for today’s organizations. The Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(2), 1-20. Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford, UK: Oxford University. Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First and higher order factor models and their invariance across group. Psychological Bulletin, 97(3), 562-582. McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analysis. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64-82.. 59. Miller, J. D. (2012). The effect of leadership for positive behavior intervention and equity (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertation and theses database. (UMI No. 3516235) Noar, S. M. (2003). The role of structural equation modeling in scale development. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 10(4), 622647. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60(5), 410-421. Tomlinson, C. A. (2015). Communication that powers leadership. Educational Leadership, 72(7), 90-91..

(32)