二、橫斷面之研究：社群意識除了會受到不同社群背景影響外，也需要長時間 建立情感才能產生，因此會隨時間有階段性不同之差異，故本研究結果提 出之資訊型與情感型虛擬社群意識，或許有因果或是階段性的關係，此類 需要長時間觀察之情感意識皆需要縱斷面研究能才得知結果。
第四節、未來研究建議
本研究結果將給予未來研究啟發，可思考各種不同延伸方向：
一、更多元的Web 2.0 相關應用比較：Web 2.0 相關應用並不限定只有網站，例 如還有網路軟體、播客服務等 (資策會 Find，2006)，且也不限定是給一般 消費者使用，也有許多企業甚至是美國軍方在使用Web 2.0 概念與科技，並 且網站分類也不僅止於內容與溝通的分類方法，未來研究可針對其他 Web 2.0 相關議題進行探討，填補 Web 2.0 學術研究較少之鴻溝。
二、縱斷面研究：如前述社群意識這樣的內心情感，是會有階段性的演變，除 了可能存在因果或階段性關係外，也會受到參與時間與程度所影響，因此
未來研究可進行縱斷面研究，長期觀察使用者從一開始參與網站，到逐漸 產生社群意識且不斷加深之過程，將可提供更加完整的社群意識指引。
三、不同的切入觀點：本研究是以使用者認知概念，探討Web 2.0 網站功能與資 訊內容對社群意識之影響，未來研究可選擇不從使用者觀點出發，而從其 他較客觀而非主觀角度切入，如從專家或軟體檢測進行，這樣的角度或許 能進行更多網站間的相互比較，因有固定的檢測標準可遵循。或是更進一步 深入探討，如從過去系統品質相關研究，挑選出網站互動性與資訊可存取 性以外變數來衡量，或更深入從資訊品質觀點，了解除了來源可信度外，
是否有其他因素影響了網站資訊內容之價值。
參考文獻
中文
1. 日本總務省 (民 97)。取自：
http://www.ithome.com.tw/itadm/article.php?c=54373。
2. 中國互聯網訊息中心 (民 97)。取自：
http://epaper.pchome.com.tw/archive/last.htm?s_date=oldands_dir=20090116and s_code=0001ands_cat。
3. 台灣網路資訊中心 (民 97)。取自：
http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/8/2/20/n2016977.htm。
4. 林東清 (民 98)。資訊管理：e 化企業的核心競爭能力。台北市：智勝文化。
5. 道瓊斯 Venture One 和安永全球 (民 97 年)。取自：
http://it.big5.enorth.com.cn/system/2007/09/14/001969603.shtml。
6. 資策會 Find (民 95)。取自：http://www.find.org.tw/find/home.aspx。
7. 財團法人資訊工業策進會 (民 96)。從 Web 2.0 趨勢看網路大廠的經營模式 研究。
8. 經濟部技術處 (民 95)。Web 2.0 網路上有錢，創意在裡面，財團法人資訊 工業策進會。
9. 伊思哲 (民 96)。Web 2.0 大引爆天窗出版。
10. 方至民 (民 91)。資訊人的故事，哈佛學不到的創業典範，天下遠見出版股 份有限公司。
11. 蘋果日報 (民 97)。取自：http://savingmoney.pixnet.net/blog/post/10394039。
12. Richard J.G. (民 97)。網民經濟學：運用 Web 2.0 群眾智慧搶得商機。美商麥 格羅.希爾國際出版公司。
英文
1. Abel, J. D., & Wirth, M. O. (1977). Newspaper vs. TV credibility for local news.
Journalism Quarterly, 54, 371-375.
2. Adams, D., Nelson, R., & Todd, P. (1992). Perceived usefulness, ease of use,
&usage of information technology: a replication, MIS Quarterly, 16(2), 227-247.
3. Adler, R. P., & Christopher, A. J. (1998). Internet community primer- overview
& business opportunity.
4. Addington, D. W. (1971). The effect of vocal variations on ratings of source credibility. Speech Monographs, 38, 242-247.
5. Ahuja, M. K., & Galvin, J. E. (2003). Socialization in Virtual Groups. Journal of
Management, 29(2), 161-185.
6. Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22.
7. Alessio, V. A., Massimo, S. A., Massimiliano, P. A., & Douglas D. P. (2007).
Social support, sense of community in school, and self-efficacy as resources during early adolescence: an integrative model. Am J Community Psychol, 39, 177-190.
8. Antil, J. H. (1984). Conceptualization and Operationalization of Involvement.
Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 203-209.
9. Armstrong, A., & Hagel, J. (1996). The Real Value of Online Communities.
Harvard business review, 74(3), 134-141.
10. Arndt, J. (1967). Role of Product-Related Conversations in the Diffusion of a New Product, Journal of Marketing Research, 4, 291-295.
11. Baker, M., & Churchill, G. A. (1977). The Impact of Physically Attractive Models on Advertising Evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 14, 538-555.
12. Barwise, P., & John U. F. (2005). The State of Interactive Marketing in Seven Countries: Interactive Marketing Comes of Age. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19(3), 67-80.
13. Bassellier, G., & Bembasat, I. (2004). Business competence of information technology professionals: Conceptual development & influence on IT-Business Patnerships. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 673-694.
14. Benavidez, C., Fuertes, J. L., Gutierrez, E., & Martinez, L. (2006).
Semi-automatic evaluation of web accessibility with HERA 2.0. Computer Science, 4061, 199-206.
15. Blanchard, A. L., & Markus, M. L. (2004). The experienced “sense” of a virtual community: characteristics & processes. Database for Advances in Information Systems.
16. Blanchard, A. L. (2007). Developing a Sense of Virtual Community Measure.
Cybersychology & Behavior, 10(6), 827-830.
17. Bolland, J. M., & McCallum, D. M. (2002). Neighboring & community
mobilization in high poverty inner-city neighborhoods. Urban Affairs Review, 38, 42-69.
18. Bonabeau, E. (2009). Decisions 2.0: The Power of Collective Intelligence.
MITSloan Management Review, 50(2).
19. Bruffee, K. A. (1993). Collaborative learning: higher education, interdependence, and the authority of knowledge. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
20. Buckner, J. C. (1988). The development of an instrument to measure neighborhood cohesion. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 771-791.
21. Burgoon, J. K., Joseph A. B., Bjorn B., Artemio, R., Norah, E. D., and Nathan Miczo. (2000). Testing the Interactivity Model: Communication Processes, Partner Assessments, and the Quality of Collaborative Work. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(3), 33-56.
22. Chaiken, S. (1979). Communication physical attractiveness and persuasion.
Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 37, 1387-1397.
23. Chervokas, J., & Watson, T. (Ed.). (1997). Community: it takes an electronic village. New York Times, from:
http://www.nytimes.com/library/cyber/nation/050297nation.html.
24. Chin, W. W. (2004). Frequently asked Question-Partial Least Squares &
PLS-Graph. From: http://disc-nt.cba.uh.edu/chin/plsfaq/multigroup.htm.
25. Chipuer, H. M., & Pretty, G. M. H. (1999). A review of the Sense of Community Index: Current uses, factor structure, reliability, and further development. Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 643-658.
26. Chris, M., Miriam, M., Kevin, O., & Ashok, G. (1999). Making Real of Virtual Community. Pricewalerhouse Coopers.
27. Cohen, A. (1985). (Ed.). The Symbolic Construction of Community. New York:
Communication & persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change. New Haven Communication.
28. Conway, B. P., & Hachen, D. S. (2005). Attachments, grievances, resources, and efficacy: The determinants of tenant association participation among public housing tenants. Journal of Urban Affairs, 27, 25-52.
29. Cuneo A.Z. Cuneo, (1996). Internet world show spurs online commerce debate.
Advertising Age, 16.
30. Cunningham, P., & Wilkins, J. (2009). A Walk in the Cloud. Information Management Journal, 43(1).
31. Culnan, M. J. (1984). The Dimensions of Accessibility to Online Information:
Implications for Implementing Office Information Systems. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, 2(2), 141-150.
32. Crano, W. D. (1970). Effects of Sex, Response Order, and Expertise in Conformity: A Dispositional Approach. Sociometry, 33(3), 239-252.
33. Davenport, T. H. (1997). Some Principles of Knowledge Management. Strategy
& Business.
34. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of
Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
35. Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339.
36. Day, E. & Crask, M. R. (2000). Value assessment: The antecedent of customer satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 13, 52-60.
37. Dede, C. (1996). The evolution of distance education: emerging technologies
&distributed learning. American. Journal of Distance Education, 10(2), 4-36.
38. Dervin, B., & Nilan M. (1986). Information needs and uses. Annual review of information science & technology, 21, 3-33.
39. Dervin, B. (1997). Useful Theory for Librarianship: Communication, Not Information. Drexel library quarterly, 13(3), 16-32.
40. Dholakia, R., & Sternthal, B. (1977). Highly Credible Sources: Persuasive Liabilities. Journal of Comsumer Research, 3, 223-232.
41. DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (1992). Information Systems Success: The Quest for Dependent Variable. Information Systems Research. 3(10), 60-95.
42. Dixson, N. (2000). (Ed.). Common knowledge: how company thrive by sharing what they know, Harvard Business School Press.
43. Duncan, T., & Sandra E. M. (1998). A Communication-Based Marketing Model for Managing Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 62, 1-13.
44. Eagley, A., Wood, W., & Chaiken, S. (1978). Causal Inferences about Communicators & Theor Effect on Opinion Chan. Journal of Personality &
Social Psychology, 36, 424-443.
45. Englefield, P., Tibbits, C., & Damani, M. I. (2005). A proposed architecture for integrating accessibility test tools. IBM Systems Journal, 4061, 234-241.
46. Elena, K., & Detmar W. S. (1999). The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use. Information & Management, 35, 237-250.
47. Ellison, J. (2004). Accessing the accessibility of fifty United States government Web pagesL Using Booby to check on Uncle Sam. 9(7). From:
http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue9_7/ellison/index.html.
48. Fariborz, A., Marof, B. R., & Emby, Z. (2009). Assessing Sense of Community Dimension of Community. European Journal of Social Sciences, 7(3), 126-132.
49. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (Ed.). (1975). Belief, attitude, intentions & behavior: an introduction to theory & research. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
50. Ford, D. P, & Staples, D. S. (2005). Perceived Value of Knowledge: Shall I Give
Conference on System Sciences.
51. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unoberservable variable variables & measurement erroe. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.
52. Fornell, C. (Ed.). (1982). A Second Generration of Multivariate Analysis. Praeger, New York.
53. Frymier, A. B. (1993). The impact of teacher immediacy on students’ motivation over the course of a semester. Communication Quarterly, 41(4), 454-464.
54. Gantz, W. (1981). The influence of researcher methods on television &
newspaper news credibility evaluations. Journal of Broadcasting, v25, 155-169.
55. Glynn, T. J. (1981). Psychological sense of community: Measurement &
application. Human Relations. 34(9), 789-818.
56. Goldsmith, R. E., Laffery, B. A., & Newell, S. J. (2000). The Impact of Corporate Credibility and Celebrity Credibility on Consumer Reaction to Advertisements and Brands. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 43-52.
57. Grewal, d., Gotlieb, J., & Marmorstein, H. (1994). The Moderating Effects of Message Framing & Source Credibility on the Price-Perceived Risk Rationship.
Journal of Comsumer Research, 21, 145-153.
58. Grunig, J. E., & Larissa A. G. (1989). Toward a Theory of Public Relations Behavior of Organizations: Review of a Program of Research. Public Relations Research Annual, 1, 27-63.
59. Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (2000). Knowledge flows within multinational corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 473-496.
60. Ha, L., & James, E. L. (1998). Interactivity reexamined: A baseline analysis of early business web sites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42(4), 457-474
61. Hall, K. (1981). The economic nature of information.The Information Society.
1(2), 143-166.
62. Heeter, C. (1989). Implications of New Interactive Technologies for
Conceptualizing Communication. Media Use in the Information Age: Emerging Patterns of Adoption & Computer Use, 217-235.
63. Herr, K., & Kim, J. (1991). Effect of Word-of-Mouth & Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: an Accessibility-Diagnostic Perspective, Journal of Consumer Research. 17, 454-462.
64. Hill, J. L. (1996). Psychological sense of community: suggestions for future research. Journal of Community Psychology, 24(4), 431-438.
website accessibility; Software tool vs human experts. Management Research News. Patrington, 31(1), 27.
66. Horrigan, J.B. (Ed.). (2006). Home Broadb& Adoption. Pew Internet &
American Life Project, 10.
67. Hughey, J., Speer, P. W., & Peterson, N. A. (1999). Sense of community in community organizations: Structure & evidence of validity. Journal of Community Psychology, 27(97), 113.
68. Ohanian, R. (1990). Construction and Validation of A Scale To Measure Celebrity Endorsers’ Perceived Expertise, Trustworthiness, &
Attractiveness.Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 39-52.
69. McGuire, W. J. (1985). Attitudes & Attitude Change in Handbook of Social Psychology. NY: Random House, 233-346.
70. McManus. R. (Ed.). (2005). What is Web 2.0 Retrieved July 19, 2008, from http://blogs.zdent.com/web2explorer/?p=5.
71. Mills, J., & Harvey, J. (1972). Opinion change as a function of when information about the communicator is received & Whether He Is Attractive or Expert.
Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 21(1), 52-55.
72. Mooers, C. N. (1960). The Tape Typewriter Plan. Asilb Proceedings, 12(8), 277-291.
73. Short, J. (2008). Risks in a Web 2.0 world, Risk Management. ABI/INFORM Global, 55(10), 28-33.
74. Paciello, M. (2004). Section 508: what you do not know may hurt you. from
www.tvworldwide.com/events/dhs_section508/040211/white_paper.cfm
75. Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (Ed.). (1986). Communication & Persuasion:
Central & Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York Inc. Springer-Verlag.
76. Puddifoo, J. E. (2003). Exploring personal & shared sense of community identity in Durham City England. Journal of Community Psychology, 31(1), 87-106.
77. Lin, J. C., & Lu, H. (2000). Towards an understanding of the behavioural
intention to use a web site. International Journal of Information Management, 20, 197-208.
78. Kaufman, H. F. (1959). Toward an interactional conception of community. Social Forces, 38, 8-17.
79. Kaye, H. S. (2000). Computer & Internet use among people with disabilities.
National Institute on Disability & Rehabilitation Research.
80. Kerr, E., & Hiltz, S. R. (1982). Structuring Computer-Mediated Communications Systems to avoid information overload. Communcation of the ACM, 28(7),
81. King, M., Tatcher, J.W., Bronstad, P.M., & Easton, R. (2005). Managing usability for people with disabilities in a large web presence. IBM Systems Journal, 44(3), 19-35.
82. David, K. (1997). Interactivity & Multimedia Interfaces. Instructional Science, 25(2), 79-96.
83. Kiousis, S. (2001). Public Trust or Mistrust? Perceptions of Media Credibility in the Information Age. Mass Communication & Society, 4(4), 381-403.
84. Koh, J., & Kim, Y. G. (2003). Knowledge Sharing in Virtual Communities: an E-Business Perspective. Expert Systems with Applications, 26(2), 155-166.
85. Lin, J. C., & Lu, C. H. (2000). Towards an understanding of the behavioural intention to use a Web Site. International Journal of Information Management, 20, 197-208.
86. Liu, Y. (2003). Developing a Scale to Measure the Interactivity of Websites.
Journal of Advertising Research, 43(3), 16-207.
87. Long, D. A., & Perkins, D. D. (2003). Confirmatory factor analysis of the sense of community index & development of a brief SCI. Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 279-296.
88. Lucas, H. C. (1980). The use of an interactive information storage & retrieval
system in medical research. Communications of the ACM, 21(3), 197-205.
89. Nielsen, J. (Ed.). (2000). Designing Web Usability, Indianapolis: New Riders Publishing.
90. Nielsen/NetRatings. (2009). from
http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/4/3/19/n488178.html.
91. Maddux, E., & Rogers, W. E. (1980). Effects of source expertness, physical attractiveness & supporting arguments on persuasion: A case of brains over beauty. Journal of personality & social psychology, 39, 235-244.
92. Mahood, C., Kalyanaraman, S., & Sundar, S. S. (2000). The Effects of Erotica &
Dehumanizing Pornography in an Online Interactive Environment. Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication.
93. Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior. Information Syetems Research, 2(3), 173-191.
94. Markham, D. (1968). The dimensions of source credibility of television newscasters. Journal of Communication, 18, 57-64.
95.
Marincu, C., & McMullin, B. (2004). A comparative assessment of Web accessibility & technical standards conformance in four EU states. Journal of96. McQuarrie, E. F., & Munson, J. M. (1992). A revised product involvement inventory: Improved usability & validity. Advances in Consumer Research.
97. McMillan, D. W. & Chavis, D. M. (1986). A Definition & Theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6-23.
98. McMillan, S. J. (2000). Interactivity Is in the Eye of the Beholder: Function, Perception, Involvement, & Attitude toward the Web Site. American Academy of Advertising, M. A. Shaver, ed., East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, 71-78.
99. McMillan, S. J., & Hwang J. S. (2002). Measures of Perceived Interactivity: An Exploration of the Role of Direction of Communication, User Control, & Time in Shaping Perceptions of Interactivity. Journal of Advertising, 31, 29-36.
100. McMillan, S. J. (2002). A Four-Part Model of Cyber-Interactivity: Some
Cyber-Places Are More Interactive Than Others. New Media & Society, 271-291
101. Milheim, W.D. (1996). Interactivity & Computer-Based Instruction," Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 24(3), 225-233.
102. Muhlfelder, M., Klein, U., Simon, S., & Luczak, H. (1999). Teams without trust?
Investigations in the influence of video-mediated communication on the origin of trust among cooperating persons. Behaviour & Information Technology, 18(5), 349-360.
103. Chen, Q., Chen, H. M., & Kazman, R. (2007). Investigating antecedents of technology acceptance of initial eCRM users beyond generation X & the role of self-construal. Electron Commerce Research, 7(3/4).
104. Mizerski, R., Golden, L., & Kernan, J. (1979). The Attributional Process in Consumer Decision Making. Journal of Consumer Research, 6, 123-140.
105. Moon, J. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a world-wide-web context. Information & Management, 38, 217-230.
106. Morris, M., & Christine, O. (1996). The Internet as Mass Medium. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 14(1).
107. Mulac, A., & Sherman, A. R. (1975). Relationships among four parameters of speaker evaluation: Speech skill, source credibility, subjective speech anxiety, and behavioral speech anxiety. Speech Monographs, 42, 302-310.
108. Newhagen, J. E., Cordes, J. W., & Levy, M. R. (1996). Audience Scope & the Perception of Interactivity in Viewer Mail on the Internet. Journal of
Communication, 45(3), 164-175.
109. Newhagen, J. E. (1997). The role of feedback in the assessment of news.
Information Processing & Management, 33(5), 583-594.
110. Novak, T. P. & Hoffman, D. L. (2003). The influence of goal-directed &
Psychology, 13(1/2), 3-16.
111. Nunnally, F. C. (1978). Psychometic Theory. 2nd Edition, New York:
McGraw-Hill.
112. Obst, P. L., & White, K. M. (2004). Revisiting the sense of community index: A confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Community Psychology, 32, 691-705.
113. Ohanian, R., (1991). The Impact of Celebrity Spokespersons’ Perceived Image on Consumer’s Intention to Purchase. Journal of Advertising Research, 31(1), 46.
114. O’Keefe, D. J. (1990). Persuasion theory & research. Newbury Park. CA: Sage.
115. O’Reilly, T. (Ed.). (2005). What Is Web 2.0：Design Patterns & Business Models for the Next Generation of Software, O'Reilly Media.
116. Pavri, F. (1988). An empirical investigation of the factors contributing to microcomputer usage. Dissertation, University of Western Ontario.
117. Panko, R. (1981). A survey of EMS users at DARCOM. Computer Networks, 5, 19-34.
118. Peterson, N. A., Paul, W. S., & David, W. M. (2008). Validation of A Brief Sense of Community Scale: Confirmation of the Principal Theory of Sense of
Community. Journal of community psychology, 36(1), 61-73.
119. Perkins, D. D., Florin, P., Rich, R. C., Wandersman, A., & Chavis, D. (1990).
Participation & the social & physical environment of residential blocks: Crime &
community context. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 83-115.
120. Plant, R., (2004). Online communities. Technology on Society, 26, 51-65.
121. Pretty, G. M. H., Conroy, C., Dugay, J., Fowler, K., & Williams, D. (1996). Sense of community & its relevance to adolescents of all ages. Journal of Community Psychology, 24, 365-379.
122. Quinn, J. B., Anderson, P., & Finkelstein, S. (1996). Managing professional intellect making the most of the best. Havard Business Review, 71-80.
123. Rafaeli, S. (1988). Interactivity: From New Media to Communication.
Advancing Communication Science: Merging Mass & Interpersonal Processes, R.P. Hawkins, J.M. Wiemann, & S. Pingree, eds. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 34-100.
124. Rangin, H.B. (2006). University of Illinois tools & techniques for functional web accessibility. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4061, 230-233.
125. Rafaeli, S., & Sudweeks, F. (1997). Networked Interactivity. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 2(4).
126. Rheingold, H. (Ed.). (1993).Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic
127. Rice, R.E., & Williams, F. (1984). Theories old and new: the study of new media.
The New Media: Communication, Research, and Technology, 55-80.
128. Romm, C., Pliskin, N., & Clarke, R. (1997). Virtual communities & Society:
Toward an intergrative three phase model, International of Information Management, 17(4), 261-270.
129. Rogers, E. M. (Ed.). (1986). Communication technology: The new media in society. New York.
130. Rovai, A. P. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. International review of research in open & distance, 3(1).
131. Sanborn, J. E., Hamish, O. K., & Warren, N. (2002). Web site accessibility: A Study of six genres. Library Hi Tech, 20(3), 308-317.
132. Sarason, S. B. (1974). The psychological sense of community: Prospects for a community psychology, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
133. Schauer, Brandon. (2005). Experience Attributes: Crucial DNA of Web 2.0. form http://www.itwis.com/.
134. Schonfeld, Erick. (2008). Welcome Erick Schonfeld, My New Co-Editor. from http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/20/welcome-erick-schonfeld-my-new-co-ed itor.
135. Sherif, M., & Cantril, H. (1947). The Psychology of Ego-Invilvement. New York.
136. Shi, Y. (2006). The accessibility of Queensl& visitor information center’s websites. Tourism Management, 86(3), 326-334.
137. Shin, D. H., & Kim W. Y. (2008). Applying the Technology Acceptance Model &
Flow Theory to Cyworld User Behavior: Implication of the Web 2.0 User Acceptance. Cyber psychology & Behacior, 11(3).
138. Shneiderman, B. (2000). Universal usability: Pushing human-computer interaction research to empower every citizen. Communications of the ACM, 43(5), 84-91.
139. Shrum, L. J. (2002). What Is Interactivity and Is It Always Such a Good Thing?
139. Shrum, L. J. (2002). What Is Interactivity and Is It Always Such a Good Thing?