研究建議

(一)研究方法方面

本研究所採用的研究方法，主要為德菲法及相對權重問卷調查法，此種 研究方法在使用上，因無法控制填答時的情境(填答者有無受到干擾、是否自 己親自填答、對問題的涵義是否真正瞭解等)，而在施測與研究結果分析及解 釋難避免有誤差存在；因此，建議未來研究者若能在過程中輔以焦點座談法，

達到面對面會議效果發揮所衍生的累積效果，讓整個評鑑指標建構的內涵更 加完整。

(二)試評與修正指標

因時程關係，所以評鑑指標體系建構完成後未能進行實際試評作業，難 免有遺珠之憾。建議未來進行評鑑指標體系建構研究者，如時間允許能進行 試評作業並依試評結果修正評鑑指標體系，可使評鑑指標體系更為實用。

進行指標初擬時，僅以文獻探討國內外與教育評鑑相關之指標，並無探 討評鑑的方式，故未來建議可以評鑑的方式做研究。並且，目前台灣仍未有 一套完整針對補教業評鑑的做法和實施計畫，後續研究者也可朝這個方向著 手。

(三)研究對象方面

若未來研究者採取德菲法進行後續研究時，在專家小組遴選時，可增加消費 者為對象，讓評鑑指標建構更加周延。

96

參考文獻

李明中 (1996)。台北市幼稚園園長對幼稚園評鑑觀點之研究，台北，中國文 http://www.e-land.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=4。

林志勇 (2006)。屏東市國小課後補習班與安親課輔班經營策略之研究，國立 19，95–139。

馬克貝磊 (2011)。影子教育的挑戰，歐盟家教及其對政策制定者的影響，聯

例. 國立臺南大學社會科教育學系碩士班論文。

陳耀龍 (2003)。新設兒童美語補習班經營策略之個案研究，中原大學工業工 畫成果報告（NSC88-2418-H-006-003-F16）。

賀宏偉 (2006)。以平衡計分卡建構國民小學校務評鑑指標之研究，暨南大學 教育政策與行政學系碩士論文。

黃士嘉、林文燦、洪文義、洪焌耀、白森全 (2009)。補習班經營管理策略之 研究－以台中市文理補習班爲例，[Strategies on the Management of Cram Schools: Taking the Cram Schools in Taichung as Examples]，管理學 術研討會(第七屆)，457-468。

劉正 (2006)。補習在臺灣的變遷、效能與階層化，《教育研究集刊》，第 52 http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=H0080002，民國 102 年01 月 30 日修正。

101

二、英文部分

Alkin, F (1990). Debates on evaluation. Newbury Park, CA:Sage.

Berk (1981). Educational Evaluation Methodology.

Boulmetis, J., & &Dutwin, P (2000). The ABCs of evaluation: Timeless techniques for program and project managers. . San Francisco:

Jossey-Bass.

Chelimsky, E (1985). Program evaluation: patterns and direction. Washington,

D.C.:American society for public administration.

Chen, H.-H (2002). Shadow Education in Taiwan：Study of Parental Investment and Educational Achievement. University of Oxford, Department of

Sociology, M. Phil. Thesis.

Cuttance (1990). Performance indicators and the management of quality in education. EDRS ED333575.

Douglah, M (1998). Program development and evaluation-developing a concept of extension program evaluation. Retrieved Aug. 31, 2004, from

http://www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/evaluate.html.

DuBois, P. H (1970). A history of psychological testing. Boston, MA:Allyn and

Bacon.

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park,

CA: Sage.

House, E. R (1993). Professional evaluation. . Newbury Park, CA.: Sage. Joint

Committee on Standard for Educational Evaluation.(1994). Program evaluation standard.(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA.: Sage.

Inamdar, N., Kaplan, R. S., & Bower, M (2002). Applying the balanced scorecard in healthcare provider organizations. Journal of Healthcare Management,

47：179-195.

Johnstone (1981). Indicators of education systems. London：Kogan Page Press.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P (1992). The balanced scorecard - measure that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70：71-79.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P (1996). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review, 74：75-85.

Kerlinger (1986). Foundation of behavior research. New York: Holt, Rinehart and

Winston.

Lai, Pettit, Dodge, & Bates (1997). Patterns of after-school care in middle childhood: Risk factors and development outcomes. Merrill-Palmer

Quarterly, 19(13), 341-360.

102

McLauaglin, M (1990). The rank change agent study revisited: Marco perspectives and mirco realities. Educational Researcher,19(9), 11-16.

OECD (1992). Education at a glance: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD.

Palomares-Montero, A. G. a.-A. D (2010). Examining benchmark indicator systems for the evaluation of higher education institutions. Higher

Education.

Popham, W. J (1993). Educational evaluation.(3rd ed.). London: Allyn and Bacon.

Ranking (1992). Total Quality Management: Implications for Educational Assessment. NASSP Bulletin, September,66-76.

Sammons, P., Hillman, J. and Mortimore, P (1995). Key characteristics of effective schools : A review of school effectiveness research. Institute of

Education, University of London. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED389326).

Stevenson, David L. and Baker, D. P (1992). Shadow Education and Allocation in Formal Schooling: Transition to University in Japan. American Journal of

Sociology, 97(6): 1639-1657.

Stufflebeam D.L. (1971). The Relevance of the CIPP Evaluation Model for Educational Accountability. Ohio State Univ.,Columbus.Evaluation

Center.(ERIC Document Reproducation Service No.ED346082).

Stufflebeam, D. L (1985). Systematic evaluation. Boston:Kluwer-Nijhoff.

Stufflebeam, D. L (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. In T. Kellaghan & D. L.

Stufflebeam(Eds.). International handbook of educational evaluation.(pp.

31-62).Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

Tenbrink, T. D (1974). Evaluation: A practical guide for teachers. New

York:McGrew-Hill.

Worthen, B. R., & Sanders, J. R (1987). Educational Evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. New York: Longman.

Worthen, B. R., Sanders, J. R., & &Fitzpartrick, J. L (1997). Program evaluation:Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (2nd ed.) New

York: Longman.

103

附錄

附錄 1 各層級評估權重-相對權重分析表