第五章、 結論與政策建議
第三節、 研究限制
國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
95
第二節、 政策建議
本研究將住商混合區的面向分為四種，分別為三個使用者-行人、居民、商店，以及影響 都市中各種使用者及動植物生存環境的自然環境面向，不同使用者重視的實質建成環境或影響 生態面永續都市的面向也不盡相同，以下針對各使用者以及生態住商混合區整體給予都市規劃 與設計之相關政策建議如下：
一、行人友善步行空間面向
行人友善步行空間方面，表現最佳的為依序為建蔽率 55%、50%的正方塔型建築，而後 為建蔽率 45%的長條形建築。若欲維持較優良的步行空間供居民及購物者行走，建築建蔽 率不應超過 55%(若為長條式建築則可至 60%)。
二、居民住家可居住性面向
若欲提供住商混合區較優良的住宅環境，長條形建築之建蔽率應在 50%以下；正方塔型 建築則應在 60%以下，而配合階層式退縮型式為建築退縮也有助於提高住家環境。
三、商店商業經營性面向
在商家商業經營性方面，最佳的情境依序為建蔽率 50%的長條型建築、45%的正方塔型 建築與建蔽率 45%的長條形建築。若為長條式建築，建蔽率應保持在 45%-55%；若為正方 塔式建築，則保持在 40%-45%。而階梯式退縮情境則不對商業經營性造成影響。
四、自然環境面向
在整體自然環境方面，建築建蔽率愈大，自然環境數值愈差。若欲保持住商混合區中 良好的自然環境供動植物生長，建築建蔽率應採較低的型式並配合三階層式建物退縮。
五、生態住商混合區整體表現
在生態住商混合區整體表現方面，表現最佳的依序為 SSB3-2、SSB3-1 以及建蔽率 30%
的正方塔型與長條型建築若欲使住商混合區具較佳的生態永續性，建築建蔽率應愈低愈高，
而建築型態則應採取退縮式建築。
第三節、 研究限制
雖然本研究以臺北市松江南京站附近地區為研究範圍，並以區域現況做為模擬住商混合區 之基本情境，但為使研究單純化及操作方便，仍將模擬區內之街廓、基地面積道路及公園系統 為適度之調整與統一，因此本研究仍具有一定程度的失真。
另外，本研究對於指標之計算並無考量當地之環境因子(如氣候)及物理現象(如植物調節 微氣候、降低熱島效應)等實地測量，為本研究之研究限制。
‧
生態大眾運輸村的營造」，『建築 Dialogue』，(130)：114-121。吳綱立，2009，「高雄市區鐵路地下化站區新生地都市設計開發策略規劃案結案報告書」，高雄：
‧
‧
ASCE, 1999. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) manuals and reports on engineering practice No. 67: wind tunnel studies of buildings and structures. Virginia.
Bennett J., 2010, “New Zealand Apartment Living: Developing a Liveability Evaluation Index”, http://www.tbher.org/index.php/tbher/article/download/20/21
Blocken, B., J.,Carmeliet, T., and Stathopoulos. 2007. CFD Evaluation of The Wind Speed Conditions In Passages Between Buildings E Effect of Wall-Function Roughness
Modifications on the Atmospheric Boundary Layer Flow.Journal of Wind Engineering and
Industrial Aerodynamics, 95: 941-62.
Brook McIlroyInc ,2006,”Burlington Downtown Urban Design Guidelines”
Cervero,R. and Kockelman, K, 1997, “Travel demand and 3Ds:Density, diversity, and design”, Transportation Research, 2(3): 199-219.
Cervero R and Murakami J., 2009, “Rail and Property Development in Hong Kong: Experiences and Extensions”, Urban Studies46(10): 2019-2043.
Cervero R and Sullivan C., 2010, Institute oftransportationstudiesuniversity of California, Berkely Chin G., Niel, K. CortiB.andKnuiman M., 2008, “Accessibility and connectivity in physical activity
studies: The impact of missing pedestrian data”, Preventive Medicine, 46(1): 41-45.
Churchman, A. 1999, “Disentangling the concept of density”, Journal of Planning Literature 13:
389-411. 13:389-411.
Chapman L ,2000” Improved one dimensional energy balance modelling, tilising sky-view factors determinedfrom digital imagery”. 10ThInternational Road Weather Conference, Davos, Switzerland
Chow W.and. Roth M, 2006, “Temporal dynamics of the urban heat island of Singapore”,International Journal of Climatology, 26(15): 2243-2260.
Cozens, Saville, Hillier, 2005 "Crime prevention through environmental design: a review and modern bibliography", Property Management, 23(5):328 – 356
Elkin, Tim, D. McLaren, and M. Hillman, 1991. Reviving the city: Towards sustainable urban development., London: Friends of the Earth.
Envision Utah,2002“Wasachfront transitorienteddevelopmentguideline”
Grant, J., 2002, “Mixed use in theory and practice: Canadian experience with implementing a planning principle, Journal of the American Planning Association68(1): 71-85.
Hess P., Moudon A, Snyder M, Stanilov K.,1999, “Site Design and Pedestrian Travel, Transportation Research Record” Journal of the Transportation Research Board (1647):9-19
Herzele, A. V. and Wiedemann, T., 2003, “A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 63:109-126.
Hillier, B., 1996Space is the Machine.” Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press
Holden E. and I. Norland T., 2005, “Three Challenges for the Compact City as a Sustainable Urban
‧
Form: Household Consumption of Energy and Transport in Eight Residential Areas in the Greater Oslo Region”, Urban Studies, 42(12): 2145-2166.
Holmes J.,Hemert J, ”Peacefulness and Livability” The Rocky Mountain Land Use Institute HurM., Nasar J. L. and Chun B., 2010, “Neighborhood satisfaction, physical and perceived
naturalness and openness”, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1): 52-59.
IESNA, 2000, “IESNA Technical Memorandum on Light Trespass: Research, Results and Recommendations”, IESNA TM-11-2000., The Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, New York
I. Fleming, A. Baum, L. M. Davidson, E. Rectanus and S. McArdle, 1987, “Chronic stress as a factor in physiologic reactivity to challenge”, Health Psychol, 6(3): 221-237.
Inam A., 2002,“Meaningful Urban Design: eleological/Catalytic/Relevant”, Journal of Urban Design, 7(1): 35-58.
J. Grant, 2002, “Mixed Use in Theory and Practice: Canadian Experience with Implementing a Planning Principle”, Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(1): 71-84.
Li, F., Wang, R., Paulussen, J., and Liu, X., 2005, “Comprehensive concept planning of urban greening based on ecological principles: a case study in Beijing, China”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 72:325-336.
Lloyd-Jones T., 2004,Urban Design for sustainability, Final Report of the Working Group on Urban Design for Sustainability to theEuropean Union Expert Group on the Urban Environment Mfula, A. M., V. Kukadia, R. F. Griffiths, and Hall D. J., 2005.Wind Tunnel Modeling of Urban
Building Exposure to Outdoor Pollution.Atmospheric Environment, 39(15): 2737-45.
Maas,J, VerheijR. A, GroenewegenP. P., de Vries S. and SpreeuwenbergP., 2006, “Green space, urbanity, and health: how strong is the relation?”, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60(7): 587-592.
Ng, E., Chao Y., C. Liang, R. Chao, C.H. F., Jimmy, 2011. Improving the Wind Environment in High-Density Cities By Understanding Urban Morphology and Surface Roughness: A Study In Hong Kong. Landscape and Urban Planning, 101, pp. 59–74
Niles, J. and Nelson, D. (1999) Measuring the Success of Transit-Oriented Development: Retail MarketDynamics and Other Key Determinants, Seattle, Washington: American Planning Association, NationalPlanning Conference.
O’Neill, D. J., 2000,The Smart Growth Tool Kit, Washington, DC: Urban Land Institute.
S. Porta and J. L. Renne, 2005, “Linking urban design to sustainability: formal indicators of social urban sustainability field research in Perth, Western Australia”, Urban Design International, 10(1): 51-64.
Raw, G.J., Aizlewood, C.E. and Hamilton, R.M., 2001,”Building regulation, health and safety”, Watford: Building Research Establishment.
Ruth S.,1997,”Traditional Neighborhood Shopping Districts: Patterns of Use and Modes of Access”
‧
Monograph 54, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California, Berkeley
Register, R., 1987,Eco-city Berkeley:Building Cities for a Healthy Future, Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic Books.
R. Plummer, 2006, “The evolution of sustainable development strategies in Canada: an assessment of three federal natural resource management agencies”, Sustainable Development, 14(1):
16-32.
Saelens B. E., Sallis J. F. and Frank L. D., 2003, “Environmental Correlates of Walking and Cycling:
Findings From the Transportation, Urban Design, and Planning Literatures”, Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 25(2): 80-91.
Tan, S., 2005, “Makati Central Business District Pedestrianization and Traffic Segregation Projects.”, Forum on Improving Pedestrian Facilities and Bikeways in Metro Manila,
www.cleanairnet.org/caiasia/1412/ articles-69376_ayala.pdf
Teller, J., 2003, “A spherical metric for the field-orientated analysis of complex urban open spaces”, Environment and Planning B, Planning and Design,30: 339-365.
Turner, A and Penn, A, 1999, “Making isovistssyntatic: Isovist integration analysis”, inProceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Space Syntax Vol. 3, Universidadde Brasil, Brasilia, Brazil.
Turner, P.A., Doxa, M., O Sullivan, D.and Penn, A., 2001,”From Isovist Fields to Visibility Graphs,Environment and Planning”Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28:103-121
Thorne, Robert, and William Filmer-Sankey. 2003. Transportation. In Sustainable urbandesign, 25-32. London: Spon Press.
Town of Halton Hills Official Plan ,TOWN OF HALTON HILLS OFFICIAL PLAN URBAN DESIGN GUIDELINES
Y. R. Jabareen, 2006, “Sustainable Urban Forms”, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(1): 38-52.
Yannas, Simon. 1998. “Living with the city: Urban design and environmental sustainability”. In Environmentally friendly cities, 41-48.London:James& James
Yang, P. Putra, S.Y., Li, W., 2005, “Viewsphere: a GIS-based 3D visibility analysis for urban design evaluation”. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design.
Yuen B. and Chor C. H., 1998, “Pedestrian streets in Singapore”, Transportation, 25(3): 225-242.
Y.-H. Tsai, 2005, “Quantifying Urban Form: Compactness versus 'Sprawl'”, Urban Studies, 42(1):
141-161.
Y-H. Tsai, 2011, “Efficiency of neighbourhood planning and design tools in building eco-cities”, 2011 International Winter Conference on Environmental Innovations and Sustainability, Beppu, Oita, Japan, 28 and 29 January, 2011
Y.-H. Tsai, 2012, “Urban Planning and Design Tools for Improving Physical Aspects of Livability in
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
101
High-Density Neighborhoods”
Wong, N. H., and C. Yu, 2005. Study of Green Areas and Urban Heat Island in A Tropical City.
Habitat International, 29(3): 547-558
Wong, M. S., J. E. Nichol, P. H. To, and J. Wang, 2010. A Simple Method for Designation of Urban Ventilation Corridors and Its Application To Urban Heat Island Analysis. Building and
Environment,45:1880-89.
Whitford, V., Ennos, A. R. and Handley, J. F., 2001, “City from and natural process-indicators for the ecological performance of urban area and their application to Merseyside, UK”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 57:97-103.
Zenaida, C., Galingan, 2009, “Pedestrian-Friendly Streetscape in a Tropical Business District”, Journal of Architecture, Landscape Architecture and the Designed Environment, University of the Philippines College of Architecture.