• 沒有找到結果。

彰化縣國小教師工作壓力、組織公平與組織承諾之研究 莊維仁、童惠玲

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "彰化縣國小教師工作壓力、組織公平與組織承諾之研究 莊維仁、童惠玲"

Copied!
4
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

彰化縣國小教師工作壓力、組織公平與組織承諾之研究 莊維仁、童惠玲

E-mail: 9601100@mail.dyu.edu.tw

摘 要

組織承諾為組織效能之指標,其亦能預測員工之工作績效, 故教師對學校的組織承諾於組織而言極其重要,工作壓力會降 低 員工的組織承諾,Greenberg (2004)強調公平便沒有壓力,其整合 分配、程序、互動公平與壓力反應的關係,即公平知 覺高則壓力 低;Judge and Colquitt (2004)指出組織不公平為壓力的來源; Aryee, Budhwar, & Chen (2002)證實組織公平顯著 的正向影響組織 承諾;Siegel et al. (2005)證實程序公平在工作-生活之衝突與組織 承諾間具干擾效果,故組織公平是否亦 於工作壓力與組織承諾間 具干擾效果,則有待研究來驗證。 本研究探討國民小學教師工作壓力、組織公平與組織承諾之 關係,除檢驗工作壓力對組織承諾之直接關係外,並驗證組織公 平之干擾效果。研究資料來自彰化縣50 所國民小學之625 位教師 ;結果顯示:(1)工作壓力對組織承諾有顯著負向預測力;(2)分配 公平與工作壓力之交互效果對組織承諾有顯著正 向預測力;(3)程 序公平與工作壓力之交互效果對組織承諾有顯著正向預測力;(4) 互動公平與工作壓力之交互效果對組織 承諾有顯著正向預測力。 即分配公平、程序公平與互動公平均能有效緩和工作壓力對組織 承諾所產生的負向預測力,分 配公平、程序公平以及互動公平在 工作壓力與組織承諾之間具有干擾效果。

關鍵詞 : 工作壓力,組織公平,分配公平,程序公平,互動公平 ,組織承諾,國小教師,干擾 目錄

封面內頁 簽名頁 授權書 ...iii 中文摘要 ...iv 英文摘要 ...v 誌謝 ...vii 目錄 ...viii 圖目錄 ...x 表目錄 ...xi 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究動機

...1 第二節 研究目的 ...4 第三節 研究範圍與工具 ...4 第二章 文 獻探討 第一節 組織承諾 ...5 第二節 工作壓力 ...11 第三節 組織公平

...18 第四節 工作壓力、組織公平與組織承諾之相關研究 ...28 第三章 研究方法 第一節 研究架構 ...34 第二節 研究假設 ...37 第三節 研究對象及抽樣方法 ...38 第四 節 研究工具 ...39 第五節 量表信度分析 ...44 第四章 研究結果 第一節 背景變項與研 究變項之分析 ...51 第二節 背景變項於研究變項之差異 ...59 第三節 主要效果變項高低群組對組織承 諾之變異數分析 ...70 第四節 研究變項之相關 ...72 第五節 工作壓力對組織承諾之影響 ...75 第 六節 組織公平對工作壓力與組織承諾之干擾效果 ...76 第七節 實證結果 ...83 第五章 結論 第一節 結 論 ...84 第二節 建議 ...87 參考文獻 ...91 附錄一 ...103 附錄二 ...104 附錄三 ...105 附錄四 ...106

參考文獻

一、中文部份 1.George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (2003)。組織行為(培生教育譯)。台北 市,智勝文化。 2.Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (2004)。組 織行為,第六版(陳素勤譯)。 台北市,麥格羅.希爾。 3.毛晉平 (2005)。中學教師工作壓力與教學效能感的關係。中國臨 床心理學雜誌

,13(4),458-459。 4.王琡棻、張英鵬 (2004)。臺北市、高雄市國小資優教育教師專業 能力、工作壓力、因應策略與職業倦怠之相關研 究。資優教 育研究,4(2),105-132。 5.古金英 (2004)。工作自主性、員工股權擁有滿意、自主性需求與 組織承諾間關係之再探討:以台 灣電子業員工為例。科技管 理期刊,9(2),131-161。 6.吳宗立、林保豐 (2003)。國民小學教師工作壓力與組織承諾關係 之研究。國教學 報,15,193-230。 7.李超平、時勘 (2003)。分配公平與程序公平對工作倦怠的影響。 心理學報,35(5),677-684。 8.周子敬、彭睦清 (2005)。國內大專院校教師工作壓力及工作滿足 感模式。教育心理學報,36(3),201-219。 9.周俊良、李新民、許籃憶 (2005)。學前階段 特殊教育教師因應策 略與工作壓力之相關研究。 特殊教育學報, 21,79-102。 10.周瑛琪、顏炘怡 (2005)。由社會交換理論探討組織公 平對員工績 效之影響-以中醫診所為例之探索性研究。健康管理學刊, 3(1),19-34。 11.林鉦棽 (2004)。休閒旅館業從業人員的組織公 正、組織信任與組 織公民行為關係:社會交換理論觀點的分析。中華管理學報 ,5(1),91-112。 12.邱麗蓉、單小琳 (2005)。國民小學組 織公平與組織公民行為關係 之研究。康寧學報,7,1-44。 13.姜定宇、鄭伯壎、任金剛、黃政瑋 (2003)。組織忠誠:本土化的 建構與測 量。 本土心理學研究,47(2),273-337。 14.姜定宇、鄭伯壎、任金剛、謝宜君 (2005)。主管忠誠:華人本土 構念的美國驗證。中華心理 學刊,47(2),139 15.范熾文 (2004)。國小教師組織承諾與學校績效關係之研究。教育 研究資訊,12(1),29-48。 16.范熾文 (2005)。國小

(2)

校長轉型領導與教師組織承諾關係之研究。 臺中教育大學學報:教育類,19(2),1-22。 17.風貞豪、何若湯 (2005)。臺北縣國民小學體育 教師工作壓力與組 織承諾關係之研究。東南學報,29,379-390。 18.張火燦、紀乃文 (2006)。護理人員組織承諾與專業承諾多元構面 交 互作用對離職傾向與離業傾向的影響:離職傾向與離業傾 向的中介效果。人力資源管理學報,6(2),111-133。 19.張瑞村 (2003)。職業學 校教師組織承諾與教師效能關係之研究。 朝陽學報,37-69。 20.莊淑灣、呂錘卿 (2005)。中部地區國民小學主任工作壓力與因應 方式之 研究。臺中教育大學學報:教育類,19(2),127-150。 21.郭建志、章珮瑜、鄭伯壎 (2002)。學校文化對教師效能的影響: 以我國國民小學 為例。應用心理研究,19,175-209。 22.郭順成、趙必孝、王喻平、陳榮德 (2004)。政府組織再造策略對 員工組織承諾與工作投入影響 之研究─以精省為例。人力資源 管理學報,4(1),1-28。 23.陳券彪、羅文旗 (2005)。學校行政人員工作壓力、工作特性與工 作滿意之研 究。學校行政,38,11-30。 24.陳素惠 (2005)。教師工作壓力探討。諮商與輔導, 229,28-34。 25.陳惠芳、洪嘉徽 (2006)。員工知覺薪 酬公平與賦權對組織承諾影 響之研究。東吳經濟商學學報,52,235-262。 26.彭玉樹、林家五、郭玉芳 (2004)。購併公司命名決策、組 織公平 和組織認同之研究 — 主、被併公司員工之觀點。人力資源 管理學報,4(1),49-70。 27.湯柏齡、陳永煌、諶立中 (2002)。工作壓 力。中華職業醫學雜誌 ,9(2),145-147。 28.黃正雄 (2006)。購併後變革活動、組織正義與員工態度。人力資 源管理學報,6(3)

,001-021。 29.黃國隆、陳惠芳 (1998)。資訊技術、組織價值觀與組織承諾之關 係。管理學報,15(3),343-366。 30.黃瑋苓 (2005)。國 民小學融合教育班教師工作壓力與其因應策略 之研究。身心障礙研究。3(3),201-215。 31.葉子超 (2005)。國民中小學校長行政領導、

工作壓力與積極調適 之道。學校行政,36,1-16。 32.董時叡 (2001)。工作壓力過程模式之驗證:台灣基層農業推廣人 員之分析。應用心 理研究,10,199-220。 33.廖年淼、何信助、賴銘娟 (2004)。高級職業學校組織文化與教師 組織承諾關係之研究。中正教育研究

,3(2)69-96。 34.蔡進雄 (2005a)。超越轉型領導:國民中小學校長新轉型領導影響 教師組織承諾之研究。國民教育研究集刊, 13,37-63

。 35.蔡進雄 (2005b)。學校組織正義對教師組織承諾影響之研究。菁莪 , 17(1),13-27。 36.鄭仁偉、黎士群 (2001)。組織公平、信任與 知識分享行為之關係 性研究。人力資源管理學報,1(2),69-93。 37.鄭清揚 (2005)。組織公平與職場偏差行為關係之研究。文大商管 學 報,10(1),75-99。 38.鄭燿男 (2004)。國民中小學教師的組織公民行為之影響模式。師 大學報教育類,49(1),41-62。 39.賴明政 (2004)

。企業倫理行為、組織承諾、工作滿足與組織公民 行為關係之研究。企業管理學報,60,31-59。 40.簡佳珍、林天祐 (2002)。桃園縣國`

民小學教師組織承諾與教師效 能感關係之研究。教育研究資訊,10(5),137-162。 二、英文部分 1.Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an understanding of inequity. journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422-436. 2.Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L.

Berkowitz (Chiu & Kosinski), Advances inexperimental social psychology, 2, 267-299. 3.Allen, V. (1982). Effects of conformity pressure on justice behavior. In . Greenberg, J. & Cohen, R. L. Equity and justice in Social Behavior, 187-215. 4.Aryee, S., Budhwar, P. S., & Chen, Z. X.(2002).

Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: Test of a social exchange model. Journal of

Organizational Behavior, 23(3), 267-285. 5.Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. F. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. Research on negotiations in organizations, 1, 43–55. 6.Bogler, R., & Somech, A. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers’ organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 277–289.

7.Bozeman, D. P., & Perrewe, P. L. (2001). The effect of item content overlap on organizational commitment questionnaire-turnover cognitions relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(1), 161-173. 8.Brenner, S. O., & Bartell, R. (1984). The teacher stress process: A cross-cultural analysis. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 5(3), 183-195. 9.Brooke, P. P., Russell, D. W., & Price, J. L. (1988). Discriminant validation of measures of job satisfaction, job involvement, and organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(2), 139-145. 10.Cammann, C., Fichman, M., Jenkins, G. D., & Klesh, J. R. (1983). in Price, J. L. and Mueller, C. W. (Eds), Handbook of Organizational Measurement, 1986,Pitman Publishing, Marshfield, MA. 11.Chang, E. (2002). Distributive justice and organizational commitment revisited: Moderation by layoff in the case of Korean employees. Human Resource Management, 41(2), 261-270. 12.Chiu, C. K., Chien, C. S., Lin, C. P., & Hsiao, C. Y.(2005). Understanding hospital employee job stress and turnover intentions in a practical setting. The Journal of Management Development, 24(10), 837-855. 13.Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: Aconstruct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86,386–400.

14.Colquitt, J. A. (2004). Does the justice of the one interact with the justice of the many? Reactions to procedural justice in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 633-646. 15.Commeiras, N., & Fournier, C. (2001). Critical evaluation of porter et al.'s organizational commitment questionnaire: Implications for researchers. The Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 21(3), 239-245. 16.Cremer, D. D., Bos, A., &

Dijke, M. V. (2004). Distributive justice moderating the effects of self-sacrificial leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 25(5/6), 466-475. 17.Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive Justice: A Social Psychological Perspective, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.

18.Diefendorff, J. M., Brown, D. J., Kamin, A. M., & Lord, R. G. (2002). Examining the roles of job involvement and workcentrality in predicting organizational citizenship behaviorsand job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 93–108. 19.Fimian, M. J., & Fastenau, P. S.

(1990). The validity and reliability of the Teacher Stress Inventory: A re-analysis of aggregate data. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, 151 –157. 20.Folger, R., & Greenberg, J. (1985). Procedural justice: an interpretive analysis of personnel systems. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 1(1), 141-183. 21.Fresko, B., Kfir, D., & Nasser, F. (1997). Predicting teacher commitment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13, 429-438. 22.Greenberg, J. (1990). Organizational justice: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399-432.

23.Greenberg, J. (2002). managing behavior in organizations. Prentice Hall, New Jersey. 24.Greenberg, J. (2004). Stress fairness to fare no stress:

Managing workplace stress by promoting organizational justice. Organizational Dynamics, 33(4), 352-365. 25.Harvey, S., & Haines III, V.Y.

(2005). Employer treatment of employees during a community crisis: The role of procedural and distributive justice. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20(1), 53-68. 26.Hernandez-Marrero, P., & Flint, D. (2005). The Mediating Effects of Procedural Justice in Predicting Commitment from Social Structural Factors in the Workplace. The Business Review, 4(2), 61-67. 27.Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: its elementary

(3)

forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World, Inc. 28.Howell, J. P., & Dorfman, P. W. (1986). Leadership and substitutes for leadership among professional and nonprofessional workers. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22, 29–46. 29.Johnson,R. E., Selenta, C., & Lord, R. G.

(2006). When organizational justice and the self-concept meet: Consequences for the organization and its members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99(2), 175-201. 30.Judge, T. A., & Colquitt, J. A. (2004). Organizational Justice and Stress: The Mediating Role of Work-Family Conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 395-404. 31.Kelly, A. L., & Berthelsen, D. C. (1995). Preschool Teacher experiences of stress. Teaching & Teacher Education, 4, 345–357. Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (2004). Organizational Behavior, 6/e. McGraw-Hill Higher Education. 32.Kwong, A. Y. Y., & Leung, K. (2002). A moderator of the interaction effect of procedural justice and outcome favorability:

Importance of the relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87(2), 278-299. 33.Kyriacou, C. (1987). Teacher stress and burnout: An international review. Educational Research, 29, 146-152. 34.Kyriacou, C. (2000). Stress-busting for teachers. Cheltenham: Nelson Thornes. Kyriacou, C., & Chien, P. Y. (2004). Teacher stress in Taiwanese primary schools .Journal of Educational Enquiry, 5(2), 86-104. 35.Lee, C., Pillutla, M., & Law, K. S. (2000). Power-distance, gender and organizational justice. Journal of Management, 26(4), 685-704. 36.Lemons, M.

A., & Jones, C. A. (2001). Procedural justice in promotion decisions: using perceptions of fairness to build employee commitment. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 16(4) 268-280. 37.Leong, C. S., Furnham, A., & Cooper, C. L. (1996). The moderating effect of organizational

commitment on the occupational stress outcome relationship. Human Relations, 49(10), 1345-1363. 38.Leung, K., Tong, K. K., & Ho, S.S. (2004).

Effects of interactional justice on egocentric bias in resource allocation decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(3), 405-415. 39.Leventhal, G. S.

(1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg,

& R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (27–55). New York: Plenum. 40.Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. Plenum Press, New York. 41.Martin, C. L., & Bennett, N. (1996). The role of justice judgments in

explaining the relationship between job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Group & Organization Studies, 21(1), 84-104. 42.Mathieu, A., Bruvold, N. T., & Ritchey, P. N. (2000) .Subcultural research on organizational commitment with the 15 OCQ invariant instrument. The Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 20(3), 129-138. 43.McDowall, A., & Fletcher, C. (2004). Employee development: an organizational justice perspective . Personnel Review, 33(1), 8-29. 44.Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1984). Testing the 'side-bet theory' of organizational commitment:

Some methodological considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology , 69(3), 372-378. 45.Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993).

Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538-551. 46.Montgomery, C., & Rupp, A. A. (2005). A meta-analysis for exploring the diverse causes and effects of stress in teachers. Canadian Journal of Education, 28(3), 458-486. 47.Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(6), 845-855. 48.Mossholder, K. W., Bennet, N., Kemery, E. R., & Wesolowski, M. A. (1998). Relationships between bases of power and work reactions: the mediational role of procedural justice. Journal of Management, 24(4), 533-552. 49.Mossholder, K. W., Bennett, N., & Martin, C. L. (1998). A multilevel analysis of procedural justice context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(2), 131-141. 50.Motowidlo, S. J., Packard, J. S., & Manning, M. R. (1986). Occupational stress: Its causes and consequences for job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(4), 618-629. 51.Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W., & Steers, R. M. (1982). Employee-organization linkages. New York: Academic Press. 52.Mowday, R. T., Steers, R. M., & Porter, L. W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 14, 224-247. 53.Mueller, C. W., Finley, A., Iverson, R. D., & Price, J. L. (1999). The effects of group racial composition on job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and career commitment: The case of teachers.

Work and Occupations, 26(2), 187-209. 54.Naumann, S. E., & Bennett, N. (2000). A case for procedural justice climate: Development and test of a multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal. 43(5), 881-889. 55.Niehoff, B. P., & Moorman, R. H. (1993). Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 527-556. 56.Otto, R. (1986). Teacher under stress: Health hazards in a work role and modes of response. Melbourne: Hill of Content. 57.Pearson, L. C., & Moomaw, W. (2005).The relationship between teacher autonomy and stress, work satisfaction, empowerment, and professionalism. Educational Research Quarterly, 29(1), 37-53. 58.Pillai, P., Williams, E. S., & Tan, J. J. (2001). Are the scales tipped in favor of procedural or distributive justice? An investigation of the U.S., India, Germany, and Hong Kong (China). International Journal of Conflict Management, 12(4), 312-332. 59.Porter, L.

W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 603-609. 60.Porter, L. W., William, J. C., & Smith, F. J. (1976). Organization commitment and managerial turnover : A longitudinal study. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 543-565. 61.Reyes, P. (1990). What research has to say about commitment, performance and productivity. In P. Reyes (Ed.), Teachers and their workplace: Commitment, performance and productivity. 15-21. Newbury Park, California: SAGE Publications Ltd. 62.Robbins, S. T. (2003). Organizational Behavior, tenth edition. Pearson Education, New Jersey. 63.Roberts, J. A., Coulson, K. R., & Chonko, L. B. (1999). Salesperson perceptions of equity and justice and their impact on organizational commitment and intent to turnover. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, (1), 1-16. 64.Samad, S. (2005).Unraveling the Organizational Commitment and Job Performance Relationship: Exploring the Moderating Effect of Job Satisfaction. The Business Review, Cambridge, 4(2), 79-84. 65.Samad, S. (2006). Procedural and distributive justice: differential effects on employees' work outcomes. The Business Review, Cambridge, 5(2), 212-218. 66.Siegel, P. A., Post, C., Brockner, J., Fishman, A. Y., & Garden, C. (2005). The moderating influence of procedural fairness on the relationship between worklife conflict and organizational commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 13-24.

67.Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of

(4)

Applied Psychology, 82(3), 434-443. 68.Staley, A. B., Dastoor, B., Magner, N. R., & Stolp, C. (2003). The contribution of organizational justice in budget decision-making to federal managers' organizational commitment. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 15(4), 505-524. 69.Tang, T. L.-P., & Sarsfield-Baldwin, L. J. (1996). Distributive and procedural justice as related to satisfaction and commitment.

S.A.M. Advanced Management Journal, 61(3), 25-31. 70.Trendall, C. (1989). Stress in teaching and teacher effectiveness: A study of teachers across mainstream and special education. Educational Research, 31, 52-58. 71.Umphress, E. E., Labianca, G., Brass, D. J., Kass, E., & Scholten, L.

(2003). The role of instrumental and expressive social ties in employees' perceptions of organizational justice. Organization Science, 14(6), 738-753.

72.Yochi, C. C., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations : A metaanalysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 86(2), 278-321. 三、網路資料部份 1.教育部統計處網站(2006)。94~109 學年度國民教育階段學生人數 2.預測分析報告。最新查詢 日期: 12/02/2006 , 檢自: http://www.edu.tw/EDU_WEB/EDU_MGT/STATISTICS/EDU7220001/publish/basic-edu-stnum/2005.pdf 3.

全國教師會網站(2006)。熱門法案一覽表。最新查詢日期: 12/31/2006,檢自: http://forum.nta.org.tw/v362/hotlawfile/ 4.彰化縣國中小學 校基本資料平台(2006)。各項資料統計。最新查詢 日期:12/31/2006,檢自: http://schooldata.chc.edu.tw/faculty.php 5.彰化縣教育局網 站(2006)。95 國小第二次核定班數。最新查詢日 期12/31/2006),檢自: http://www.boe.chc.edu.tw/boepage/國 6.教課資料夾/學區/95 國 小第二次核定班數950914.xls

參考文獻

相關文件

5 這些國家和國際組織包括:國際勞工組織和聯合國教育、科學及文化組織(ILO & UNESCO,2006) 、 歐盟(European Communities,2007)、挪威(Norway Ministry of

2.28 With the full implementation of the all-graduate teaching force policy, all teachers, including those in the basic rank, could have opportunities to take

To tie in with the implementation of the recommendations of the Task Force on Professional Development of Teachers and enable Primary School Curriculum Leaders in schools of a

7 HPM 原是 International Study Group on the Relations between History and Pedagogy of Mathematics 這

• The unauthorized disclosure of information could be expected to have a severe or catastrophic adverse effect on organizational operations, organizational assets, or

• The unauthorized disclosure of information could be expected to have a severe or catastrophic adverse effect on organizational operations, organizational assets, or

The analysis indicated that, community commitment, dependence, and reputation positively influence sense of virtual community.. The findings also reveal that reciprocity

Keywords: Financial and Insurance Industry, Work Motivation, Work Pressure, Job Satisfaction, Organizational