Aldrich, P. W., & Mills, C. J. (1989). A special program for highly able rural youth in grades 5 and 6. Gifted Child Quarterly, 33, 11-14.
doi:10.1177/001698628903300102
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity.
Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Anderson, R., Reder, L., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Situated learning in education.
Educational Researcher, 25(4), 5-11.
Archambault, F. X., Westberg, K. L., Brown, S. W., Hallmark, B. W., Zhang, W., &
Emmons, C. L. (1993). Classroom practices used with gifted third and fourth grade students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 16, 103-119.
Betts, G. T. (1985). The autonomous learner model: For the gifted and talented. Greeley, CO: ALPS Publishing.
Black, S. (2010). Engaging the disengaged student: Research shows why some are immersed in learning while others are indifferent. In F.W. Parkay, G. Hass, & E.J.
Anctil (9th Ed.), Curriculum leadership: Readings for developing quality educational programs (pp. 530-533). New York: Allyn & Bacon.
158
Boix M. V., & Gardner, H. (1999). What are the qualities of understanding? In S. Wiske (Ed.), Teaching for understanding: A practical framework (pp. 161-196). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Boix M. V., & Gardner, H. (2008). Disciplining the mind. Educational Leadership (February), 65, No.5, 14-19.
Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain,mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
Carolyn R. C., Susan M. B., & Terry W. N.,(2004). Developing scientific talent in
students with special needs: An alternative model for identification, curriculum, and assessment. Journal of advanced academics, 15(4), 162-169.
Chae, Y., & Gentry, M. (2011). Gifted and general high school students’ perceptions of learning and motivational constructs in Korea and the United States. High Ability Studies, 22, 103-118. doi:10.1080/13598139.2011.577275
Clark(1997). Growing up gifted: Developing the Potential of Children at Home and at School.（5th ed., pp.474-476）. In Clark. Editor(Ed.), New Jersey : Prentice Hall, Inc.
Cook, D. W., (1989). Systematic need assessment：A primer. Journal of Counseling and Development, 67, 462-464.
Cordova, D. L., & Lepper, M. R. (1996). Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning:
Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 715-730. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.88.4.715 Cox, J., & Daniel, N. (1984). The pull-out model. Gifted Child Today, 34, 55-60.
Cox, J., Daniel, N., & Boston, B. O. (1985). Educating able learners: Programs and promising ractices. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York:
Harper and Row.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikszentmihalyi, I. (1988). Introduction to part Ⅳ. In M.
159
Csikszentmihalyi, & I. S. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience:
Psychological study of flow in conscious (pp.251-265). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Curry, J., & Samara, J. (1991). Curriculum guide for the education of gifted high school students. Austin: Texas Association for the Gifted and Talented.
Davis, G. A. (1991). Teaching creative thinking. In N. Colangelo & G.A. (Ed.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 236-244). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (1998). Education of the gifted and talented (4th ed.).Boston:
Allyn and Bacon.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024-1037.
DeLandtsheer, J. (2011). Making all kids smarter: Strategies that help all students reach their highest potential (Eds.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin A SAGE Company.
Delcourt, M. A. B. (1994). Characteristics of high-level creative productivity. In R.
Subotnik & K. Arnold (Eds.), Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent, (pp. 401-436). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston: D.C.
Dunn, R., Dunn, K., & Price, G. E. (1989). Learning Style Inventory. Lawrence, KS: Price Systems.
Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1992). Teaching elementary students through their individual learning styles: Practical approaches for grades 3-6. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Ennis, R. (1964). A definition of critical thinking. The Reading Teacher, 18, 599-612.
Eriksson G. I. (2006). Introduction: Applying multicultural and global education
principles to the education of diverse gifted and talented children. In B. Wallace &;
G. I. Eriksson (Eds.) Diversity in gifted education: International perspectives on
160
global issues.(pp. 1-8). New York, NY: Routledge.
Feldhusen, J. F., & Treffinger, D. J. (1980). Creative thinking and problem solving in gifted education. Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt.
Feldhusen, J. F., & Sokol, L.(1982). Extra-school programming to meet the needs of gifted youth: Super Saturday. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26(2), 51-56.
Fleith, D. (2000). Teacher and student perceptions of creativity in the classroom environment. Roeper Review, 22, 148-153.
Gallagher, J. J. (1991). Issues in the education of gifted students. In N. Colangelo & G.A.
(Ed.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 14-24). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
Gallagher, S. A. (2005). Adapting problem-based learning for gifted students. In F.A.
Karnes & S.M. Bean (2nd ed.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (pp.
285-312). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press, Inc.
Gallagher, J. J. (2006). How to shoot oneself in the foot with program evaluation. Roeper Review, 28, 122-124.
Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of Mind: The theory of multiple intelligences (10th anniversary ed.). New York: BasicBooks.
Gardner, H. (1999). The Disciplined Mind: What all students should understand. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Gentry, M., Gable, R. K., & Rizza, M. G. (2002). Students’ perceptions of classroom activities: Are there grade-level and gender differences? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 539-544.doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.3.539
Gentry, M., & Gable, R. K. (2001). My class activities: A survey instrument to assess students’ perceptions of interest, challenge, choice and enjoyment in their classrooms [Instrument]. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
Gentry, M., Gable, R. K., & Springer, P. (2000). Gifted and non-gifted middle school students: Are their attitudes toward school different as measured by the new affective
161
instrument, My Class Activities? Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 24, 74-96.
Getzels, J. W. (1964). Creative thinking, problem solving, and instruction. In E.R. Hilgard (Ed.), Theories of learning and instruction (NSSE 66th Yearbook, pp.240-267).
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 3-13. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.3 Kendra H. D, (2011). Gifted students’ perceptions of the differentiated curriculum.
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Faculty of the Usc Rossier School of Education University of Southern California, California.
Kaplan, S. N. (2005). Layering differentiated curricula for the gifted and talented. In F.A.
Karnes & S.M. Bean (2nd ed.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (pp.
107-132). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press, Inc.
Kaplan, S. N. (2009). The grid: A model to construct differentiated curriculum for the gifted. In J. S. Renzulli, E. J. Gubbins, K. S. McMillen, R. D. Edkert, & C. A. Little (2nd Ed.), Systems & models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp.
235-251). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press, Inc.
Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1992). Meta-analytic findings on grouping programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 73-77.
Lebow, J. (1982). Consumer satisfaction with mental health treatment. Psychological Bulletin, 91(2), 244-259.
Maker, C. J. (1982). Curriculum development for the gifted (Ed.). Austin, TX:
PROED,Inc.
Maker, C. J. (1982). Teaching models in education of the gifted. An Aspen Publication Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, J. E. (2001). Classroom instruction that works:
Research-based strategies for increasing student achievement. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
162
Marland, S. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented. Report to the Congress of the United States by the U.S. Government Printing Office.
McTighe, J., Seif, E., & Wiggins, G. (2010). You can teach for meaning. In F. W. Parkay, G. Hass & E. J. Anctil (9th Ed.), Curriculum leadership: Readings for developing quality educational programs (pp. 530-533). New York: Allyn &Bacon.
Miller, R., & Gentry, M. (2010). Developing talents among high-potential students from lowincome families in an out-of-school enrichment program. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21, 594-627.
Mills, C. J. (2003). Characteristics of effective teachers of gifted students: Teacher background and personality styles of students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 272-281.
Moneta, G. B., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). The effect of perceived challenges and skills on the quality of subjective experience. Journal of Personality, 64(2), 275-310.
Moon, S. M., Feldhusen, J. F., & Dillon, D. R. (1994). Long-term effects of an enrichment program based on Purdue Three-Stage Model. Gifted Child Quarterly, 38, 38-48.
doi:10.1177/001698629403800106
Newmann, F. M. (2010). Can depth replace coverage in the high school curriculum? In F.
W. Parkay, G. Hass & E. J. Anctil (9th Ed.), Curriculum leadership: Readings for developing quality educational programs (pp. 551-556). New York: Allyn & Bacon.
Oakland, T., Joyce, D., Horton, C., & Glutting, J. (2000). Temperament-based learning styles of identified gifted and nongifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 183-189.
Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Wynn, S. R. (2010). The effectiveness and relative importance of choice in the classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 896-915.
doi:10.1037/a0019545
Pereira, N., Peters, S., & Gentry, M. (2010). The My Class Activities instrument as used in Saturday enrichment program evaluation. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21,
163
568-593.
Renzulli, J. S., & Gable, R. K. (1976). A factorial study of the attitudes of gifted students toward independent study. Gifted Child Quarterly, 20, 91-99.
Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensive programs for the gifted and talented. Wethersfield, CT: Creative Learning Press.
Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1985). The schoolwide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT:Creative Learning Press.
Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1991). The schoolwide enrichment model: A
comprehensive plan for the development of creative productivity. In N. Colagnelo &
G. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 111-141).Boston: Allyn &
Bacon.
Renzulli, J. S. (1994). Schools for talent development: A comprehensive plan for total school improvement. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2008). Enriching curriculum for all students (2nd Ed.).
Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Ricca, J. (1984). Learning styles and preferred instructional strategies of gifted students.
Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 121-126.
Robinson, N. M. (2006). NAGC symposium: A report card on the state of research in the field of gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50, 342-345.
Rock, M. R., Gregg, M., Ellis, E., & Gable, R. A. (2008). REACH: A framework for differentiating classroom instruction. Preventing School Failure, 52(2), 31-47.
Rogers, C. R. (1962). Toward a theory of creativity. In S. J. Parnes & H. F. Harding(Eds.).
A source book for creative thinking (pp. 63-72). New York: Scribner's.
Roger, K. B. (2002). Reforming gifted education: How parents and teachers can match the program to the child. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
Rogers, K. B. (2007). Lessons learned about educating the gifted and talented: A synthesis of the research on educational practice. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 382-396.
164
doi:10.1177/0016986207306324
Ross, P. O. (Ed.). (1993). National excellence: A case for developing American talent.
Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education.
Schiever, S.W. (1990). A comprehensive approach to teaching thinking. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Schiever, S. W., & Maker, C. J. (1991). Enrichment and acceleration: An overview and new directions. In N. Colangelo & G. A. (Ed.), Handbook of gifted education (pp.
99-110). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
Schiro, M. S. (2008). Curriculum theory: Conflicting visions and enduring concerns(Ed.).
Sage Publications, Inc.
Seeley, K. R. (1993). Gifted children at risk. In L. K. Silverman (Eds.), Counseling the gifted and talented (pp. 263-276). Denver: Love Publishing Company.
Sellin, D. F., & Birch, J. W. (1981). Psychoeducational development of gifted and talented learners (Ed.). Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems Corporation.
Silverman, L. K. (1993). The gifted individual. In L. K. Silverman(Eds.), Counseling the gifted and talented. (pp.3-28). Denver, CO: Love Publishing Company.
Smutny, J. F., & von Fremd, S. E. (2009). Igniting creativity in gifted learners, K-6.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Swiatek, M. A., & Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (2003). Elementary and middle school student participation in gifted programs: Are gifted students underserved? Gifted Child Quarterly, 47, 18-130. doi:10.1177/00169862030470020
Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development: Theory and practice. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.
Taylor, C. W. (1968). The multiple talent approach. The Instructor, April.
Terman, L. & Oden, M. (1951). The Stanford studies of the gifted. In P. Witty (Ed.), The Gifted Child, (pp. 20-46). Boston: Heath.
Tomlinson, C., Kaplan, S. N., Purcell, J., Leppien, J. & Burns, D. (2002). The parallel
165
curriculum: A design to develop high potential and challenge high ability learners (Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
Tomlinson, C. A., & Edison, C. C. (2003). Differentiation in practice: A resource guide for differentiating curriculum, grades 5-9. Alexandria, VA: Association for
Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Yang, Y., & Gentry, M., (2011). Gifted and general elementary students’ perceptions in China and the United States: A cross-national study. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Yang Y., Marcia G., & Young O. C.(2012). Gifted Students’ Perceptions of the Regular Classes and Pull-Out Programs in South Korea. Journal of Advanced Academics, 23(3), 270-287.
Van der Westhuizen CN, Maree JG: 2010. Student teachers' perceptions of violence in primary schools. Acta Criminologica: South African Journal of Criminology, 23 (2), pp 1-18.
Van Tassel-Baska, J. (1986). Acceleration. In C. J. Maker (Ed.), Critical issues in gifted education: Defensible programs for the gifted (pp. 179-196).Rockville, MD: Aspen.
Van Tassel-Baska, J. (1987a). The ineffectiveness of the pull-out program model in gifted education: A minority perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10, 255-264.
Van Tassel-Baska, J. (1987b). Response to Renzulli: Advocating the pull-out model.
Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 10, 267-269.
Van Tassel-Baska, J. (1988). Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners (Ed.).Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
Van Tassel-Baska, J., Feldhusen, J., Seeley, K., Whealley, G., Silvenman, L., & Foster, W.
(1988). Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners. Boston: Allyn & Bacon
166
Van Tassel-Baska, J. (1989). A comprehensive model of gifted program development. In J.
F. Feldhusen, J. Van Tassel-Baska, & K. Seeley. (Eds.), Excellence in educating the gifted. (pp.123-142). Denver Co.：Love Publishing.
Van Tassel-Baska, J. (1994). Comprehensive curriculum for gifted learners (2nd ed.).
Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Van Tassel-Baska, J. & Brown, E. F. (2005). An analysis of gifted education
curricular models. In F. A. Karnes & S. M. Bean (2nd ed.), Methods and materials for teaching the gifted (pp. 75-106). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press,Inc.
Van Tassel-Baska, J. (2006). NAGC symposium: A report card on the state of research in the field of gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 50, 339-341.
Van Tassel-Baska, J., & Brown, E. F. (2007). Toward best practice: An analysis of the efficacy of curriculum models in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 342-358.
Ward, V. S. (1961). Educating the gifted: An axiomatic approach. Columbus, OH:
Merrill.
Wiederholt, J. L., Hammill, D.D. & Brown, V.(1978). The resource teacher: A guide to effective practices. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Woolfolk, A. (2001). Educational psychology (8th Ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
167
168