• 沒有找到結果。

探討適性U-learning數學步道對不同學習風格學生數學學習成效及學習態度之影響- 以國小五年級面積單元為例

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "探討適性U-learning數學步道對不同學習風格學生數學學習成效及學習態度之影響- 以國小五年級面積單元為例"

Copied!
152
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

U-learning

(2)
(3)

ii U-learning U-learning U-learning U-learning U-learning 29 27 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. a. U-learning

(4)
(5)

iv

Abstract

The effect of adaptive U-learning mathematics path for

different learning style students - using Area unit in the fifth

grade as an example

Abstract

The purposes of this research are probing into the adaptive U-learning mathematics path and traditional teaching about the teaching effect of applying to the fifth grade mathematics course. In order to achieve the goal of studying, the researcher is based on knowledge structure to construct “the adaptive U-learning mathematics path system“ combining ubiquitous learning in mathematics situation with the computerized adaptive diagnostic test and adaptive remedial learning. The teaching designs are including the self-edited teaching material, the self-edited remedial material, and the self-edited teaching and remedial multimedia material. As for assessment, it is the self-edited computerized adaptive test. Finally, the researcher conducts the adaptive U-learning mathematics path and traditional teaching to discuss the effects of learning and remedial instruction for different learning style students. Furthermore, the research also evaluates the effect of the adaptive U-learning mathematics path and the attitude towards learning mathematics.

The methodology of this study is the nonequivalent quasi-experimental design. The subjects are fifth grade students from one elementary school in Taichung City. It is to assign two classes; one is the experimental group to be taught with the model of adaptive U-learning mathematics path instruction (29 students). The other one is the control group to be taught with traditional instruction (27 students).

The results of this study show as follows:

1. There are insignificant differences shown in the learning achievement of the experimental group and the control group with different learning styles, but be significant differences shown with different learning model. The average score of the

(6)

experimental group is better than the control group.

2. There are insignificant differences shown in the remedial achievement of the experimental group and the control group with different learning styles, but be significant differences shown with different remedial model. The average score of the experimental group is better than the control group.

3. There are insignificant differences shown in the mathematics learning attitude of the experimental group and the control group with different learning styles, but be significant differences shown with different learning and remedial model. The average score of the experimental group is better than the control group.

4. There are not significant differences shown in the follow up effects of the experimental group and the control group with different learning styles, neither be significant differences shown with different learning and remedial model. However the average score of the experimental group is better than the control group. 5. As for the students of the experimental group:

a. There are significant differences shown in the learning achievement of high, medium, and low ability students in the experimental group.

b. There are significant differences shown in the remedial achievement of medium and low ability students in the experimental group, not the high ones.

Key words: U-learning, mathematics path, computerized adaptive diagnosis test, area, learning style, mathematics learning attitude

(7)

vi ... 1 ... 1 ... 5 ... 7 ... 9 ... 13 ... 15 ... 15 ... 25 ... 31 ... 37 ... 41 ... 41 ... 45 ... 47 ... 51 ... 65 ... 75 ... 77 ... 77 .. 83 .. 89 .. 95 ... 101 ... 103 ... 103 ... 105 ... 108 ...115 ...116 ...118 ...119 OT ... 120 ... 121 ... 125 ... 127 ... 142

(8)

2-1-1 ...16 2-1-2 ...20 2-1-2 ( ) ...21 2-1-2 ( ) ...22 2-1-2 ( ) ...23 2-3-1 ...32 3-4-1 ...53 3-4-2 ...54 3-5-1 ...68 4-1-1 ...77 4-1-2 .78 4-1-3 .79 4-1-4 ...79 4-1-5 ...80 4-1-6 ...80 4-1-7 ...81 4-1-8 ...81 4-1-9 ...82 4-2-1 ...84 4-2-2 ...85 4-2-3 .85 4-2-4 ...86 4-2-5 ...86 4-2-6 ...87 4-2-7 ...87

(9)

viii 4-2-8 ...87 4-2-9 ...88 4-3-1 ...89 4-3-2 .90 4-3-3 .91 4-3-4 ...91 4-3-5 ...92 4-3-6 ...92 4-3-7 ...93 4-3-8 ...93 4-3-9 ...93 4-4-1 ...95 4-4-2 .96 4-4-3 .96 4-4-4 ...97 4-4-5 ...97 4-4-6 ...98 4-4-7 ...98 4-4-8 ...98 4-4-9 ...99 4-5-1 U-learning t ...101 4-5-2 U-learning t ...102

(10)

3-1-1 ...42 3-1-2 ...43 3-3-1 ...48 3-4-1 ...51 3-4-2 ...55 3-4-3 ...56 3-4-4 ...56 3-4-5 - ...57 3-4-6 ...58 3-4-7 ...58 3-4-8 ...59 3-4-9 ...59 3-4-10 ...60 3-4-11 ...60 3-4-12 ...61 3-4-13 ...61 3-4-14 ...62 3-4-15 ...62 3-4-16 ...63 3-4-17 ...63 3-5-1 U-learning ...66

(11)

2003

ubiquitous learning, U-learning

……

(12)

situated learning 2002 2005 1. 2. 3. 4. 2005 2006 2007 2007 U-learning E-learning 2009 2009 2009 U-learning U-learning

(13)

U-learning

U-learning

wireless lan radio frequency

identification, RFID RFID

tag reader

U-learning

2005

2006 1999 ATI aptitude treatment interaction

U-learning

knowledge structure based adaptive testing, KSAT 2008

(14)

U-learning U-learning

(15)

2003 5-n-16 5-s-05 5-a-04 U-learning KSAT 2003 2004 2005 2005 KSAT U-learning U-learning U-learning U-learning

(16)
(17)

1-1 1-2 1-3 2-1 2-2 2-3 3-1 3-2 3-3 4-1 4-2 4-3 U-learning

(18)

5-1 U-learning

(19)

2003 5-n-16 5-s-05 5-a-04 1987 1996

(20)

2000 1995

-

-U-learning

(21)

U-learning

ubiquitous learning, U-learning

2007

knowledge structure based adaptive testing, KSAT

(22)

2009

U-learning

U-learning

(23)

2003 5-n-16 5-s-05 5-a-04 1. 56 49 2. 3.

(24)
(25)

U-learning U-learning

-1-3 4-5 6-7 8-9 2003 2-1-1

(26)

2-1-1 4-n-14 4-s-04 4-n-15 4-n-16 4-s-09 4-s-01 4-s-02 4-s-03 4-s-04 4-n-14 4-s-05 4-s-06 4-s-07 4-s-08 4-s-09 4-n-16 5-n-16 5-s-05 5-s-01 180 5-s-02 5-s-03 180 360 5-s-05 5-n-16 2007 1.

(27)

2. 3. 4. 2003

1997 1995a 1998

(28)

1. 1995a 2. 1995a 1995b 1998 1. 2. 3.

(29)

1995 Piaget et al.(1960) (Hall,1984) Hildreth(1980) chunking squeezing rearrange 1995b

1991

(30)

1996 1989 2-1-2 2-1-2 Herstein(1981) Kouba et al(1988) 1. 2. Woodward and Byrd(1983)

1992 1996 1. 2. 3. 4. 5.

(31)

饋 饋饋 饋閾閾閾閾1111閾閾閾閾饋 饋 饋 饋 (((( )))) 2001 2002 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 1996 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.

(32)

饋 饋饋 饋閾閾閾閾1111閾閾閾閾饋 饋 饋 饋 (((( )))) 2001 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.

(33)

饋 饋饋 饋閾閾閾閾1111閾閾閾閾饋 饋 饋 饋 (((( )))) 1998 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 1999

(34)
(35)

2000 2000 …… 1998 2000 2002 1998

(36)

1. 2. 3. 4. 1995 Piaget stage of concrete operations …… Bruner Bruner, 1960 1985 John Dewey facilitator 1998

(37)

1985

constructivist cognition

situated context (Brown, Collins,

& Duguid, 1989) person-plus-the-surround (Brown, et al., 1989) Brown 1989 2001 1990 1995 1998

(38)

1994 1995

(39)
(40)
(41)

computer aided learning,

CAL E-learning M-learning

U-learning Ubiquitous

U-learning E-learning

M-learning E-learning

tablet PC

web pad PDA

E-learning wireless/handheld W/H

M-learning 2007

U-learning M-learning

mobile web access (Chen & Kotz, 2000; Yang, et al., 2005)

M-learning U-learning

(Schmidt & Van

Laerhoven, 2001; Dey & Abowd, 2000) context

information

(42)

context oriented ubiquitous web access M-learning U-learning E-learning M-learning U-learning 2-3-1 2-3-1 E-learning M-learning U-learning U-learning U-learning

(43)

2005 Ubiquitous U-learning (Bekkestua, 2003) 2005 U-learning U-learning U-learning U-learning U-learning U-learning

(44)

U-learning U-learning U-learning U-learning 2003 U-learning Sharples(2000)

Weiser(1991) ubiquitous computing

U-learning (Chang, Sheu, & Chan, 2003)

IR bluetooth

wireless lan radio frequency identification,

(45)

wireless lan RFID wireless lan RFID tag reader U-learning U-learning U-learning ……

U-learning tablet PC web pad

PDA Tablet PC PDA RFID reader tag KSAT U-learning U-learning

(46)

U-learning 2006

(47)

U-learning Sternberg Grigorenko(1995) cognition-centered personality-centered activity-centered U-learning learning style 2009 1998

(48)

Kolb Dunn Dunn Sternberg 2008 Likert Scale 1. executive legislative judical 2. global

(49)

local Cronbach α 0.8464 Cronbach α 0.5714 Cronbach α 2002 2003 2004 2004 2002 2004 2004 2005

(50)

2005

2006

(51)

U-learning U-learning

(52)

3-1-1

U-learning

(53)

2-4 U-learning C U-learning U-learning U-learning 49 3-1-2 評析型, 13 自主型, 23 程序型, 20 評析型 自主型 程序型 3-1-2

(54)

98 240

(55)

98 6 3 1 10 262 249 98 99 1 100 U-learning 29 27 56 49 U-learning 98 99 6

(56)
(57)

2003 RFID tag reader RFID RFID 3-3-1

(58)

3-3-1

(59)

Excel tag reader tag U-learning U-learning SPSS

(60)
(61)

U-learning

99 6 2

3-4-1

(62)

A U-learning 6 B U-learning C A

(63)

U-learning 3.4.1 3.4.2 3-4-1 1. 1 U-learing 2 U-learing U-learing reader tag 0.5 3 5-n-16 5-s-05 5-a-04 1. U-learing 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. U-learing 1 3

(64)

1. 2. 0.5 3 1. 2. U-learning KSAT 2 KSAT 1 3-4-2 1. 5-n-16 5-s-05 5-a-04 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 1.5

(65)

1. 2. 0.5 1. 2. KSAT 2 KSAT 1 U-learning 1. 3-4-2 3-4-2

(66)

2. reader tag 3-4-3 3-4-3 3. 3-4-4 3-4-4

(67)

4. 3-4-5

3-4-5

-5.

3-4-6 3-4-7

(68)

3-4-6

(69)

6. 3-4-8 3-4-8 7. 3-4-9 3-4-10 3-4-9

(70)

3-4-10

8. 3-4-11

(71)

9. KSAT 3-4-12

3-4-12

10. 3-4-13

(72)

11.

3-4-14 3-4-15

3-4-14

(73)

12. X 3-4-16 3-4-16 13. 3-4-15 3-4-17 3 33 3閾閾閾閾4444閾閾閾閾1参 1参 1参 1参

(74)

(75)

KSAT U-learning SPSS EXCEL KSAT KSAT 2007 PHP MySQL Apache OT U-learning 3-5-1

(76)

3-5-1 U-learning 2010 U-learning RFID tag reader U-learning 1. RFID …… 2. RFID reader tag U-learning KSAT

(77)

radio frequency identification, RFID RFID 2010 (tag) (reader) 50 RFID 1. 2003 98 2. 3 36 3 3-5-1 1.2.1.1.1.1

(78)

1 2 101 102 1 201 202 2 1 101 102 3-5-1 1.2.1.1.1.1 1.     1 2 3 4 B2 B2 B2 101.     1 2 3 4

(79)

B2 B2 B2 102.     1 2 3 4 B2 B2 B2 2.     1 2 3 4 B4 B4 B4 201.     1 2 3 4 B4 B4 B4

(80)

202.     1 2 3 4 B4 B4 B4 1. 2. Cronbach's Alpha 0.9210

Item09 Item19 Item24 Cronbach's Alpha

0.003 0.001 0.002

3.

0.279~0.671 0.2

(81)

4. Item09 Item19 Item24 51.1%~93.9% 76.1% Item09 Item24 Item19 Adobe Flash CS3 Professional RFID U-learning U-learning 2009

(82)

24 Likert 5 1 1 4 7 15 SPSS critical ratio, CR 27% 27% t 24 4.984 14.139 Pearson 24 .335 .691 0.3 24 Cronbach α .893 24 α α 1 4 7 15 α 0.893 2008 Cronbach's Alpha 0.865

(83)

Cronbach α 0.8464 Cronbach α 0.5714 Cronbach α judical legislative executive orderingtheory OT 2005 OT SPSS SPSS EXCEL

Microsoft Excel Microsoft Windows Apple Macintosh

……

(84)
(85)

Excel SPSS KSAT Excel SPSS 1995 OT

(86)
(87)

U-learning

1.1

U-learning SPSS α 0.05 4-1-1 4-1-2 4-1-3 4-1-1 : III F 259.009 1 259.009 1.430 .239 437.886 2 218.943 1.209 .310 5000.554 1 5000.554 27.609 .000 * 178.754 2 89.377 .493 .614 * 344.236 2 172.118 .950 .396 * 40.034 1 40.034 .221 .641

(88)

III F * * 74.788 2 37.394 .206 .814 6882.680 38 181.123 246027.000 50 21442.980 49 a. R = .679 R = .586 4-1-1 F .950 p .396 .05 F .221 p .641 .05 F .206 p .814 .05 4-1-2 : 71.8000 17.45566 5 68.6000 19.97332 10 77.6000 23.08535 10 U-learning 72.8400 20.43012 25 63.0000 21.41650 7 69.3000 17.08833 10 49.5000 19.19077 8 61.2000 20.13703 25

(89)

4-1-3 : III F 10205.130 1 10205.130 59.634 .000 1656.876 1 1656.876 9.682 .003 391.070 2 195.535 1.143 .328 * 431.990 2 215.995 1.262 .293 7358.570 43 171.130 246027.000 50 21442.980 49 a. R = .657 R = .609 4-1-3 F 1.262 p=.293 .05

1.2

4-1-3 4-1-4 : 66.6667 19.53241 12 68.9500 18.09471 20 65.1111 25.30261 18 67.0200 20.91917 50

(90)

4-1-5 : III F 12000.809 1 12000.809 59.355 .000 218.780 2 109.390 .541 .586 9300.585 46 202.187 246027.000 50 21442.980 49 a R = .566 R = .538 4-1-5 F .541 p .586 .05 4-1-6 95% 69.135 a 4.117 60.848 77.423 68.229 a 3.181 61.826 74.632 64.266 a 3.353 57.517 71.016 a = 48.9400. 4-1-6

(91)

1.3

4-1-7 : U-learning 72.8400 20.43012 25 61.2000 20.13703 25 67.0200 20.91917 50 4-1-8 : III F 11621.485 1 11621.485 67.202 .000 1391.490 1 1391.490 8.046 .007 8127.875 47 172.934 246027.000 50 21442.980 49 a R = .621 R = .605 4-1-8 F 8.046 p .007 .05

(92)

4-1-9 95% U-learning 72.299 a 2.631 67.006 77.591 61.741 a 2.631 56.449 67.034 a = 48.9400. 4-1-9 U-learning 72.299 61.741 U-learning

(93)

U-learning

2.1

U-learning SPSS α 0.05

(94)

4-2-1 : III F 312.621 1 312.621 3.181 .082 294.002 2 147.001 1.496 .237 9200.948 1 9200.948 93.626 .000 * 200.979 2 100.489 1.023 .369 * 207.558 2 103.779 1.056 .358 * 276.962 1 276.962 2.818 .101 * * 240.299 2 120.150 1.223 .306 3734.385 38 98.273 318599.000 50 19215.780 49 a. R = .806 R = .749 4-2-1 F 1.056 p .358 .05 F .2.818 p .101 .05 F 1.223 p .306 .05

(95)

4-2-2 : 86.0000 11.20268 5 83.3000 17.53124 10 82.3000 19.60754 10 U-learning 83.4400 16.80050 25 74.4286 25.91561 7 77.5000 13.85841 10 60.8750 22.44000 8 71.3200 21.02126 25 4-2-3 : III F 11707.009 1 11707.009 116.954 .000 1013.85 1 1013.85 10.131 .032 267.546 2 133.773 1.336 .273 * 137.571 2 68.785 .687 .508 4304.280 43 100.100 318599.000 50 19215.780 49 a. R = .776 R = .745 4-2-3 F=.687 p=.508 .05

(96)

2.2

4-2-3 4-2-4 : 79.2500 21.15366 12 80.4000 15.66558 20 72.7778 23.04103 18 77.3800 19.80300 50 4-2-5 : III F 14037.010 1 14037.010 141.194 .000 264.723 2 132.362 1.331 .274 4573.151 46 99.416 318599.000 50 19215.780 49 a R = .762 R = .746 4-2-5 F 1.331 p .274 .05

(97)

4-2-6 95% 79.537 a 2.878 73.743 85.331 78.833 a 2.233 74.338 83.329 74.327 a 2.354 69.590 79.065 a =67.0200 4-2-6

2.3

4-2-7 : U-learning 83.4400 16.80050 25 71.3200 21.02126 25 77.3800 19.80300 50 4-2-8 : III F 12632.667 1 12632.667 125.078 .000 90.941 1 90.941 9.132 .034 4746.933 47 100.999 318599.000 50 19215.780 49 a R = .753 R = .742

(98)

4-2-8 F .900 p .034 .05 4-2-9 95% U-learning 78.785 a 2.053 74.656 82.915 70.975 a 2.053 71.845 80.104 a = 67.0200. 4-2-9 U-learning 78.785 70.975 U-learning

(99)

U-learning

3.1

U-learning SPSS α 0.05 4-3-1 : III F 2.147 1 2.147 .018 .894 19.511 2 9.756 .082 .921 306.119 1 306.119 2.586 .116 * 10.969 2 5.485 .046 .955 * 16.766 2 16.766 .060 .942 * 14.174 1 7.087 .142 .709

(100)

III F * * 10.889 2 5.444 .046 .955 4380.067 37 118.380 473605.920 49 8513.097 48 a R = .485 R = .333 4-3-1 F .060 p .942 .05 F .142 p .709 .05 F .046 p .955 .05 4-3-2 : 3.9760 .43334 5 4.5533 .24758 12 4.2291 .34778 11 U-learning 4.3229 .38348 28 3.4940 .20452 5 3.8340 .55448 10 3.6767 .76758 6 3.7081 .56009 21

(101)

4-3-3 : III F 474.677 1 474.677 4.500 .040 847.773 1 847.773 8.037 .007 528.116 2 264.058 2.503 .094 * 59.106 2 29.553 .280 .757 4430.062 42 105.478 473605.920 49 8513.097 48 a R = .480 R = .405 4-3-3 F=.280 p=.757 .05

3.2

4-3-3 4-3-4 : 3.7350 .40815 10 4.2264 .54614 22 4.0341 .57772 17 4.0594 .55490 49

(102)

4-3-5 : III F 1983.658 1 1983.658 16.044 .000 392.158 2 196.079 1.586 .216 5563.768 45 123.639 473605.920 49 8513.097 48 a R = .346 R = .303 4-3-5 F 1.586 p .216 .05 4-3-6 95% 92.037 a 3.567 84.853 99.221 99.791 a 2.406 94.946 104.637 97.533 a 2.703 92.090 102.977 a = 97.6359 120 4-3-6

(103)

3.3

4-3-7 : U-learning 4.3229 .38348 28 3.7081 .56009 21 4.0594 .55490 49 4 44 4閾閾閾閾3333閾閾閾閾8888 : III F 872.153 1 872.153 7.978 .007 927.249 1 927.249 8.482 .006 5028.677 46 109.319 473605.920 49 8513.097 48 a R = .409 R = .384 4-3-8 F 8.482 p .006 .05 4 44 4閾閾閾閾3333閾閾閾閾峯峯峯峯 95% U-learning 101.730 a 2.101 97.500 105.959 91.686 a 2.473 86.709 96.664 a = 97.6359 120

(104)

4-3-9 U-learning 101.730

91.686 U-learning

(105)

U-learning

4.1

U-learning SPSS α 0.05 4-4-1 : III F 193.670 1 193.670 .758 .390 59.176 2 29.588 .116 .891 2658.509 1 2658.509 10.400 .003 * 808.328 2 404.164 1.581 .219 * 31.543 2 15.772 .062 .940 * 32.592 1 32.592 .127 .723 * * 663.349 2 331.675 1.297 .285 9458.437 37 255.633 298997.000 49 19760.245 48 a R = .521 R = .379

(106)

4-4-1 F .062 p .940 .05 F .127 p .723 .05 F 1.297 p .285 .05 4-4-2 : 87.6000 7.82943 5 72.2000 27.13260 10 84.1000 16.92762 10 U-learning 80.0400 20.93140 25 73.8333 24.37553 6 71.5000 16.37919 10 67.5000 19.47893 8 70.7500 18.86854 24 4-4-3 : III F 7297.929 1 7297.929 30.071 .000 1332.880 1 1332.880 5.492 .024 856.363 2 428.182 1.764 .184 * 531.077 2 265.538 1.094 .344 10193.105 42 242.693 298997.000 49 19760.245 48 a R = .484 R = .410 4-4-3 F=1.094 p=.344 .05

(107)

4.2

4-4-3 4-4-4 : 80.0909 19.32074 11 71.8500 21.81568 20 76.7222 19.49300 18 75.4898 20.28970 49 4-4-5 : III F 7509.315 1 7509.315 28.819 .000 724.340 2 362.170 1.390 .260 11725.755 45 260.572 298997.000 49 19760.245 48 a R = .407 R = .367 4-4-5 F 1.390 p .260 .05

(108)

4-4-6 95% 81.487 a 4.874 71.670 91.304 71.492 a 3.610 64.221 78.764 76.266 a 3.806 68.601 83.931 a = 49.2449. 4-4-6

4.3

4-4-7 : U-learning 80.0400 20.93140 25 70.7500 18.86854 24 75.4898 20.28970 49 4-4-8 : III F 7210.891 1 7210.891 28.862 .000 957.526 1 957.526 3.833 .056 11492.569 46 249.838 298997.000 49 19760.245 48 a R = .418 R = .393

(109)

4-4-8 F 3.833 p .056 .05 4-4-9 95% U-learning 79.822 a 3.162 73.458 86.186 70.977 a 3.227 64.482 77.472 a = 49.2449. 4-4-9 U-learning 79.822 70.977 U-learning

(110)
(111)

U-learning 33% 33% t

5.1

U-learning

- -- SPSS t 4-5-1 4-5-1 U-learning t 95% t – -13.875 8.675 3.067 -21.128 -6.621 -4.523 7 .003 – -31.000 11.726 3.908 -40.013 -21.986 -7.931 8 .000 – -24.000 17.541 6.201 -38.665 -9.334 -3.870 7 .006 4-5-1 p=.003 p=.000 p=.006 U-learning U-learning

(112)

5.2

U-learning

- -- SPSS t 4-5-2 4-5-2 U-learning t 95% t -3.875 7.376 2.607 -10.041 2.291 -1.486 7 .181 -10.666 8.874 2.958 -17.487 -3.845 -3.606 8 .007 -17.250 13.456 4.757 -28.499 -6.000 -3.626 7 .008 4-5-2 p=.181 p=.007 p=.008 U-learning U-learning

(113)

KSAT U-learning

U-learning U-learning U-learning U-learning U-learning

(114)

U-learning U-learning U-learning U-learning U-learning U-learning

(115)

1. U-learning 2. U-learning 3. 4. U-learning 5. 6. U-learning

(116)

1. U-learning U-learning U-learning 2. U-learning U-learning 3. 4. 5. 6.

(117)
(118)

1987 1995 75 12-22 1995 20 113-145 2000 10 29-31 2003 WISCS 2003 2002 2004 2005 2007 2008 11 08 http://content.edu.tw/primary/math/jm_jh/math/s3high/s303.htm 1998 37 5 47-53 2006 1994 25 38-44 2002 150 54-60 2007 - “ ” 8 2 191-197 饋008 10 ( ) 饋008

(119)

2006 -2006 2010 U-learning NSC-98-2511-S-142-003 2003 2002 1989 183 - 219 1992 NSC-75-0111-S-153-001 2003 1995 Irsp 2003 I NSC-91-2520-S-142-001 2004 II NSC-92-2521-S-142-003 2005 III NSC-93-2521-S-142-004 2005

(120)

1996 ─ 3 1998 64 10-24 1995 2004 2003 2004 2009 2001 I NSC-89-2511-S-152-021 1996 85 2 1997 2002 2 105-111 1985 18 191-227 2001 2001 5 18 http://www.nmh.gov.tw/edu/basis3/25/gz12.htm 1995 35 2-7 2007

(121)

2005 64 89-101 2005 2007 2009 U-learning -1985 2004 2002 k- 6 2005 2006 2 23 http://www.nici.nat.gov.tw/content/application/nici/generala/guest-cnt-browse.p hp?cntgrp_ordinal=1002006100110003&cnt_id=758 2005 峯0 饋00恒 6 饋峯 http://epaper.hrd.gov.tw/峯0/EDM峯0閾0恒01.htm 2009 U-learning GCCCE 2009 2009 U-learning 2000 web-bbs 22

(122)

6-11 1995a ─ 1995b 35 14-19 1998 11 573 - 602 1999 12 407- 436 1990 41 4 6-13 1999 1996 2007 1991 2005 2001

(123)

Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated Cognition and the Culture of

Learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 1, 32-42.

Bekkestua, S. (2003). Mobile education - A glance at the future. Retrieved January 16, 2010, from http://www.dye.no/articles/a_glance_at_the_future/introduction.html Chen, G. & Kotz, D. (2000). A survey of context-aware mobile computing research.

Technical Report TR2000-381, Dept. of Computer Science, Dartmouth College. Chang, C. Y., Sheu J.P., & Chan, T.W. (2003). Concept and design of Ad Hoc and

Mobile classrooms. Journal of computer assisted learning, 19, 336-346. Dey, A. K. & Abowd, G.D. (2000).Towards a better understanding of context and

context-Awareness. Proceedings of the 1st international symposium on Handheld and Ubiquitous Computing, Springer-Verlag, Karlsruhe, Germany, 1999.

Hall, L.T. (1984). Estimation and approximation-not synonyms. Arithmetic Teacher,

77(7), 516-517.

Hildreth, D. (1980) . Estimation strategy use in length and area measurement tasks by

fifth and seventh grade students. Doctor dissertaion. The Ohio State University.

Herstein, J. J. (1981). The second national assessment in mathematics: area and volume. Mathematics Teacher , 74(9), 704-708.

Kouba, V., Brown, C., Carpenter, T., Lindquist, M., Silver, E. A., & Swafford, J. 0. (1988). Results of the fourth NAEP assessment of mathematics: Measurement, qeometry, data interpretation, attitudes and other topics. Arithmetic Teacher,

35(9), 10-16.

Piaget, J., Inhelder, B., & Szeminska, A. (1960). The child’s conception of geometry. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

(124)

Schmidt, A., & Van Laerhoven, K. (2001). How to build smart appliances. IEEE

Personal Communications, 66-71.

Sharples, M. (2000). The Design of Personal Mobile Technologies for Lifelong Learning. Computers and Education, 34, 177-193.

Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (1995). Styles of thinking in the school.

European Journal for High Ability, 6, 201-219.

Weiser, M. (1991). The Computer for the Twenty-First Century. Scientific American, 94-104.

Woodward, E. & Byrd, F. (1983). Area included topic, neglected concept . School

Science and Mathematics, 83(7), 343-347.

Yang, S. J. H., Lan, B. C. W., Wu, B. J. D., & Chang, A. C. N. (2005). Context aware service oriented architecture for web based learning. Journal of Advanced

(125)
(126)

1.







 □

(127)

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

□ □ □ □ □

16.

17.

□ □ □ □ □

18.

19.

20.

□ □ □ □ □

21.

□ □ □ □ □

22.

23.

24.

(128)

B01 B02 B03 B04 B05 B06 B07 B08 B09 B10 B11 B12 B13 B14 B15 B16 B17 B18 B19 B20 B21

(129)
(130)
(131)
(132)
(133)
(134)
(135)

Cronbach's Alpha ITEM PCT PEARSON 0.9210 1 MATH01 59.9 0.331 0.9208 -0.0002 2 MATH02 90.1 0.407 0.9195 -0.0015 3 MATH03 92 0.388 0.9198 -0.0012 4 MATH04 93.9 0.377 0.9199 -0.0011 5 MATH05 81.7 0.515 0.9183 -0.0027 6 MATH06 87 0.535 0.9183 -0.0027 7 MATH07 87.8 0.502 0.9186 -0.0024 8 MATH08 63 0.454 0.9191 -0.0019 9 MATH09 51.1 0.3 0.9213 0.0003 10 MATH10 67.9 0.429 0.9194 -0.0016 11 MATH11 90.5 0.546 0.9184 -0.0026 12 MATH12 72.9 0.513 0.9183 -0.0027 13 MATH13 84.4 0.505 0.9185 -0.0025 14 MATH14 77.1 0.623 0.9169 -0.0041 15 MATH15 83.6 0.626 0.9172 -0.0038 16 MATH16 81.7 0.615 0.9172 -0.0038 17 MATH17 76 0.595 0.9173 -0.0037 18 MATH18 68.3 0.361 0.9203 -0.0007 19 MATH19 39.3 0.31 0.9211 0.0001 20 MATH20 85.5 0.293 0.9206 -0.0004 21 MATH21 78.6 0.546 0.9179 -0.0031 22 MATH22 61.8 0.437 0.9193 -0.0017 23 MATH23 38.2 0.411 0.9197 -0.0013 24 MATH24 26 0.279 0.9212 0.0002 25 MATH25 53.1 0.478 0.9188 -0.0022 26 MATH26 65.3 0.517 0.9182 -0.0028 27 MATH27 82.4 0.619 0.9172 -0.0038 28 MATH28 82.1 0.671 0.9166 -0.0044 29 MATH29 74.8 0.566 0.9176 -0.0034 30 MATH30 71.8 0.455 0.9190 -0.0020 31 MATH31 76 0.552 0.9178 -0.0032 32 MATH32 71.8 0.466 0.9189 -0.0021

(136)

33 MATH33 81.7 0.581 0.9176 -0.0034

34 MATH34 61.5 0.493 0.9186 -0.0024

35 MATH35 70.6 0.539 0.9179 -0.0031

(137)

4

(138)

:

1

1. 饋. 3. 4.

(139)

恒. 6. 参. 8. 峯.

(140)

10. 11. 1饋. 13. 14. 1恒.

(141)

16. 1参. 18. 1峯. 饋0. 饋1.

(142)

饋饋. 饋3. 饋4. 饋恒. 饋6. 饋参.

(143)

饋8. 饋峯. 30.

(144)

A 1. A 饋. A 3. B 4. B 恒. B 6.

(145)

3

C 1. C 饋. C 3.

(146)

4

D 1. D

饋.

D

3.

(147)

E 1. 饋. E 3. E

(148)

6

F

1.

G

(149)

参:

H H

(150)

8:

I

I

J

(151)
(152)

Q1 7.403 *** .496 ** Q13 9.986 *** .483 ** Q2 10.907 *** .517 ** Q14 8.756 *** .496 ** Q3 7.806 *** .465 ** Q15 6.076 *** .389 ** Q4 4.984 *** .335 ** Q16 12.692 *** .618 ** Q5 13.140 *** .637 ** Q17 9.265 *** .565 ** Q6 7.955 *** .395 ** Q18 9.119 *** .533 ** Q7 8.102 *** .484 ** Q19 11.982 *** .622 ** Q8 9.991 *** .569 ** Q20 12.394 *** .667 ** Q9 9.531 *** .537 ** Q21 14.139 *** .691 ** Q10 10.546 *** .601 ** Q22 11.259 *** .591 ** Q11 11.214 *** .568 ** Q23 11.526 *** .678 ** Q12 11.171 *** .592 ** Q24 9.784 *** .632 **

參考文獻

相關文件

Motivation Phases of Carrer Development: Case Studies of Young Women with Learning Disabilities.

二、 學 與教: 第二語言學習理論、學習難點及學與教策略 三、 教材:.  運用第二語言學習架構的教學單元系列

Rebecca Oxford (1990) 將語言學習策略分為兩大類:直接性 學習策略 (directed language learning strategies) 及間接性學 習策略 (in-directed

趣 趣、 、 、 、學習風格 學習風格 學習風格 學習風格等的不同,並有不同的學習需要。2.

 包括 包括 包括 包括學校 學校 學校管理 學校 管理 管理、 管理 、 、學生學習 、 學生學習 學生學習、 學生學習 、 、校風 、 校風 校風及其 校風 及其 及其 及其 他支援. 他支援

Active learning / e-Learning / Higher order activity (主動學習法/電子學習/高階思維活動). Active learning / e-Learning / Higher order

學習範疇 主要學習成果 級別 級別描述 學習成果. 根據學生的認知發展、學習模式及科本

 Biggs’ Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome (SOLO) Taxonomy.