第五章 結論與建議
第四節 後續研究建議
國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
第四節、後續研究建議
一、研究法白組織轉型後的組織資源分配與知識內容控管
法白於民國 108 年 8 月正式轉型為有限公司，希冀透過小額營利支撐整體 組織的運作，此外站長也面臨支付核心成員薪水或負擔辦公室租金的成本壓力，
因此隔年將會是決定法白得否繼續生存的關鍵年份。若法白成功存活，未來的研 究者得以進一步探究法白內部的組織資源分配，以及在組織規模擴大情況下，如 何掌控知識內容的產出與品質。
二、探討中老年族群的環境制約成因與解決辦法
本研究利用 Golden Circle 的概念分析中老年族群與青年族群逃避接收新資 訊的可能原因，而中老年族群所面臨的時間不足、科技障礙或現實主義等要素較 難處理，導致法律知識無法在短時間內普及於中老年族群內。若將時間線拉長觀 察，或許法律白話文運動或其他法律知識倡議組織會提出更多新穎想法，逐漸軟 化中老年族群的思想壁壘，開始願意吸收新資訊。
三、分析不同領域之於知識傳播方式的應用
本研究主要以法律白話文運動組織為個案研究，針對法律知識的普及與知識 傳播方式進行探討。然而除了法律知識外，哲學思辨能力或科學應用知識等對於 市井小民也是不可或缺，目前也有其他組織致力於傳播該方面的知識，而這些組 織所應用之知識傳播方法是否與法白的方法有所差異，或是在知識轉譯過程和激 起受眾動機的策略不同，實屬值得探討之議題。
‧
Ardichvili, A., Cardozo, R., & Ray, S. (2003). A theory of entrepreneurial opportunity identification and development. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(1), 105-123.
Babbie, E. (2016)。社會科學研究方法（The practice of social research）（林秀雲 譯）。台北市：雙葉書廊。（原作第十四版2016 年出版）
Back to Basics: What is Advocacy?. Retrieved September 18, 2019, from https://www.salsalabs.com/blog/advocacy-definition
Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329-366.
Barney (2019，7 月)。你知道嗎？在台灣，每三個人就有一個在收聽 Podcast，這 是 什 麼 都 市 傳 說 。 上 網 日 期 ：2019 年 11 月 20 日 ， 檢 自 ：
B8%82%E5%82%B3%E8%AA%AA-4ab989c3a9a4
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
Bechky, B. A., & Okhuysen, G. A. (2011). Expecting the unexpected? How SWAT officers and film crews handle surprises. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 239-261.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Anchor.
Blackmore, C. (2007). What kinds of knowledge, knowing and learning are required for addressing resource dilemmas?: a theoretical overview. Environmental Science
& Policy, 10(6), 512-525.
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. London: Longman.
Bojica, A., Ruiz Jiménez, J., Ruiz Nava, J., & Fuentes-Fuentes, M. (2018). Bricolage and growth in social entrepreneurship organisations. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 30(3-4), 362-389.
‧
corporation: How low-power actors gain influence. Journal of Management, 34(3), 477-508.Bouquet, C., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008b). Weight versus Voice: How Foreign Subsidiaries Gain Attention from Corporate Headquarters. The Academy of Management Journal, 51(3), 577-601.
Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American journal of sociology, 110(2), 349-399.
Canadian Health Services Research Foundation. (2003). The theory and practice of knowledge brokering in canada’s health system. Retrieved Nov 30, 2019, from https://www.cfhi-fcass.ca/migrated/pdf/Theory_and_Practice_e.pdf
Carlile, P. (2004). Transferring, Translating, and Transforming: An Integrative Framework for Managing Knowledge Across Boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555-568.
Carlile, P. R., & Rebentisch, E. S. (2003). Into the black box: The knowledge transformation cycle. Management science, 49(9), 1180-1195.
Carnabuci, G., & Bruggeman, J. (2009). Knowledge specialization, knowledge brokerage and the uneven growth of technology domains. Social forces, 88(2), 607-641.
Cho, J., De Zuniga, H. G., Rojas, H., & Shah, D. V. (2003). Beyond access: The digital divide and Internet uses and gratifications. It & Society, 1(4), 46-72.
Christensen, C. M., Baumann, H., Ruggles, R., & Sadtler, T. M. (2006). Disruptive innovation for social change. Harvard business review, 84(12), 94.
Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M. E., & McDonald, R. (2015). What is disruptive innovation. Harvard business review, 93(12), 44-53.
Clark, G., & Kelly, L. (2005). New directions for knowledge transfer and knowledge brokerage in Scotland. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Social Research.
Desa, G. (2008). Mobilizing resources in constrained environments: A study of technology social ventures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
Di Domenico, M., Haugh, H., & Tracey, P. (2010). Social bricolage: Theorizing social value creation in social enterprises. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 34(4), 681-703.
‧
Dobkin Hall, P. (1987). Abandoning the rhetoric of independence: Reflections on the nonprofit sector in the post-liberal era. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 16(1-2), 11-28.
Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3(2), 179-202.
Ferguson, D. A., & Perse, E. M. (2000). The World Wide Web as a Functional Alternative to Television. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 155-174.
Gaglio, C. M., & Katz, J. A. (2001). The psychological basis of opportunity identification: Entrepreneurial alertness. Small business economics, 16(2), 95-111.
Heine, S. J., & Lehman, D. R. (1997). The cultural construction of self-enhancement:
An examination of group-serving biases. Journal of personality and social psychology, 72(6), 1268.
Kemp, S. (2019). DIGITAL 2019: TAIWAN. Retrieved November 30, 2019, from https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2019-taiwan
Kickul, J., Griffiths, M. D., & Gundry, L. (2010). Innovating for social impact: is bricolage the catalyst for change?. In Fayolle, A., & Matlay, H., Handbook of research on social entrepreneurship (chap.12, pp. 232-251), Chetenham: Edward Elgar Pub.
Kickul, J., Griffiths, M., Bacq, S., & Garud, N. (2018). Catalyzing social innovation: is entrepreneurial bricolage always good?. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 30(3-4), 407-420.
Kirzner, I. M. (2015). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: issues and implications. Boston: Longman.
Ladstaetter, F., Plank, A., & Hemetsberger, A. (2018). The merits and limits of making do: bricolage and breakdowns in a social enterprise. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 30(3-4), 283-309.
Leonard, D. (1995). Wellsprings of knowledge: building and sustaining the sources of innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Leonard-Barton, D. (1990). A dual methodology for case studies: Synergistic use of a longitudinal single site with replicated multiple sites. Organization Science, 1(3), 248-266.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1966). The savage mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
‧
Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 47-81.
Lipman-Blumen, J. (2006). The allure of toxic leaders: Why we follow destructive bosses and corrupt politicians--and how we can survive them. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Litwak, E., & Hylton, L. F. (1962). Interorganizational Analysis: A Hypothesis on Co-ordinating Agencies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 6(4), 395-420.
London, M. (2008). Leadership and Advocacy: Dual Roles for Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Entrepreneurs. Organizational Dynamics, 37(4), 313-326.
López, L., Mendes, J. F., & Sanjuán, M. A. (2002). Hierarchical social networks and information flow. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 316(1-4), 695-708.
Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. A. (2001). Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 545-564.
Luo, X., Slotegraaf, R. J., & Pan, X. (2006). Cross-functional “coopetition”: The simultaneous role of cooperation and competition within firms. Journal of Marketing, 70(2), 67-80.
Maccoby, E. E., & Maccoby, N. (1954). The interview: A tool of social science.
Handbook of social psychology, 1(1), 449-487.
Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2009). Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 419-435.
Marzano, R. J. (1992). A different kind of classroom: Teaching with dimensions of learning. USA: Assn for supervision & curriculum.
Mason, J. (2017). Qualitative researching. New York: Sage.
McFarlane, C. (2006). Knowledge, learning and development: a post-rationalist approach. Progress in Development Studies, 6(4), 287-305.
Meyer, K. E. (2006). Globalfocusing: From domestic conglomerates to global specialists. Journal of management studies, 43(5), 1109-1144.
Minniti, M. (2004). Entrepreneurial alertness and asymmetric information in a spin-glass model. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(5), 637-658.
Neuman, W. L. (2018)。研究方法：質化與量化方法之應用（Understandning Research）（郭思餘譯）。台北市：雙葉書廊。（二版 2016 年出版）
Obstfeld, D. (2005). Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 100-130.
‧
Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 44(2), 175-196.Partidario, M. R., & Sheate, W. R. (2013). Knowledge brokerage-potential for increased capacities and shared power in impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 39, 26-36.
Prasad, P. (1993). Symbolic processes in the implementation of technological change:
A symbolic interactionist study of work computerization. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1400-1429.
Retzbach, A., & Maier, M. (2015). Communicating scientific uncertainty: Media effects on public engagement with science. Communication Research, 42(3), 429-456.
Robertson, S. P., Vatrapu, R. K., & Medina, R. (2010). Online video “friends” social networking: Overlapping online public spheres in the 2008 US presidential election.
Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 7(2-3), 182-201.
Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2005). A typology of public engagement mechanisms.
Science, Technology, & Human Values, 30(2), 251-290.
Salancik, G. R. (1977) Commitment and the Control of Organizational Behavior and Belief. In Staw, B., & Salancik, G., Eds., New Directions in Organizational Behavior (chap.1, pp. 1-54). Chicago: St. Clair Press.
Scheufele, D. A. (2014). Science communication as political communication.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(Supplement 4), 13585-13592.
Schön, D. A. (1995). Frame reflection : toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: BasicBooks.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1982). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (1912/1934). New Jersey:
Transaction Publishers.
Senyard, J., Baker, T., Steffens, P., & Davidsson, P. (2014). Bricolage as a path to innovativeness for resource-constrained new firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 211-230.
Shannon, C. E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379-423.
Sheate, W. R., & Partidário, M. R. (2010). Strategic approaches and assessment techniques—Potential for knowledge brokerage towards sustainability.
Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(4), 278-288.
‧
Sinek, S. (2009). Start with why: How great leaders inspire everyone to take action.
London: Penguin
Sonenshein, S. (2014). How organizations foster the creative use of resources. Academy of Management Journal, 57(3), 814-848.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. In Denzin, N. K., &
Lincoln, Y. S., Handbook of qualitative research (chap.17, pp. 273-285). New York: Sage.
Tang, J., Kacmar, K. M. M., & Busenitz, L. (2012). Entrepreneurial alertness in the pursuit of new opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(1), 77-94.
Tasselli, S. (2015). Social Networks and Inter-professional Knowledge Transfer: The Case of Healthcare Professionals. Organization Studies, 36(7), 841-872.
Tewksbury, D., Weaver, A. J., & Maddex, B. D. (2001). Accidentally informed:
Incidental news exposure on the World Wide Web. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(3), 533-554.
Tichenor, P. J., Donohue, G. A., & Olien, C. N. (1970). Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public opinion quarterly, 34(2), 159-170.
Vaghely, I. P., & Julien, P.-A. (2010). Are opportunities recognized or constructed?:
An information perspective on entrepreneurial opportunity identification. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 73-86.
Vernet, A. (2012, June). Tertius Gaudens vs. Tertius Iungens: the Dynamics of market changes. In DRUID Conference Society, Symposium held at Copenhagen Business School, Denmark.
Vonk, R. (2002). Self-serving interpretations of flattery: Why ingratiation works.
Journal of personality and social psychology, 82(4), 515.
Walter, J., Lechner, C., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2007). Knowledge transfer between and within alliance partners: Private versus collective benefits of social capital. Journal of Business Research, 60(7), 698-710.
Weaver, A., Pope, J., Morrison-Saunders, A., & Lochner, P. (2008). Contributing to sustainability as an environmental impact assessment practitioner. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 26(2), 91-98.
Weitzman, M. L. (1996). Hybridizing growth theory. The American Economic Review, 86(2), 207-212.
Wernerfelt, B. (1995). The Resource-Based View of the Firm: Ten Years After.
Strategic Management Journal, 16(3), 171-174.
‧
AmericanSociological Review, 42(5), 726-743.
丁玉珍 (2015)。政府協助非營利組織朝向社會企業發展之角色探討。未出版之碩 士論文，國立臺灣大學政治學研究所，台北市。
于卓民 (2014)。台灣的競爭力！中小企業的創業與國際化。上網日期：2019 年 9 月 7 日，檢自：http://nccubr.nccu.edu.tw/article.php?aid=67&mid=27
內政部公益資訊平台 (2019)。全國非營利組織數量現況。上網日期：2019 年 1 月 7 日，檢自：https://npo.moi.gov.tw/npom/
王億晴、梁慈芳 (2018，4 月)。假新聞對閱聽者之影響探討。圖文傳播藝術學報，
38-45。
白廷奕 (2019，10 月)。為了身體自主，脫下裙子。上網日期：2019 年 11 月 23 日，檢自： https://www.instagram.com/p/B3GOL5XgHz4/
江子鳴 (2011)。破壞性創新理論的回顧與應用 - 破壞分類模型提出。未出版之 碩士論文。國立成功大學企業管理學系碩博士班，台北市。
何家仰 (2019，7 月)。民法的監督不周——小孩打破餐廳音響，爸媽就得賠？。
上網日期：2019 年 11 月 21 日，檢自：https://plainlaw.me/2019/07/25/legalrep/
吳玟嶸 (2017，10 月)。鐵欄杆內自成一國──從韓劇被告人談監獄法制。上網日 期：2019 年 11 月 21 日，檢自：https://plainlaw.me/2017/10/10/innocent-defendant/
吳玟嶸 (2019，10 月)。人不是應該生而自由嗎？。上網日期：2019 年 11 月 23 日，檢自： https://www.instagram.com/p/B3M8FbzgguV/
吳家豪 (2018，11 月)。臉書：動態消息將改版 回覆討論比按讚排序較前。上網 日 期 ： 2019 年 11 月 18 日 ， 檢 自 ： https://www.cna.com.tw/news/afe/201811140192.aspx
吳麗珍、黃惠滿、李浩銑 (2014)。方便取樣和立意取樣之比較。護理雜誌， 61(3)，
105-111。
沈東玫 (2012，10 月)。量化研究 quantitative research。上網日期： 2019 年 10 月9 日，檢自：http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1678721/
林佳燕 (2010)。利用語意及人際網路篩選資訊並說明之研究。未出版之碩士論文。
國立臺灣大學資訊網路與多媒體研究所，台北市。
林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花 (2005)。質性研究方法：訪談模式與實施步驟分析。身 心障礙研究季刊，3(2)，122-136。
法操Follaw (2014，12 月)。【太陽花學運】案件摘要。上網日期：2019 年 1 月 14 日，檢自： https://www.follaw.tw/f01/01case/5475/
‧
2019 年 1 月 14 日， 檢自：https://www.peoplenews.tw/news/f3347aad-ed0d-42de-aa45-475f10727814
施琮仁 (2016)。社交網站與公眾參與：「Pansci 泛科學臉書專頁」使用者研究。
傳播研究與實踐，6(2)，209-241。
柯芳枝 (2013)。公司法論(下)（九版）。台北市：三民書局。 d=82&index=2
張甘青 (2014)。從使用者網路點閱習慣探討搜尋引擎最佳化。東海大學圖書館館 訊，(149)，39-54。
莊文忠、徐明莉、張鐙文 (2009)。非營利組織的議程設定與政策倡議的形成：質 化研究的檢證。公共行政學報，(33)，121-163。
許伯崧 (2017，10 月)。【鳴人你來當】一場法律白話文的社會運動—訪站長楊 貴 智 。 上 網 日 期 ： 2019 年 10 月 13 日 ， 檢 自 ： https://opinion.udn.com/opinion/story/10763/2755449
陳向明 (2002)。社會科學質的硏究。 台北市：五南。
陳姿伶 (2003)。個案研究法 Knowledge Base。上網日期：2019 年 10 月 9 日，檢 自： http://ken.hd.org.tw/modules/tad_book3/pda.php?tbdsn=40
陳雅玫 (2016)。學生臉書使用與政治參與：以太陽花學運為例。中國行政評論，
22(4)，61-91。
陳愛娥 (2011，5 月)。憲法與行政法的互動場域：第一講-從特別權力關係到特別 身分關係。月旦法學教室，103，32-44。
陳薪智 (2019，6 月)。拉近我們與「法」的距離！「法律白話文運動」讓法律融 入日常生活。上網日期： 2019 年 10 月 13 日，檢自： https://medium.com/jandi-blog-tw/plainlow-ngo-jandi-e67d5db1a737
程韻舫 (2004)。台灣第三部門政策倡導之研究－以國民年金為例。未出版之碩士 論文。國立政治大學公共行政研究所，台北市。
‧
日期：2019 年 11 月 22 日，檢自： https://plainlaw.me/2019/07/25/insidertrade/黃郁真 (2019，11 月)。史上最慢還錢的公司。上網日期：2019 年 11 月 23 日，
檢 自 ：
https://www.facebook.com/plainlaw.me/photos/a.1415628632046173/243856957 6418735/?type=3&theater
黃書瑜 (2017，4 月)。什麼是扣繳憑單？。上網日期：2019 年 11 月 24 日，檢 自：https://plainlaw.me/2017/04/06/tax-reduction/
黃書瑜 (2018，8 月)。逃稅？避稅？節稅？。上網日期：2019 年 11 月 24 日，檢
自 ：
https://plainlaw.me/2018/08/18/%e9%80%83%e7%a8%85%e9%81%bf%e7%a8
%85%e7%af%80%e7%a8%85/
黃惠萍 (2016)。公民團體倡議策略與論述分析：以臺灣動物社會研究會反海豹油 個案為例。傳播研究與實踐，6(2)，243-283。
黃銘輝 (2019，9 月)。假新聞、社群媒體與網路時代的言論自由。月旦法學雜誌，
292，5-29。
楊貴智 (2017，1 月)。那些年我們看不懂的判決與契約 — 談法律白話文的可行
96%87%E7%9A%84%E5%8F%AF%E8%A1%8C%E6%80%A7-14c8eb40b861 葉乃靜 (2012，10 月)。質性研究 qualitative research。上網日期：2019 年 10 月 8
日，檢自： http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1678706/
葉亮吟 (2010，6 月)。探討大學生社團經驗、人際關係、學業成績對其職涯發展 的影響。育達科大學報，23，59-80。
廖榮利 (1992)。社會個案工作。台北市：幼獅文化。
趙雅儀、蕭哲芬、蔡秋田、鄭琬諭 (2018，8 月)。非營利組織之資源運用及經營
趙雅儀、蕭哲芬、蔡秋田、鄭琬諭 (2018，8 月)。非營利組織之資源運用及經營