第五章 結論
第二節 未來研究方向
國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
108
第二節 未來研究方向
有關本案例未來可能的研究方向，有以下幾點可以觀察。
最重要的一點是，鑒於推動制定《農民權及鄉村勞動者權利宣言》的倡議尚 在進行中，將來是否會真的產出《農民權與鄉村勞動者權利宣言》或公約，仍有 待持續觀察，並可持續觀察倡議團體對人權理事會接下來的倡議活動如何進行。
另外，有關工作小組應當如何修訂宣言草案的內容，也是一個值得關注的面 向，長年關注農民權議題的學者 Christophe Golay 曾建議當他們在討論《宣言》
草案時，可以試圖藉由援引在其他文件中已被接受的字眼，另外宣言除了認可新 權利外也認可部分已存在的權利 ，Golay 教授認為可以從國際人權法（條約、宣 言及軟法文件）以及其他國際文件中（如在聯合國糧農組織或國際勞工組織中發 展出的），找到可以適用在「農民權與鄉村工作者權利宣言」的聯合國通用語彙，
Golay 教授的這份報告顯示這些通用的語彙可以協助更精確地定義宣言的內容，
另外，由於代表團曾在工作小組會議中，討論「糧食主權」此一詞彙的適用性以 及是否可改用其他詞彙取代，糧食主權這個概念到最終是否仍會被納入宣言還是 未知，如果納入了，是否會對整個世界的糧食體系產生重大衝擊，亦值得觀察。
第三，在人權理事會的各個國家集團或國家面對此宣言倡議的態度是否會轉 變，仍是一個可以觀察的重點。我們可以觀察個別國家態度的變化是受到什麼影 響，本文中所提到瑞士態度的變化，是來自於倡議團體對政府的遊說、對社會吸 引認可，再加上學院的支持，讓瑞士的態度有了改變，此後我們仍可繼續觀察會 否有其他國家出現類似的轉變，或是進一步瞭解這幾個因素中，到底哪一個是最 關鍵的原因？是由於政府中官員支持的態度？抑或是公眾輿論的支持對政府帶 來了壓力。再者，我們可以觀察不同國家集團立場的變化及結盟的情形。
最後，倘若真的通過此宣言，研究者可繼續觀察該宣言在國際人權法架構中 的定位，以及宣言通過之後個別國家接受並納入國內法或影響其農業政策的情形。
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
109
參考文獻
1. 中文部分
王甫昌，（2002），社會運動，收錄於瞿海源、王振寰編，社會學與台灣社會。
台北：巨流，頁 422-448.
江素慧，（2011），全球食物體系與人類健康暨公衛危機之關連：分析架構建立 之初探，全球政治評論，第三十五期，頁 81-110。
李河清、譚偉恩，（2012），衛生安全與國際食品貿易：以「人類安全」檢視世 貿組織相關立法缺失，問題與研究，第 51 卷第 1 期，頁 69-110。
李河清、譚偉恩，（2012），氣候變遷與人權：以農業和糧食安全為起點的思考，
台灣人權學刊，第一卷第二期，頁 59-75。
吳美智，（2010），非政府組織跨國倡議運動：1997-98 年反多邊投資協定運動 之研究，全球政治評論，第二十九期，頁 95-122。
苗延威（譯）（2002），社會運動概論（原作者：Donatella della Porta/ Mario Diani）。
臺北市：巨流出版。（原著出版年：1999）
潘明宏、陳志瑋（譯）（2003），最新社會科學研究方法（原作者：C.
Frankfort-Nachmias，David Nachmias）。臺北市：韋伯出版。
葉志誠，（2000），社會科學概論，台北，揚智。
葉家興、謝伯讓、高薏涵、謝佩妏（譯）（2009）。糧食戰爭（原作者:Raj Patel）。
臺北市:高寶國際出版。（原著出版年:2008）
譚偉恩，（2012），國際合作中的寧靜政治─論食品衛生安全與糧食援助制度之 法益失衡與不當性 (未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學，臺北市。
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
110
池思親(譯)(2014)。把「吃什麼」的權利要回來。（原作者:Rachel Schrman和William A. Munro）。臺北市:城邦文化。（原著出版年: 2010）
沈 智 新 ， （ 2014 ） ， 社 會 運 動 有 什 麼 影 響 力 ？ 菜 市 場 社 會 學 ：
http://whogovernstw.org/2014/09/05/chihhsinsheen2/
施正峰，2009，原住民族的集體權，2009 年 3 月 30-31 日於「98 年度原住民族
政 策 論 壇 」 與 談 內 容 ，
http://faculty.ndhu.edu.tw/~cfshih/politics%20observation/other/20090330.ht ml
2. 外文部分
Agrikoliansky, Eric, 2010. Les usages protestataire de droit, Penser les mouvements sociaux, Conflits sociaux et contestations dans les sociétés contemporaines, 225-243.
Alston, Philip. 2001. “Introduction,” in Philip Alston, ed. Peoples’ Rights, pp.
1-6. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alteri, Miguel Fernando R. Funes-Monzote, and Paulo Petersen. 2011.
Agroecologically efficient agricultural systems for small holder farmers:
contributions to food sovereignty. Agronomy for Sustainable Development (INRA and Springer-Verlag).
Amenta, E. 2013. How to Analyze the Influence of Movements. Contemporary Sociology: A Journal or Reviews., 43(1), 16-29.
Amenta, Edwin, and Jane. Poulsen. 1996. “Social Politics in Contect: The Institutional Politics Theory and U.S. Social Spending at the End of the New Deal.” Social Forces 75:33-60.
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
111
Anheier, Helmut, Glasius, Marlies and Kaldor, Mary (2001). Introducing Global Civil Society. In Anheier, Helmut, Marlies Glasius and Mary Kaldor (eds.), Global Civil Society Yearbook 2001 (pp. 3-22). Location: Oxford University Press.
Araghi, Farshad A. 1995. Global Depesantization, 1945-1990. The Sociological Quarterly 36(2):337-368.
Archibugi, D. 2008. The global commonwealth of citizens: toward cosmopolitan democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Baehr, Peter R. 1999. Human Rights: Universality in Practice. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave. Bangalore.
Batliwala, Srilatha (2002). Grassroots Movements as Transnational Actors:
Implications for Global Civil Society. International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, Vol. 13, No.4(pp.393-409).
Benford, R. D. And Snow, D. A. 2000. Framing processed and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 611-38.
Benford, Robert, and David Snow. 1988. Ideology, Frame Resonance, and Participant Mobilization. International Social Movement Research 1:197-217.
Berkowitz WR. 1974. Socioecnomic indicator changes in ghetto riot tracts. Urban Aff.
Q. 10:69-94.
Bernstein, Henry, and Terence J. Byres. 2001. From Peasant Studies to Agrarian Change. Journal of Agrarian Change 1 (1) (Janurary):1-56.
Bestill, Michele M. and Elisabeth Corell. 2001. NGO Influence in International Environmental Negotiations: A Framework for Analysis. Global Environmental Politics 1:4, 65-85.
Borras JR, S., 2008. La Vía Campesina and its Global Campaign for Agrarian Reform.
Journal of Agrarian Change, Vol. 8 Nos. 2 and 3(pp. 258-289).
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
112
Borras Jr, Saturnino, Edelman, Marc and Kay Kristóbal (2008), Transnational Origins and Politics, Campaigns and Impact, Journal of Agrarian Change, Vol.8 Nos.2 and 3(pp.169-204).
Borras Jr. S. 2004. La Via Campseina: An Evolving Transnational Social Movement., Transtional Institute, TNI Briefing Series No.2004. 6.
Borras, Saturnino. 2008. La Via Campesina and its Global Campaign for Agrarian Reform. Transnational Agrarian Movements Confronting Globalization (Borras et al. eds.), 91-122. West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Borras, Saturnino. 2009. Agrarian change and peasant studies: change, continuities and challenges. Journal of Peasant Studies 36(1) (January) 5-31.
Boyer, Jeff. (2010). “Food Security, Food Sovereignty, and Local Cagllenges for Transnational Agrarian Movements: The Honduras Case.” Journal of Peasant Studies 37(2):319-351.
Button JW. 1978. Black Violence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
Castells, M. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Vol. 1, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Charvet, John, and Elisa Kaczynska-Nay. 2008. The Liberal Project and Human Rights.
The theory and Practice of a New World Order. Cambridge University Press.
Claeys, Pricilla. 2012. The Creation of New Rights by the Food Sovereignty Movement:
The Challenge of Institutionalizing Subversion. Sociology 46 (5)(October):844-860.
Claeys, Pricilla. 2013. From Food Sovereignty to Peasants’ Rights: and Overview of La Via Campesina’s Right-Based Claims over the Last 20 Years, Conference paper No. 24 for discussion at “Food Sovereignty: A Critical Dialogue” International Conference.
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
113
Climate Space. 2014. Social Movements Representing more than 200 million people around the world denounce corporate take-over of Ban Ki-Moon Climate
Summit. “Retrieved from:
https://climatespace2013.wordpress.com/2014/09/17/press-release-social-mo vements-representing-more-than-200-million-people-around-the-world-denou nce-corporate-take-over-of-ban-ki-moon-climate-summit/
Cohen R. & Rai S. M. (2002). Global Social Movements, London: Athlone.
Corell, Elisabeth and Bestill, Michele M., 2001. A Comparative Look at NGO Influence in International Environmental Negotiations: Desertification and Climate Change. Global Environmental Politics 1:4, 86-107. corporations. London:
Routledge.
Crawford, James, ed. 1988. The Rights of Peoples. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Crossley, P. K. (2008/2012), 書寫大歷史：閱讀全球史的第一堂課（劉文明譯）。
台北：廣場出版。
Desmarais, A(2007). La Vía Campesina: Globalization and the Power of Peasants, Pluto Press.
Diagnino, E. 1998. Culture, citizenship, and democracy:changing discourses and practices of politics of the Latin American Left. In: S.E. Alvarez, and E.Diagnino and A. Escobar, eds. Culture of politics, politics of culture: re-visioning Latin American social movements. Boulder, CO:Wesview Press, pp. 33-63.
Diaye S., (2001). The Role of Institutional Reforms. Finance & Development, vol. 38, Dec, p18-21.
Edelman M. and Crawil James. 2011. Peasants’ rights and the UN system: quixotic struggle? Or emancipatory idea whose time has come? Journal of Peasant Studies 38:1, 81-108.
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
114
Edelman, M. 2009. Peasant-farmer movements, third world peoples, and the Seattle protests against the World Trade Organization. 1999. Dialectical Anthropology, 33(2), 109-28.
Edelmann, Marc. 1999. Peasants Against Globalization. Rural Social Movements in Costa Rica. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Elias, J. 2010. Transnational migration, gender, and rights: Advocacy and activism in Malaysian context. International Migration 48(6):44-71.
Eschle, Catherine. 2001. Globalizing Civil Society? Social Movements and the Challenges of Global Politics from Below.” In P. Hamel, H. Lustiger-Thaler, Evans, P. 2000. Fighting Marginalization with Transnational Networks:
Counter-Hegemonic Globalization.” Contemporary Sociology. 29(1), 231.
Falk, Richard. 1999. Predatory Globalisation: A Critique. Cambridge: Polity Press.
FIAN and Vía Campesina. 2004. Violation of peasants’ human rights. A report on cases and patterns of violation 2004. Availiable from:
http://www.fian.org/fileadmin/media/publications/Violations-of-peasants-hum an-rights-2004.pdf.
Finnemore, Martha. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Cornell University Press.
Florini A. M. 2000. The Third Force: The Rise of Transnational Civil Society.
Washington: Brookings.
Fording, Richard C. 1997. “The Conditional Effect of Violence as a Political Tactic:
Mass Insurgency, Welfare Generosity, and Electoral Context in the American States.” American Journal of Political Science 41:1-29.
Fox, J. 2001. “Vertically Integrated Policy Monitoring: A Tool for Civil Society Policy Advocary.”, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quaterly, 30(3):616-27.
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
115
Gamson WA. 1990. The Strategy of Social Protest. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. 2nd ed.
Gamson, William. 1992. Social Psychology of Collective Action, in A. D. Morris and C.M. Mueller (ed) Forntiers in Social Movement Thory, pp53-76. New Haven, CT:
Yale University Press.
Giugni, Marco G. 1998. “Was It Worth the Effort? The Outcomes and Consequences of Social Movements.” Annual Review of Sociology 24:371-93.
Glasius, M. 2006. Pipe dream of panacea? Global civil society and economic and social rights. In: H. K. Anheier, M. Kaldor and M. Glasius, eds. Global civil society 2006/7. London: Sage, pp. 62-93.
Gledhill, J. 2003. Rights and the poor. In:R. A. Wilson and J. P. Mitchell. Eds. Human Rights in global perspective: anthropological studies of rights, claims and entitlements. London: Routledge, pp. 209-28.
Glipo, Arze, and Francisco G. Pascual Jr., Food Sovereignty Framework: Concept and Historical Context. Retrieved November 20, 2012, from http://www.nyeleni.org/spip.php?article89
Golay, C. 2009a. Towards a convention on the rights of peasants. In: S. Murphy and A.
Paasch, eds, The global food challenge: towards a human rights approach to trade and investment. Minneapolis: Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, pp.102-11. Availiable from:
https://in.boell.org/2008/11/28/global-food-challenge-towards-human-right-s-approach-trade-and-investment-policies
Golay, C. 2009b. The rights of peasants. Available from:
http://www.cetim.ch/legacy/en/documents/report_5.pdf
Goldstone JA. 1980. The Weakness of organization: a new look at Gamson’s The Strategy of Social Protest. Am. J. Sociol. 85: 1017-42,1426-32.
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
116
GRAIN .2011. Food and Climate Change: the forgotten link. Against the Grain, 28
Spetember 2011.
https://www.grain.org/article/entries/4357-food-and-climate-change-the-forgo tten-link
Gurr TR. ed. 1980. On the outcomes of violent conflict. In Handbook of Political Conflict, Theory and Research, ed. TR Gurr, pp. 238-94. New York: Free Press.
Habermas, J. 1987. The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason. Cambridge: Polity.
Hadden, Jennifer. 2015. Networks in Contention. The Divisive Politics of Climate Change. Cambridge.
Hansen, John Mark. 1991. Gaining Access: Congress and the Farm Lobby, 1919-1981.
University of Chicago Press.
Hertel, S. 2006. New moves in transnational advocacy: getting labor and economic rights on the agenda in unexpected ways. Global Governance, 12(3), 263-81.
Holsti, Kal J. 1988. International Politics: A Framework for Analysis. Toronto:
Prentice-Hall International.
Holt-Giménez(ed.),Eric. 2010. Linking farmers’ movement for advocacy and practice.
Journal of Peasant Studies 37(1):203-236.
Houtzager, Peter P. 2005. The Movement of the Landless (MST), juridical field, and legal change in Brazil. Law and Globalization from Below: Towards a Cosmopolitan Legality, 218-240. Cambridge: Cambridge Universiry Press.
Howard-Hassman, R. E. 2005. The second great transformation: human rights leapfrogging in the ear of globalization. Human Rights Quarterly. 27(1), 1-40.
http://viacampesina.org/en/index.php/main-issues-mainmenu-27/sustainable-peasa nts-agriculture-mainmenu-42/1670-un-masking-climate-smart-agriculture
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
117
Hull, K. E. 2001. The political limits of the rights frame: The case of same sex marriage in Hawaii. Sociological Perspectives 44(2):207-32.
Human Rights Council. 2012. Resolution on the Promotion of the human rights of peasants and other people working in rural areas (A/HRC/21/L.23). United Nations.
International Council on Human Rights Policy. 2006. Human Rights Standards:
Learning from Experience. International Council on Human Rights Policy. Versoix, Switerland. Retrieved from: http://www.ichrp.org/en/projects/120.
Ishii-Eiteman, M. 2009. Food Sovereignty and the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledgem Science and Technology for Development. Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(3), 689-700.
J.N. Pieterse and S. Roseneil (eds.) Globalization and Social Movements. Houndmills, Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave.
Johnston, Darlene M. 1995. “Native Rights as Collective Rights: A Question of Group Self-Preservation,” in Will Kymlicka, ed. The Rights of Minority Cultures, pp. 179-201. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jones, P. 1999. Human rights, group rights, and peoples’ rights. Human Rights Quarterly 21(1): 80-107.
Kaldor, Mary. 2003. The Idea of Global Civil Society, International Affairs(Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), Vol70. No. 3, pp583-593.
Ikenberry, G. John (2003) Review (Global Civil Society? by John Keane) in Foreign Affairs, November/December 2003.
Keck, Margret E., and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activits Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY:Cornell University Press.
Keck, Margret E., and Kathryn Sikkink. 1999. Transnational advocacy networks in
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
118
international and regional politics, International Social Science Journal 51.
No.159. pp89-101.
Knocke, David. 1990. Political Networks: The Structural Perspective. Cambridge:
Camdridge University Press.
Kolben, Kevin. 2008. Labor Rights as Human Rights? Virginia Journal of International Law 50(2):450-484.
Lang, Tim, and Michael Heasman, (2007). Food Wars: The Global Battle for Mouths, Minds and Markets. London: Earthscan.
Lee, Richard. (2007). Food Security and Food Sovereignty. Center for Rural Economy Discussion Papers Series No.11.
Lerner, Natan. 1991. Group Rights and Discrimination. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.
Lohmann, Susanne.1993. “A Signalling Model of Informative and Manipulative Political Action.” American Political Science Review 87:319-33.
Maggio, G. and Lynch, O. J. 1997. Human Rights, Environment, and Economic Development: Existing and Emerging Standards in International Law and Global Society. Retrieved from: http://www.ciel.org/Publications/olp3iv.html
Martínez-Torres, M. E. And P.M. Rosset 2010. La Vía Campesina: the birth and evolution of a transnational social movement. Journal of Peasant Studies, 37(1), 149-175.
McAdam, D. 1996. The framing function of movement tactice: Strategic dramaturgy in the American civil rights movements. In McAdam, D. McCarthy JD and Zald MN(eds) Comparative Perspectives and Social Movements. Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Cultural Framings. Cambridge
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
119
University Press, 338-57.
McGrew, A. and Held, D. (eds.) (2002) Governing globalization: power, authority and global governance,Cambridge, UK, Polity Press
McKeon, N. 2009. The United Nations and Civil Society: legitimating global governance-whose voice? London:zed.
McKeon, Nora and Carol Kalafatic. (2009). Strengthening Dialogue: UN Experience with small Farmer Organizations and Indigenous Peoples. New York: UN NGO Liaison Service. Retrieved from:
http://www.un-ngls.org/IMG/pdf_Flyer_in_english.pdf
McKeon, Nora. 2014. La Via Campseina: The Peasants Way to Changing the System, not the Climate. Journal of World-Systems Research. Vol.# 21 No. 2.
McMichael, Philip. (2004). Development and Social Change: A Global Perspective.
Thousands Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
McMichael, Philip. (2009). “A Food Regime Genealogy.” Journal of Peasant Studies 36(1):139-169.
McMichael, Philip. 2013. Food Regimes and Agrarian Questions. Halifx & Winnepeg:
Fernwood Publishing.
McMichael, Philip.2009. A Food Regime Genealogy, Journal of Peasant Studies 36(1) (January 1):139-169.
Menezes, Francisco. (2001). “Food Sovereignty:A Vital Requirement for Food Security in the Context of Globalization.” Development 44(4):29-33.
Merry, S. E. 1997. Changing rights, changing culture. In: Cowan, J. K., Dembour, M. B.
and Wilson, R.A. (eds) Culture and Rights: Anthropological Perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
120
Messer, E. 1993. Anthropology and human rights. Annual Review of Anthropology, 22,221-49.
Mooney, P.H. and Hunt, S.A. 1996. A reprtroire of interpretation: Master frames and ideological continuity in US agrarian mobilization. The Sociological Quarterly 37(1):177-97.
Narula, S. 2010. Reclaiming the right to food as a normative reponse to the global food crisis. Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal, 13(2), 403-20.
Nelson J. Paul and Dorsey Ellen. 2008. New Rights Advocacy: Changing Strategies of Development and Human Rights NGOs , Georgetown University Press (April 14,
Nelson J. Paul and Dorsey Ellen. 2008. New Rights Advocacy: Changing Strategies of Development and Human Rights NGOs , Georgetown University Press (April 14,