• 沒有找到結果。

中國幼兒教師工作壓力源對其教師承諾之影響 - 政大學術集成

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "中國幼兒教師工作壓力源對其教師承諾之影響 - 政大學術集成"

Copied!
47
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. Pre-School Teacher Stressors in China and Its Impact On Teacher Commitment. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(2) 上 (response model of stress). 友文 文. 去。. 尤子. 文. 下 尤. 升. 尤. 升. 、. ,. 升 尤. 入 升. 尤. 174. ,. 以. 尤. 入. ,. 入 下. ,. 文. 尤. 以. 切子三. 文. :分. 尤 切. 文. 立. 尤. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(3) ........................................................................................................ 1 .................................................................................................................... 1. .................................................................................... 4 ........................................................................................ 4 .................................................................................... 8 ............................................................................................ 9. ............................................................................................ 11 .......................................................................................... 11 .............................................................................................................. 11. 政 治 大 .............................................................................................. 12 立 .......................................................................................................... 12. 學. ‧ 國. .............................................................................................................. 12. .................................................................................................................. 13 .................................................................................................................. 13. ‧. .............................................................................................................. 13. y. Nat. ...................................................................................................... 13. .............................................................................................. 14. n. al. er. io. sit. .................................................................................................................. 14. i n U. v. .................................................................................................................. 14. Ch. engchi. .......................................................................................................... 14. .............................................................................................. 15 ......................................................................................................... 15 .................................................. 15 .................................................................. 15 .............................................................................. 15 ............................................................................................. 18 .............................................................................................. 18 ...................................................................................... 20. ...................................................................................................... 23 ......................................................................................................... 23. ii. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(4) ...................................................... 23 ............................................................................................. 24 .................................................................................................................. 24 .................................................................................................................. 25 ................................................................................................................. 26 /. ........................................ 26. .................................................................................................................. 27 .............................................................................................. 27 .................................................................................................................. 27 ......................................................................................................... 28 .................................................................................. 28 治 政 大. ........................................................................................................... 30. 立. 學. ‧ 國. ...................................................................................................................... 30 ...................................................................................................................... 31. ...................................................................................... 36. ‧. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. iii. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(5) 心 ....................................................................................... 5 ..................................................................................................................... 17 ................................................................................................. 19 ............................................................................................................. 21 ..................................................................................................... 23. ................................................................................................................. 10 ......................................................................... 22. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. iv. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(6) 大切. ) Jarvis. 2002. 分. 互. 以. 以. 去. ,. 月. 。 2017. 下. 1723 另. ,. 下文. 入. 下. 治 2010 文 Troman, 政 大 下 ,. 立 加. ,. 工. ,. Nat. 友 Borge. 1990. al. n. 子。. Travers 子 Cooper. 以. 子 今. 文. Ch. 1993. engchi. i n U. 41. 以. Collins, Matthews,. 以. ,. 文. v. 文 三. 文 31. 29. 27. ,. ). ,. 文. 升. 互 (. ). 大 2010. 友 Piaget. 1936. 二之. 切. 二之. , ,. 升. Smith, Brice,. 文. McNamara, 2000 工. 升. ,. er. 。. io. ,. 1999. &. 中. y. 子. ‧. )子. 文. sit. 。. 切. ,. ‧ 國. ,. ,. 學. 下. 可. 升 出. 下. 下. , 升. 五. 仁. 2007. ,. 下. 1. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(7) , ,. )。三己. 子. 可. 升. 。三 (. ,. 升. 升 加. , 去. ,. 「. 2010. 尤. 十. ,. ,. 文. 入. 、. 去. Copper 升. 文. 文. 下. response model of stress. 文 , 三 去. al. 子文 文. 入. 下. 切. ‧. 月. 尤. 子文. 文. , 文. 文. 入. 下 去 v i n Ch Hakanen et. al., 2006; Kokkinos, & Barnett, 2011) i U e n g2007; c hMcCormick 天. n. 去. 去. 文. 文. 尤. 政今 治 大 文 尤 ?. 切. io. 友. 尤子. 1990. Nat. 子. 尤. 學. Sutherland. 切. 立. 乏. ‧ 國. 下. 子. 天 升. 天. 文. y. 、. 文. sit. ,. ,. er. 公切. 文. 2004. 子. , 下. ,. 文. 、. 文. 文. 文. 文. Sutherland & Copper, 2000. 了. 尤. 文. -. 文 尤. 文. 月. 尤 文. 。. 文 文. 入. Tennant, 2001; Tang, Au, Schwarzer, & Schmitz, 2001; Travis & Cooper, 1993. 他 可入. 2010. 乏. 出. 下. 文. Jackson. 2. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(8) & Maslach, 1982; Leiter & Maslach, 1988 ,. 王. 了. 下. 切子 入. 升. 入. 文. 文. 力. 文 Friedman, 1995; Little & Hudson,. 下 1998; Miller, Ferguson,. Byrne, 2000; Poulou & Norwich, 2000; Kyriacou & Pei-Yu Chien,. 2004. Brazil,. 升. 2013). (. 2010. 切. , 2003. 文. 2004. 2007 2002. 也. 立 、. 政 七治 大文 2003 戶 2004 文 ). 切. 才. 去. 互. Copper, 1996. ‧. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 2004. 學. 元. ‧ 國. 文. 2003. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 3. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(9) 包. 可子. ,. 切. ). 包. Selye (1956) 口. 文. 文. 乏. 升. 文. 文. 子月 2008. 功. 升. Grayson & Alvarez, 2008. 文以. 大 2000. (升. 2010. %. 文. 子. 治 文 政 大 子 少. 大. 」. 文. 升 子. Nat. 文 已. n. al. 下 文. Ch. 友入—. e n入g c h i. v i升 n U. 。. 文. 入. 。三. Sapolsky, 1998 升. er. io Brazil, 2013). 月. 入. Vasse, Nighuis, & Kok, 1998. 文. 文. 升. ‧. 文. Kyriacou,. 予. 學. 。. ‧ 國. 立. 。. 文. y. 入. sit. 去. 文. 文. 文. 口. 尺. 文. 文 文 已. 文. 升. 4. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(10) Marianne & David. 1997 1999 1999. 2000 2002 2003 2003 2004. 立. 2004. y. sit. al. n. 2007. io. 2007. Nat. 2006. er. 2006. ‧. 2005. ‧ 國. 2005. 學. 2004. 政 治 大. 2007. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 2008 2008 2008 2010. Kiryako 203. Chien 2004 98%. 90%. 5. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(11) 政 治 大. 立. McGuigan et al., 1988. ,. n. al. 子 ( 升. Ch. 2001. 子. 內. i n ,U. e下n g c h i. 升. 升. 文. 互. v,. 反. 升. 小. 不. 2007. 子. ;. er. io. 毋代. 下. sit. 也. 入. y. Nat. 下. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 入. 升 毋. (. 代. , 文. :. 切. 子. 升. 久 ....... &. 代. 代. 去. 升. 文. 1999. 6. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(12) 下. ,. ;. 只. 子. ,. —— 1999. & 子. 子. 下. ,. 下. 子. ,. 下. 文. 入 1999. &. 公. ,升. ,. 化. ,. ,. 子. 下. 文. 。三. 互 出. 子. 立文. 反. 、. 也. 升. :下. Nat 下. sit. n. 升. 1999 仍. a已 l ,. ,. Ch 反. ,. 文. i n U. , 1999. &. 子. e n g c升h i. ,. 2001. 子. 下. ?. 已. 比. io 子. (. 子 升. ,. y. 文. 下. ,. ‧. 已. 升. 2003. er. 分. 女. 下. 學. ‧ 國. 以. 政 治 下大 ;. v. 2000 文. ;. 下. 子. ,. 下 手毋 口 (. 子. 文. 2010. 了. ,. 水. 子. ,. 天 文. 2002. 7. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(13) ,. 文. 互. ,. 去. 去. 下升. 升. ,. 升. 2001. (. 文. 友文 去. 子. ,. 反. 文. job burnout. 加 入. 下。. 文. 子. 文. Kushnir, Cohen, & Kita,. 文. 政 治 大 下 升下. 2000; Innstrand, Espnes, & Mykletun, 2004) 大. 立. 升. 升. 學. ‧ 國. 下升. 大. 升. 文. 文. Carter, 1983. 2009. 文. al. 文. n. ,. 文. 。. Ch. engchi 大. (physiological responses). 入. 升. 文. Golembiewski, 文. sit. io. 大. Maslach, Schaufeli, & Leiter,. y. Nat. Munzenrider,. Mslach & Jackson, 1981. ‧. 2001. 2017. 才. 干. er. ’. i n U Weiten. v. 五. 1998. emotional responses. behavioral responses. 支. 文. 功. 大 1999. Caspi, Bolger, &. Eckenrode, 1987 Affleck, Tennen, Urrows, & Higgins, 1994 Repetti, 1993 功. 1999. Abramson, Seligman, &. Teasdale, 1984 Grunberg & Straub, 1992 Cohen & Lichtenstein,1990 文 去. 大 出. 大 ?. 功. 1999. 8. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(14) ,. 文. 1 1a 1b 1c. 政 治乏 尤大(organizational commitment) 乏. 尤 (teacher commitment) 三. 立. 乏. 尤. 升. 升. io. 升. al. 升. 升. 以. 尤. i n U. 子. 以 commitment to. 尤. 2. v. 升 3. 升. 尤 尤. 五. commitment to profession. 以. ). 2014. 1. 升. 子. C h下 也 升 engchi 4. 乏. 升 下. n. commitment to school 占. 升. 1. 下. commitment to teaching. 乏. 、. Thien & Razak, &. sit. students. 尤. identification. Nat. 尤. 月. ‧. Ramayah, 2014). 下. 子. ). psychological attachment. 升. 尤. 學. ). 尤子. y. 升. er. 1992. ‧ 國. 尺. Thien & Razak, & Ramayah,. 尤. 互. Cohen 2000 ;. Firestone & Pennell , 1993 ; Firestone & Rosenblum 1988 ; Somech & Bogler , 2002 尤、. 尤. 升. 下. 尤. Thien, Razak, & Ramayah,. 升 2014 子。. 入 乏. & Cross, 1990). 尤 乏. 尤 乏. 去. Somech & Bogler, 2002. 太 也. (Culver, Wolfe, 升. 升. 9. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(15) (Kushman, 1992). 、. 文. 下 文 尤. 升. 尤. ,. 。. 去. 文. 入. 。 2. ,. 文. 子. 尤. 2a. ,. 文. 子升. 尤. 2b. ,. 文. 子升. 尤. 2c. ,. 文. 子 升. 尤. 2d. ,. 文. 子以. 尤. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. 十. i n U. v. 十. 10. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(16) 互. , 子。. 尤. 文 升. 互. 子. 尤. 下. 升. 及. 尤. 升. 子. 尤. 以. 子. ,. 升 尤. 下 :分. , ,. 立. A :子 B :. ‧ 國. 子. 不 230. Nat. ,. 以. 一. 98%. ). 174. 互. io. 26. n. al. Ch. 乎 乎. engch 少i. 入. i n U. 又. 尤. 入—升 日. 、. ?. 。. 子 今 互 34. 升. 尤. 友。. 切. v. 日 Brislin, 1980. 引. 升 升. 尤. 以. 尤. 、. 乎. IBM SPSS Statistics 22.0. 、. (Bagozzi & Yi, 1988). 主. 乎. 文 升. 尤. (back translation). ?. 乎. 尤. 以. er. ). 3. 太 :. 尤. 升. 內. ,. 子. 升. 下. ‧. ). 尤. 學. 入. 子. 不. 升. 治 政 入夕七 大 1. 子. 三. :. 尤. y. :. 升. sit. :. 二. :. 文 尤. 互. 夕七. 、. 入. 友 Fornell 子 Larcker 1981. 、 .50. 。. 五 方 人. 。. 11. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(17) composite reliability extracted, AVE. >.70. 。. average variance. ?. >.50. 、. 、 ,. 文. Karasek. Likert. 立. 政 治1-5 大 1 5 Cronbach's alpha. 1. io. 毋. 5. n. al. Ch. Likert 5. Kyriacou. i n U. 1-5. 文. 手. 1978. 1. 1. 0.92. 16 0.945. Educator Burnout Inventory , EBI 1981. v. Sutcliffe. engchi. 17 Cronbach's alpha. Likert). ?. Nat. 1-5. 8. ‧. ). customer mistreatment. 2008. y. :. Walker. sit. 下. 0.851. er. 可. 1. 0.83. Skarlicki Jaarsveld. 下. 5. 學. ‧ 國. 4. 1999. Maslach. (MBI) 1. 5. 1. 6 17. 12. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(18) 5. 13 Cronbach's alpha. Cronbach's alpha. 0.902. 0.908. 0.906. 0.899. 0.908. 尤. Thien Razak. Ramayah. Likert scale. 2014. 1. 5 17. 5. 5 Cronbach's alpha. 0.593. 3. Cronbach's alpha = 0.524. 2. 5. 5. 0.541. 政 治 大1. Cronbach's alpha = 0.566. =0 .762. 立. validity. Cronbach's alpha expert. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 升 子. 尤. ). al. n. 以. Ch. engchi. SPSS 22.0 子. i n U. v. Amos 21.0 descriptive statistics. ). analysis. 升. er. io. Pines & Aronson, 1988; Caufield & Yahior, 2001 ,. ). y. 入. sit. 去. Nat. 尤. 下. Cronbach. s alpha. 友 correlation factor analysis. structural equation model. ). 13. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(19) SPSS 22.0. ). 互. 五. 五. 互. Pearson , ). 文. 政 治 大 、. 立Cronbach’s alpha. ?. ). 三. )子. 少. 五. Cronbach. 人 0.7. 介. ‧ y. sit 入. 、. n. al. Ch 今. engchi. i n U. 切. 下. ?. er. io 今. s alpha. 、. Nat. 且. 日. 學. ‧ 國. 下. 文. 。. 今. ). 0.6. 尤. v升. 。 ). 日 文. 子. , 五. 14. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(20) 日. 下. ). 五. 乏. 升. size. position. 政 治 大. < .05. 立. p < .05. r. y 文. n. al. er. io. workload. p. sit. 子. 友入—. r = .21. ‧. 文. Nat. ,. r = . 21. ‧ 國. p < .05. p < .05. 學. = .18. r = -.15. parent mistreatment. 下. Ch. misbehavior. 子. engchi. i n U. v. student. 升. r = .24 p < .05. r = .40 p < .05 r = 40 p < .05 下. 子. , 升 = -.32. 升. 五. 子. 尤. 尤 p < .05. 。 子. ,. 升 以. 尤. 升. 尤 r. 尤 下. 15. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(21) 尤 尤. 以. 尤 升. 下. 尤. 升. 尤. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 升. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 16. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(22) Mean. S.D.. 1. 1.. 3.67. 1.26. --. 2.. 1.75. 0.79. .03. --. 3.. 34.01. 37.60. .01. -.23**. --. 4.. 26.58. 9.01. .08. -.32***. .31***. 5.. 1.99. 0.13. .02. -.01. -.04. 6.. 3.25. 0.81. -.08. .36***. -.04. 7.. 2.81. 0.70. -.01. -.14. 8.. 1.51. 0.76. -.35***. .12 .16*. 3. 4.. 5. 6. 7. 8. 10. 9. 11. 12. 13. 政 治 大. --. 立. -.18*. --. .32***. -.10. --. .10. -.10. .08. -.17*. -.07. -.11. -.01. .24**. .15*. 學. -.13. .09. -.01. .17*. .13. .56***. -.01. -.01. .12. .15*. .24**. .40***. .41***. (.95). -.02. .10. .01. .34***. -.02. .34***. .28***. .09. (.78). ‧ 國. 2. .86. (.95). 0.77. 10.. 2.32. 0.69. -.15*. .02. 11.. 2.92. 0.70. -.05. .21**. 12.. 3.39. 0.69. .06. .18*. .01. .12. -.03. .14. .05. .23**. .25**. .05. .55***. (.84). 13.. 3.25. 0.79. -.12. .12. .08. .06. .01. .09. .10. .34***. .21**. .11. .59***. .66***. (.83). 14.. 2.50. 0.87. -.01. .05. -.01. -.04. -.03. .09. .14. .28***. .17*. .33***. .22**. .09. .15*. =1 101. 150. y. sit. er. al. v=4 301 i =1 =2 n =3 Ch engchi U. =2 151. n. =2 =3 =1 =2 * p < .05 ** < .01 *** < .001 N=174. io. 100. (.95). ‧. 2.23. Nat. 9.. -.19*. 200. =3 201. 300. =5 =4. (.76). =1 =5. 17. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(23) Litte Cunningha, Shahar. Widama 2002. item parceling. 立. 政 治 大. c2 = 484.19 df = 224 CFI = .91 NFI =.84 IFI = .91. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. RMSEA = .08. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 18. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(24) df. 8. 484.19. 224. 7. 718.37. 231. 6. 1010.98. 237. 5. 1073.96. 242. 4. 1105.89. 246. 28.26***. 3. 1265.37. 249. 2. 1563.28. 1. 2031.30. NFI. IFI. RMSEA. .91. .84. .91. .08. .82. .76. .83. .11. .67. .72. .14. .65. .70. .14. .69. .63. .69. .14. 31.25***. .63. .58. .63. .15. 251. 39.97***. .52. .48. .53. .17. 252. 55.25***. .35. .33. .29. .20. 33.45***. ‧ 國. +. + +. y. sit. Model 3. a l+. er. +. ‧. +. n. Model 2. io. +. +. Model 5. +. +. +. Model 6. +. +. +. Model 7. +. +. +. 治 .72 政40.52*** 大.70 32.77*** 學. :. +. CFI. 立. Model 1. Model 4 (. △c2/△df. Nat. Baseline. c2. Ch. e n g c h++i U + +. +. v i n + + +. + +. 19. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(25) Structural Equation Model SEM. c2 = 788.63 p < .001 df = 245 NFI = .89 IFI = .80. RMSEA = .11. c2 = 1015.89 p <. 001 df = 350 NFI = .64. CFI = .77. IFI = .77. 政 治 大. RMSEA = .11. 立p < .01. β = .19. β = .26. p <. 001. β < .28 p < .001. ‧. ‧ 國. 學 sit. y. Nat. n. al. er. io. bootstrapping. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. β = .19 p < .01 β = .26 p <. 001 β < .28 p <. 001 1a. 1b. 2. 1. 1c. 2d. 20. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(26) 2a. 2b. 2c. 1. 95% Bootstrapping = 5000. .01. -.05. .07. .02. -.03. .09. -.16. -.01. -.03. .16. .01. -.06. .13. .02. -.04. .14. -.10*. -.25. -.02. .03. -.02. .12. .01. -.04. .11. .02. -.03. .11. v-.19. -.01. Ch. engchi. y. sit. er. ‧ 國 n. -.07*. ‧. io. .10. 治 政 -.07* 大 .04. Nat. al. -.02. 學. 立. .02. i n U. 21. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(27) 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi U. v i n. 22. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(28) 也 。. 。. 》. 。. 也 1: 1a: 1b. 政 治 大. 1c. 立. 2. 2b 2c. 。. er. io. v i8 n U. n. al. sit. y. Nat. 2d. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 2a. B. 9. SEM 4. Ch. :. B. e:n g c h i … —. 4. B. 2. 3. 524. 5. 1:1a:1b:1c. 2. B. 5. : :. —. : 3. :. 3 : 3 B :. :. :. : B. :. : 3. 23. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(29) : 3 2. …. —. :. …. 2a:2b:2c:. : :. 8. 2. :. B. —. 4. :. 5. 3. 立. …. 4. B. 5. … 4. …. B. 5. …. 4. …. 52. 4. …. 2d. :. 2. ‧. ‧ 國. 5. 學. 3. Nat. sit. y. :. al. 8Friedman,. er. io. :. 9 B. 政 4 治… 524 大 3. _. 2a:2b:2c B. :. B. :. B. SEM. :. 524. : 5. 2. 3. : :. 2d3. v. n. 1995; Little & Hudson, 1998; Miller, Ferguson, 7Byrne, 2000; Poulou & Norwich, 2000;. Ch. Kyriacou & Pei-Yu Chien, 200493 : 5. 8. engchi. i n U. :. 4. 524. :199993 :. : B. 3. B :. 2. 2 3. : :. B :. model of stress9. : Sutherland. : Copper820009. :. 8response B. :. 3. 24. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(30) 2 :_. 3. B. B. B. B. : :. :. :. 4. 5. 3 :. 3. : 5. …. : B 立. 524 …. 5. :. :. : :. Nat. io. :. : B. 4. 5. : 3. :. n. 3 9. 4. …. 5. Ch. B. :. :. al. _. e n g8c h i. ‧. 3. …. 學. 4. 政 治 大 5 4 B 5. 8Sutherland & Copper:20009:. 5. 4. 4. i n U. _. B …. 3. 。. 。. 。. Culver, Wolfe & Cross 2002 。. :. v. 。. Bogler. :. y. 0. : 3. ‧ 國. 0. SEM. 3. sit. …. …. er. 4. :. 1990. 。. Somech & 。. Thien Razak & Ramayah 2014. 25. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(31) 。. 。. 。. 。. 入 。. 》. 。. 。. 。. 。. 。 。 。 ? 。. ?. ;. 。. 、. 。 。. 了。. 政 治 大. 。. 立. 。. ;. 》. ( ;. 。. 。. 。. (. 。. io. n. al. 。 。. 。. er. 。. 。. (. y. Nat. 。. 。. sit. ‧ 國. 。. 」. ‧. 》. 。. 學. 。 (. (. Ch. 。. engchi. i n U. v. 。. 。. /. 。. 。. 。 A/B. ,A. 。. 。 。. 。. priming effect. B. 。 ?. Blaxton, 1989. 26. 1-3. 上 。. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(32) 《 》. 。. 。. 》. 。. 」. 。. non-probability sampling. 。 。. 一。. 》 》. 。. 。. 。. 。 。. 。 。. 政 治 大. 》. 立. ‧ 國. 。. 》. ). 。 。. n. al. y. sit. er. 。. io 下. 。. /. Nat. ?. 》. ‧. 」. 。. 」. 。. 學. 。. 。. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 174. 26. 。一. 。也 。. 》. /. 《. 。. 。. 。 。. 」. ;. 27. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(33) (. 。. 。. 三. 。. 」. 。. 三. 。. 。 ?. 。 。. 2015. Bacharach. Bamberger. 」. Kuschel. 「. 。. 2016. 。. 。 治 。 政 大 。. 立. 。 Carson, Baumgartner,. y. Bacharach. 2016. n. al. Bamberger. Bacharach & Bamberger. 。. er. io. 。. 。. sit. 。. ;. 。 。. Nat. :. 。. ‧. 。. 學. 。. ‧ 國. Matthews, & Tsouloupas, 2010. Ch. 2016. Hobfoll, 2000. i U e n g c h。. 。. v ni. 。. 。 》. 。 。 。. 。 。. 。. 。. 》 上. 。. 人. 。. 》. (Westman & Etziom, 2001). 。. 》 1-3. 。 。 25-30. 。 28. 。. 。. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(34) 。 ? 。 2001. 也. 。. 》. 。. 。 》. 2009. 。. 。 1999 1999. 二. 2002. 2006. ?。 。. 入. 。 。. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. 上. ‧. ‧ 國. 。. 立 。. 政 治 大. 學. 三. 。. 2007. Ch. engchi. 29. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(35) 1999 2. <. >. 1. 146-161 2003. <. -. >. , 2003. >. 115-1 2003. <. 立. 2017. <. <. al. n 力 2009. 十. >. >. y -. sit. 2001. io. <. -. Nat. 2009. 也. 。. <. ‧. ‧ 國. -. 學. 2011. >. 政 治 ,大. >. er. 11. <. Ch. i n U. i e n g c, h1-154. <. v. >. :」. >. 2009. <. 2007. <. >. >. ,. 30. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(36) Aloe, A. M., Shisler, S. M., Norris, B. D., Nickerson, A. B., & Rinker, T. W. (2014). A multivariate meta-analysis of student misbehavior and teacher burnout. Educational Research Review, 12, 30-44. Bolger, K. E., & Patterson, C. J. (2003). Sequelae of child maltreatment: Vulnerability and resilience. Resilience and vulnerability: Adaptation in the context of childhood adversities, 156-181. Borg, M. G., Riding, R. J., & Falzon, J. M. (1991). Stress in teaching: a study of occupational stress and its determinants, job satisfaction and career commitment among primary schoolteachers. Educational Psychology, 11(1), 59-75. Brazil, T. M. (2013). An examination of stress in early childhood teachers. Open University. 政 治 大 Burley, W. W., Hall, B. W., Villeme, M. G., & Brockmeier, L. L. (1991). A path analysis of 立 the mediating role of efficacy in first-year teachers’ experiences, reactions, and plans. American Educational Research Association.. 學. ‧ 國. Press.. Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers' self-efficacy. ‧. beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students' academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of school psychology, 44(6), 473-490.. y. Nat. sit. Carson, R. L., Baumgartner, J. J., Matthews, R. A., & Tsouloupas, C. N. (2010). Emotional. er. io. exhaustion, absenteeism, and turnover intentions in childcare teachers: examining the. al. impact of physical activity behaviors. Journal of health psychology, 15(6), 905-914.. n. v i n Caulfield, R., & Kataoka-Yahiro, M. training needs of child care C(2001). U h e nHealth i h c g professionals. Early Childhood Education Journal, 29(2), 119-123.. Chan, W. Y., Lau, S., Nie, Y., Lim, S., & Hogan, D. (2008). Organizational and personal predictors of teacher commitment: The mediating role of teacher efficacy and identification with school. American educational research journal, 45(3), 597-630. Chen, J., Silverthorne, C., & Hung, J. (2006). Organization communication, job stress, organizational commitment, and job performance of accounting professionals in Taiwan and America. Leadership & Organization Development Journal,27(4), 242-249. Chung, L. C., Marvin, C. A., & Churchill, S. L. (2005). Teacher factors associated with preschool teacher‐child relationships: Teaching efficacy and parent-teacher relationships. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 25(2), 131-142.. 31. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(37) Cohen, S., & Lichtenstein, E. (1990). Perceived stress, quitting smoking, and smoking relapse. Health Psychology, 9(4), 466. Cordes, Cynthia L., and Thomas W. Dougherty. (1993) A review and an integration of research on job burnout. Academy of management review, 18(4), 621-656. Culver, S.M., Wolfe, L.M. and Cross, L.H. (1990). Testing a model of teacher satisfaction for Blacks and Whites. American Educational Research Journal, 27(2), 323–349. Hakanen, Jari J. (2008) The job-demand-resource model: A three year cross lagged study of burnout, depression, commitment and work engagement. Work & Stress, 22(3), 224-244. Enochs, L. G., Scharmann, L. C., & Riggs, I. M. (1995). The relationship of pupil control to preservice elementary science teacher self–efficacy and outcome expectancy. Science Education, 79(1), 63-75.. 治 政 大 system in the teachers' beliefs when implementing an innovative educational 立 Netherlands. British Journal of educational psychology, 72(2), 227-243.. Evers, W. J., Brouwers, A., & Tomic, W. (2002). Burnout and self-efficacy: A study on. ‧ 國. 學. Friedman, I. A. (1995). Measuring school principal-experienced burnout. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(4), 641-651.. ‧. Grayson, J. L., & Alvarez, H. K. (2008). School climate factors relating to teacher burnout: A mediator model. Teaching and teacher education, 24(5), 1349-1363.. Nat. sit. y. Grunberg, N. E., & Straub, R. O. (1992). The role of gender and taste class in the effects of. er. io. stress on eating. Health Psychology, 11(2), 97.. Houtman, I. (1999). Job stress, absenteeism and coronary heart disease European cooperative. n. al. Ch. i n U. v. study (the JACE study). The European Journal of Public Health,9(1), 52-57.. engchi. Innstrand, S. T., Espnes, G. A., & Mykletun, R. (2004). Job stress, burnout and job satisfaction: an intervention study for staff working with people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 17(2), 119-126. Jackson, S. E., Schwab, R. L., & Schuler, R. S. (1986). Toward an understanding of the burnout phenomenon. Journal of applied psychology, 71(4), 630. Jarvis, M. (2002). Teacher stress: A critical review of recent findings and suggestions for future research directions. Stress News: The UK Journal of the International Stress Management Association, 14(1), 12-16. Jepson, E., & Forrest, S. (2006). Individual contributory factors in teacher stress: The role of achievement striving and occupational commitment. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(1), 183-197.. 32. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(38) Karasek, R. (1999). The job content questionnaire (JCQ): An instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. PsycEXTRA Dataset. doi:10.1037/e366492004-013 Kushman, J. W. (1992). The organizational dynamics of teacher workplace commitment: A study of urban elementary and middle schools. Educational administration quarterly, 28(1), 5-42. Kushnir, T., Cohen, A. H., & Kitai, E. (2000). Continuing medical education and primary physicians’ job stress, burnout and dissatisfaction. Medical Education, 34(6), 430-436. Kyriacou, C., & Chien, P. Y. (2009). Teacher stress in Taiwanese primary schools. The Journal of Educational Enquiry, 5(2). 86-104. Kyriacou, C., & Ortega Martín, J. L. (2010). Beginning secondary school teachers’. 治 政 大 sources, and symptoms. Kyriacou, C., & Sutcliffe, J. (1978). Teacher stress: Prevalence, 立 British journal of educational psychology, 48(2), 159-167. perceptions of pupil misbehavior in Spain. Teacher development, 14(4), 415-426.. ‧ 國. 學. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Coping and adaptation. The handbook of behavioral medicine, 282-325.. ‧. Leiter, M. P., & Maslach, C. (1988). The impact of interpersonal environment on burnout and organizational commitment. Journal of organizational behavior, 9(4), 297-308.. Nat. sit. y. Golembiewski, R. T., Munzenrider, R., & Carter, D. (1983). Phases of progressive burnout applied behavioral science, 19(4), 461-481.. n. al. Ch. er. io. and their work site covariates: Critical issues in OD research and praxis. The Journal of. i n U. v. Little, E., & Hudson, A. (1998). Conduct problems and treatment across home and school: A. engchi. review of the literature. Behaviour Change, 15(4), 213-227. Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of organizational behavior, 2(2), 99-113. Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual review of psychology, 52(1), 397-422. Miller, A., Ferguson, E., & Moore, E. (2002). Parents' and pupils' causal attributions for difficult classroom behaviour. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(1), 27-40. Sagie, Abraham (1998). Employee absenteeism, organizational commitment, and job satisfaction: Another look. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 52(2), 156-171. Pines, A., & Aronson, E. (1988). Career burnout: Causes and cures. Free press.. 33. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(39) Poulou, M., & Norwich, B. (2000). Teachers’ causal attributions, cognitive, emotional and behavioural responses to students with emotional and behavioral difficulties. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(4), 559-581. Repetti, R. L. (1993). Short-term effects of occupational stressors on daily mood and health complaints. Health Psychology, 12(2), 125. Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1988). A model of behavioral self-regulation: Translating intention into action. In Advances in experimental social psychology, 21, 303-346. Academic Press. Schwab, J. J. (1983). The practical 4: Something for curriculum professors to do. Curriculum inquiry, 13(3), 239-265. Schwarzer, R., & Hallum, S. (2008). Perceived teacher self-efficacy as a predictor of job. 治 政 大 and escalating Schaubroeck, J., & Williams, S. (1993). Type A behavior pattern 立 commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology,78(5), 862-867. doi:10.1037//0021stress and burnout: Mediation analyses. Applied psychology, 57, 152-171.. ‧ 國. 學. 9010.78.5.862. Seligman, M. E., Kaslow, N. J., Alloy, L. B., Peterson, C., Tanenbaum, R. L., & Abramson,. ‧. L. Y. (1984). Attributional style and depressive symptoms among children. Journal of abnormal psychology, 93(2), 235.. Nat. sit. y. Selye, H. (1956). The stress of life.. er. io. Smith, A., Brice, C., Collins, A., Matthews, V., McNamara, R. (2000). The scale of occupational stress: a further analysis of the impact of demographic factors and type of. n. al. Ch. i n U. job. Sudbury: Health and Safety Executive. HSE Books.. engchi. v. Somech, A., & Bogler, R. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of teacher organizational and professional commitment. Educational administration quarterly, 38(4), 555-577. Sutherland, V., & Cooper, C. (2000). Strategic stress management: An organizational approach. Springer. Tang, C. S. K., Au, W. T., Schwarzer, R., & Schmitz, G. (2001). Mental health outcomes of job stress among Chinese teachers: Role of stress resource factors and burnout. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 22(8), 887-901. Tennant, C. (2001). Work-related stress and depressive disorders. Journal of psychosomatic research, 51(5), 697-704.. 34. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(40) Thien, L. M., & Razak, N. A. (2013). Academic coping, friendship quality, and student engagement associated with student quality of school life: A partial least square analysis. Social Indicators Research, 112(3), 679-708. Travers, C. J., & Cooper, C. L. (1993). Mental health, job satisfaction and occupational stress among UK teachers. Work & Stress, 7(3), 203-219. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and teacher education, 17(7), 783-805. Vasse, R. M., Nijhuis, F. J. N., & Kok, G. (1998). Associations between work stress, alcohol consumption and sickness absence. Addiction, 93(2), 231-241. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of personality and. 治 政 Westman, M., & Etzion, D. (2001). The impact of vacation大 and job stress on burnout and 立 absenteeism. Psychology & Health, 16(5), 595-606. social psychology, 54(6), 1063.. ‧ 國. 學. Weiten, W. (1998). Pressure, major life events, and psychological symptoms. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13(1), 51.. ‧. Woods, P., Jeffrey, B., Troman, G., & Boyle, M. (1997). Restructuring schools, reconstructing teachers: Responding to change in the primary school. Open University. n. al. er. io. sit. y. Nat. Press. Ch. engchi. 35. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(41) 6 6 0. 3 治 政 大. 7 0.. .. 學. ‧ 國. 立. 3 4 54. A. ‧. 0. B. 3. sit. n. al. er. io. y. Nat .. 3. Ch. engchi. 36. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(42) A: _____________________ □. □1008. 9. 300. □301. □101. 8. (. □. □. ________ □. □ □. □. 立□. □ 8. (. ). / ____. 9______________. ________. 政 治 大 :________ □. □. 學. □. 9 ________. ________. io. n. al. er. Nat. □20008 9 □2,001 4,000 □4,001 6,000 □6,001 8,000 □8,001 1,0000 □10,001. ‧. ‧ 國. □. 200. ____. _8. ________. ). 9______________. □151. 150. 9. □. □. _8. y. □201. □. sit. □. Ch. engchi. 37. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(43) 8 5. 6 31 7 42. 0. 0. 4 9. 立. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 5. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. 3. Ch. engchi. 38. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(44) : :. —. 3. (. :. 3. 2 _. 立. 105. —. 5) 3. n. al. :. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 31111111111111. (. 31111111111111. (. 3111111111111. (. 3111111111. (. 311111. (. :. : : :. (. er. io. : (1. —. sit. Nat. : 3. y. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. 3. 政 治 大. 39. 6 .. :. 6. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(45) B-. 5. (. B. : :. —. 3. :. B. ( :. 立 —. 3………………………………. —. 6. Nat. 7. io. 8. n. al. :. 11 12. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 1. 2. 4. 5. 3. 3………………………. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 3……………………. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 3. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 2. 3. 4. 5. 2. 3. 4. 5. 2. 3. 4. 5. 3……………………………. 10. 1. v i 3…… 1 n Ch U e n g cBh i 3 1. B. 3…. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 14. 3…. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 15. 3……………. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 16. 3……………………. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 17. 3. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 3………………………………. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 13. 18. 3……. 5. ‧. 5. 3……………. 4. y. 4. —. 3. er. 3. 3……………. 2. 學. ‧ 國. 2. 1. sit. —. 1. 治 政 3……………………大. —. 40. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(46) : :. —. 3 :. ( :. 2. 3. . 2. 0. .. 6. 政6治 大 6. 2 7. 0. 立. 3. 0. ). 3. 3. 6. ‧. 3. ‧ 國. 學. (. 2. y. Nat. n. al. er. io. sit. 3. 2 3. Ch. engchi. i n U. v. 8 0 3. 6 .. .. (. 41. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(47) :. 6 :. 立. 6. 政 治 大. ‧. ‧ 國. 學. n. er. io. sit. y. Nat. al. Ch. engchi. 42. i n U. v. DOI:10.6814/NCCU201901103.

(48)

參考文獻

相關文件

The result indicated that the constitutive relationship among the flow stress, deformation temperature, and strain rate for IN 600 during hot deformation satisfied the

Thus, emotional intelligence and social support are main elements to reduce teacher stress and interpersonal conflict, as well as to increase job

In different gender、time for study、time for cram、the parents education level and household income of junior high school students , some aspects of the academic stress were

In addition, the study found that mood, stress, leadership and decision-making will affect the employees’ job satisfaction1. In other words, those factors increasing or

(1980), A Conceptual Formulation for Research on Stress, In J.E.McGrat, Social and psychological factors in stress, New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston. (1982), “Counselor’s Role

The purposes of this research are to find the factors of affecting organizational climate and work stress, to study whether the gender, age, identity, and

The isothermal and anisothermal mechanical behavior were analyzed by using finite element method (FEM) in this study to simulate the stress/strain behavior of the solder balls

In Type I, one performed comparison of 2D&amp;3D model, impact of intrinsic stress of devices, package thermal effect, and transistor location effect.. On the other hand,