GreaTeach 2002 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 , 1998 , 2001 *
ERIC Thesaurus creative teaching development and use of novel, original, or inventive
teaching methods ERIC, 1966 Disney’s American teacher awards
creative teaching strategies
Disney, 2002 Wood 1998 jealousy, envy Killion, 2000 Killion 1999 1996 1998 a culture of learning
GreaTeach 2002 Chinese Creativity Development
Association, CCDA National Taiwan Normal University, NTNU
35-40 35 20 30 30
Ford 1999
case-based reasoning argumentation
information extraction
text summarizing text clustering
term matching
e-h 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
Banks 1994 APU The APU model of
interaction between mind and hand
Konno Nonaka 1995 explicit knowledge
2
Hong 2002
Anderson 1976 I love myself 1. 1 / 2 3 4 5 2. 1 2 3 4 5 No, David! 4 60% 20% Spearman 1923 1. 2. 3.
3 4 / 5 Tree Monster 2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 40% 20% Maslow 1968 Maslow 1968
1. 1 2 3 4 5 2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 40% 30% 20% 10% Guilford 1950 structure of intellect model,SOI
Wallach Kogan 1969
4 5 2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Waller 1932 The Sociology of Teaching
Barrows 1986 a b c
d e f
2 1. 1. 1. 1. 40 40% 60% 40% % 30% 30% 20% 20% 20% 2. 2. 2. 10% 3. 3. 3. 2. 4. 3. 4. 4. 5. 5. 4. 6. 5. 5. 6. 6. 6. 7. 7. 7. 8. 8. 8. 9. . 9. 9. 1. 1. 1. 1. 2. 2. 3. 4. 2. 3. 2. 3. 5. 3. 6.
3. 4. 1 2 5. 6. 7. 8. Sternberg 1994 a b c d e f g h Bruner 1960 3 1. 1. 1. 1. 2. 2. 2. 2. 3. 3. 3. 4. 4.
1. 1. 1. 1. 2. 2. 2. 2. 3. 3. 3. 3. 4. 4. 5. 4. 5. 4. 6. 5. 6. 6. 7. 7. 7. 8. 8. 1. 1. 1. 1. 2. 2. 2. 3. 1. 1. 1. 1.
1. 1. 1. 1. 2. 2. 2. 3. 1. 1. 2. 3. 1. 1. 2. 2. 3.
What are you
doing 3.
I am -Ving. 4.
4.
1. 1 2 3 4 5 2. 3. 1 2 3 4 4. 1 2 3 5. 1 2 6. 7. / TPR
Swartz 2003 teaching of thinking
teaching for thinking
Swartz 2003
2001 1998
Anderson, N. (1976). Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Barrows, H. S. (1986). A taxonomy of problem-based learning methods. Medical Education, 20, 481-486. Banks, F. (1994). Teaching technology. London: The Open University.
Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. NY: Vintage Books.
Disney (2002). Disney’s American teacher awards: Honoring creativity in teaching. Burbank, California: Disney Hand.
ERIC (1966). http://www. ericfacility. net/extra/pub/thesfull. cfm?TERM=Creative%20Teaching
Ford, N. (1999). Information retrieval and creativity: Towards support for the original thinker. Journal of
Documentation, 55(5), 528-542.
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American psychologist, 5, 444-454. Hong, J. C. (2002). http://www. ccda. org. tw
Killion, J. (1999). Islands of Hope in the sea of dreams: A research report on the eight schools that received
the National Award for model professional Development. U. S. Department of Education and WestEd.
Killion, J. (2000). Teachers who learn kids who achieve. WestEd.
Konno, N. & Nonaka, I. (1995). Intellectualizing capability. Tokyo: Japan Economic News.
Maslow, A. H. (1968). A holistic approach to creativity, Reprinted from C. W. Tylor (ed. ). A climate for
creativity: Reports of the seventh national research conference on creativity. University of Utah.
Spearman, C. (1923). The nature of intelligence and the pricaiples of cognition.
Wood, J. M. (1999). Early literacy instruction and educational technologies: Three classroom-based models. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation of the Graduate School of Education of the Havard University.
2003 10 03
2004 01 12
2004 02 12
A Case Study of Teaching Strategies for Four Award Winning
Creative Teachers at Elementary and Junior High Schools
J
ON-C
HAO, H
ONGY
A-L
ING, L
INC
HAN-L
I, L
INGraduate School of Toy
Camphor Tree Junior
Department of Industrial Education
and Game Design National
High School
National Taiwan Normal
Taipei Teachers College
Taipei County
University
This study aimed to investigate the teaching strategies applied by creative teachers at elementary and junior high school and their teaching effectiveness after the implementation of creative teaching activities. Through purposive sampling, four recipients of Creative Teaching Award at GreaTeach 2002 were studied. The four award winners came from various fields, including Art & Humanities, English, Synthetic Activities, and Mathematics. The in-depth interview research method was used in order for the selected creative teachers to self-describe their strategies and results after implementation. The research findings of this study include: 1) To help students develop respect for each other, the Synthetic Activities ,English, and Math teachers all used in-class discussion; 2) The Art & Humanities and Math case subjects used in-class discussion to promote openness in students’ emotional expressions, while the Synthetic Activities teacher created and environment conducive to openness, and the English case subject used game oriented activities to increase students’ openness; 3) The Synthetic Activities , English, Art & Humanities, and Math case subjects applied activities with a discussion orientation, a game orientation, a teaching orientation, and hands-on teaching materials respectively; 4) Game oriented activities adopted by the four instructors were found to be effective for teenagers and children; 5) All four teachers used teaching orientated activities to increase students’ cognition; 6) To boost students’ question raising ability, all four instructors used discussion-oriented activities; 7)To increase the students’ self-confidence, the Synthetic Activities and English teachers adopted lecturing-orientated activities, while the Art & Humanities teacher used students’ artwork and projects to decorate the school environment, and the Math teacher adopted in- class discussion. To enhance students’ comprehension, the Synthetic Activities, English, and Art & Humanities teachers utilized contextualized teaching methods, while the Math teacher arranged experiments for self-observation and teaching; and 9) To increase student collaboration, the Synthetic Activities and English Teachers applied games, while the Art & Humanities and Math teachers divided students into smaller groups.
KEY WORDS: creative teaching, teaching strategy, teaching effectiveness.