• 沒有找到結果。

A Study of the Relationships among Behavioral Integrity, Person- Supervisor Fit and Job Satisfaction 黃威權、李泊諺

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "A Study of the Relationships among Behavioral Integrity, Person- Supervisor Fit and Job Satisfaction 黃威權、李泊諺"

Copied!
3
0
0

加載中.... (立即查看全文)

全文

(1)

A Study of the Relationships among Behavioral Integrity, Person- Supervisor Fit and Job Satisfaction

黃威權、李泊諺

E-mail: 359995@mail.dyu.edu.tw

ABSTRACT

Based on research recent years, some scholars pointed out that employees are affected by perceptions of their supervisor’pattern of word-action consistency, such acts are called behavior integrity. In addition, as the mediating variable of this study is

Per-son-Supervisor fit, one new field in Person-Environment fit which is quite popular in organizational behavior research

nowadays. So, this study is aimed to investigate the relationship and to discover the influence between Behavioral integrity, Person- Super-visor fit, and Job satisfaction of elementary school teachers. The studied population is elementary school teachers in northern Taiwan, and all valid questionnaires are 400 copies, thus all collection of real result as follow: 1. Behavioral integrity and Job satisfaction have significant positive relationship. 2. Behavioral integrity and Person-Supervisor fit have significant positive

relationship. 3. Person-Supervisor fit and Job satisfaction have significant positive relationship. 4. Person-Supervisor fit was found to have partially mediating effects between Behavioral integrity and Job satisfaction. According to the conclusion of this study, when a Supervisor owns highly behavioral integrity, it will appear to mediate impacts of Job satisfaction through the person-supervisor fit.

Keywords : Behavioral integrity、Person-Supervisor fit、Job satisfaction Table of Contents

中文摘要 .......................i 英文摘要 .....................

..ii 誌謝辭 .......................iii 目 錄 ....................

...iv 表目錄 .......................vi 圖目錄 ..................

.....vii 第一章 緒論 第一節 研究背景與動機............ 1 第二節 研究目的...........

.... 7 第二章 文獻探討和研究假設 第一節 行為正直............... 8 第二節 員工主管適配性..

.......... 11 第三節 工作滿足............... 13 第四節 知覺主管支持........

..... 18 第五節 研究假設............... 20 第三章 研究方法 第一節 研究架構........

....... 23 第二節 研究變項之操作型定義與衡量工具.... 24 第三節 研究對象.............

.. 29 第四節 統計方法............... 29 第四章 研究結果與分析 第一節 敘述性統計分析.....

....... 32 第二節 研究模型修正............. 38 第三節 信效度分析與相關評估.......

.. 42 第四節 結構方程模式分析........... 49 第五章 結論和建議 第一節 研究結論..........

..... 57 第二節 管理意涵............... 58 第三節 研究限制與後續研究建議........

59 參考文獻 中文文獻................... 62 英文文獻...................

65 附錄 研究問卷................... 73 表目錄 表1-1 勞動力與就業調查表..........

..... 4 表3-1 行為正直量表..................25 表3-2 員工主管適配量表........

........26 表3-3 工作滿足量表..................27 表3-4 知覺主管支持量表.....

...........28 表3-5 問卷發放學校統計表...............29 表4-1 樣本結構之敘述性統計 分析............34 表4-2 各構面題項之資料統計分析............36 表4-3 本研究所採用之 模式適配度指標值.........38 表4-4 行為正直測量題項之初階因素分析表........44 表4-5 員工主管 適配性測量題項之初階因素分析表.....44 表4-6 工作滿足測量題項之初階因素分析表........45 表4-7 知 覺主管支持測量題項之初階因素分析表......45 表4-8 區別效度檢定表................46 表4-9 行為正直信度分析表..............47 表4-10 員工主管適配性信度分析表..........

.47 表4-11 工作滿足信度分析表..............48 表4-12 知覺主管支持信度分析表.........

...48 表4-13 整體模型參數估計表..............52 表4-14 路徑關係檢定表...........

.....56 表4-15 整體模型影響效果表..............56 圖目錄 圖3-1 研究架構.........

........... 23 圖4-1 行為正直之初階因素測量模式圖.......... 39 圖4-2 員工主管適配性之初階 因素測量模式圖....... 40 圖4-3 工作滿足之初階因素測量模式圖.......... 41 圖4-4 知覺主管支持之 初階因素測量模式圖........ 42 圖4-5 未標準化估計值模型圖.............. 50 圖4-6 標準化估 計值模型圖............... 53

(2)

REFERENCES

一、中文部分 王郁智,章淑娟(2006),升遷機會、社會支持、工作滿意度與留任意願之相關性研究,志為護理,p.90-101。 方 萱

(2007),探討粉領族之人格特質、同儕互動、階級意識與工作滿意度間關係,中國文化大學勞動學研究所碩士論文 中國時報(2007),力 霸集團弊案背後的一連串疑問[線上資料], 來源: http://news.chinatimes.com/list/3.html [2011, Nov 28]。 毛彥傑(2008),個人與主管適 配前因與後果之探討-中介與干擾的效果,國立臺灣大學管理學院商學研究所碩士論文。 行政院主計處(2011),人力資源統計[線上資 料],來源: http://2k3dmz2.moea.gov.tw/gnweb/Indicator/wFrmIndicator.aspx [2011, Nov 28]。 李婉菱(2008),組織變革過程中內部工作 轉換機制與個人特性對轉職者個人與環境適配程度之影響,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,未出版。 吳明龍,張毓仁

(2010),結構模式方程-實務應用祕笈,台北市:五南圖書出版公司。 林惠彥(2004),個人與環境適配對工作態度及行為之影響,國立 台灣科技大學企業管理系碩士論文。 邱麗家(2006),內部稽核人員人格特質、工作特性與工作滿意度關係之研究-以成就動機為中介 變項,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文。 周慧珍(2006),組織成員知覺主管支持對其離職傾向之影響—探討 工作負荷與成就動機之干擾作用,人力資源學報,6(4),67-80。 徐正光(1977),工廠工人的工作滿足及其相關因素之探討,中研 院民 族學研究所集刊,34:26-27。 張春興(1991),張氏心理學辭典,台北市:東華書局。 孫 震(2003),人生在世–善心、公益與制度,台北 市:聯經出版社。 陳寬裕,王正華(2010),結構方程模型分析實務:AMOS的運用,台北市:五南圖書出版公司。 曾詠郎(2006),學校變 革公平性與國小教師工作滿意度及組織承諾關係之研究,國立臺南大學教育經營與管理研究所碩士論文。 楊銀興,梁丁財(2001),國 民小學校長轉型領導與教師工作滿意度關係之研究,台中師範學院國民教育研究所士論文。 經濟日報(2006),美國世界通訊集團弊案手 法之探究[線上資料], 來源: http://edn.gmg.tw/article/index.jsp?mid=1 [2011, Nov 28]。 鄭伯壎(1995),組織價值的上下契合度與組織成 員個人的效能,中華心理學刊,37,235-244。 謝月香(2003),桃園縣國民小學教師兼任行政職務工作滿意度之研究,國立花蓮師範學 院國民教育研究所碩士論文。 蘇弘文(2004),個人與環境主觀適配之前因與後果,國立台灣科技大學企業管理系碩士論文。 蘇英芳

(2005),我國銀行業人際信任度之研究,人力資源管理學報,第五卷第三期。 二、英文部分 Adams, J. S. (1963). Towardan

Understanding of Inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422-436. Alderfer, C. P. (1972). Existence, Relatedness, and Growth.

New York: Free Press. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423. Anne, L. D., & Hannah, R. R. (2006). The Effects of the Perceived Behavioral Integrity of Managers on Employee Attitudes: A Meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics. DOI: 10.1007 /s10551-006-9034-4 Becker, T. (1998). Integrity in Organizations: Beyond Honesty and Conscientiousness. Academy of Management Review, 23, 154–161. Bentler, P. M., Yung, K., & Wei, Z.

(2005). The Effect of Skewness and Kurtosis on Mean and Covariance Structure Analysis: The Univariate Case and Its Multivariate Implication.

SAGE Journals Online and HighWire Press platforms, Sociological Methods Research 2005; 34, 240 DOI: 10.1177/0049124105280200.

Bernardin, H. J. (1979). The predictability of discrepancy measures of role constructs. Personnel Psychology, 32, 139-153. Cable, D. M., & DeRue, D. S. (2002). The convergent and discriminant validity of subjective fit perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 875-884. Cole, M. S., Bruch, H., & Vogel, B. (2006). Emotion as mediators of the relations between perceived supervisor support and psychological hardiness on employee cynicism. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 27, 463-484. David, J. P. (2008). Perceived Behavioral Integrity:Relationships with Employee Attitudes,Well-Being, and Absenteeism. Journal of Business Ethics, DOI 10.1007/s10551-007-9496-z. Davis, A. L., & Rothstein, H. R.

(2006). The Effects of the Perceived Behavioral Integrity of Managers on Employee Attitudes: A Meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 407 –419. Dineen, B. R., Lewicki, R. J., & Tomlinson, E. C. (2006). Supervisory guidance and behavioral integrity: Relationships with employee citizenships and deviant behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology , 91, 622–635. Eisenberger, R., Cummings, J., Armeli, S., & Lynch, P. (1997).

Perceived Organizational Support, Discretionary Treatment,and Job Satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 812-820. Eisenberger, R., &

Huntington, R. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journalof Applied Psychology , 71(3): 500-507. Fournet, G. P. (1966). Job Satisfaction : Issues and Problems, Personnel Psychology,19, 165-183. Grandey, A. A. (2000). Emotional regulation in the workplace: A new way to

conceptualize emotional labor. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, 95-110. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Tatham, R. L., & Anderson, R. E., Jr. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis,(5th ED.).Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959).

The Motivation To Work. NY:John Wiley & Sons, Inc.2nd Ed, 136-142. Hoppock, R. (1935). Job Satisfaction. New York: Harper and Row, p.271.

Kalleberg, A. L. (1977). Work Values and Job Rewards: A Theory Job Satisfaction. American Sociological Review, 42, 124-143. Kline, R. B.

(2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (2nd Edition ed.). New York:The Guilford Press. Kristof-Brown, A. L., Zimmerman, R. D., & Johnson, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58, 281-343. LaRocco, J. M., House, J. S., & French, J. R. (1980). Social support, occupational stress, and health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21(3), 202-218. Locke, E. A. (1976). The Nature and Causes of Job Satisfaction. In Handbook of Industrual and Organizational Psychology. M.D. Dunnette (Ed.),27-55, New York : Plenum. Maslow, A. H. (1954).

Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper & Brothers Pub,146-150. McCroskey, J. C., & Young, T. J. (1981). Ethos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decades. Central States Speech, 32, 24–34. McGregor, D. (1967). The professional manager. New York:

McGraw-Hill, Meglino, B. M., & Ravlin, E. C. (1998). Individual values in organizations:Concepts, controversies, and research. Journal of Management, 24, 351–389. Michael, E. P., Surinder S. K., & Francis, J. Y. (2011). Team Virtues and Performance An Examination of Transparency, Behavioral Integrity, and Trust. Journal of Business Ethics. DOI 10.1007/s10551-010-0650-7. Palanski, M. E., Kahai, S. S., &

Yammarino, F. J. (2011) Team V irtues and Performance:An Examination of Transparency, Behavioral Integrity, and Trust. Journal of Business

(3)

Ethics. Palanski, M. E., & Yammarino, F. J. (2007). Integrity and Leadership: Clearing the Conceptual Confusion. European Management.

Journal, 25, 171–184. Porter, L. W., & Lawler, E. E. (1968). Managerial Attitudes & Performance. Homewood:Dorsey press. Price, J. H. (1972).

Handbook of organization measurement. District of Columbia: Health & Company, 156-157. Prottas, D. J. (2008) Perceived Behavioral Integrity:

Relationships with Employee Attitudes,Well-Being, and Absenteeism. Journal of Business Ethics, 81, 313–322. Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., &

Armeli, S. (2001). Affective commitment to the organization:The contribution of perceived organizational support. Jornal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 825-836. Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and Implied Contracts in Organizations. Employees Responsi lities and Rights,121–139.

Schaubroeck, J., & Lam, S. K. (2002). How similarity to peers and supervisor influences organizational advancement in different cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1120-1136. Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. L., & Noel, T. W. (1997). The effect of ethical frameworks on perceptions of organizational justice. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1190–1207. Schneider, B. (1987) . The people make the place. Personnel

Psychology, 40, 437-453.13. Seashore, S. E., & Taber, T. D. (1975). Job Satisfaction Indicators and Correlates. American Behavioral Scientists, 18, 347. Simons, T. (2002). Behavioral integrity: The perceived alignment between managers’ words and deeds as a research focus. Organization Science, 13, 18–35. Simons, T., Friedman, R., Liu, L. A., & Judi, M. P. (2007). Racial Differences in Sensitivity to Behavioral Integrity:

Attitudinal Consequences, In-Group Effects, and “Trickle Down” Among Black and Non-Black Employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, No. 3, 650–665, 2007. Simons, T., & McLean, P. J. (2000). The sequential impact of behavioral integrity on trust, commitment, discretionary service behavior, customer satisfaction, and profitability. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Singh, J. (2000). Performance Productivity and Quality of Frontline Employees inService Organizations. Journal of Marketing, 64, 1, 2, 15-34. Smith, P. C., Kendall, L. M., & Hulin, C. L. (1969). The Measurement of Satisfaction in Work and Retirement. Chicago: Rand Mc nally. Tsui, A. S., & O’Reilly, C. A., (1989). Beyond simple demographic affects: The importance of relational demography in

superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of Management Journal, 32(2), 402-423. Turban, D. B., & Jones, A. P. (1988). Supervisor-subordinate similarity: Types,effect, and mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 228-234. Velicer, W. F., Prochaska, J. O., Bellis, J. M., DiClemente, C. C., Rossi, J. S., Fava, J. L., & Steiger, J. H.(1993). An expert system intervention for smoking cessation. Addictive behaviors, 18, 269-290.

Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and Motivation. New York: Wiley. Weiss, D. J., Davis, R. V., England, G. W., & Lofgurist, L. H. (1967). Manual for theMinnesota, Industrial Relations Center. Weiss, H. M. (1978). Social learning of work values in organizations. Journal of applied psychology, 63(6), 711-718. Whitener, E. M., Brodt, S. E., Korsgaard, M. A., & Werner, J. M. (1998). Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior. Academy of Management Review, 23(3): 513-530. Worden, S. (2003). The role of integrity as a mediator in strategic leadership: A recipe for reputational capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 46, 31-44.

參考文獻

相關文件

Therefore, this study uses Mainland Chian tourist as survey respondent to explore the relationships among store expertise, shopping satisfaction and share of wallet.. The study

(1968), “What is Job Satisfaction, Organization Behavior and Human Performance,” Journal of Applied Psychology, 4, pp. (1976) “The Nature & Cause of Job Satisfaction”,

The purposes of this research was to investigate relations among learning motivation, learning strategies and satisfaction for junior high school students, as well as to identify

The purpose of this study is to investigate the researcher’s 19 years learning process and understanding of martial arts as a form of Serious Leisure and then to

This study was aimed to measure human foot volume using 3D scanning range data, to investigate the relationships among foot length, width, height and ankle circumference, to

This study is aimed to investigate the current status and correlative between job characteristics and job satisfaction for employees in the Irrigation Associations, by

In this study, Technology Acceptance Model (TAM 2) is employed to explore the relationships among the constructs of the model and website usage behaviors to investigate

This study combines American Customer Satisfaction Index(ACSI) with European Customer Satisfaction Index(ECSI), and measures the cause-and-effect relationship running