這一節將針對本研究進行的過程與所得知結果，分成三個部份而做出一些 建議：
(一) 對於未來統計教學研究
在統計教學中，許多研究都建議以生活為例，不過透過本研究中可以看出 這兩種生活例其實可以再細分成 INLd 與 INLs 兩種，它們影響了學生對於統計 的觀感，也反映出會因為個案教師的教學觀感不同，而採用不同類型的生活 例，可以提供一個觀點讓往後有關於統計教學的研究，可以更細緻地去描述、
發展。
120
(二) 對於在職教師
兩名個案教師明顯抱持著不同的教學想法，T1 試著教給學生的是統計的特 性，而 T2 則是將統計視為一種工具，藉由統計的特性來提高學生學習的興趣，
這兩種統計教學想法各有利弊，可以讓國中在職教師在進行統計教學時做為反 思，使自己在統計教學中能夠確切傳達出想要讓學生理解的部分。
此外小組合作學習一直是統計教學研究中極為建議的教學法，但很多教師 可能會認為太過耗時且費力，而依舊使用傳統的直接講述法，但從本研究中可 以看出統計的特性之一，就是容易與學習者的直觀、信念互相矛盾，所以採用 較為折衷的互動式教學法，似乎也是可行的道路之一。
(三) 對於師資培育
本研究發現兩名個案教師主要是依賴自己的統計教學觀感而進行統計教 學，在統計內容知識差異與影響並不大，而統計教學知識的不足是較讓人擔憂 的，對於師資培育將來可以更加重視這部分，因為它確切地影響到個案教師對 於學習者的統計教學知識，也實際影響到個案教師的統計教學。
121
122
123
參考文獻
一、 中文部分
丁興祥、張慈宜和曾寶瑩（譯）（2006）質性心理學一研究方法的實務指南（原 作者：Smith）。台北市：遠流。（原著出版年：2003）
方吉正 (1998)。教師信念研究之回顧與整合一六種研究取向。教育資料與研究，
20，36-44。
任眉眉 (2004)。機率統計之概念暨網路學習研究—子計畫二：統計概念與應用網 路學習研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。 （編號：NSC92-2511-S-006-001），未出版。
張少同、王建都、呂小娟（2003）。青少年的數學概念學習研究—子計畫七：青 少年的統計概念學習研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。（編 號：NSC 91-2521-S-003-007），未出版。
吳芝儀、李奉儒（譯）（1995）。質的評鑑與研究（原作者：Patton, M. Q.）。台北：
桂冠。（原著出版年：1990）
吳柏林、葉倩亨 (2002)。由自然潛能與數學生活化探討國中數學的統計與機率領 域課程設計。教育研究月刊，101，90-104。
卓明惠 (2011)。探討高中數學教師在統計單元教學之個案研究(未出版之碩士論 文)。國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所。彰化市。
香 港 特 別 行 政 區 教 育 局 (1999) 。 中 學 課 程 綱 要 數 學 科 。 取 自 http://www.edb.gov.hk/tc/curriculum-development/kla/ma/curr/sec-math-1999.html 高中數學學科中心 (2009)。普通高級中學必修科目「數學」課程綱要。取自 http://mathcenter.ck.tp.edu.tw/MCenter/Center/CourseOutline.aspx
國民教育司 (2011)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要數學學習領域修正草案對照 表。取自 http://140.111.34.54/EJE/content.aspx?site_content_sn=15326
教育部（2011）。國民教育階段九年一貫課程綱要總綱。教育部，台北。
124
熊召弟、王美芬、段曉林、熊同鑫（譯）（1996）。科學學習心理學（原作者：Glynn, S. M., Yeany, R. H., & Britton, B. K.）。台北：心理。（原著出版年：1991）。
陳宜良（2005）。中小學數學科課程綱要評估與發展研究－我國與美國加州、英 國、新加坡、日本、中國大陸、南韓之跨國比較。2011 年 12 月 29 日，取自 http://www.math.ntu.edu.tw/~chern/mathedu/Comparison.pdf
陳幸玫 (2006)。國小統計課程之內函與教學理念。科學教育月刊，287，2-12。
新 加 坡 教 育 局 (2012) 。 中 一 、 中 二 數 學 綱 要 。 取 自 http://www.moe.gov.sg/cpdd/syllabuses.htm
黃精裕（2008）。高中數學教師數學教學相關知識之初探─以集中與離散趨勢量數 為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺北教育大學數學教育研究所，臺北市。
蘇國樑 (2000)。統計對象的抽象原則。科學教育月刊，233，19-26。
鄭天澤 (2011)。機率統計之概念暨網路學習研究—子計畫三：高中教師對機率統 計課程認知之現況了解與改進研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報 告。（編號：NSC 89-2511-S-004-001），未出版。
楊凱琳(2012)。探討中學數學教師的統計教學知能。行政院國家科學委員會專題 研究計畫成果報告。(編號：NSC 98-2511-S-003-009 -M)，未出版。
125
二、 英文部分
Ball, D. L. (1991). Teaching mathematics for understanding: What do teachers need to know about subject matter? In M. Kennedy (Ed.), Teaching academic subjects to diverse learners (pp. 63–83). New York: Teachers College Press.
Ball, D. L., Thames, M.H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching:
What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389-407.
Ball, D. L., Hill, H. H., & Bass, H. (2005, Fall). Knowing mathematics for teach-ing: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, pp. 14-46.
Batanero, C., Godino, J. D., & Roa, R. (2004). Training teachers to teach probability. Journal of Statistics Education, 12(1).
Online:www.amstat.org/publications/jse.
Begle, E. I (1979). Critical variables in mathematics education：Finding from a survey of the empirical literature. Washington, DC：Mathematical Association of America and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Brown, S. I. (1985). Problem-solving and Teacher Education：The Humanism twixt Models and Muddles. In：R. Morris (ed.), Studies in Mathmatics Education.
Vol. 4 The Education of Secondary School Teachers of Mathmatics, pp. 3-28.
Paris, Unesco.
Burgess, T. A. (2008). Teacher knowledge for teaching statistics through investigations. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, C. Reading, & A. Rossman (2008).
Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., & Carey, D. (1988). Teachers' pedagogical content knowledge of students' problem solving. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 19, 385-401.
Chick, H. L., & Pierce, R. U. (2008). Teaching statistics at the primary school level: Beliefs, affordances, and pedagogical content knowledge. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, C. Reading.
Clark, C, & Yinger, R. (1979). Teachers' thinking. In P. Peterson & H. Walberg (Eds.), Research on teaching. Berkeley, Calif.: McCutchan.
126
Curcio, F. R. (1987). Comprehension of mathematical relationships expressed in graphs. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18(5), 382-393.
Deborah L MacCullough. (2007), A Study of Experts' Understanding of Arithmetic Mean.
Denzin, N.K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York: McGraw-H.
Dietz, E. J. (1993). A Cooperative Learning Activity on Methods of Selecting a Sample, The American Statistician, 47, 104-108.
Fennema, E., & Franke, M. L. (1992). Teachers’ knowledge and its impact. In D.
A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 147-162). New York, NY: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Friel, S. N., Curcio, F. R., & Bright, G. W. (2001). Making sense of graphs:
Critical factors influencing comprehension and instructional implications. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(2), 124 e 158.
Garfield, J., & Ahlgren, A. (1988). Difficulties in learning basic concepts in probability and statistics: implications for research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(1), 44-63.
Garfield, J. and Ben-Zvi, D. (2004). Statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking:
goals, definitions, and challenges. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds.), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning, and thinking (pp. 3-16).
Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Garfield, J. and Ben-Zvi, D. (2007). How Students Learn Statistics Revisited: A Current Review of Research on Teaching and Learning Statistics,"International Statistical Review, 75, 372 – 396.
Groth, R. E., & Bergner, J. A. (2005). Preservice elementary school teachers' metaphors for the concept of statistical sample. Statistics Education Research Journal, 4(2), 27-42.
Guimarães, Gitirana, Marques & dos Anjos (2010). The Conecpt of Mean by Primary School Students. ICOTS8 (2010) Contributed Paper.
Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement.American Education Research
127
Journal, 42(2), 371-406.
Lajoie, S. P., Lavigne, N. C., & Lawless, J. (1993). The use of hypercard for facilitating assessment : A library of exemplars for reifying statistical concepts.
Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, Atlanta ,GA.
Magel, R. C. (1998), Using Cooperative Learning in a Large Introductory Statistics Class, Journal of Statistics Education, 6,
http://www.amstat.org/publication
Marton, F. (1988). Phenomenography: A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. In R. R. Sherman & R. B. Webb (Eds.), Qualitative research in education: Focus and methods (pp. 141-161). New York:
The Falmer Press.understandings of reality. In R. R. Sherman & R. B. Webb (Eds.), Qualitative research in education: Focus and methods (pp. 141-161). New York: The Falmer Press.
McDiarmid, G. W., Ball, D., and Anderson, C. (1989). Why staying ahead one chapter just won'twork: Subject-specific pedagogy. In M. Reynolds (Ed.), Knowledge base for beginning teachers. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges of Education.
Mevarech, Z. R. (1983). A deep structure model of students' statistical misconceptions. Educational studies in mathematics, 14, pp415-429.
Mokros, Jan ,& Russell, Susan Jo(1992). Children’s Concepts of Average and Representativeness.
National Council of Teachers of thematics. (1989). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for Shool Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
National Council of Teachers of thematics.(2000).Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. printed in U Piaget , J .(1973). To understand is to invent :The future of education. New eston, VA: NCTM.
The National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future (2002).取自
http://nctaf.org/
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.).
Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
128
Pollatsek, S. Lima, A. D. Well (1981) . Concept or Computation: Students' Understanding of the Mean. Educational Studies in Mathematics , 12 . pp. 191-204
Powell, A. B., Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2003). An analytical model for studying the development of learners’ mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22, 405–435.
Qualification and Curriculum Authority (1999). Mathematics, the National Curriculum for England.
R𝑎̇de, L. 1985. Statistics. In: R. Morris (ed), Studies in Mathematics Education.
Vol. 4: The Education of Secondary School Teachers of Mathematics, pp.97-107.
Paris, Unesco
Rebecca.B Corwin, & Susan Jo Russell (1990). A unit of study for grades 3-4 from Used Numbers: Real Data in the Classroom. Developed at Technical Education Research Centers and Lestey Collage.
Roschelle, J. (2000). Choosing and using video equipment for data collection. In:
R. Lesh (Ed.), Handbook of research data design in mathematics and science education (pp. 709–731). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erblaum Associates.
Sachs, J. (1997). Reclaiming the agenda of teacher professionalism: An Australianexperience. Journal of Education for Teaching, 23, 263–275.
Scheaffer R. L.(1988). Statistics in the schools: The past, present and future of the quantitative literacy project. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association from the Section on Statistical Education, 71-78.
Shaughnessy, J. M. (1992). Research in probability and statistics: Reflections and directions. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research in mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 465-494). New York: Macmillan.
Shulman, L. S. (1985). An emerging model for the study of knowledge growth in teaching. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
Shulman, L. S.(1986). Those who understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching.
Educational Researcher, 15(1), 4-14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform.
129
Harvard Educational Review, 51, 1-22.
Stake, R. (1995). The art of case research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Steinbring, H. (1989). The Interaction between Teaching Practice and Theoretical Conceptions A Cooperative Model of In-Service Training in Statistics for
Mathematics Teachers (Grades 5-10). Studies in mathematics education,7,202-214 Stella, C. A. (2003). Um estudo sobre o conceito de média com alunos do
Ensino Médio. São Paulo, 2003. 181p. Master Dissertation (Master degree in Mathematics Education), Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo.
Strauss, S., &. Bichler, E. (1988). The development of children’s concepts of the arithmetic average. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19(1), 64-80.
Valli, L. (1992). Reflective teacher education: Cases and critiques. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Vermette,Gattuso& Bourdeau(2005).Data analysis or how high school students
“read” statistics.
Watson, J., Callingham, R., & Nathan, E. (2009). Probing Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Statistics: “How will Tom get to school tomorrow?” In R.
Hunter, B. Bicknell, & T. Burgess (Eds.), Crossing divides (Proceedings of the 32 nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Wellington, NZ, Vol. 2, pp. 563-570), Palmerston North, NZ:
MERGA.
Watson, J. M., & Moritz, J. B. (1999). The development of concepts of average.
Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 21 (4) 15–39.
Wilson, S. & Cooney, T. (2002). Mathematics teacher change and development:
The role of beliefs. In G.C. Leder, E. Pehkonen, & G. Törner (Eds.) Beliefs: A Hidden Variable in Mathematics Education. pp. 127-147.
Wilson, S. M., Shulman, L. S., & Richert, A. E. (1987). ‘150 different ways" of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers' thinking (pp. 104-124). London: Cassell.
Yang, K. L. (2012). Investigating Mathematics teachers thoughts of statistical inference. Research in Mathematics Education, 14(3), 299-300. (Current Report)
130
131
附錄(一)
問卷初稿
附錄(二)
132
正式問卷
133
134
135
附錄(三)
T1 班上學生答題表現
136
137
138
附錄(四)
T2 班上答題表現
139
140
141
附錄(五)
課前訪談大綱
142
143
附錄(六)
教師編碼第二版
144
附錄(七)
正式課室觀察記錄表