第五章 結論與建議
第三節 研究限制
國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
第三節 研究限制
本研究主要的研究限制有下列幾項：
壹、 研究方法的限制
國內收養家庭隱密性高，私下收養家庭更是難以接觸，本研究以單一機構為 合作對象，僅選取機構收養家庭進行訪談，未納入私下收養家庭，無法比較不同 收養管道家庭經驗之差異性，研究結果稍嫌片面，無法推論本土開放收養家庭全 貌。
貳、 研究場域的限制
由於研究時間及經費的限制，本研究僅選取北部地區的收養家庭進行訪談，
並未擴及全台以了解各地區的家庭樣態，資料多元性來看稍嫌單薄，無法比較各 地理區域如北、中、南地區的收養家庭對開放收養的看法及感受。
參、 研究對象的限制
本研究僅以開放收養家庭中的養父母為訪談對象，並未針對被收養童、出養 家庭成員進行深入訪談，資料蒐集較難避免受訪者的主觀經驗，無法與收養關係 中的其他關係人進一步確認資料的真實性。
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
109
參考書目
壹、 中文部分
內政部兒童局（2009）。《台灣地區歷年法院交查收養監護案件調查統計》。
內政部兒童局網頁（http：//www.cbi.gov.tw/CBI_2/internet/main/index.aspx）。
內政部統計處（2009a）。《戶政司歷年人口身分變更統計資料》。
內政部統計資訊服務網頁（http：//www.ris.gov.tw/version96/stpeqr_01.html）。
內政部統計處（2009b）。《各縣市人口出生率、育齡婦女一般生育率、年齡別生 育率及總生育率資料》。內政部統計資訊服務網頁
（http//www.ris.gov.tw/gateway/stpeqr01.cgi）。
內政部統計處（2009c）。《內政部戶政司統計年報（歷年人口身分變更統計資料）》。 內政部統計處網頁（http：//www.ris.gov.tw/version96/stpeqr_01.html）。
自由時報（2007）。《小孩知道買來的，還肯不肯叫我媽》。自由時報新聞網頁（http：
//www.libertytimes.com.tw/2007/new/apr/16/today-fo5.htm）。
自由時報（2008）。《王精明開診所販嬰 150 家庭涉案》。自由時報新聞網頁（http：
//www.libertytimes.com.tw/2008/new/oct/12/today-so1-3.htm）。
白麗芳譯，M. Komar 原著（1998）。《收養父母寶典》。台北：中華民國兒福 利聯盟文教基金會。
王美恩（2002）。〈收養服務本土化的探討-兒盟六個收養家庭案例分析〉，《東吳 社會工作學報》，第8 期，頁 75-115。
王美恩（2000）。《兒童福利聯盟收養服務評估與未來發展之探討》。中華民國 兒童福利聯盟文教基金會委託研究報告。
王碧珠譯，R. S. Carole 原著（1997）。《收養與寄養：實務與理論》。台北：巨 流。
王仁雄（1983）。《領養安置服務與社會工作》。台中：中華兒童福利基金會。
李芳玲（2007）。《為愛收養，身世告知不害怕》。兒童福利聯盟文教基金會網頁
（http：//www.children.org.tw/news.php?offset=0&id=1708&typeid=16）。
李欣芸（2006）。《論海峽兩岸之收養法制》。東海大學法律學系碩士論文。
吳秀峰（2003）。《我們都是一家人—成功收養大孩子之初探性研究》。國立台 灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所碩士論文。
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
吳芝儀、李奉儒譯，M. Q. Patton 原著（1995）。《質的評鑑與研究》。台北：桂 冠。
利翠珊（1999）。〈已婚女性家庭系統的交會：親情與角色的兩難〉，《中華心理 衛生學刊》，第3 期，頁 1-26。
周震歐（1995）。《兒童福利》。台北：巨流。
林芳如（2007）。《養女不是問題，問題才是問題：女性被收養者的自我認同》。
國立台北教育大學心理與諮商學系碩士論文。
林秋君（2005）。《影響收養家庭生活適應歷程之初探》。國立台灣大學社會工 作研究所碩士論文。
林美瑜（1989）。《我國兒童福利領養服務現況探討》。中國文化大學兒童福利 研究所碩士論文。
林勝義（2002）。《兒童福利》。台北：五南。
胡幼慧（1996）。《質性研究：理論、方法與本土女性研究實例》。台北：巨流。
郭靜晃（2004）。《兒童福利》。台北：揚智。
張秀傑（2007）。《兩岸收養法制之比較研究》。國立台灣海洋大學海洋法律研 究所碩士論文。
張毓娟（1994）。《收養服務制度化之可行性評估研究：以台北市社會局之收養 方案為例》。中國文化大學兒童福利研究所碩士論文。
陳麟祥（2004）。《兒童及少年福利法與親屬法之交錯─兼論兒童及少年福利法 相關規定之修訂》。輔仁大學法律學研究所碩士論文。
陳向明（2002）。《社會科學質的研究》。台北：五南。
陳祥彬（2002）。《我國收養法修正芻議─以收養之成立要件及效力為中心》。
國立政治大學法律學系碩士論文。
陳蓋聖（1994）。《收養之研究》。國立台灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文。
陳若喬、王枝燦（2003）。〈生的放一邊，養的卡大天--台北市收養概況與變遷〉，
《兒童福利期刊》，第5 期，頁 17-36。
彭南元（1999）。〈美國現行收養法制之研究〉，《警大法學論集》，第 4 期，頁 347-378。
彭懷真（1996）。《婚姻與家庭》。台北：巨流。
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
111
黃雅琴（2003）。《收養要件之評析與前瞻》。國立成功大學法律學研究所碩士 論文。
黃瑞琴（1994）。《質的教育研究方法》。台北：心理。
雷文玫（1999）。〈以「子女最佳利益」之名：離婚後父母對未成年子女權利義務 行使與負擔之研究〉，《台大法學論叢》，第28 期第 3 卷，頁 245-309。
劉怡伶（2009）。《機構式收養經驗之探討》。東海大學社會工作學系碩士論文。
駱叔君（2002）。《國際收養法律問題之研究》。國立台灣大學法律學研究所碩士 論文。
簡春安、鄒平儀（2004）。《社會工作研究法》。台北：巨流。
簡春安、鄒平儀（1998）。《社會工作研究法》。台北：巨流。
蘇靖媛（1989）。《養父母收養動機與收養安置方式之研究》。中國文化大學兒童 福利研究所碩士論文。
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
貳、 西文部分
Alty, C. and S. Cameron (1995). ‘Open adoption: The way forward?’, International
Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 15: 40-58.
Avery, R. J. (1998). ‘Information disclosure and openness in adoption: State policy and empirical evidence’, Children and Youth Services Review, 20: 57- 85.
BAAF(British Agencies for Adoption and Fostering). (1999). Contact in permanent
Placement-Guidance for local authorities in England & Wales and Scotland,
London: BAAF.Barth, R. (1987). ‘Adolescent Mothers’ Beliefs About Open Adoption’, Social
Casework, 68: 323-331.
Barth, R. P. and M. Berry (1988). Adoption and disruption: rates, risks, and responses.
New York: Aldine. De Gruyter.
Baran, A., A. Sorosky and R. Pannor (1975). ‘Secret Adoption Records: the Dilemma of Our Adoptees’, Psychology Today, 9: 38-42.
Beek, M. (1994). ‘The reality of face to face contact after adoption’, Adoption and
Fostering, 18(2): 39-43.
Belbas, N. F. (1987). ‘Staying in touch: Empathy in open adoptions’, Smith College
Studies in Social Work, 57: 184-198.
Bell, V. (1959). ‘Special considerations in the adoption of the older child’, Social
casework, 40( 6): 73-86.
Berman, L. C. and R. K. Buffered (1986). ‘Family treatment to address loss in adoptive families’, Social Casework, 67: 3-11.
Berry, M. (1998). ‘Adoption in an era of family preservation’, Children and Youth
Services Review, 20: 1-12.
Berry, M. (1993). ‘Risks and Benefits of Open Adoptions’, The Future of Children:
Adoption, 3(1): 125-138.
Berry, M. (1991). ‘The effects of open adoption on biological and adoptive parents and their children: The arguments and the evidence’, Child Welfare, 70: 637-651.
Berry, M., D. J. Dylla, R. P. Barth and B. Needell (1998). ‘The role of open adoption in the adjustment of adopted children and their families’, Children and Youth
‧
Services Review, 20: 151-171.
Borgman, R. (1982). ‘The Consequences of Open and Closed Adoptions for Older Children’, Child Welfares, 4: 217-230.
Brodzinsky, D. M. and M. D. Schechter (1993). The Psychology of Adoption. (eds.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brodzinsky, D. M., D. W. Smith and A. B. Brodzinsky (1998). ‘Children's Adjustment to Adoption: Development and clinical issues’, Developmental Clinical
Psychology and Psychiatry, 38: 1-142.
Byrd, A. D. (1988). ‘The case for confidential adoption’, Public Welfare, 46: 20-23.
Checkland, S. G. and E. O. A. Checkland (1974). The Poor Law Report of 1834. (eds.) Harmondsworth U. K. : Pelican Classics.
Christian, C. and C. Bryant (1998). ‘Birth Mothers’ Adjustment and Resolution of Grief’, in R. McRoy and H. Grotevant (eds.), Openness in Adoption: Exploring
Family Connections, pp. 135-172. Newbury Park: Sage.
Churchman, D. (1986). ‘The debate over open adoption’, Public Welfare, 44: 11-14.
Cole, E. S. and K. S. Donley (1990). History, Values and Placement Policy Issue in
Adoption. New York: Oxford University Press.
Crossen-Tower, C. (2007). Exploring child welfare: a practice perspective (4th ed.).
Boston, Mass. : Allyn and Bacon.
Cushman, L. F., D. Kalmuss and P. B. Namerow (1997). ‘Openness in adoption:
Experiences and social psychological outcomes among birth mothers’, Marriage
and Family Review, 25: 7-18.
Dhami, M. K., D. R. Mandel, G. Loewenstein and P. Ayton (2006). ‘Prisoners’
Positive Illusions of Their Post-Release Success’, Law and Human Behavior, 30:
631-647.
Dickson, L. R., W. M. Heffron and C. Parker (1990). ‘Children from disrupted and adoptive homes on an inpatient unit’, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 60:
594-602.
Digiulio, J. F. (1987). ‘Assuming the adoptive parents role’, Social Casework, 68:
561-566.
Dutt, R. and A. Sanyal (1991). ‘Openness’ in adoption or open adoption - A black
‧
perspective’, Adoption and Fostering, 15(4): 111-115.
Etter, J. (1993). ‘Levels of cooperation and satisfaction in 56 open adoptions’, Child
Welfare, 72: 257-267.
Fanshel, D. and E. Shinn (1978). Children in Foster Care. Columbia: Columbia University Press.
Fox, G. L. (1980). ‘The Mother-Adolescent Daughter Relationship as a Sexual Socialization Structure: A Research Revie’, Family Relations, 29(1): 21-28.
Fox, N. (1977). ‘Attachment of Kibbutz Infants to Mothers and Metaplet’, Child
Development, 48: 1228-1239.
Fratter, J. (1989). ‘How adoption parents feel about contact with birth parents after adoption’, Adoption & Fostering, 13(4): 18-26.
Fravel, D. L., R. G. McRoy and H. D. Grotevant (2000). ‘Birthmother perceptions of the psychologically present adopted child: Adoption openness and boundary ambiguity’, Family Relations, 49: 425-433.
Goldenstein, J. (1979). Beyond The Best Interest of Child. N.Y. : Macmillan Publishing.
Goodman, G., R. Emery and J. J. Haugaard (1998). ‘Developmental psychology and the law: Divorce child maltreatment, foster care, and adoption’. in I. Sigel and A.
Renninger (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, (5th ed), pp.775-876. New York:
John Woley and Sons.
Gross, H. (1997). ‘Variants of open adoptions: The early years’, Marriage and Family
Review, 25: 19-42.
Gross, H. (1993). ‘Open Adoption: A Research-Based Literature Review and New Data’, Child Welfare, 72: 269-284.
Grotevant, H. D. (2000). ‘Openness in adoption: Research with the adoption kinship network’, Adoption Quarterly, 4(1): 45-64.
Grotevant, H. D. and J. K. Kohler (1999). ‘Adoptive families’. in M. Lamb (Ed),
Nontraditional families: Parenting and child development (2
nd ed), pp. 161-190.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Grotevant, H. D. and R. G. McRoy (1998). Openness in Adoption: Exploring Family
Connection. London: Sage.
‧
Grotevant, H. D. and R. G. McRoy (1997). ‘The Minnesota/Texas adoption Research project: Implications of openness in adoption for development and relationships’,
Applied Developmental Service, 1(4): 168-186.
Grotevant, H. D., R. G. McRoy, C. L. Elde and D. L. Fravel (1994). ‘Adopive family system dynamics: Variations by the level of openness in the adoption’. Family
Process, 33: 125-146.
Grotevant, H. D., Y. V. Perry and R. G. McRoy (2005). ‘Openness in adoption:
Outcomes for adolescents and their adoptive kinship networks’. in D. Brodzinsky and J. Palacios (Eds.), Psychological issues in adoption: Theory, research, and
Application, pp.167-186. New York: Praeger.
Grotevant, H. D., N. M. Ross, M. A. Marchel and R. G. McRoy (1999). ‘Adoptive behavior in adopted children: Predictors from early risk, collaboration in relationship with the adoptive kinship network, and openness aeeangements’,
Journal of Adolescent Reasearch, 14: 231-247.
Hajal, F. and E. B. Rosenberg (1991). ‘The family life cycle in adoptive families’,
American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 61(1): 78-85.
Haugaard, J. J., N. M. West and A. M. Moed (2000). ‘Open adoptions: Attitudes and experiences’. Adoption Quarterly, 4(2): 89-99.
Henry, M. and D. Pollack (2009). Adoption in the United States: A reference for
families, professionals, and students. Chicago, IL: Lyceum Books, Inc.
Hill, M. and M. Show (1998). Signposts in Adoption: Policy, Practice and research
issues. London: BAAF.
Holbrook, S. M. (1990). ‘Adoption, infertility, and the new reproductive technologies:
Problems and prospects for social work and welfare policy’, Social Work, 35:
333-337.
Howe, D. and J. Feast (2000). Adoption, Search & reunion: The long term experience
of adopted adults. London: The children’s Society.
Hughes, J. R. (1995). ‘Applying harm reduction to smoking’, Tobacco Contral: An
International Journal, 4(2): 33-38.
Iwanek, M. (1987). A Study of Open Adoption, 14 Emerson Stree. Petone, Wellington, New Zealand: Unpublished.
Katz, L. (1986). ‘Parental stress and factors for success in older-child adoption’, Child
‧
Welfare, 65: 569-578.
Kimmel, A. J. (1996). ‘Ethical issues in the Conduct of Human Subject Research II:
Field Research’. in Kimmel, A. J., Ethical issues in behavioral research: A survey, pp.118-157. Oxford.
Kirk, D. (1964). Shared fate. New York: The Free Press.
Kirk, D. and S. Mcdaniel (1984). ‘Adoption policy in great Britain and North America’, Journal of Social Policy, 13(1): 75-84.
Kohler, J. K., H. D. Grotevant and R. G. McRoy (2002). ‘Adopted adolescents’
preoccupation with adoption: Impact of adoptive family dynamics’, Journal of
Marriage and the Family, 64: 93-104.
Lauderdale, J. and J. Boyle (1994). ‘Infant Relinquishment through Adoption in Image’, Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 26(3).
Lee, J. S. and J. A. Twaite (1997). ‘Open adoption and adoptive mothers: Attitudes toward birthmothers. adopted children, and parenting’, American Journal of
Orthopsychiatry, 61: 576-584.
Leeding, A. (1977). ‘Access to Birth Records’, Adoption and Fostering, 89(3): 19-25.
Logan, J. and C. Smith, (2005). ‘Face-to-Face Contact Post Adoption: Views from the Triangles’, British Jr. of Social Work, 35: 3-35.
Logan, J. and C. Smith, (1999). ‘Adoption and direct postadoption contact’. Adoption
& Fostering, 23(4): 58-59.
Macaskill, A. (2002). Heal the hurt: How to forgiven and move on. London: Guilford Press.
Maynard (2005). ‘Generation and investigation of airborne Ag nanoparticles with specific size and morphology by homogeneous nucleation, coagulation and sintering’, J. Aerosol sci., 36(9): 1108-1124.
McCubbin, H. I. and J. M. Patterson (1983). Stress and the family, Vol. 1: Coping with normative transitions (Eds.). New York: Brunner / Mazel.
McRoy, R. G. (1991). ‘American experience and research on openness’, Adoption &
Fostering, 15(4): 99-110.
McRoy, R., H. Grotevant and L. Zurcher (1988). Emotional disturbance in adopted
adolescents: Origins and development. New York: Praeger.
‧
McWhinnie, A. (1967). Adoptied Children: How They Grow Up. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Melina, L. R. (1986). Raising adopted children: a manual for adoptive parents. New York: Harper & Row.
Miall, C. (1998). ‘Community assessments of adoption issues: Open adoption, birth reunions, and the disclosure of confidential information’, Journal of Family
Issues, 19: 556-577.
Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and family therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Neil, E. (2009). ‘Post-Adoption Contact and Openness in Adoptive Parents' Minds:
Consequences for Children's Development’, British Journal of Social Work, 39:
5-19.
Neil, E. C. (2000). Contact with birth relatives after adoption: A study of young,
recently placed children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, UK: University of
East Anglia, Norwich.Peters, B. R., M. C. Atkins and M. M. McKay (1999). ‘Adopted children’s behavior problems: A review of five explanatory models’, Clinical Psychology Review, 19:
297-328.
Plumer, E. H. (1992). When You Place a Child. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Powell, S. and J. Warren (1997). The easy way out？
London: Minerva press.
Powledge, F. (1985). The new adoption maze and how to get through it. St. Louis, MO: C.V. Mosby.
Rappaport, B. M. (1992). The open adoption book. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Reitz, M. and K.W. Watson (1992). Adoption and the family system. New York:
Guilford press.
Roby, J. and S. Matsumura (2002). ‘If I give you my child, aren't we family? a study of birthmothers participating in Marshall Island-US Adoptions’, Adoption
Quarterly, 5(4): 7-31
Roby, J. L., J. Wyatt and G. Pettys (2005). ‘Openness in International Adoptions - A Study of U.S. Parents Who Adopted Children from the Marshall Islands’,
Adoption Quarterly, 8(3): 47-71.
‧
Rockel, J. and M. Ryburn (1988). Adoption Today: Change and Choice in New
Zealand. Auckland: Heinemann Reed.
Rosenblatt, P. C. and L. R. Fischer (1993). ‘Qualitative family research’, in P. G. Boss, W. J. Doherty, R. LaRossa, W. R. Schumm and S. K. Steinmetz (Eds.),
Sourcebook of family methods: A contextual approach, pp.167-177, New York:
Plenum Press.
Ryburn, M. (1994). Open Adoption: Research Theory and Practice. Great Britain:
Ashgate Publishing Company.
Ryburn, M. (1992). Adoption in the 1990’s:Identity and Opennes. Warwickshire:
Leamington Press.
Ryburn, M. (1990). ‘Open in adoption’. Adoption & Fostering’, 14(1): 21-26.
Sachdev, P. (1991). ‘The Triangle of Fears: Fallacies and Facts’, in E. Hibbs (eds.),
Adoption: International perspectives, Maddison CT: International Universities
Press.Sachdev, P. (1989). ‘The triangle of fears: Fallacies and facts’, Child Welfare, 68:
491-503.
Samuels, S. C. (1990). Ideal Adoption: A Comprehensive Guide to Forming an
Adoptive Famil. New York: Plenum Press.
Sandven, K. and M. D. Resnick (1990). ‘Informal adoption among black adolescent mothers’, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 60(2): 217.
Schaffer, H. R. and P. E. Emerson (1964). ‘The development of social attachments in infancy’, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Serial 94, 29(3): 3-75.
Siegel, D. H. (1993). ‘Open adoption of infants: Adoptive parents' perceptions of advantages and disadvantages’, Social Work, 38: 15-23.
Smith, S. L., J. A. Howard, and A. D. Monroe (2000). ‘Issues Underlying Behavior Problems in At-Risk Adopted Children’, Children and Youth Services Review, 2(7): 539-562.
Sobol, M. P., K. J. Daly and E. K. Kelloway (2000). ‘Paths to the facilitation of open adoption’, Family Relations, 49: 419-424.
Sorosky, A. and R. Pannor (1978). The Adoption Triangle. New York: Doubleday / Anchor.
‧
Spencer, M. (1983). ‘Children’s Cultural Views and Child Rearing Strategies’,
developmental Review, 4: 351-370.
Stone, S. (1994). ‘Contact between adopters and birthparents: The Strathclyde experience’, Adoption and Fostering, 18(2): 36-38.
Susan, M. H., O. Steven, G. M. Ruth and D. G. Harold (1998). ‘Changing Agency Practices Toward Openness in Adoption’, Adoption Quarterly, 1(3): 45-76.
Sykes, M. (2000). ‘Adoption with contact: A study of adoptive parents and the impact of continuing contact with families of origin’, Adoption and Fostering, 24(2):
20-33.
Thomas, C., V. Beckford, N. Lowe and M. Murch (1999). Adopted children speaking.
London: British Agencies for Adoption and Fostering.
Triseliotis, J. P. (1991). ‘Open adoption’, in A. Mullender (eds.), Open adoption: The
philosophy in practice. London: BAAF.
Triseliotis, J. P. (1973). In Search of Origins. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Triseliotis, J. P. and V. Lobban (1973). ‘Recent Developments Affecting Adoption Numbers and Adoption Practice’, British Journal of Social Work, 5(3): 333-334.
Triseliotis, J. P., J. Shireman and M. Hundleby (1997). Adoption: theory, policy and
practice. London: CASSELL.
Valentine, G. (2001). ‘At the Drawing Board: Developing a Research Design’. in M.
Limb and C. Dwyer (Eds.), Qualitative methodologies for geographers: Issues
and debates, pp. 41-54. London: Arnold.
Walsh, F. (1998). Strengthenening family resilience. New York: Guilford Press.
Wang, C. W. (2000). ‘Openness in Adoption - an examination of contact with birth
families in Taiwan’, University of East Anglia school of social work.
Watson, K. W. (1988). ‘Thee case of open adoption’, Public Welfare, 46(4): 24-28.
Wegar, K. (1997). Adoption, Identity, and Kinship: The Debate Over Sealed Records.
New Heaven: Yale University Press.
Winkler, R. and M. Van Keepel (1984). Relinquishing Mothers in Adoption: Their
Long-Term Adjustmen. Melbourne: Institute of Family Studies, Monograph, 3.
Wolfgram, S. M. (2008). ‘Openness in Adoption: What We Know So Far-A Critical Review of the Literature’, Social Work, 53(2): 133-143.
‧ 國
立 政 治 大 學
‧
N a tio na
l C h engchi U ni ve rs it y
Wrobel, G. M., S. Ayers-Lopez, H. D. Grotevant, R. McRoy and M. Friedrick (1996).
‘Openness in adoption and the level of child participation’, Child Development,
‘Openness in adoption and the level of child participation’, Child Development,