• 沒有找到結果。

希望感對於學生的自我概念、未來觀、學業領域成就,以及人際關 係,皆能產生正向關聯,足見其對學生個人發展之重要性,而近年來國內 有關希望感研究文獻較多著重在心理諮商領域,鑑於正向心理學在資優教 育領域的崛起與情意教育預防性觀點之提倡,探究希望理論在資優生之情 意教育應用實有其必要性。結合希望理論與創造性問題解決模式的情意教 育,未來得以運用於生活情境中或融入各領域課程進行,希望理論為一種 認知的思考歷程,在課程設計上能夠由後設認知的角度監控並促進資優生 的情意發展與成長。

人生就像一場馬拉松,更是一場意志力的歷程,如何設定個人最適目 標、透過各種路徑思考進行自我調整,並維持動力堅持跑到最後;過程中 不忘享受沿途各式各樣的風景,累積經驗值闖過一關又一關,跑得盡心盡

力且充實愉悅,可能來得比最終的成果產生更令人快樂。期待教師能協助 資優生建立希望感,助益其成為個人學習旅途中最幸福的贏家。鑒於目前 國內尚未有探究希望理論在資優教育應用的相關文獻,本文探究希望理論 的內涵及其在資優生情意教育中的應用,未來建議可以運用希望理論設計 資優生情意教育課程,並進一步檢驗教學成效。

參考文獻

王沂釗(2005)。幽谷中的曙光:正向心理學發展與希望理論在輔導上的應 用。教育研究月刊,134,106-117。

李慧鈴(2019)。從希望感觀點進行國中國語文補救教學之行動探究。慈濟 科技大學學報,9,105-136 。

唐淑華(2010)。從希望感模式論學業挫折之調適與因應:正向心理學提供 的「第三種選擇」。臺北:五南 M

陳慧芬(2011)。希望理論在提升國小六年級英語學習低成就學生學習成效 之行動研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北市。

郭靜姿(2009)。聰明的孩子,資優的教學。臺北:心理。

童竹暄(2010)。希望課程方案對國小五年級學童希望感及挫折復原力影響 之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立臺南大學,臺南市。

賴英娟、巫博瀚(2009)。希望理論的概念分析與理論應用。教育與發展,

2(4),71-78。

Achter, J. A., D., Benbow, C. P., & Eftekharin Sanjami, H. (1999). Assessing vocational preferences among gifted adolescents adds incremental validity

to abilities: A discriminant analysis of educational outcomes over a10-year interval. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 777-786.

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1-26.

Clack, B. (2007). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at home and at School. Person Education, Inc. Prentice Hall.

Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (1994). Education of the gifted and talented (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Dabrowski, K., & Piechowski, M. M. (1977). Theory of levels of emotional development. Oceanside, NY: Dabor Science.

Halsted, J. (2002). Some of my best friend are books: Guiding gifted readers from pre-school to high school.(1nd ed.). Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential.

Lovecky, D. V. (1992). Exploring social and emotional aspects of giftedness in children. Roeper Review, 15 (1), 18-25.

Moon, S. M. (2003). Personal talent. High Ability Studies, 14, 5-21.

Renzulli, J. S. (2002). Expanding the conception of giftedness to include co-cognitive traits and to promote social capital. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(1), 33-58.

Ruehlman, L. S., & Wolchik, S. A. (1988). Personal goals and interpersonal support and hindrance as factors in psychological distress and well-being.

Journal of Persinality and Social psychology, 55, 293-301

Snyder, C. R., Lehman, K. A., Kluck, B., & Monsson, Y. (2006). Hope for rehabilitation and vice versa. Rehabilitation Psychology, 51(2), 89-112.

Snyder, C. R., Lopez, S. J., Shorey, H. S., Rand, K. L. and Feldman, D.B. (2003).

Hope theory, measurements, and applications to school psychology. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(2), 122-139.

Snyder, C. R., & Lopez, S.J.(2002). Handbook of positive psychology. New York:

Oxford press.

Snyder, C. R.(1995).Conceptualizing, measuring, and nurturing hope. Journal of Counseling and Development, 73(3), 355-360.

Snyder, C. R., Hoza, B., Pelham, W. E., Rapoff, M., Ware, L., Danovsky, M. et al. (1997). The development and validation of the Children’s Hope Scale.

Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 22, 399-421.

Salovey, P. Bedell, B., Detweiler, J., & Mayer, J. (2000). Current directions in emotional intelligence research. In M. Lewis & J. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of Emotions (2nd ed.) (pp.504-520). New York: Guilford Press.

Strop, J. (2002). Meeting the social emotional needs of gifted adolescents: A personal and contextual journey. Understanding Our Gifted, 3, 7-11.

Tal Ben-Shahar(2007). Happier: Learn the secrets to daily joy and lasting fulfillment. McGraw-Hill.

Treffinger, D. J., & Isaken, S. G. (2006). Creative problem solving: An introduction. Buffalo: Center for Creative Learning. Inc.

VanTassel-Baska, J. & Stambaugh, T. (2006). Comprehensive curriculum for the gifted learners (3rd Ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. (ch.13-affective curriculum and instruction 211-226).

Combining Hope Theory and Applying CPS to Develop