5. 研究結論與建議
5.3. 未來研究建議
在產品設計概念開始執行設計之前，必先評估其可行性與未來之市場相關問題。本 研究因侷限於如廁輔具的使用者族群較為特殊，且較不易於獲得更多的研究對象與受訪 者，因此在產品設計概念形成之後，並不能利用大量樣本而科學的方式評估與驗證之。
因此針對未來相關輔具企劃與研究有以下建議：
(1) 由於設計的需求元素眾多，使用者的行為亦相當複雜，建議可以與醫療相關單 位或是特殊學校合作，藉以匿名問卷與量化研究的方式，再次深入調查各個需 求元素之間的關係，用以驗證有關訪談與編碼所得之結果是否為確實。如此一 來，則可讓產品企劃工作更為完整。
(2) 如廁輔具常需要因為使用者之間的差異性做出客製化的產品規格與設計。因此 產品企劃除了需要了解使用者、輔具設計師、以及服務提供者的需求外，有關 市場行銷端的訊息，亦可納入設計相關資訊之中，落實企業在設計研發產品應 得知之各項要素。因此建議未來相關輔具開發之時，可以加入市場行銷所需之 概念因素，以讓凝聚之設計概念結合更有量產與市場化的擴充性。
(3) 未來產品設計完成之後，亦可參考服務設計之相關驗證方法，以作後續的評估 與修整。而產品本身則能再度因應產品創新的原則，不斷的更新與升級，以貼 近使用者需求、市場需求，以及輔具的相關特殊性，而改善其實際商品在運作 與服務的流程之中，所遇到的問題與困難。
124
125
參考文獻
英文部分
Ahlner-Elmqvist, M., & Bjordal, K. (2008). Characteristics and Quality of Life of Patients Who Choose Home Care at the End of Life. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management , pp. 217-227.
Arai, T., & Shimomura, Y. (2004). Proposal of Service CAD System - A Tool for Service Engineering. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology , pp. 397-400.
Bachman, T. (1998). 18 Views on the Definition of Design Management. Design Management
Journal , p. 14.
Baxter, D., Gao, J., Case, K., Harding, J., Young, B., Cochrane, S., et al. (2008). A framework to integrate design knowledge reuse and requirements management in engineering design.
Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 24 , pp. 585-593.
Best, K. (2006). Design management: Managing Design Strategy, Process and
Implementation. Lausanne: AVA Publishing SA.
Birgit, M. (2006). Design Dictionary: Service Design. Service design review , p. 355.
Brigman, H. (2004). Defining Customer Touchpoints. imedia connection .
Buhler, C., & Schmidt, M. (1993). User involvement in evaluation and assessment of assistive technology. ECART2 , pp. 26-28.
Bullinger, H.-J., Fahnrich, K.-P., & Meiren, T. (2003). Service engineering—methodicaldevel opment of new service products. Int. J. Production Economics , pp. 275–287.
Cerny, M., & Penhaker, M. (2008). Circadian rhythm monitoring in homecare systems.
IFMBE Proceedings (pp. 950-953). Singapore: the 13th international conference on
biomedical engineering.Chan, M., Campoa, E., Estève, D., & Fourniols, J. Y. (2009). Smart homes — Current features and future perspectives. Proceedings , pp. 90-97.
Chiva, R., & Alegre, J. (2007). Linking design management skills and design function organization: An empirical study of Spanish and Italian ceramic tile producers.
Technovation 27 , pp. 616–627.
Chuang, M. C., & Ma, Y. C. (2001). Expressing the expected product images in product design of micro-electronic products. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics , pp.
233-245.
Clark, K. B., & Fujimoto, T. (1991). Product Development Performance: Strategy,
Organization, and Management in the WorldAuto Industry. Harvard University Press .
126
Cook, A. M., & Hussey, S. M. (2002). Assistive Technology: Principles and Practice(2nd ed.).
St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
Cook, A. M., & Polgar, J. M. (2007). Cook and Hussey's Assistive Technologies: Principles
and Practice. Elsevier Health Sciences.
Cooper, R. G. (2000). Doing it Right: Winning with New Products. Ivey Business Journal . Damanpour, F., & Gopaiakrishnan, S. (2001). The dynamics of the adoption of product and
process innovations in organizations. Journal of Managemen tStudies 38 , pp. 45-65.
Danilovic, M., & Browning, T. R. (2007). Managing complex product development projects with design structure matrices and domain mapping matrices. International Journal of
Project Management 25 , pp. 300–314.
Dekker, D., Buzink, S. N., Molenbroek, J. F., & Bruin, R. d. (2007). Hand supports to assist toilet use among the elderly. Applied Ergonomics , pp. 109–118.
Design Council. (2007). A study of the design process. London, UK.
Design Council. (2007). Eleven lessons: managing design in eleven global companies.
London: Design Council.
EvensonShelley. (2006). Theory and Method for Experience Centered Design. Pittsburg:
Carnegie Mellon University.
Gause, D. C., & Weinberg, G. M. (1989). Exploring Requirements - Quality Before Desing.
Dorset House Publishing Co., Inc .
Gausemeier, J., Fink, A., & Schlake, O. (1998). Scenario Management: An Approach to Develop Future Potentials. Technological Forecasting and Social Change , pp. 111-130.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative
research. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company.
Hogan, S., Almquist, E., & Glynn, S. E. (2004). Building a Brand on the Touchpoints That Count. Mercer Management Journal .
Hohenegger, J., Bufardi, A., & Xirouchakis, P. (2007). A new concept of compatibility structure in new product development. Advanced Engineering Informatics 21 , pp.
101-106.
Hollins, G., & Hollins, W. (1991). Total Design: Managing the Design Process in the Service
Sector. Financial Times/ Prentice Hal.
Hsiao, S., & Chen, C. (1997). A semantic and shape grammar based approach for product design. Design Studies 18 , pp. 275-296.
Hsiao, S., & Liu, M. (2002). A morphing method for shape generation and image prediction in product design. Design Studies , pp. 533–556.
International Organization for Standardization. (2007). Assistive products for persons with disability — Classification and terminology. Switzerland.
127
Kaner, C. (2003). Cem Kaner on Scenario Testing: The Power of ''What If…'' and Nine Ways to Fuel Your Imagination. Software Testing & Quality Engineering , 16-22.
Kapitsaki, G. M., Prezerakos, G. N., Tselikas, N. D., & Venieris, I. S. (2009). Context-aware service engineering: A survey. The Journal of Systems and Software , pp. 1285–1297.
Karjalainen, T. M. (2005). Semantic Mapping of Design Processes. The 6th international
conference of the European Academy of Design. Berman: The University of the Arts
Bremen.Kettner, P. M., Moroney, R. M., & Martin, L. L. (2008). Designing and Managing Programs:
An Effectiveness-Based Approach. Sage Publications.
Khambete, P. (2008). Multi Touch Point User Experience: Telecom Service Provider
Perspective. Tech Mahindra.
Kimbell, L., & Seidel, V. P. (2008). Designing for Services - Multidisciplinary Perspectives.
Oxford: University of Oxford.
Kimita, K., Shimomura, Y., & Arai, T. (2009). A customer value model for sustainable service design. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology , pp. 254-261.
Koskinen, J. (2008). Service Design. Finland: Servicedesign.tv.
Krippendorff, K. (1997). A Trajectory of Artificiality and New Principles of Design for the Information Age. Annenberg School for Communication , pp. 91-96.
Krippendorff, K. (1997). Design in the Age of Information: A Report to the National Science Foundation (NSF). Annenberg School for Communication , pp. 1-184.
Krippendorff, K., & Butter, R. (1984). Product Semantics - Exploring the Symbolic Qualities of Form. Annenberg School for Communication Departmental Papers (ASC) .
Lee, W. S., & Kim, B. Y. (2008). Designed by KTF: A Telecoms Case Study. Design
Management Review , pp. 53-58.
Li, Y., Su, Z., & Liu, Y. (2009). Can strategic flexibility helpfirms profit from product innovation? Technovation .
Li, Y., Yan, R., & Jian, J. (2009). A semantics-based approach for collaborative aircraft tooling design. Advanced Engineering Informatics .
Lin, C.-C., & Luh, D.-B. (2009). A vision-oriented approach for innovative product design.
Advanced Engineering Informatics , pp. 191-200.
Løvlie, L., Downs, C., & Reason, B. (2008). Bottom-line Experiences: Measuring the Value of Design in Service. Design Management Review , pp. 72-79.
Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Oxford University Press , pp.
522-525.
McNally, R. C., Durmusoglu, S. S., Calantone, R. J., & Harmancioglu, N. (2009). Exploring new product portfolio management decisions: The role of managers' dispositional traits.
128
Industrial Marketing Management 38 , pp. 127–143.
Moritz, S. (2005). Service Design: Pratical Access to An Evolving Field. London, UK.
Morris, A., Donamukkala, R., Kapuria, A., & al, e. (2003). A robotic walker that provides guidances. Proceedings (pp. 25-30). Taipei: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation.
Nardi, B. A. (1992). The Use of Scenario in Design. SIGCHI Bulletin , pp. 13-14.
One Hundred Fifth Congress of the United States of America. (2004). Assistive Technology Act of 2004. Washington, the United States of America.
Orsini, C. (2009). Changing the way the elderly live: Evidence from the home health care market in the United States. Journal of Public Economics .
Parker, S., & Heapy, J. (2006). The Journey to the Interface. London: DEMOS.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks:
Sage Publications.
Poulson, D., Ashby, M., & Richardson, S. (1996). USERfit: A practical handbook on user
centred design for assistive technology. Luxembourg: ECSC-EC-EAEC.
Rewsedavies, J. (1998). 18 VIEWS on the definition of Design Management. Design
Management Journal , p. 17.
Roberto, S. M., & Alexis, G. P. (2008). Service Design: An Appraisal. Design Management
Review , p. 12.
Roy, U., Pramanik, N., Sudarsan, R., Sriram, R., & Lyons, K. (2001). Function-to-form mapping: model, representation and applications in design synthesis. Computer-Aided
Design , pp. 699-719.
Sakao, T., & Shimomura, Y. (2007). Service Engineering: a novel engineering discipline for producers to increase value combining service and product. Journal of Cleaner
Production , p. 590e604.
Sanchez, R. (1996). Strategic Product Creation: Managing New Interactions of Technology, Markets, and Organizations. European Management Journal , pp. 121-138.
Service Design: An Appraisal. (2008). Design Management Review Vol. 19 No. 1 (pp. 10-19).
Boston: Design Management Institute.
Shimomura, Y., Sakao, T., Hara, T., Arai, T., & Tomiyama, T. (2006). Service explorer - a tool for service design -. Mechatronics for Safety, Security and Dependability in a New Era , pp. 247-252.
Shina, D. H., Lee, K. H., & Suda, T. (2009). Automated generation of composite web services based on functional semantics. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on
theWorldWideWeb , pp. 332–343.
Sjöberg, M., Laaksonen, J., Honkela, T., & Pölla, M. (2008). Inferring semantics from textual
129
information in multimedia retrieval. Neurocomputing , pp. 2576– 2586.
Spengler, C. (2008). The competitive advantage of a brand- typical client experience.
Handlerszeitung & The Wall Street Journal , pp. 13-19.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures
for Developing Grounded Theory. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
SullivanH.Louis. (1896). the tall office building artistically considered.
Tether, B. (2008). Service design: time to bring in the professionals? Oxford: University of Oxford.
Walton, T. (2008). It's All About Service. Design Management Review , pp. 6-9.
Wang, C. H. (2007). Collaborative Design with User Involvement for Product Concept Development. Ph.D Thesis(Unpublished) (p. 1). Taipei: Institute of Industrial Management, National Taiwan University of Science & Technology.
Westerlund, B. (2002). Form is Function. DIS2002 , pp. 25-28.
Wolff, F., & Galina, A. C. (2008). Marketing and Design Management in Design Education: a Brazilian Research. Design Thinking: New Challenges for Designers, Managers and
Organizations. Cergy-Pointoise: International DMI Education Conference.
Wolff, F., & Galina, A. C. (2008). Marketing and Design Management in Design Education: a Brazilian Research. International DMI Education Conference (p. 3). Cergy-Pointoise:
Design Management Institute.
Wu, F. G., Ma, M. Y., & Chang, R. H. (2009). A new user-centered design approach: A hair washing assistive device design for users with shoulder mobility restriction. Applied
Ergonomics , pp. 878–886.
Yang, J., & Liu, C. Y. (2006). New product development: An innovation diffusion perspective.
Journal of High Technology Management Research 17 , pp. 17-26.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage Publications.
You, H. C., & Chen, K. H. (2007). Applications of affordance and semantics in product design.
Design Studies , pp. 23-38.
Zhang, Q., Vonderembse, M. A., & Cao, M. (2009). Product concept and prototype flexibility in manufacturing: Implications for customer satisfaction. Production, Manufacturing and
Logistics , pp. 143-154.
130
余德彰，林文綺，王介丘。(2001)。劇本導引 Scenario-Oriented Design－資訊時代產品 與服務設計新法。台北市：田園城市。
131
科技大學設計研究所碩士論文，未出版。台北市。
陳燕禛，李育哲。(2009)。高齡者使用智慧型機器人輪椅需求評估之初探。桃園市：元 智大學老人福祉科技研究中心。
陳靜儀。(2005)。概念發展前之設計資訊搜尋行為探討。國立成功大學工業設計學系碩 士論文，未出版。台南市。
黃上育。(2006)。輔助科技服務的參考模式，淺談 HAAT Model。於內政部多功能輔具 資源整合推廣中心，輔具之友(頁 05-09)。台北市：內政部。
新產品管理（黃研聰翻譯） (2007)。台北市：美商麥格羅‧希爾國際股份有限公司台灣 分公司。
鄧建國。(2008)。產品情感聯想的概念設計。台北市：亞太圖書出版社。
龍希文。(2008 年 9 月)。產品設計藉輔具需求創造消費市場。台北市，中華民國。
謝寶煖。(2006)。量化研究與統計分析。台北市，中華民國。
蘇逸玲。(2005 年 6 月)。長期照護立法政策與管理定位之探討。國立陽明大學醫務管理 研究所碩士論文，未出版。台北市。
132
網路文獻
Crow, K. (2002). Product Definition. Retrieved 02 27, 2010, from New Product Development Solution: http://www.npd-solutions.com/pdef.html
Digital Rights Management Associates. (2007). New Product Development. Retrieved 12 2009, from New Product Development Glossary:
http://www.npd-solutions.com/glossary.html#n
Engine Creative Consultants Limited. (2010). Contextual Interview. Retrieved 5 4, 2010, from Engine Service Design:
http://www.enginegroup.co.uk/service_design/m_page/contextual_interview1 Gaffney, G. (2000). Scenarios. Retrieved 08 19, 2009, from Information and Design:
http://www.infodesign.com.au/usabilityresources/scenarios
Inkinen, S. (2008). Inventing the Future. Retrieved 09 30, 2009, from Servicedesign.TV:
www.servicedesign.tv
live|work. (2009). live|work. Retrieved 12 2009, from live|work: http://www.livework.co.uk/
live|work. (2008). Service Design. Retrieved 12 15, 2009, from Servicedesign.org:
http://www.servicedesign.org/glossary/service_design/
live|work. (2009). Service Thinking. Retrieved 1 5, 2010, from live|work:
http://www.livework.co.uk/articles/service-thinking
內政部多功能輔具資源整合推廣中心。(2006)。輔具產品說明。2009 年 12 月 22 日擷取 自輔具資源入口網: http://repat.moi.gov.tw/03product/pro_a_list.asp
133
134
135
136
137
附錄二
安全
複合功能 便利
溫暖
中風之後單側軀幹不能
腳不能彎曲的人
膝關節或髖關節受傷的 脊椎受傷需要直立的人 手臂肌肉力量不足的人
腳部行動不便者
可調整座墊高度
免治馬桶
電動起身
可符合不同的使用體型 復健
附加於輪椅
好清洗
造型與顏色可變化性 自主的
安全的
便利的
溫暖的 開心的
貼心的
138
139
140
請依據之前所提過的動詞與形容詞，描述此產品的造型應該有甚 麼樣的特性。
答：造型應該是讓使用者覺得舒適的弧線、光滑易維持衛生的表 面材質、溫暖舒適的色彩、容易修理的結構、不易夾傷使用者的 構件
請你就你的認知來看，甚麼樣的使用情況會是最佳的使用如廁輔 具的狀態？請描述操作的步驟。
答：要先閱讀說明，然後正常安裝，視自己可以承受的力道，調 整好速度，依據身高好好安裝，沒有要上廁所的時候要先練習使 用看看，確定會使用再使用，使用的時候如果坐不下去就先啟 動，然後坐穩了上完，如果站不起來再把他升起來。
請你解釋為什麼你認為剛剛解釋的使用操作步驟會是最佳的？
答：因為有完成練習才不會受傷阿，輔具使用都需要練習，身體 才不會有傷害
141
142
143
144
請你就你的認知來看，甚麼樣的使用情況會是最佳的使用如廁輔 具的狀態？請描述操作的步驟。
答：大概就是在發作期間，早上起床後，可以用半站立的姿勢靠 在坐墊上，讓機器自己降低(降低衝擊力)。順利上完廁所，然後 起來的時候也不需要很用力，就按了就可以起來，
請你解釋為什麼你認為剛剛解釋的使用操作步驟會是最佳的？
答：不用一大早精神不好的狀況下就用疼痛把自己叫醒開啟美好 的一天，而不是晦氣的一天。心情上會差很多，雖然描述起來不 很精彩，可是對於生活的改變是很重要的
145 should be very convenient and relieved.
會購買這些輔具的人，通常跟使用輔具的人有甚麼關係？
146 它的存在，invisible。
D.使用者活
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155 imagination, it should be very convenient and relieved.
156 在，invisible。
Z03
157
158
159
160
因為每個人的高度不同，不管是坐著移過去或者站 著轉身，屁股的高度跟角度都不一樣。如有可以自 動去貼合屁股角度的話，那當移過去的時候，就不 比較不擔心會下滑的問題。
Z05