研究限制

研究理應越加全面越好，然而，礙於研究者的時間與空間上的限制，因此難 免會有些疏漏。時間上的限制包括，為求研究效率通常會有一段研究期程，若是 被研究的現象持續發生，則會因時間的限制造成研究上的缺失。而空間上的限制 亦是地理學研究所關注的，由於地理是討論社會現象之空間化的學科，但是地理 亦強調區域與地方特色的差異，因此理論會因地制宜，所以在使用理論上一定會 有研究區差異上的不吻合。而除了時間與空間的限制外，亦提出其他本文的研究 限制：

一、調查不夠全面之限制

本研究討論的是鄉村再結構，但僅以兩項產業作經濟再結構之代表，因 此會有其他產業調查不足的疑慮。由於，本文是一個以地方為載體的研究，

必須從眾多社會現象中撿選能夠具代表性的來做討論。然而，即便選了關西 鎮過去和現在的地方特色農產業，仍是缺乏其他產業的討論，因此可能會有 代表性不足的限制。

二、受訪對象數目的限制

130

由於本文是以一個地方的兩項農產業為討論對象，因此各產業的訪談對 象會比只研究一項產業的受訪者對象之豐富度少，因為人力、物力以及時間 的關係，無法作更全面的調查與訪談，因此通常都以資料飽和為限，而沒有 餘力多預備訪談同類別之其他對象，在資料檢證上可能會有缺失。

三、理論適用的限制

由於地方上有許多精彩的社會現象在發生，然而，研究者必須透過自己 的選擇來建構出一套說法，所以會有許多相關的現象或概念未被使用在本研 究當中。例如，本文是以經濟地理的關係取向切入，因此忽略了客家人聚集 可能帶來的產業變遷與再結構之影響，因此在客家文化的論述上，採用文化 經濟與族群經濟的觀點補充田野中的相關現象，然而勢必會有缺漏。再者，

Marsden（1998）的鄉村再結構強調經濟上的轉變，然而如何從經濟帶到社 會、文化甚至是地景的論述亦是本文較沒有處理到的地方。

131

132

133

Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (1995). Institutional issues for the European regions: from markets and plans to socioeconomics and powers of association. Economy

and society, 24(1), 41-66.

Bergstrom, J. C. (2005). Postproductivism and changing rural land use values and preferences. Land Use Problems and Conflicts, 50.

Bowen, S. (2011). The Importance of Place: Re‐territorialising Embeddedness.

Sociologia ruralis, 51(4), 325-348.

Burton, R. J., & Wilson, G. A. (2006). Injecting social psychology theory into conceptualisations of agricultural agency: towards a post-productivist farmer self-identity? Journal of rural studies, 22(1), 95-115.

Callon, M. (1986). Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. Book, 196-223.

Chiffoleau, Y. (2009). From Politics to Co‐operation: The Dynamics of Embeddedness in Alternative Food Supply Chains. Sociologia ruralis, 49(3), 218-235.

Cristovao, A., Oostindie, H., & Pereira, F. (1994). Practices of endogenous development in Barroso, Northern Portugal. Jan Douwe van der Ploeg and

Ann Long (Eds.), 38-58.

Evans, N., Morris, C., & Winter, M. (2002). Conceptualizing agriculture: a critique of post-productivism as the new orthodoxy. Progress in human geography,

26(3), 313-332.

Fløysand, A., & Sjøholt, P. (2007). Rural development and embeddedness: the importance of human relations for industrial restructuring in rural areas.

Sociologia ruralis, 47(3), 205-227.

Freidberg, S. E. (2003). Culture, conventions and colonial constructs of rurality in southā€“north horticultural trades. Journal of rural studies, 19(1), 97-109.

Frisby, W., & Getz, D. (1989). Festival management: A case study perspective.

Journal of Travel Research, 28(1), 7-11.

134

Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity (Cambridge. Polity, 53(83), 245-260.

Goodman, D. (2003). Editorial: the quality turn and alternative agro-food practices: reflections and agenda. Journal of rural studies, 19, 1-7.

Goodman, D. (2004). Rural Europe redux? Reflections on alternative agro‐food networks and paradigm change. Sociologia ruralis, 44(1), 3-16.

Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American journal of sociology, 481-510.

Granovetter, M. (1992). Economic institutions as social constructions: a framework for analysis. Acta sociologica, 35(1), 3-11.

Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and Human Interests.

Hess, M. (2004). ‘Spatial’relationships? Towards a reconceptualization of embedded ness. Progress in human geography, 28(2), 165-186.

Holmes, J. (2006). Impulses towards a multifunctional transition in rural Australia:

Gaps in the research agenda. Journal of rural studies, 22(2), 142-160.

Ilbery, B., & Bowler, I. (1998). From agricultural productivism to post-productivism:

Addison Wesley Longman Ltd.

Lowe, P., Murdoch, J., & Ward, N. (1995). Networks in rural development: beyond exogenous and endogenous models. Ploeg, JD van der; Dijk, G. van (eds.):

Beyond Modernisation: The impact of endogenous rural development.

Assen, 87-106.

Marsden, T. (1998). Economic perspectives. The geography of rural change, 13-30.

Marsden, T., Banks, J., & Bristow, G. (2000). Food supply chain approaches:

exploring their role in rural development. Sociologia ruralis, 40(4), 424-438.

Moragues-Faus, A. (2014). How is agriculture reproduced? Unfolding farmers' interdependencies in small-scale Mediterranean olive oil production.

Journal of rural studies, 34, 139-151.

Murdoch, J. (1998). The spaces of actor-network theory. Geoforum, 29(4), 357-374.

Murdoch, J. (2000). Networks—a new paradigm of rural development? Journal of

rural studies, 16(4), 407-419.

Murdoch, J. (2006). Post-structuralist geography: a guide to relational space Sage:

London.

Murdoch, J., & Marsden, T. (1994). Reconstituting rurality.

Polanyi, K. (1944). The great transformation: The political and economic origins

of our time: Beacon Press.

135

Selberg, T. (2006). Festivals as celebrations of place in modern society: Two examples from Norway. Folklore, 117(3), 297-312.

Sice, B. (1994). 10 Theoretical Aspects of the Study of Endogenous Development.

Born from within: Practice and perspectives of endogenous rural development, 184.

Sismondo, S. (2004). An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies.

Sonnino, R. (2007). The power of place: embeddedness and local food systems in Italy and the UK. Anthropology of food(S2).

Sonnino, R., & Marsden, T. (2006). Beyond the divide: rethinking relationships between alternative and conventional food networks in Europe. Journal

of economic geography, 6(2), 181-199.

Srisomyong, N., & Meyer, D. (2015). Political economy of agritourism initiatives in Thailand. Journal of rural studies, 41, 95-108.

Thorne, L. (1996). Local exchange trading systems in the United Kingdom: a case of re-embedding? Environment and Planning A, 28(8), 1361-1376.

Watts, D. C., Ilbery, B., & Maye, D. (2005). Making reconnections in agro-food geography: alternative systems of food provision. Progress in human

geography, 29(1), 22-40.

Wiilson, G. A., & Rigg, J. (2003). ‘Post-productivist’agricultural regimes and the South: discordant concepts? Progress in human geography, 27(6), 681-707.

Wilson, G. A. (2001). From productivism to post‐productivism… and back again?

Exploring the (un) changed natural and mental landscapes of European agriculture. Transactions of the institute of British Geographers, 26(1), 77-102.

Woods, M. (2004). Rural geography: Processes, responses and experiences in

rural restructuring: Sage.

Yeung, H. W. c., & Lin, G. (2003). Theorizing economic geographies of Asia.

Economic Geography, 79(2), 107-128.

136